HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare
Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HLT 362 Topic 2 DQ 1 The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Select a research article, other than the articles from your assignments, from the GCU library. Provide an overview of the study and describe the strategy that was used to select the sample from the population. Evaluate the effectiveness of the sampling method selected. Provide support for your answer. Include the article title and permalink in your post.
Title: “The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare”
The article that I have selected is called “The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare” and it was published in the International Journal of Health Sciences in 2016. The purpose of this study was to “investigate the impact of social media on modern healthcare from the perspective of healthcare professionals.” The researchers used a survey to collect data from a total of 1,005 healthcare professionals from all over the world. The results of the study showed that social media has had a positive impact on healthcare, particularly in terms of communication, education, and patient care.
Overview of study
The study used a survey to collect data from healthcare professionals from all over the world. The sample was selected from the population by the researchers in order to investigate the impact of social media on modern healthcare.
Effectiveness of the sampling method selected
The sampling method selected for this study was effective because it allowed the researchers to collect data from a large number of healthcare professionals from all over the world. This allowed them to get a better understanding of how social media has impacted healthcare from the perspective of those who work in the field.
Permalink of the article:
Good pick! “The Impact of Social Media in Modern Healthcare.” We cannot argue that the rise of social media has impacted our world with some disadvantages and advantages. Social media when used correctly and under guidelines to prevent these risks, it is a great tool to be utilized in the healthcare industry. Social media has many tools that healthcare providers can take advantage of. For example, networking platforms, blogs, media-sharing sites, and more (Ventola, 2014). Social media can be utilized to improve healthcare through patient education, public health programs, telehealth, and health promotion, just to mention some. According to the article
“Social Media and Health Care Professionals: Benefits, Risks, and Best Practices,” Healthcare providers can use social media to potentially improve health outcomes, develop a professional network, increase personal awareness of news and discoveries, motivate patients, and provide health information to the community (Ventola, 2014).
I enjoyed reading your post. Thank you for sharing.
References
Ventola C. L. (2014). Social media and health care professionals: benefits, risks, and best practices. P & T : a peer-reviewed journal for formulary management, 39(7), 491–520.
- Cornelius Ayoyi
replied toAmber Jones
Feb 10, 2023, 8:33 AM
I like the study you picked Amber. Social media matters across industries and health care is no exception. As more people have become active on social media, the medical field has embraced it and now incorporates social media into a number of health care strategies. Leaders in public health realize they can build comprehensive public health care plans through social media platforms and social media-driven strategies. About 44% of individuals who research hospitals and doctors online end up scheduling an appointment, according to a study by Compete, Inc. According to the Southern Medical Association, 88% of physicians research medical tools and biotech data through the internet and social media platforms and According to research by Pew Research Center, 70% of the caregivers in their study said they looked online for medical advice and answers.
Reference.
Ohio university online master of public health. (2020). The role of social media in health care. https://onlinemasters.ohio.edu/blog/social-media-in-healthcare/.
Furthermore, the results showed how social media functioned as a disciplining tool where nurses used social media to raise awareness among other people regarding the right of ‘COVID-19- behavior’. This is in line with other studies showing that social media is used by both professionals and laymen to spread facts for educational purposes and raise awareness about the situation’s gravity . Timotijevic shows that the COVID-19 pandemic illustrates the complex interaction between political judgement, ideological orientations of governments, and medical expert advice forming this medico-political discourse. Nurses are regarded as medical experts in relation to COVID-19, which makes their voice particularly legitimate for people who support the medical speech accurate on COVID-19 and the need for the ‘new normal’ of behaviors . However, what is understood as (true) information, misinformation or disinformation is dependent on the viewpoint of the information consumers and influences potentially affecting their perspectives . In a crisis such as the COVID-19 pandemic, people are more likely to follow an official announcement, or order, than in so-called ordinary social situations , where the nurses’ voices in social media are a prolonged voice of the official guidelines regarding COVID-19. Healthcare professionals’, including nurses, use of social media can contribute to rapid dissemination by providing people with the latest medico-political knowledge and useful practices for handling COVID-19 . In that way, social media functions as a channel to raise people in the right COVID-19 spirit and consolidate the medico-political understanding of (accurate) information and (proper) knowledge.
Felice C, Di Tanna GL,Zanus G, Grossi U. Impact of COVID-19 Outbreak on Healthcare Workers in Italy: Results from a National E-Survey. J Community Health. 2020. Aug;45(4):675–683. doi: 10.1007/s10900-020-00845-5 ; PMCID: PMC7242177.
Haas S, Swan BA, Jessie AT. The Impact of the Coronavirus Pandemic on the Global Nursing Workforce. Nursing Economic$ 2020. Sep-Oct;38(5):231–237.
The article selected for this discussion is titled, ‘‘Hospital acquired Clostridium Difficile Infection (CDI) and risk factors for severity at a university hospital.’’ The authors of this article are Hüseyin Bilgin MD, Elvan Sayın MD, Hande Perk Gürün MD, Elif Tükenmez-Tigen MD, Nurver Ülger Toprak MD and Volkan Korten MD. This article was published in the American Journal of Infection Control in 2020 (Bilgin et al, 2020). The aim of the study was to investigate the incidence, clinical characteristics and factors associated with CDI in a tertiary care university hospital in Istanbul, Turkey (Bilgin et al, 2020).
