NR701 Application of Analytic Methods
Week 8
assignment
This assignment provides documentation of student ability to
meet the following course outcomes:
CO1: Formulate PICOT/PICoT questions relevant to advanced
nursing practice (PO #3).
CO4: Compare and contrast differences and similarities with
selected characteristics of qualitative and quantitative research designs (PO
#3).
CO5: Evaluate appropriateness of a qualitative research
design for a selected PICoT question (PO #3).
CO6: Evaluate appropriateness of a quantitative research
design for a selected PICOT question (PO #3).
CO8: Demonstrate competence in basic analysis of qualitative
and quantitative data (PO #3).
CO9: Differentiate between quality improvement, system
change, research, and evidence-based practice initiatives (PO #5).
Findings show that religious engagement among students declines during college, but their spirituality shows substantial growth. “Students become more caring, more tolerant, more connected with others, and more actively engaged in a spiritual quest.” (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher Education”) The authors also found that spiritual growth enhances other outcomes, such as academic performance, psychological well-being, leadership development, and satisfaction with college. The study also identified a number of college activities that contribute to students’ spiritual growth. Some of these–study abroad, interdisciplinary studies, and service learning–appear to be effective because they expose students to new and diverse people, cultures, and ideas. Spiritual development is also enhanced if students engage in “inner work” through activities such as meditation or self-reflection, or if their professors actively encourage them to explore questions of meaning and purpose. (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher (Alexander W, 2010)”). By raising public awareness of the key role that spirituality plays in student learning and development, by alerting academic administrators, faculty, and curriculum committees to the importance of spiritual development, and by identifying strategies for enhancing that development, this work encourages institutions to give greater priority to these spiritual aspects of students’ educational and professional development
POINTS
This assignment is worth a total of 100 points.
DUE DATE
Submit your completed application by Wednesday 11:59 p.m. MT
of Week 8 as directed.
REQUIREMENTS
1. The You
Decide Reflection is worth 100 points and will be graded on quality of
self-assessment, use of citations, use of Standard English grammar, sentence
structure, and overall organization based on the required components as
summarized in the directions and grading criteria/rubric.
2. Create
your essay using Microsoft Word (a part of Microsoft Office), which is the
required format for all Chamberlain College of Nursing documents. You can tell
that the document is saved as a MS Word document because it will end in “.docx”
3. Follow
the directions and grading criteria closely. Any questions about your essay may
be posted under the Q & A forum.
4. The
length of the reflection is to be within three to six pages excluding title
page and reference pages.
5. APA
format is required with both a title page and reference page. Use the required
components of the review as Level 1 headers (upper and lower case, centered):
Note: Introduction – Write an introduction but do not use
“Introduction” as a heading in accordance with the rules put forth in the
Publication manual of the American Psychological Association (2010, p. 63).
a. You
Decide Reflection
b. Conclusion
PREPARING YOUR REFLECTION
The DNP Essentials (AACN, 2006) outline a number of
analytical methods for evidence-based practice competencies for the
DNP-prepared nurse. Reflect on the NR701 course readings, discussion threads,
and applications you have completed across this course and write a reflective
essay regarding the extent to which you feel you are now prepared to:
1. “Use
analytic methods to critically appraise existing literature and other evidence
to determine and implement the best evidence for practice.
2. Design
and implement processes to evaluate outcomes of practice, practice patterns,
and systems of care within a practice setting, healthcare organization, or
community against national benchmarks to determine variances in practice
outcomes and population trends.
3. Design,
direct, and evaluate quality improvement methodologies to promote safe, timely,
effective, efficient, equitable, and patient-centered care.
4. Apply
relevant findings to develop practice guidelines and improve practice and the
practice environment.
5. Use
information technology and research methods appropriately to:
a. collect
appropriate and accurate data to generate evidence for nursing practice
b. inform
and guide the design of databases that generate meaningful evidence for nursing
practice
c. analyze
data from practice
d. design
evidence-based interventions
e. predict
and analyze outcomes
f. examine
patterns of behavior and outcomes
g. identify
gaps in evidence for practice
6. Function
as a practice specialist/consultant in collaborative knowledge-generating
research.
7. Disseminate
findings from evidence-based practice and research to improve healthcare
outcomes” (AACN, 2006, p. 12).
Reference:
American Association of Colleges of Nursing [AACN]. (2006).
The essentials of doctoral education for advanced nursing practice.
Washington, DC: Author.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
Graded Item | Points | Weighting |
---|---|---|
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) | 375 | 37.5% |
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) | 200 | 20% |
Management of Power Paper (Week 5) | 200 | 20% |
Executive Summary (Week 7) | 225 | 22.5% |
Total | 1,000 | 100% |
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
Letter Grade | Points | Percentage |
---|---|---|
A | 940–1,000 | 94% to 100% |
A- | 920–939 | 92% to 93% |
B+ | 890–919 | 89% to 91% |
B | 860–889 | 86% to 88% |
B- | 840–859 | 84% to 85% |
C+ | 810–839 | 81% to 83% |
C | 760–809 | 76% to 80% |
F | 759 and below | 75% and below |
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.