NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
The introduction for the Walden University NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
Project management allows for a clear and focused workflow to approach an issue or task. These approaches streamline a process, allow for checks and balances, and ensure all stakeholders are active participants in the process. Project management approaches often utilize SMART objectives to define and set the objectives for the project.
Healthcare organizations are constantly engaging in performance improvement initiatives with the aim of improving the patients’ experiences and outcomes. Quality care delivery results in quick recovery to the patients as well as reduced medical costs because of the reduced hospital stay period. Quality improvement initiatives focus on measuring the patients’ outcomes and develop new strategies to address the existing gaps and improve the efficiency of the healthcare delivery processes (Joshi, Ransom, Nash, & Ransom, 2014). Various quality indicators are considered in the improved process, and they include reduced hospital readmissions, proper waste management and disposal, patients’ data management and reducing the turnaround time. Proper data management is an important quality indicator that many hospitals focus on currently. In as much as there are other quality indicators, data management has been prioritized in the hospital set-up and thus will be the main focus of analysis in the paper.
Quality Improvement Initiative
As mentioned, the present health care setting focuses on data management as its quality improvement initiative. This focus has occurred in cognizance of the essence of having proper data management system given the technological pervasion of the health care industry. Poor data management results in communication errors between the healthcare providers, and prolonged patients’ stay in the hospital due to data unavailability. Indeed, Clarke and Persaud (2011) have implied that the absence of proper data management structures have led to the existence of certain adverse events in health care. Therefore, improving the patients’ data management is essential in the realization of high quality delivery of health care services. Patients’ data are collected from the time they get to the outpatient department. Hence, this data should be made readily available for proper management of the patients until the time they leave the hospital. Also, such records should be kept for easy monitoring and follow-up of patients with chronic diseases.
Photo Credit: Getty Images/iStockphoto
Each letter of the acronym SMART defines a different criterion for the objective. A SMART objective is specific, measurable, assignable, realistic, and timely. These objectives help to steer the work and direct the stakeholders to the completion of the project.
For this Assignment, you will reflect on project management approaches that could be used to address a quality improvement practice gap. You will develop SMART objectives for the planning and execution of a quality improvement project, and will consider potential project management approaches or activities that could be used in executing this project.
To Prepare:
- Review the Learning Resources for this week, and consider the approaches of project management.
- Refer to the Week 3 Discussion, and reflect on the quality improvement practice gap you identified.
- Consider how you might apply the project management approaches examined this week to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.
- Think about how you might develop SMART objectives for the planning and execution of a project to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.
- Consider any other project management approaches or activities you might recommend using for your project that will address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.
The Assignment: (2–3 pages)
- Briefly describe the quality improvement practice gap you identified in your nursing practice or organization. Be specific.
- Develop at least two SMART objectives you might apply in the project planning phase or execution phase to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified.
- Recommend at least two project management activities you would use for your project, addressing the quality improvement practice gap you identified. Explain your justification for why these activities would provide the best support. Be specific and provide examples.
Reminder: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/templates/general#s-lg-box-20293632). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
NURS 8302 Assignment 1 Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap - Click the Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 4 Assignment 1 link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK4Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 4 Assignment 1 Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 4 Assignment 1 draft and review the originality report.
Read Also: NURS 8302 Week 3 Assignment: Tools for Measuring Quality
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7 of Week 4
To participate in this Assignment:
Week 4 Assignment 1
Sample Answer 2 for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
Health care organizations should be continually involved in practice outcomes’ improvement. In this case, they need to make practice gaps identification a norm and respond effectively. Regardless of the situation, the approach chosen to address practice gaps affects outcomes considerably. Project management principles and activities can be integrated into practice improvement projects to guide planning, execution, and implementation. This paper describes the quality improvement practice gap, SMART objectives, and project management activities suitable for the project.
Quality Improvement Practice Gap
Medication errors are common in practice settings, and their rates depend on the experience of the workforce, the technology used, and health conditions, among other factors. The causes of medication errors in practice settings vary, with diagnosis and prescription inefficiencies and ineffective drug distribution practices among the leading causes (AMCP, 2019). Human-based issues and team inefficiencies are other major causes. Such issues include communication gaps and an uninformed patient population (Tiwary et al., 2019). Medication errors impact health outcomes adversely, necessitating up-to-date and evidence-based interventions. They are sources of new health conditions, injuries, and even death (Wondmieneh et al., 2020). Medication errors also cause patient dissatisfaction by reducing the quality of overall care.
Health care organizations can apply different strategies in medication errors control. These strategies can be the basis for using project management activities in practice improvement. Modern technology integration into health care practices is highly recommended in reducing and preventing medication errors. For instance, as Godshall and Riehl (2018) proposed, barcode scanning can prevent and mitigate drug prescription and administration problems. The other strategy is creating an informed nursing staff through nursing education. Doing so can help nurses follow institutional policies on medication transcription, such as the five rights of medication (Hanson & Haddad, 2021). Individually or jointly, these strategies can effectively address the practice gap.
