NURS 6052 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6052 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6052 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6052 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

In general, healthcare provision entails identifying public health issues and developing practical intervention strategies. As this occurs, policies are developed to streamline care delivery while healthcare providers continue to learn to improve outcomes. The overall mandate of care providers is to improve patient safety while always striving to optimize quality. However, everything does not go as planned because many healthcare stressors affect care delivery and prevent healthcare providers from meeting the set goals. This paper assesses the impacts of nursing shortage as a relevant healthcare issue at the organizational level and summarizes evidence-based interventions used by other organizations.

Nursing Shortage
In practice, healthcare providers should be kept from becoming exhausted. The care provider to patient ratio should be manageable so that healthcare providers are not physically and mentally exhausted. When the number of patients exceeds the capacity of care providers, a nursing shortage occurs. The issue creates an environment in which caregivers are highly dissatisfied and ready to leave (Chang et al., 2017). As a result, it has resulted in a 25% increase in nurse turnover in the organization, with 10% of care providers leaving the profession entirely. This data indicates a lack of motivation to continue providing healthcare services, regardless of other measures such as rewards used by the organization to inspire employees.
This proportion of turnover is undeniably high, which implies two things. To begin, the organization will continue to expend massive resources to replace the lost workforce. As a result of inefficient resource allocation, some areas are underserved. Second, turnover increases the healthcare burden on the employees who remain in service. Because those left behind are overworked, they are easily frustrated and may quit as well. Eventually, a cycle of underserving and dissatisfied patients develops. Such incidents lower overall care quality and make meeting set goals difficult.

Articles Synopsis
Nursing shortages cause dissatisfaction, which increases turnover. In this case, nurses are overwhelmed, and the reasons to stay in practice dwindle gradually. In response, various organizations employ varying and sometimes interrelated strategies to increase the satisfaction of healthcare workers. The primary purpose of the strategies employed is to motivate healthcare providers and give them more reasons to serve. Indeed, motivation drives them to embrace critical healthcare principles such as empathy and compassion. It is reasonable to conclude that if such methods were used universally, nursing outcomes would improve.
The first article I read looked at the relationship between career development and healthcare outcomes. According to Price and Reichert (2017), providing meaningful training and development opportunities for healthcare workers increases their engagement. The primary reason for investing in development is to reduce the cost of recruiting a new workforce. Interviewing, onboarding, and orientation costs are just a few of the costs that training and development can help you avoid. Furthermore, if given the opportunity to obtain the highest level of education possible, healthcare providers are more satisfied and are more likely to remain with the organization for a long time.

Thank you for sharing your thoughts with us. I agree, the nursing shortage is a an extremely important issue that needs resolution. I had not heard of nursing students being given temporary licenses to work prior to reading your post. According to the Indiana Professional Licensing Agency, an executive order was placed in March of 2020 allowing for out-of-state practitioners, retired healthcare professionals, recent graduates, and graduate pharmacists to practice under temporary licenses (Indiana Professional Licensing Agency, n.d.). I suppose, desperate times calls for desperate measures and during the pandemic, this was the case. With so many factors effecting the need of nursing professionals, the problem is sure to persist. Many issues continue to influence the need for healthcare providers such as, cost-containment pressures, hospital consolidation, reduction in inpatient hospitalization, increased acuity of hospital patients, and a shift in outpatient care from hospitals to ambulatory and community-based settings (Peterson, 2001). How do you think we as healthcare providers can contribute to promoting the healthcare profession and helping in times of shortage?

References:

Indiana Professional Licensing Agency. (n.d.). COVID-19 Temporary Healthcare Provider Registry. Retrieved September 15, 2022, from https://www.in.gov/pla/covid-19-temporary-healthcare-provider-registry/

Peterson, C. P. (2001). Nursing Shortage: Not a Simple Problem – No Easy Answers. The Online Journal of Issues in Nursing6(1). Retrieved from https://ojin.nursingworld.org/MainMenuCategories/ANAMarketplace/ANAPeriodicals/OJIN/TableofContents/Volume62001/No1Jan01/ShortageProblemAnswers.html

https://nursingassignmentgurus.com/nurs-6052-analysis-of-a-pertinent-healthcare-issue/
The other article I read looked at the relationship between healthcare worker engagement and health outcomes. According to Bokhour et al. (2018), healthcare organizations should always align employee and organizational goals. This consideration is based on the premise that healthcare workers are initially motivated to help others, but their attitudes shift depending on how healthcare organizations treat them. Given this, as Bokhour et al. (2018) emphasized, healthcare workers should be prepared for success by providing them with the necessary resources and skill development opportunities. Organizations should always recognize the role of workers and consider their personal goals when developing their goals.
Strategies for Addressing Organizational Impact
A high turnover rate is detrimental to achieving healthcare goals. Situations that encourage turnover at any level should be avoided at all costs. According to Ayanwale (2019), reward systems can be integrated into healthcare practice to reduce turnover. Healthcare providers, like other employees, should be highly motivated to work by recognizing their efforts in areas where they excel. For example, if they meet their weekly goals, they should be given time off. Opportunities for advancement should be equitable and merit-based. If such practices continue, healthcare workers will be satisfied and committed to their jobs. Although reward systems have a positive impact, they must be carefully maintained because they can be costly.
Another method of preventing turnover is to involve healthcare workers in policymaking. As Safari et al. (2020) suggested, organizations must consider employees’ input when making decisions. The main benefit of recognizing employees’ input is that organizational leaders can see where they may be falling short. Employee feedback enables them to adapt and deliver better results. Eventually, the entire practice makes employees feel valued and wanted. Such a culture reduces turnover because the level of satisfaction is high, but it can be disastrous because healthcare workers may feel entitled to contribute to everything.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6052 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6052 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

