NUR 550 Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality
NUR 550 Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality
NUR 550 Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality
Topic 5 DQ 1
Description:
Identify either a safety or quality improvement initiative related to improving population health. Explain how translational research can influence the development of the initiative. Include a specific example to support your response.
Findings show that religious engagement among students declines during college, but their spirituality shows substantial growth. “Students become more caring, more tolerant, more connected with others, and more actively engaged in a spiritual quest.” (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher Education”) The authors also found that spiritual growth enhances other outcomes, such as academic performance, psychological well-being, leadership development, and satisfaction with college. The study also identified a number of college activities that contribute to students’ spiritual growth. Some of these–study abroad, interdisciplinary studies, and service learning–appear to be effective because they expose students to new and diverse people, cultures, and ideas. Spiritual development is also enhanced if students engage in “inner work” through activities such as meditation or self-reflection, or if their professors actively encourage them to explore questions of meaning and purpose. (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher (Alexander W, 2010)”). By raising public awareness of the key role that spirituality plays in student learning and development, by alerting academic administrators, faculty, and curriculum committees to the importance of spiritual development, and by identifying strategies for enhancing that development, this work encourages institutions to give greater priority to these spiritual aspects of students’ educational and professional development
The need for efficiency in the3M 360 framework necessitated the designation of a professionals to provide necessary support, enhancement, and upgrades to the framework. In particular, the head of the server ensures that the server and the interfaces are maintained. On the other hand, end clients such as the CDIS, quality evaluators, and coders are tasked with the responsibility of accomplishing the testing of the framework. On their side, the in heads of clinical documentation and coding are tasked with approving access to new clients, alterations in the design, and discoveries from the framework. Besides, they are responsible for pursing new ideas and strategies from various clients and vendors of 3M to help in improving the effectiveness of the framework. The framework also involves preceptors in every unit who are responsible for accomplishing the preparation and training of the new consumers.
Information System Application Design and Development
The projections showed that the healing centers needed about 30% of the all the coding personnel or approximately $1.2 billion labor cost for ICD-10-CM/PCS coding. The 3M 360 system is fitted with tools to help in realizing the requirements of ICD-10-CM/PCS coding. These pre-arranged instruments resulted in a smooth outline and improvement of the system during implementation. Moreover, the system was also customized to include swim stream work lists for each physician’s facility. Besides, the suppliers and payers were also incorporated into the framework. Importantly, the system is remarkably flexible for adjustment. In the interview conducted with C. Earlier, the director of clinical documentation change, C. Earlier admit to have raised concerns that the outline of the questions used to contact suppliers did not meet the details of medical services frameworks, the coding authority, physicians’ counsel. As a result, the clinical documentation change initiative formulated new questions that complied with the requirements of the framework.
Topic 5 DQ 2
Description:
Identify a quality initiative from your workplace. What were some barriers to implementation? What are common barriers for translating research into practice?
Topic 5: Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality and Eliminate Barriers
Description
Objectives:
1. Explain how translational research can be used for safety and quality improvement initiatives related to improving population health.
2. Discuss common barriers for translating research into practice.
Study Materials
Read Chapter 8 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare
NUR 550 Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality
Description:
Read Chapters 4 and 9 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.
Translating Evidence into Practice: How Advanced Practice RNs Can Guide Nurses in Challenging Established Practice to Arrive at Best Practice
Description:
Read “Translating Evidence into Practice: How Advanced Practice RNs Can Guide Nurses in Challenging Established Practice to Arrive at Best Practice,” by Fenci and Matthews, from AORN Journal(2017).
NUR 550 DQ Translating Evidence into Practice to Improve Safety and Quality
Eliminating Cardiovascular Health Disparities: There has Been Progress, but There is More to
Do!
Description:
Read “Eliminating Cardiovascular Health Disparities: There has Been Progress, but There is More to Do!” by Coke, from The Journal of Cardiovascular Nursing (2018).
Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care
Description:
Read “Quality Improvement in Athletic Health Care,” by Sauers, Sauers, and Valier, from Journal of Athletic Training
(2017).
Lost in Translation: The Promise and Problems of the Globalization of Research
Description:
Read “Lost in Translation: The Promise and Problems of the Globalization of Research,” by Baumann, from Nursing Science Quarterly (2019).
