DNP 805 Week 8 Professionalism Assignment
DNP 805 Week 8 Professionalism Assignment
Smart homes play a critical role in older individuals’ health and life as they promote better health outcomes and better living. The implication is the smart homes’ user interface should be formulated to help fulfill the safety needs and perform particular tasks as needed. To enhance the interaction, various interfaces can be used. One of them is input controls such as buttons, text fields, checkboxes, radio buttons, dropdown lists, list boxes, toggles, and date fields (Hargreaves & Wilson, 2017). Navigation components are also critical, and they include breadcrumb, slider, the pagination search field, tags, and icons. In addition, there are informational components such as tooltips, icons, progress bar, notifications, message boxes, and modal windows.
Assessing these elements is important as they help in determining the functionality. For example, one can tell the technicality of a user interface by looking at the input controls. Smart homes are majorly formulated for elderly individuals; therefore, the user interface needs to be as simple as possible. The optimization of smart home use for better results may mean that older adults have to navigate the functionalities to achieve specific tasks. The implication is that elements used for navigation, such as icons, should be representative and clear to enhance their ability to navigate and interpret the system (Hargreaves & Wilson, 2017). Complex navigation bars the user from using some of the best functionalities which could have been of good use. Therefore, their use is limited, or they are not used at all.
The use of nursing theories is critical to patient care because of the different purposes that they serve. Nursing theories assist in informing every interaction between nurses and patients. Through defining the features of the nurse-patient interaction, these theories shape how nurses develop relationships with patients (Wei et al., 2019). The purpose of most nursing theories is to help nurses identify care needs among patients, articulate what they can do for patients and why they do it, and determine the kind of information to collect to develop care plans. Through theories, nurses can comprehend and evaluate health situations, explain and anticipate certain responses from patients and map out objectives and anticipated outcomes (Bahabadi et al., 2020). These theories also help nurses determine the interventions to deliver, best practices, and selection of productive areas for research. The implication is that nursing theories are fundamental to quality care provision as they help nurses to possess background propositions to offer the best care.
Informational components like the tooltips, progress bar, and message boxes, among others, can also be at the center of assessment. Therefore, their design should also be as simple as possible for better manipulation. For example, in the case of an error message, especially a technical error, the user should be able to effortlessly trace the message in the message box and appropriately act on the same (Hargreaves & Wilson, 2017). Such is only possible with a simple design. However, in cases where the informational components have complexities, then the user may miss critical system warnings, notifications, and messages, which can lead to poor functions.
Suggestions for Improvement
Even though the discussed smart homes improve the elderly’s health outcomes, some of its components and
elements can be adjusted or improved to make them better. The elements that can be improved include smart devices such as switches, plugs, lighting, speakers, cameras, appliances, accessories, and sensors. One of the possible improvements is procuring quality smart devices that will have few technical issues or errors (Demiris et al., 2017). The end result is enhanced functionality of the system. The gateway is a major component of the smart home; hence it needs to be of high quality and not error-prone. Therefore, it should be acquired from trusted suppliers. In addition, security is key in such systems. Therefore, the devices used as part of the system, such as smartphones, need to have security enhancements to bar potential access by unauthorized individuals.
Conclusion
Smart homes are one of the most common assistive technologies for older individuals who usually have more health complications, compromised gait and balance, and reduced mobility. Therefore, this assignment has explored smart homes and their components. The components need to be efficient to improve the functionality. In addition, the user interface should be simply built to enable elderly individuals to navigate the system and perform specific tasks.
References
Demiris, G., van Hoof, J., & Wouters, E. (2017). Handbook of smart homes, health care, and well-being. Springer International Publishing.
Hargreaves, T., & Wilson, C. (2017). Smart homes and their users. Cham: Springer International Publishing
Pal, D., Funilkul, S., Charoenkitkarn, N., & Kanthamanon, P. (2018). Internet-of-things and smart homes for elderly healthcare: An end-user perspective. IEEE Access, 6, 10483-10496. https://doi.org/10.1109/ACCESS.2018.2808472
Pirzada, P., White, N., & Wilde, A. (2018, April). Sensors in smart homes for independent living of the elderly. In 2018 5th International Multi-Topic ICT Conference (IMTIC) (pp. 1-8). IEEE. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTIC.2018.8467234
Wu, M., & Luo, J. (2019). Wearable technology applications in healthcare: a literature review. Online J. Nurs. Inform, 23(3). https://www.himss.org/resources/wearable-technology-applications-healthcare-literature-review
Assessment Description
Professional behavior will be assessed using the “Professionalism Assignment” resource. Review the “Professionalism Assignment” resource, before attending any practice immersion experience. Formative evaluations from the preceptors and faculty will be ongoing throughout the program to support the final summative grade at the end of the course. The faculty will be completing this step. Learners do not turn anything in to the dropbox.
Attachments
DNP-RS-Professionalism-Assignment.d
Professionalism Assignment
Doctor Of Nursing Practice Program
Instructions: Learners are expected to maintain professional behaviors at all times in both written and verbal forms in all environments. Compliance and adherence with Office of Field Experience’s (OFE) Guidelines for Graduate Field Experiences, the University Policy Handbook, and Professional Dispositions are mandatory. Violations may result in a loss of points as determined by the instructor. The instructor will complete grading in the Learning Management System (LMS). The learner is not responsible for uploading this assignment.
Total point value is 25
| Professional Standard | Point Value | Student Score | Comments |
Professional behaviors at all times in both written and verbal forms for:
|
12 | ||
| Timely and organized:
1. Timely submission of all course assignments, including discussion questions (DQs) and participation 2. Attendance and full participation in class 3. Appropriate communication regarding practice immersion site or project concerns |
8 | ||
| Incidence/Variance reporting:
Counseling and remediation activities with recommendations |
5 | ||
| Code of Conduct Violations/Professional Standards Committee:
Any violations of the following will result in a full loss of 25 points:
|
The * indicates areas where all 25 points would be lost
Read Also: NHS 8060 Scholarly Methods in Nursing and Health Sciences Full Course Tasks
Name: Assignment Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. | 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values. An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing. An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing. |
||
| Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: Assignment Rubric