NURS 6052 Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue

In conclusion, nursing shortage is a real problem in healthcare provision. It hampers the delivery of quality care and risks patients’ safety since patients are underserved. As discussed, the problem can be addressed by addressing issues that cause employee turnover. Such strategies include career development plans for healthcare providers, reward systems, and involving healthcare workers in policymaking.
Assignment: Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
The Quadruple Aim provides broad categories of goals to pursue to maintain and improve healthcare. Within each goal are many issues that, if addressed successfully, may have a positive impact on outcomes. For example, healthcare leaders are being tasked to shift from an emphasis on disease management often provided in an acute care setting to health promotion and disease prevention delivered in primary care settings. Efforts in this area can have significant positive impacts by reducing the need for primary healthcare and by reducing the stress on the healthcare system.
Changes in the industry only serve to stress what has always been true; namely, that the healthcare field has always faced significant challenges, and that goals to improve healthcare will always involve multiple stakeholders. This should not seem surprising given the circumstances. Indeed, when a growing population needs care, there are factors involved such as the demands of providing that care and the rising costs associated with healthcare. Generally, it is not surprising that the field of healthcare is an industry facing multifaceted issues that evolve over time.
In this module’s Discussion, you reviewed some healthcare issues/stressors and selected one for further review. For this Assignment, you will consider in more detail the healthcare issue/stressor you selected. You will also review research that addresses the issue/stressor and write a white paper to your organization’s leadership that addresses the issue/stressor you selected.
To Prepare:
Review the national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the Resources and reflect on the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected for study.
• Reflect on the feedback you received from your colleagues on your Discussion post for the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected.
• Identify and review two additional scholarly resources (not included in the Resources for this module) that focus on change strategies implemented by healthcare organizations to address your selected national healthcare issue/stressor.
The Assignment (3-4 Pages):
Analysis of a Pertinent Healthcare Issue
Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing your selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:
• Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).
• Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources on the national healthcare issue/stressor. Explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
• Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected. Explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.
Looking Ahead
The paper you develop in Module 1 will be revisited and revised in Module 2. Review the Assignment instructions for Module 2 to prepare for your revised paper.
By Day 7 of Week 2
Submit your paper.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
• Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
• Click the Week 2 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
• Click the Week 2 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
• Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK2Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
• If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
• Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
• Due to the nature of this assignment, your instructor may require more than 7 days to provide you with quality feedback.

Excellent Good Fair Poor
Develop a 3- to 4-page paper, written to your organization’s leadership team, addressing the selected national healthcare issue/stressor and how it is impacting your work setting. Be sure to address the following:

·   Describe the national healthcare issue/stressor you selected and its impact on your organization. Use organizational data to quantify the impact (if necessary, seek assistance from leadership or appropriate stakeholders in your organization).

23 (23%) – 25 (25%)

The response accurately and thoroughly describes in detail the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes accurate, clear, and detailed data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

20 (20%) – 22 (22%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization.

The response includes accurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

18 (18%) – 19 (19%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague or inaccurate.

The response includes vague or inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected.

(0%) – 17 (17%)

The response describes the national healthcare issue/stressor selected and its impact on an organization that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing.

The response includes vague and inaccurate data to quantify the impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor selected, or is missing.

·   Provide a brief summary of the two articles you reviewed from outside resources, on the national healthcare issue/stressor and explain how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

A complete, detailed, and specific synthesis of two outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that fully support the summary provided.

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate synthesis of at least one outside resource reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response integrates at least 1 outside resource and 2 or 3 course-specific resources that may support the summary provided.

The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations.

21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided. The response minimally integrates resources that may support the summary provided.

The response explains how the healthcare issue/stressor is being addressed in other organizations that is vague or inaccurate.

(0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of no outside resources reviewed on the national healthcare issue/stressor selected is provided, or is missing.

The response fails to integrate any resources to support the summary provided.

·   Summarize the strategies used to address the organizational impact of national healthcare issues/stressors presented in the scholarly resources you selected and explain how they may impact your organization both positively and negatively. Be specific and provide examples.
27 (27%) – 30 (30%)

A complete, detailed, and accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response accurately and thoroughly explains in detail how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively, with specific and accurate examples.

24 (24%) – 26 (26%)

An accurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively. May include some specific examples.

21 (21%) – 23 (23%)

A vague or inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague or inaccurate. May include some vague or inaccurate examples.

(0%) – 20 (20%)

A vague and inaccurate summary of the strategies used to address the organizational impact of the national healthcare issue/stressor is provided, or is missing.

The response explains how the strategies may impact an organization both positively and negatively that is vague and inaccurate, or is missing. Does not include any examples.

Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization:

Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria.

(5%) – 5 (5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity.

A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria.

(4%) – 4 (4%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive.

3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time.

Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic.

(0%) – 3 (3%)

Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time.

No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided.

Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards:

Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation

(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list.
(5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors.
(4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors.
3.5 (3.5%) – 3.5 (3.5%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors.
(0%) – 3 (3%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors.
Total Points: 100