HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
Grand Canyon University HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
HLT-362V Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
| Article Citation and Permalink
(APA format) |
Maciel, H. I. A., Costa, M. F., Costa, A. C. L., Marcatto, J. D. O., Manzo, B. F., & Bueno, M. (2019). Pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures of pain management and treatment among neonates. Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 31(1), 21-26.
Permalink: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443311/ |
| Point | Description |
| Broad Topic Area/Title | The article’s main topic or area of study involves an analysis of pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures of pain management among neonates. |
| Problem Statement
(What is the problem research is addressing?) |
The main problem being addressed in the above study is associated with pain management among the neonates. The researchers, therefore, attempt to analyze if pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures are the best measures of pain management among the neonates. |
| Purpose Statement
(What is the purpose of the study?) |
The study’s purpose is to quantify and describe the pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches used to reduce stress/ pain among the newborns during hospitalization. |
| Research Questions
(What questions does the research seek to answer?) |
What is the most common pain-relieving approach used among the neonates in intensive care units?
What are some of the effective pain-relieving methods among the neonates in intensive care units |
| Define Hypothesis
(Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used) |
Ho: Nonpharmacological approaches are not the most common pain-relieving methods among the neonates intensive care units
H1: Nonpharmacological approaches are the most common pain-relieving methods among the neonates intensive care units |
| Identify Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables | Independent variable: Pain-relieving approach (categorical variable)
Dependent variable: Treatment outcome (level of pain among neonates); the variable is continuous with a normal distribution. |
| The population of Interest for Study | The population of interest in the study is the newborns or neonates in intensive care units from different hospitals. |
| Sample | The sample size used in the study included 50 newborns (neonates) from various healthcare settings. |
| Sampling Method | A simple random sampling method was used to identify the respondents/study participants. |
| Identify Data Collection
Identify how data were collected |
The questionnaires were used to collect information from the study participants. |
| Summarize Data Collection Approach | The process of data collection involved creating a specialized form regarding the information of neonates, including date of birth, type of delivery, Apgar score at 1 and 5 minutes of life, weight, sex, etc. (Maciel et al., 2019) |
| Discuss Data Analysis
Include what types of statistical tests were used for the variables. |
The data analysis process involved descriptive analysis in showing the attributes of the dependent and independent variables used. Also, there was the use of frequencies and percentages to show the effectiveness of pharmacological and nonpharmacological approaches in pain management. |
| Summarize Results of Study | From the study, it was confirmed that neonates mainly receive nonpharmacological pain-relief approaches. On the other hand, the pharmacological measures in pain relief is still a challenge while caring for the neonates in intensive care units. Also, nonpharmacological measures in pain management can be adopted in isolation to reduce mild, moderate, and severe pain in newborns (Maciel et al., 2019). The application of more than one nonpharmacological measures can indicate a synergistic protective effect. |
| Summary of Assumptions and Limitations
Identify the assumptions and limitations of the article. Report other potential assumptions and limitations of your review not listed by the author. |
One of the assumptions is that the data collected were normally distributed with a standardized mean and variance. It was also assumed that the hypothesis was tested in a cost-effective method. Finally, it was assumed that that research environment was perfect for the studies identified.
|
Although my specialty is cardiac nursing, I often care for patients who are either being admitted for a stroke, or they have a past medical history of a stroke. As you mentioned, time is tissue and every minute counts in these scenarios. Once brain tissue has been without oxygen for too long, there is no reversing that. My facility is stroke certified and we have an average door to CT table time of 10 minutes with our fastest time being 4 minutes. This is something we pride ourselves on since time is so important. According to the Centers for Disease Control, one in four stroke survivors have another stroke within five years (2022). This is why stroke rehabilitation is also of the utmost importance to begin as soon as possible, since some of the lasting effects can be minimized with the proper therapy.
Ethical Considerations
In every quantitative and qualitative research process, there are always ethical considerations that guide the research process. In the
above study, there were concerns when it came to the confidentiality of information. The information from the study participants was made confidential. There was no recording of the names of the respondents; only the essential information was gathered without identification. While undertaking research processes, it is also necessary to present the consent documentation to seek approval or confirm the willingness of the study participants to participate in the study. Maciel et al. (2019), the researchers managed to seek parents’ consent so that the newborns could be involved in the study process.
