NURS 6050/5050 Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
Walden University Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
The introduction for the Walden University Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Assignment: Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Assignment Literature Review: The Use of Clinical Systems to Improve Outcomes and Efficiencies
The application of information processing involving computers and hardware deals with the storage, health care information, knowledge, and knowledge, which is considered healthcare information technology. Notably, a clinical system is classified as a healthcare information technology that helps in more advanced decision support and integration with medical technology. Therefore, the clinical system helps improve and transform healthcare, including facilitating care coordination, reducing human errors, and improving clinical outcomes. The paper will address the review of four sources based on the impact of clinical systems on the outcomes and efficiencies within nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
Annotated Bibliography
Karp, E. L., Freeman, R., Simpson, K. N., & Simpson, A. N. (2019). Changes in efficiency and quality of nursing electronic health record documentation after implementing an admission patient history essential data set. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(5), 260-265. https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/FullText/2019/05000/Changes_in_Efficiency_and_Quality_of_Nur sing.5.aspx
Karp et al. addressed the burden nurses encounter when documenting the quality reporting required in a healthcare setting. According to Karp et al., nurses are required to manage patient information by communicating and coordinating care with other healthcare professionals, thus help in performing improvement and efficiency in the healthcare system. Notably, striving to standardize the care process leading to the increase in the necessity for health information technology professionals to help in measuring the efficiency and quality of the clinical process supported by electronic health records. Karp et al. identify that using a health information system in a healthcare setting helps capture data in timer logs and the electronic health record, thus allowing the examination of the temporal pattern of care, which helps clinicians experience electronic health records.
Karp et al. suggest that electronic health records can help evaluate the historical context and determine the utilization patterns and
workflow, such as the clicks and time required for an electronic health records workflow. The research involved both qualitative and quantitative research methods. Karp et al. used the quantitative study to determine the sorting of a stable and efficient process and the qualitative study to address the utilization pattern for nursing documentation of the patient history and the admission history form. The study aimed to quantify the measurable impact of applying a lower number of necessary data elements to utilize the electronic health records event logs and timers. The intended audience is the nurses and other professional healthcare teams.
Karp et al. concluded that by providing practice-based perceptions into clinical workflows and interferences, the analytical frameworks help in maximizing the used electronic health record event files, thus impacting the clinical decision-making process. Additionally, the author identified that using an analytical framework could help support a health system’s ability, thus generating data- driven background intelligence that helps develop policies to develop knowledge-related clinical practice. The lesson learned from the electronic health records is that nursing documentation application improves care team communication through clinical content, which is relevant to the role, thus enhancing positive outcomes and efficiency to patient care.
Atasoy et al. discuss the benefits of digitalizing the patient’s records that make rich potentials for medical professionals by helping in processing instant and automatic reminders on patient data. Atasoy et al. identify that electronic health records derive value from technology, thus requiring a broad collection of functions that share ordinal health information. Therefore, utilizing the patient- level data to providers helps guide, thus raising the flags regarding potentially risky intervention. The author states that electronic health records are determined by the capabilities of detailed patient information based on the providers’ interface at the point of care.
The author addresses the process of adopting electronic health records grouped into three streams, including the hospital-level factors that accelerate the diffusion, direct assessments of the level of acceptance, and the physical level degree of electronic health records. The authors also explored the determinants of electronic health records, such as the neighboring organization’s social contagion, thus influencing diffusion. Therefore, the conforming policies and the absence of business cases decrease the adoption of electronic health records. Atasoy et al. argue that during the electronic adoption decisions, privacy is considered a critical concern. Electronic health records help in improving quality, thus enhancing patient safety and clinical outcomes. Atasoy et al. advocate that for best practice, prespecified order sets such as care and common postoperative monitoring may help implement care guidelines, thus minimizing deviations.
The research method used in the study is a retrospective of the voluminous empirical work, which helps in examining the effects of wrought by ensuring legible and complete documentation of patient conditions. The intended audience is nursing informatics and clinicians. The conclusion made by the author is that electronic health records gained attention through the reduction of medical care costs in the United States. The lesson learned is that electronic health records can lead to the automation process that helps improve chronic care and medical practice, thus facilitating communication within and across health care organizations.
Mbitcha, J. C. T. (2018). Strategies for Improving Healthcare Efficiency While Reducing Costs. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=symposium2018
Mbitcha aimed at determining healthcare costs based on the oppressive economic growth leading to an increase in portions of the nation’s GDP considering the added burdens on businesses. The author’s significance was to address the importance of alleviating the problems in the United States healthcare by learning about policies available for healthcare managers to progress efficiently and decrease healthcare costs. The main argument that the author aimed at was to classify the policies that healthcare managers use to help in improving efficiency by decreasing costs.
Mbitcha suggested the need for social change implications, such as providing solutions that help in improving the overall organization performance within the healthcare setting. The author used the complex adaptive system theory as the conceptual framework that helped address the scientific study of complexity. The conclusion made by Mbitcha is that it is essential to use a system thinking approach that helps the managers identify the interrelationship, thus helping in improving the feedback consistency.
Levesque, J. F., & Sutherland, K. (2020). Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1-14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5
Levesque and Sutherland addressed that agencies and organizations make information accessible and influence and backing change through healthcare routine and measurement and reporting act, thus overseeing the system’s effectiveness. The authors in the article identified acknowledging the role of public reporting in healthcare which includes conferring a positive effect for the unintended negative consequences. Levesque and Sutherland suggest that the control of public reporting leads to reporting an imperious to accurately, meaningful, and fairly measure based on the relative information.
The main argument that the authors addressed is based on bringing clarity to the performance assessment by avoiding the reductionist measure and using the relevant and robust concepts, thus enabling an easy way to shape a whole system assessment of the performance. The method used by Levesque and Sutherland is the eight stages process that aided in developing the conceptual framework through the incorporation of the literature review and the validation of the constructs that the organization uses to assess healthcare performance. Levesque and Sutherland gauged the performance by determining the coverage effectiveness, efficiency, safety, and sustainability, thus reflecting the performance perspective of the system, population, organization, and patients.
The conclusion made by the authors included that healthcare systems used a diversity of terms to help in categorizing healthcare routines. Additionally, the proposed framework out of eight incorporates the manageable number of performance domains and the comprehensive assessment, thus enabling coherence and clarity based on the multifaceted measurement system of healthcare. The lesson learned is that reporting with rigor and care requires the need to prevent the unnecessary damage of the organizational reputations.
References
Atasoy, H., Greenwood, B. N., & McCullough, J. S. (2019). The digitization of patient care: a review of the effects of electronic health records on health care quality and utilization. Annual Review of Public Health, 40, 487-500. https://www.annualreviews.org/doi/abs/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-040218- 044206
Karp, E. L., Freeman, R., Simpson, K. N., & Simpson, A. N. (2019). Changes in efficiency and quality of nursing electronic health record documentation after implementing an admission patient history essential data set. CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 37(5), 260-265. https://journals.lww.com/cinjournal/FullText/2019/05000/Changes_in_Efficiency_and_Quality_of_Nur sing.5.aspx
Levesque, J. F., & Sutherland, K. (2020). Combining patient, clinical and system perspectives in assessing performance in healthcare: an integrated measurement framework. BMC Health Services Research, 20(1), 1-14. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12913-019-4807-5
Mbitcha, J. C. T. (2018). Strategies for Improving Healthcare Efficiency While Reducing Costs. https://scholarworks.waldenu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1028&context=symposium2018