coursework-banner

NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official

NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official

Chamberlain University NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University   NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for  NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official                                

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University   NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official    depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for  NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official                                

The introduction for the Chamberlain University   NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official    is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for  NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official                                

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for  NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official                                

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for  NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official                                

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to prepare for the
professional presentation to an elected official of the selected healthcare
concern and the proposed solution. This
includes the identification of communication strategies as well as development
of presentation content.

Preventative screening for chronic diseases gives individuals clarity and a sense of security, protecting them, and allowing them to live a longer, healthier life. To achieve this, the word needs to be spread about these wonderful immunizations and screenings. One way to do this is by creating a patient profile. This patient profile would be essentially a portal with all of their medical info, immunizations, medical history, and family history. This patient portal will remind them of the dates to be tested. For example, every year a woman should have a pap smear. It will alert them when it is needed, while also showing various health centers near them. Another example would be when their immunizations expire, such as the Tdap and tetanus shots. Based on family history, it would alert you at certain ages to be tested or screened for cancer. For example, if you have a history of breast cancer, should be tested at 30 and every year after. There is a lot of information out there and it tends to get lost in translation. This app or patient profile helps track and keep your medical history up to date.\

ALSO READ:

NR506 Week 7 Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation

NR506 week 7 discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

NR506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Assignment

 

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following
course outcomes:

CO 2. Communicate with decision-makers to advocate for
effective policies that impact nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare
system. (PO 2)

CO 3. Demonstrate professional and personal growth regarding
the advocacy role of the advance practice nurse in healthcare policy for
diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3)

CO 5. Advocate for
institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence
person-centered healthcare, consumers, and nursing practice. (PO 5)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 4

Total Points: 200 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

For this assignment, the focus is preparation for the
presentation to the selected elected official regarding the healthcare concern
and the proposed resolution. A video
presentation of the healthcare concern and its proposed resolution will be
prepared and presented. Following
completion of this, a written self-evaluation is required.

Criteria for Content

Video Presentation:

Content: The video presentation is to include the following elements:

Introduction of self

Presentation of healthcare policy concern

Presentation of student identified solution to the
healthcare policy concern

Summary

Evaluation of video presentation includes the following
elements:

Content:

Introduction of self

Presentation of healthcare policy concern

Presentation of student identified solution to the
healthcare policy concern

Summary

Information is relevant to healthcare concern and its
solution

Method of Delivery:

Effective opening

Stayed connected to audience

Grammar was correct

Style of Delivery:

Eye contact

Voice clarity

Gestures

Appearance

Paper Content:

Overview of the healthcare policy concern and solution: This
section provides a concise but comprehensive overview of the healthcare policy
as well as the solution. Required content includes:

Identification of the healthcare policy

Identification of the student identified solution

Relevance to the community or population group

Identification of communication techniques: This section
requires the delineation of communication techniques useful to the upcoming
presentation to the selected elected official. Required content includes:

Identification of the selected elected official and position

Rationale for the selection

Identification of 4 (four) beneficial
communication/presentation techniques

Providing scholarly resources that support the use of the
identified communication techniques

Self-evaluation of video presentation: This section provides
an opportunity for self-evaluation of the video recording. The student must self-evaluate oneself in
each major content area by identifying one positive and one area to improve
(i.e. content, method of delivery, and style of delivery):

Content:

Introduction of self

Presentation of healthcare policy concern

Presentation of student identified solution to the
healthcare policy concern

Summary

Information is relevant to healthcare concern and its
solution

Method of Delivery:

Effective opening

Stayed connected to audience

Grammar was correct

Style of Delivery:

Eye contact

Voice clarity

Gestures

Appearance

Conclusion: This section requires a summary of the key
points from the video and paper assignment.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions:

The video presentation will be recorded via the use of Voice
Thread located within the course on the initial page in the left column.

The video presentation will last a minimum of 3 minutes and
no longer than 5 minutes.

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page)
should be at least 2, but no more than 4 pages. Points will be lost for not
meeting these length requirements.

Title page, running head, body of paper, and reference page
must follow APA guidelines as found in the 6th edition of the manual. This
includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the
introduction where no heading is used.

A minimum of 4 (four) appropriate research-based scholarly
references must be used.

Required textbook for this course, dictionary and
Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly
references for this assignment. For additional assistance regarding scholarly
nursing references, please see “What is a scholarly source” located in the
Course Resources tab. Be aware that
information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided. References are current – within a 5-year time
frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them
prior to submission of the assignment.

Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing
sources must be cited and referenced correctly.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are
followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) 375 37.5%
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) 200 20%
Management of Power Paper (Week 5) 200 20%
Executive Summary (Week 7) 225 22.5%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0

Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0

Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost -5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.