SMART Goals
Medication errors cannot be effectively addressed without setting goals to guide practice improvement. Suitable goals in the planning phase or execution phase include:
- Adopting appropriate technologies in the practice setting to prevent medication errors within six months.
- Educating the nursing staff to equip it with knowledge on medication errors prevention and control in three months.
As required in goal setting, these goals are specific, measurable, and time-bound. They outline the measures necessary to achieve a particular outcome.
Project Management Activities to Apply in the Project
Project management is a broad topic with different phases and activities. A suitable project management activity for the project is a project strategy and business case. In project management, project strategy and the business case involve defining all the project’s requirements and proposing an appropriate methodology to achieve the desired goals (Schmidt, 2021). In medication errors’ prevention, project strategy and business case would involve identifying the technologies needed to prevent errors and proposing an approach to acquire them. For instance, the practice setting can rely on internal resources or donations. The other crucial activity is preparation. It is a critical activity before the project starts. Here, the project leader ensures that all the necessary resources are in place and timelines and roles are defined through work breakdown structure and Gantt charts, among other tools. Both activities are crucial to prevent working on a project without a definite end and specific goals.
Conclusion
Quality improvement requires high-level thinking and applying appropriate approaches. A project approach is justified when addressing quality improvement practice gaps such as medication errors. Preparation is vital before starting the project, among other activities like developing a project strategy and business case. Addressing medication errors requires a similar approach due to the complexity of the task and the need to work on specific, measurable, and time-bound goals.
References
AMCP. (2019). Medication errors. https://www.amcp.org/about/managed-care-pharmacy-101/concepts-managed-care-pharmacy/medication-errors
Godshall, M., & Riehl, M. (2018). Preventing medication errors in the information age. Nursing2020, 48(9), 56-58. doi: 10.1097/01.NURSE.0000544230.51598.38
Hanson, A., & Haddad, L. M. (2021). Nursing rights of medication administration. StatPearls [Internet]. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK560654/
Schmidt, T. (2021). Strategic project management made simple: Solution tools for leaders and teams. New Jersey Wiley.
Tiwary, A., Rimal, A., Paudyal, B., Sigdel, K. R., & Basnyat, B. (2019). Poor communication by health care professionals may lead to life-threatening complications: Examples from two case reports. Wellcome Open Research, 4. https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.15042.1
Wondmieneh, A., Alemu, W., Tadele, N., & Demis, A. (2020). Medication administration errors and contributing factors among nurses: A cross sectional study in tertiary hospitals, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. BMC Nursing, 19(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-020-0397-0
Sample Answer 3 for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
Chronic heart failure annually impacts approximately 5.7 million individuals in the United States, resulting in a financial burden of over $30.7 billion due to healthcare expenses and treatment costs (Taklalsingh et al., 2020). According to Driscoll et al. (2020), the annual survival rate for hospital admissions is only 30-40%, suggesting a potential impact on morale. The projected readmission rate within 30 days is 23% for patients. The Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program was initiated by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) in 2012. It aims to reduce avoidable readmissions for heart failure patients by imposing financial penalties on institutions with higher readmission rates following heart failure hospitalizations. These penalties result in lower monthly payments or reimbursements for these institutions. This paper aims to elucidate the identified gap in quality improvement practice.
Identification of the Gap for Quality Improvement
During this practicum, I observed a deficiency in my practice regarding the 30-day hospitalization rates for congestive cardiac failure. The inclusion of the 30-day readmission rate as a metric for evaluating hospital quality aims to reduce healthcare expenses and prevent inadequate treatment for individuals with heart failure. This study utilized multiple communities to evaluate various metrics, including hospital rating and payment rate, to promote improved care for individuals with congestive heart failure. Healthcare institutions have recognized the importance of maintaining a low 30-day readmission rate to achieve high-quality assessments and receive high reimbursement rates. As a result, they have enhanced their ability to monitor and provide appropriate treatment to patients with congestive heart failure (Roshanghalb et al., 2019). This research investigates how project execution and root-cause analysis can improve outcomes for individuals with congestive heart failure. This research seeks to utilize the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice and the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice Translation Tool to identify effective measures or strategies for significantly reducing the 30-day readmission rate among patients with heart problems. Lewin’s theory of managing change is a component of the change management process.
SMART Objectives for Quality Improvement
This research evaluates interventions hospitals and healthcare providers can implement to reduce the 30-day readmission rate for cardiac conditions. The proposed intervention seeks to achieve two main objectives.
- This study aims to evaluate the quality of available information regarding effective strategies and interventions for reducing the 30-day readmission rate for heart-related issues in hospitals within a 12-month.
- The objective is to reduce the hospital’s 30-day readmission rate for heart conditions to be lower than the national average or to be ranked within the top five hospitals in the country.