Decreasing Barriers to Research Utilization Among Labor and Delivery Nurses
Description:
Read “Decreasing Barriers to Research Utilization Among Labor and Delivery Nurses,” by Heelan-Fancher, Edmonds, and Jones, from Nursing Research (2019).
Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement
Description:
Read “Differentiating Between Research and Quality Improvement,” by Gregory, from Journal of Perinatal and Neonatal Nursing (2015).
Tasks
Topic 5 Participation
Description:
NA
Topic 6: Quality Improvement Initiatives and Clinical Prevention Intervention
Description
Objectives:
1. Integrate appropriate information and communication technologies for a clinical preventative intervention.
2. Evaluate clinical prevention interventions that promote health and wellness for populations.
Study Materials
Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness
Description:
Read Chapter 9 and review Chapter 1 in Population Health: Creating a Culture of Wellness.
Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare
Description:
Read Chapter 19 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare.
The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety
Description:
Read “The Role of the Nurse in Quality Improvement and Patient Safety,” by Hickey and Giardina, from Journal of Neurological and Neurosurgical Nursing(2019).
Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice
Description:
Read “Reviewing the Literature: Essential First Step in Research, Quality Improvement, and Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice,” by Bernhofer, from Journal for Nurses in Professional Development (2015).
Clinical Preventive Services
Description:
Read “Clinical Preventive Services,” by Guerrero Ayres and Bradley, from Encyclopedia of Nursing Research (2017).
Reviewing the Literature
Description:
Read “Reviewing the Literature,” by Bryne, from Sage Research Methods’ Project Planner (2017).
How to Conduct a Literature Review
Description:
Read “How to Conduct a Literature Review,” by Watts, from Podiatry Review (2020).
Preventative Care Benefits for Adults
Description:
Explore “Preventative Care Benefits for Adults,” located on the Healthcare.gov website.
My Healthfinder
Description:
Explore “My Healthfinder,” located on the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services website.
Healthy People 2030
Description:
Explore “Healthy People 2030,” located on the Healthy People 2030 website.
Health Communication and Health Information Technology
Description:
Read “Health Communication and Health Information Technology,” located on the HealthyPeople.gov website.
Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health
Description:
Read, “Using E-Health and Information Technology to Improve Health,” located on the World Health Organization website.
Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment
Description:
Read “Technology and the Future of Mental Health Treatment,” located on the Mental Health Information page of the National Institute of Mental Health website.
Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (Protocol)
Description:
Read “Impacts of Information and Communication Technologies on Nursing Care: An Overview of Systematic Reviews (Protocol),” by Rouleau, Gagnon and Cote, from Systematic Reviews (2015).
Translational research has the potential to influence the development of health-improvement initiatives. The four stages of translational research were highlighted in this course: T1, T2, T3, and T4. In the given example, stage two (T2), which assesses the efficacy and effectiveness of health initiatives, can be incorporated into current research to evaluate the relationship between physical exercise and healthy eating habits, as well as aging and longevity. The outcomes will determine whether the proposed initiative will improve population health, particularly that of the elderly.
A variety of challenges confront hospital systems, resulting in delays, clinical variations, and preventable medical errors, all of which impede quality care. As a result of these challenges, hospital systems have implemented a number of initiatives to ensure that population health continues to improve. To improve population health in the United States, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) launched the National Public Health Improvement Initiative. The initiative has assisted health systems in improving their ability to make decisions based on data, which has been critical in improving healthcare practices. The National Public Health Improvement Initiative, according to the CDC (2017), has facilitated quality improvement in approximately 86% of the country’s health agents.
Two of the articles’ researcher recommendations are incorrect or incomplete. Each article includes researcher recommendations. The researcher recommendations described in one article are either incorrect or incomplete. The researcher recommendations for each article are presented accurately. Minor details are required for clarity or accuracy. For each article, researcher recommendations are accurately and thoroughly described.
NUR 550 Evidence-Based Practice Project Evaluation of Literature Table Explanation of How Articles Support Proposed Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal 10.0% An explanation of how the article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is omitted for one or more of the articles. The explanation for three or more articles is inaccurate or incomplete. An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for two of the articles is inaccurate or incomplete. A general explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. The explanation for one article is inaccurate or incomplete. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is generally evident. An explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy or clarity. Adequate support for the evidence-based project proposal is demonstrated. A detailed explanation for how each article supports the proposed evidence-based practice project proposal is presented. Support for the evidence-based project proposal is clearly evident.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
