NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With ADHD
NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With ADHD
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With ADHD
The management of attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) in children is difficult due to a lack of evidence supporting the safety of several recommended drugs for this disorder. The case of an 8-year-old Caucasian female has been provided to further illustrate the management of ADHD. The patient exhibits ADHD symptoms as identified by her teacher, who completed the Conner’s Teacher Rating Scale-Revised. Her teacher claims that the patient is frequently forgetful and easily distracted, with a short attention span. The patient also has poor language, spelling, and arithmetic skills, which negatively impact her overall school performance. The teacher also stated that the patient has recently been failing to follow instructions, resulting in incomplete homework. Despite her parents’ denial that their daughter has ADHD, the patient reports that she is bored most of the time at school and has little interest in her schoolwork. She, on the other hand, denies any kind of bullying at school and has a positive home life experience. The patient was diagnosed with Attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly inattentive presentation, based on the findings of the conducted mental status examination and the Conner’s Teacher Rating Scale-Revised.
Several factors were considered when deciding on the specific pharmacological agent and dosage to prescribe in the patient’s condition management. Such factors include the patient’s young age, Caucasian race, ADHD diagnosis, and reported symptoms. The completed Conner’s Teacher Rating Scale-Revised can also assist in determining the severity of the patient’s condition, which is important in determining the dosage of the chosen drug. As such, the purpose of this discussion is to devise the most effective treatment plan for the 8-year-old patient’s ADHD management, with a rationale for each decision made.
Not only do children and adults have different presentations for ADHD, but males and females may also have vastly different clinical presentations. Different people may also respond to medication therapies differently. For example, some ADHD medications may cause children to experience stomach pain, while others can be highly addictive for adults. In your role, as a psychiatric nurse practitioner, you must perform careful assessments and weigh the risks and benefits of medication therapies for patients across the life span. For this Assignment, you consider how you might assess and treat patients presenting with ADHD.
To get ready for this Task:
Review the Learning Resources for this week, as well as the Medication Resources for this week.
Think about what kinds of psychopharmacological treatments you might suggest for evaluating and treating people with ADHD.
The Task: Five pages
Check out the Case Study: A Young White Girl with ADHD.
You will be asked to decide on three different medications to give to this patient. Make sure to think about things that could affect the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes of the patient.
At each decision point, you should think about all of your choices before making a choice and moving on. Before you make a choice, make sure you’ve looked into each option and thought carefully about the one you’ll choose. Make sure to look into each choice using the primary sources.
The beginning of the case (1 page)
Explain and sum up the case for this Assignment in a few words. When writing a prescription for this patient, make sure to list the specific patient factors that may affect your choice.
Choice No. 1 (1 page)
Which choice did you choose?
Why did you choose this path? Be specific and back up your answer with resources that are clinically relevant and specific to the patient, such as the primary literature.
Why didn’t you choose either of the other two choices in the exercise? Be specific and back up your answer with resources that are clinically relevant and specific to the patient, such as the primary literature.
What did you want to happen when you made this choice? Use evidence and references to the Learning Resources to back up your answer (including the primary literature).
Explain how your treatment plan and how you talk to patients may be affected by ethical issues. Give examples and be specific.
Choice No. 2 (1 page)
Why did you choose this path? Be specific and back up your answer with resources that are clinically relevant and specific to the patient, such as
-
NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With ADHD primary literature.
Why didn’t you choose either of the other two choices in the exercise? Be specific and back up your answer with resources that are clinically relevant and specific to the patient, such as the primary literature.
What did you want to happen when you made this choice? Use evidence and references to the Learning Resources to back up your answer (including the primary literature).
Explain how your treatment plan and how you talk to patients may be affected by ethical issues. Give examples and be specific.
Read Also: Assignment: Assessing and Treating Clients With ADHD NURS6630
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NURS 6630 Assessing and Treating Patients With ADHD
Choice No. 3 (1 page)
Why did you choose this path? Be specific and back up your answer with resources that are clinically relevant and specific to the patient, such as the primary literature.
Why didn’t you choose either of the other two choices in the exercise? Be specific and back up your answer with resources that are clinically relevant and specific to the patient, such as the primary literature.
What did you want to happen when you made this choice? Use evidence and references to the Learning Resources to back up your answer (including the primary literature).
Explain how your treatment plan and how you talk to patients may be affected by ethical issues. Be specific and provide examples.
In the end (1 page)
Summarize the treatment options you chose for this patient and what you think should be done. Make sure to back up your recommendations and answer with resources that are relevant to the patient and clinically useful, such as the primary literature.
Note: Use at least five academic sources to back up your reasoning. You can use the course text to back up your reasoning, but it won’t count as one of the resources you need. You should use both first-hand and second-hand sources.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 9 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 9 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK9Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 9 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 9
To participate in this Assignment: