Age Related Songbirds Mortality Biology Essay

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Age Related Songbirds Mortality Biology Essay

In ~500 words, using cohesive paragraphs with topic sentences, describe the elements of the figure, explain the main take-away(s) from the figure, and evaluate the quality of the figure. The following are example questions to help guide your evaluation of the figure, but you are not required to answer them. Does this figure effectively convey the meaning of the data? Is it easy to interpret? Is it misleading in any way? Why or why not? What would you do differently if you were presenting these data?

Figure Analysis Write-up

Select one figure from the article to write about and provide the following information:

Scientific article title:
Name of first author:
Year of publication:
Journal name:
Volume number:
Page numbers (i.e. 300–315):

Insert your figure and figure caption here:

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Age Related Songbirds Mortality Biology Essay

Writing Prompt
In ~500 words, using cohesive paragraphs with topic sentences, describe the elements of the figure, explain the main take-away(s) from the figure, and evaluate the quality of the figure. The following are example questions to help guide your evaluation of the figure, but you are not required to answer them. Does this figure effectively convey the meaning of the data? Is it easy to interpret? Is it misleading in any way? Why or why not? What would you do differently if you were presenting these data?

Age Related Songbirds Mortality Biology Essay

Grading rubric:

Tasks 0 0.25 0.5 0.75 1 comments
1. Figure with in-text figure caption is included.
2. Writing has good paragraph structure with topic sentences.
3. All aspects of the figure are described effectively.
4. Main take-away(s) of figure are clearly explained.
5. Quality of figure is thoroughly and thoughtfully evaluated.

0 = not attempted or no effort shown, 0.25 = some skill demonstrated but needs substantial work, 0.5 = adequate effectiveness, 0.75 = good mastery, but some room for improvement, 1 = excellent