MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change
Capella University MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change
The introduction for the Capella University MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change
After the introduction, move into the main part of the MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
MSN 6218 Unit 3 Assignment Proposing Evidence-Based Change
Professional
Context
Health care
systems around the world provide useful models for analysis. Familiarity with
different models and approaches to health care enables leaders to identify what
works and what does not, as the basis for proposing a change. As we continue to
evaluate the complex and fragmented system in the United States, it is
important for nurse leaders to become familiar with the programs and systems
that provide evidence-based quality care that is affordable and focused on
continual improvement.
Upon comparing the Stetler Model and Johns Hopkins Model, the Stetler Model has been regularly revised, and involves integrating evidence-base practice information into practical, sustainable day to day standards for patient care. With critical thinking and utilization of both internal and external evidence to support practice change, the Stetler Model hinges on five phases, and multiple steps to identify and support use of evidence, determined by critical thinking (Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019). A “toolkit” of sorts has been developed to implement consensus guidelines and evidence-base practice change. Upon comparison, the Johns Hopkins Model supports its use by bedside registered nurses with aim to implement research results in an evidence-based practice format. The key objective is to make it easy for direct caregivers to make change at a grass-roots level, while positively impacting patient outcomes in a meaningful way. A problem-solving approach to address clinical questions, the 18-step process allows for non-randomized control trial designed evaluations and quality improvement initiatives to take place(Melnyk & Fineout-Overholt, 2019).. With mindfulness that registered nurses encounter challenges that require a fix “tomorrow”, with potential use of nonresearch evidence by use of four pathways.
This
assignment provides an opportunity for you to examine a local or regional
health care issue from a global perspective. By successfully completing this
assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course
competencies and assignment criteria:
Competency
1: Identify the challenges and opportunities facing health care.
Identify an
aspect of a local or regional health care system or program that should be a
focus for change.
Competency 2:
Compare the effects of different health care finance models and policy
frameworks on resources and patient outcomes.
Define
desirable outcomes, including who will pay for care and factors limiting
achievement of those outcomes.
Analyze two
non-U.S. health care systems or programs that offer insight into a proposed
change for a health care system or program in the United States.
Competency
3: Evaluate the positive and negative influences of leaders on health care
processes and outcomes.
Determine
the financial and health implications of making—and not making—proposed changes
to a health care system or program.
Competency
4: Develop proactive strategies to change the culture of the organization by
incorporating evidence-based practices.
Explain why
specific changes will lead to improved outcomes.
Competency
5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and
style consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly
standards.
Write
clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
Support
assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Scenario
Your
organization, in collaboration with key stakeholders from the community, is
funding an initiative to investigate potential improvements in the local or
regional health care system. As a nurse leader attuned to the effects of health
care policy and finance on the provision of affordable, high-quality care, you
have been asked to join the task force conducting the study.
You know
that an examination of other countries’ health care systems can provide a
solid, evidence-based foundation for evaluating outcomes and identifying
benchmarks. Consequently, you have decided to undertake a comparative analysis
of selected, non-U.S. health care systems and compare them to each other and to
the current local or regional U.S. system to help inform decision making as the
task force considers proposed changes.
Instructions
Complete this
assignment in three steps:
Propose a
change to one aspect of your local or regional health care system or program
that would improve outcomes.
Conduct a
comparative analysis of different health care systems, focusing on that one
aspect of the system you are proposing to change.
Summarize your
proposed change and the results of your comparative analysis in a report to
executive leaders.
The summary
report requirements outlined below, correspond to the grading criteria in the
scoring guide for Proposing Evidence-Based Change, so be sure to address each
point. Read the performance-level descriptions for each criterion to see how
your work will be assessed. The Guiding Questions: Proposing Evidence-Based
Change document linked in the Resources provides additional considerations that
may be helpful in completing your assignment. In addition, be sure to note
the requirements below for document format and length and for citing supporting
evidence.
Identify an
aspect of a local or regional health care system or program that should be a
focus for change.
Define
desirable outcomes, including who will pay for care and factors limiting
achievement of those outcomes.
Analyze two
non-U.S. health care systems or programs that offer insight into a proposed
change for a health care system or program in the United States.
Choose one
of the following options for selecting the two systems or programs:
Option 1:
Select two systems at opposite ends of the scale in terms of desirable outcomes
for the issue reflected in your proposed change.
Option 2:
Select two systems that both produce positive outcomes but take unique or
innovative approaches to the problem.
Compare the
outcomes in each non-U.S. system with each other and with present outcomes in
your local or regional health care system.
Explain why
specific changes will lead to improved outcomes.
Determine
the financial and health implications associated with the proposed changes.
Address the
implications of making the changes.
Address the
implications of not making the changes.
Write
clearly and concisely in a logically coherent and appropriate form and style.
Support
assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Document
Format and Length
Use the
Summary Report Template, linked in the Resources. An APA Style Paper Tutorial
is also linked in the Resources to help you in writing and formatting your
report. If you would like to use a different template or document format for
your report, obtain prior approval from your instructor.
Your
summary report should be 4–5 pages in length, not including the title page and
references page.
Be sure to
apply correct APA formatting to all source citations and references.
Supporting
Evidence
Cite 3–5
credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry
publications to support your comparative analysis.
Submission
Requirements
Be sure to
delete all directions from the template before submitting your summary report.
In addition, proofread your report to minimize errors that could distract
readers and make it more difficult for them to focus on the substance of your
analysis.
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
Also Check Out: MSN 6218 Unit 5 Assignment Vila Health: Environmental Analysis and Windshield Survey
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.