Ensuring the security of data is another ethical concern that is always considered in the research process. A researcher should always ensure the safety and security of data in the process of data collection. From Maciel et al. (2019), the researchers managed to keep the data safe and secure. Given that some of the information was retrieved from the hospital databases, confidentiality had to be made so as to protect the participant’s details. During data analysis, it is always critical to ensure the accuracy of the outcome, a scenario that can reveal statistical significance. The processes of analysis were done in line with the required standards. The accuracy used in the data collection process led to the production of statistically significant outcomes in the process of data collection. The entire research conformed to the quantitative research standards. The article also involved the application of key procedures and research methodologies that are critical in ensuring effective outcomes.
Reference
Maciel, H. I. A., Costa, M. F., Costa, A. C. L., Marcatto, J. D. O., Manzo, B. F., & Bueno, M. (2019). Pharmacological and nonpharmacological measures of pain management and treatment among neonates. Revista Brasileira de terapia intensiva, 31(1), 21-26. Retrieved from: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6443311/
Article analysis involves consideration of different factors, including methodology, the process of data collection, data analysis, sampling process, and the conclusion or the research findings. The validity and applicability of quantitative research depend on the accuracy of the methodology, data collection, and data analysis. The quantitative article selected for this analysis is, Impact of Sleep Characteristics and Obesity on Diabetes and Hypertension across Genders and Menopausal Status by Matsumoto et al. (2018). The article investigates the effects of sleep characteristics and obesity on high blood pressure and obesity. The article adheres to the quantitative approaches; it incorporates methodology, hypothesis, research questions, sampling processes, data analysis, and findings. The purpose of this assignment is to undertake article analysis and evaluation of the research ethics.
Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
| Article Citation and Permalink
(APA format) |
Matsumoto, T., Murase, K., Tabara, Y., Gozal, D., Smith, D., Minami, T., … & Chin, K. (2018). Impact of sleep characteristics and obesity on diabetes and hypertension across genders and menopausal status: the Nagahama study. Sleep, 41(7), zsy071.
Permalink: https://doi.org/10.1093/sleep/zsy071 |
| Point | Description |
| Broad Topic Area/Title |
The effect of sleep characteristics and obesity on diabetes and hypertension across genders and menopausal status |
| Problem Statement
(What is the problem research is addressing?) |
The main problem being addressed in the research study is the increased hypertension and diabetes due to obesity and sleep characteristics. |
| Purpose Statement
(What is the purpose of the study?) |
The purpose of the study is to determine the potential relationships between sleep disordered breathing, obesity, objective sleep duration, and high blood pressure for different genders, as well as the impacts of pre or post-menopausal status. |
| Research Questions
(What questions does the research seek to answer?) |
Is there a strong relationship between sleep disordered breathing, obesity, objective sleep duration, and high blood pressure for different genders?
Is there positive impacts between sleep disordered breathing, obesity, objective sleep duration, and high blood pressure on pre or post-menopausal status? |
| Define Hypothesis
(Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used) |
Null Hypothesis (HO): There is no strong correlation between sleep disordered breathing, obesity, objective sleep duration, and high blood pressure for different genders
Alternative Hypothesis (H1): There is a strong correlation between sleep disordered breathing, obesity, objective sleep duration, and high blood pressure for different genders |
| Identify Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables | Independent variable: blood pressure (continuous variable)
Dependent variable: breathing rates, body weight, and sleep duration (continuous variable) |
| Population of Interest for Study | The population of interest in the study included middle-aged to elderly citizens. |
| Sample | A large sample size of 9850 was used in the study. |
| Sampling Method | Simple random sampling was used in the study process. |
| Identify Data Collection
Identify how data were collected |
The data used in the study was collected by the use of questionnaires. Each participant had a questionnaire where detail of body weight, breathing rates, sleep duration, and blood pressure were recorded. |
| Summarize Data Collection Approach | The process of data collection involved administration of questionnaires to the identified research participants. Healthcare professionals were involved in the measurement and determination of blood pressure, body weight, breathing rates, and sleep duration. |
| Discuss Data Analysis
Include what types of statistical tests were used for the variables. |
Descriptive statistics including mean, median, and mode were used to determine the distribution of variables involved in the study processes. For instance, the mean age of men with normal blood pressure was 56.1 years with a standard deviation of 12.4 years. Also, given that this was a correlation research, correlation analysis was used to determine the relationship between the independent and dependent variables. Strong correlation between variables were found to be greater than 0.5. In other words, there were strong relationship between the variables under the study. Student t-test and Mann–Whitney U-tests were also used to determine or assess the group difference.