A cohort study was conducted between January 2012 and December 2016 at Marmara University Hospital. Cohort studies are a type of longitudinal study which uses an approach that follows research participants over a period (Barrett, 2019). Specifically, cohort studies recruit and follow participants who share a common characteristic, such as a particular occupation. During the period of follow-up, some of the cohort will be exposed to a specific risk factor or characteristic; by measuring outcomes over a period, it is then possible to explore the impact of this variable (e. g, identifying the link between hospitalization and CDI.) They help researchers build an understanding of what factors increase or decrease the likelihood of developing disease. Cohort studies are an effective method of establishing cause and effect (Barrett, 2019).
The researchers recruited adult patients (≥18 years old) who had positive stool assays for C. difficile toxin A or B or toxigenic culture to the study. Potential predictors for severe CDI are age, sex, co-morbidities, previous hospitalization, surgical procedures, antimicrobial use, proton pump inhibitor use, cancer chemotherapy, and parenteral nutrition. Researchers collected information concerning the severity of the disea=se, treatment regimen, treatment response, disease recurrence, and 30-day mortality rate (Bilgin et al, 2020).
A total of 111 patients developed CDI during the study period. Eleven patients (9.9%) were diagnosed with community-acquired CDI and excluded from the study. The remaining 100 patients were diagnosed with HA-CDI, resulting in a 2012-2016 incidence rate of 1.19 per 10,000 patient-days (Bilgin et al, 2020).
This study had several limitations. First, it was a single-center study representing a small part of the patient population in Istanbul, Turkey (Bilgin et al, 2020). The researchers did not perform an active screening for CDI. Only patients with clinical indications were tested. Therefore, the results could be an underestimation of the true incidence of HA-CDI. Another limitation could be the small sample size of the study. Larger sample size could predict whether there are any other specific risk factors for severe CDI (Bilgin et al, 2020).
Title of the Article: Hospital acquired Clostridium difficile infection and risk factors for severity in a university hospital: A prospective study.
References
Barrett. (2019). What are cohort studies? Retrieved from https://ebn.bmj.com/content/22/4
Bilgin et al. (2020). Hospital acquired Clostridium difficile infection and risk factors. Retrieved from https://eds-p-ebscohost-com.lopes.idm.oclc.org/eds/detail/detail?vid=2&sid=b3948e61-bc0b-4855-931d-c2bc6ff9635
Unread
The article “Health Literacy, Self-Efficacy, Self-Care Behaviors, and Glycemic Control among Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Thai Communities” by Parichat Ong-Artborirak et al. (2023) seeks to explore the relationship between health literacy, self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control in older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in Thai communities.
Diabetes management and prevention can be attained through advocating for better lifestyle changes, such as nutrition and physical activities, to enhance self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control (Gao et al., 2022). The study was conducted through a cross-sectional research design among 414 older adults aged 60 and above diagnosed with T2DM as the sample. A sample is critical to make inferences about the entire population since it is impossible to effectively study the target population, such as individuals with diabetes. Therefore, a sample is a subset of the people representing the entire community.
A quality sampling strategy is essential since it facilitates population representation, improving the study’s accuracy. The study uses simple random sampling as the primary strategy. The sample was randomly selected for a list of patients in the Java Health Center Information System program (Parichat Ong-Artborirak et al., 2023). The effectiveness of the sampling design chosen seems suitable for attaining a representative sample from the population. Simple random sampling entails randomly picking individuals from a larger population, ensuring that each member has an equal probability of being chosen (Etikan & Babtope, 2019). The method reduces bias if a specific group is over- or under-represented. It increases the efficiency of the research process and improves cost-effectiveness. Utilizing the patient list from the Java Health Center Information System program as the sampling frame enhances the probability of obtaining a diverse range of participants with T2DM in the target community, ensuring that the sample represents the older adult population with T2DM in Thai communities more accurately. Therefore, applying the simple random sampling technique, the researchers can generalize their findings to the larger population.
Article title: Health Literacy, Self-Efficacy, Self-Care Behaviors, and Glycemic Control among Older Adults with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus: A Cross-Sectional Study in Thai Communities
Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04010-0
References
Etikan, I., & Babtope, O. (2019). A basic approach in sampling methodology and sample size calculation. Med Life Clin, 1(2), 1006.
Gao, Y., Xiao, J., Han, Y., Ji, J., Jin, H., Mawen, D. G., Zhong, Y., Lu, Q., Zhuang, X., & Ma, Q. (2022). Self-efficacy mediates the associations of diabetes distress and depressive symptoms with type 2 diabetes management and glycemic control. General Hospital Psychiatry, 78, 87–95. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.genhosppsych.2022.06.003
Parichat Ong-Artborirak, Katekaew Seangpraw, Sorawit Boonyathee, Nisarat Auttama, & Prakaipetch Winaiprasert. (2023). Health literacy, self-efficacy, self-care behaviors, and glycemic control among older adults with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study in Thai communities. 23(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12877-023-04010-0