|
| Summarize Results of Study |
Severity of sleep disordered breathing or obesity was strongly related to the shorter sleep duration. Besides, SDB showed a significant association with systematic high blood pressure, particularly in men. The severity of SDB strongly related to diabetes, however, this was only evident in women. There was no significant association between short sleep duration and diabetes. |
| Summary of Assumptions and Limitations
Identify the assumptions and limitations from the article. Report other potential assumptions and limitations of your review not listed by the author. |
Assumption of normality of data was applied in the study. In other words, it was assumed that the dataset used was normally distributed. Additionally, it was assumed that the study was undertaken under perfect environment where all the factors were constant. Limitation of the study was based on the time consumption and cost of operation. Also, there was difficulty in determining or verifying authentic and applicable information.
|
Ethical Considerations
The success of the quantitative research process relies on adherence to ethical practices. Besides, for research outcomes to be considered valid and applicable, there is the need for ethical consideration in undertaking different processes or procedures in the course of the study (Alderson & Morrow, 2020). Ethical practices often start from the planning, data collection, data analysis, and at the point of data presentation. Confidentiality of information is one of the ethical considerations that must be considered in the course of quantitative research (Edwards, 2020). While designing quantitative studies, there is always the need to consider processes and procedures that will ensure the security of data/information collected. In the above research study, the confidentiality of information was observed at all levels; therefore, the outcome of the research can be considered valid, applicable, and reliable (Yang et al., 2020). In the process of data collection, the respondents or participants were recognized by the unique codes assigned before the data collection processes. This aids in the protection of personal information that was captured. In general, the confidentiality of information collected was achieved through the use of coded language.
The signing of consent is another ethical practice that ought to be considered in the course of research processes. While recruiting study respondents, there is the need for the researchers to consider their willingness to take part in the study and to give relevant information that can be used to enhance the reliability of outcomes (Ingels et al., 2017). In the above study, research participants were involved in signing consent to confirm their readiness to give appropriate information/data. There was no form of coercion, those who found it difficult to give their personal information were dropped at the initial stages of the research. Also, those who changed their minds in the course of the study were dropped, and this led to the change in the sample size.
Conclusion
The outcomes/findings of the quantitative research are valid, applicable, and reliable given the approaches that were taken in the study. Researchers adhered to ethical practices while planning and undertaking data collection processes. Confidentiality of information is one of the ethical considerations that was considered in the course of quantitative research. Seeking consent is another ethical procedure that was considered in the research process. Although the research outcomes were valid, reliable, and applicable, the entire research process proved to be expensive and time-consuming.
References
Alderson, P., & Morrow, V. (2020). The ethics of research with children and young people: A practical handbook. Sage.
Edwards, J. R. (2020). The peaceful coexistence of ethics and quantitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 167(1), 31-40. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s10551-019-04197-6
Ingels, J. S., Misra, R., Stewart, J., Lucke-Wold, B., & Shawley-Brzoska, S. (2017). The effect of adherence to dietary tracking on weight loss: using HLM to model weight loss over time. Journal of diabetes research, 2017. https://www.hindawi.com/journals/jdr/2017/6951495/
Yang, L., Magnussen, C. G., Yang, L., Bovet, P., & Xi, B. (2020). Elevated blood pressure in childhood or adolescence and cardiovascular outcomes in adulthood: a systematic review. Hypertension, 75(4), 948-955. https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/full/10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.119.14168