To meet these goals, the hospital should conduct a root-cause analysis to determine the primary risk factors associated with heart failure readmission rates. Subsequently, intervention recommendations can be made based on this data (Delgado et al., 2019). The objectives of reducing the rate of heart disease readmissions are SMART (specific, measurable, attainable, realistic, and timely), making them feasible to implement within a medical setting.
Recommended Project Management Activities
To fulfill its goals, the facility has to consider two main tactics. Finding the best evidence-based therapies is crucial to lowering the hospital’s readmission rate for heart disease. To accomplish these changes further, change management techniques must be implemented. Project management strategies are needed for both processes (Taklalsingh et al., 2020). Comprehensive home healthcare programs that include round-the-clock phone support for up to 25–30 days after discharge, personalized education on self-care techniques during hospitalization, frequent check-in visits, and encouragement of in-home follow-up are beneficial to patients with heart failure (Cholack et al., 2021).
Through root-cause analysis, a team may use project management tools to evaluate hospitals’ readiness and current procedures to reduce 30-day hospitalization rates linked to cardiac problems. According to the National Patient Safety Foundation (NPSF), root-cause analysis is a valuable method employed by interdisciplinary development teams to identify the underlying causes and explanations for readmissions (Blumer et al., 2021). To reduce cardiovascular disease readmissions, the development team will incorporate change management strategies to implement evidence-based practice improvements (Khan et al., 2021).
Conclusion
One month post-hospital discharge. Engaging in these activities can reduce the readmission rate for heart failure by providing a meaningful approach to identifying and addressing underlying issues or causes and linking them to appropriate therapeutic interventions. Applying change management principles can be advantageous for organizations as it reduces employee resistance, enhances internal support, and optimizes the effectiveness of proposed policy changes. Therefore, by implementing project management, organizational transformation, and evidence-based practice methods, an organization may lower its 30-day readmission rate for cardiac issues.
References
Blumer, V., Mentz, R. J., Sun, J., Butler, J., Metra, M., Voors, A. A., Hernandez, A. F., O’Connor, C. M., & Greene, S. J. (2021). Prognostic role of prior heart failure hospitalization among patients hospitalized for worsening chronic heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.120.007871
Bonilla-Palomas, J. L., Anguita‐Sánchez, M., Elola-Somoza, F. J., Bernal, J. L., Fernández-Pérez, C., Ruiz‐Ortiz, M., Jiménez‐Navarro, M., Bueno, H., Cequier, Á., & Marín-Ortuño, F. (2021). Thirteen‐year trends in hospitalization and outcomes of patients with heart failure in Spain. European Journal of Clinical Investigation, 51(11). https://doi.org/10.1111/eci.13606
Cholack, G., Garfein, J., Errickson, J., Krallman, R., Montgomery, D., Kline–Rogers, E., Eagle, K. A., Rubenfire, M., Bumpus, S. M., & Barnes, G. D. (2021). Early (0-7 days) and late (8-30 days) readmission predictors in acute coronary syndrome, atrial fibrillation, and congestive heart failure patients. Hospital Practice, 49(5), 364–370. https://doi.org/10.1080/21548331.2021.1976558
Delgado, J., Gregori, A. F., Fernández, L. N., Claret, R. B., Sepúlveda, A. G., Fernández‐Avilés, F., González-Juanatey, J. R., García, R. V., Otero, M. R., Cubero, J. S., Figal, D. P., Crespo-Leiro, M. G., Álvarez‐García, J., Cinca, J., & Ynsaurriaga, F. A. (2019). Patient-associated predictors of 15- and 30-day readmission after hospitalization for acute heart failure. Current Heart Failure Reports, 16(6), 304–314. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11897-019-00442-1
Driscoll, A., Dinh, D., Prior, D., Kaye, D. M., Hare, D. L., Neil, C., Lockwood, S., Brennan, A., Lefkovits, J., Carruthers, H., Amerena, J., Cooke, J., Vaddadi, G., Nadurata, V., & Reid, C. M. (2020). The effect of transitional care on 30-day outcomes in patients hospitalized with acute heart failure. Heart, Lung and Circulation, 29(9), 1347–1355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hlc.2020.03.004
Khan, M. S., Sreenivasan, J., Lateef, N., Abougergi, M. S., Greene, S. J., Ahmad, T., Anker, S. D., Fonarow, G. C., & Butler, J. (2021). Trends in 30- and 90-day readmission rates for heart failure. Circulation: Heart Failure, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.1161/circheartfailure.121.008335
Roshanghalb, A., Mazzali, C., & Lettieri, E. (2019). Multi-level models for heart failure patients’ 30-day mortality and readmission rates: the relation between patient and hospital factors in administrative data. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-019-4818-2
Taklalsingh, N., Wengrofsky, P., & Levitt, H. (2020). The Heart Failure Clinic: Improving 30-Day All-Cause Hospital Readmissions. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 42(4), 215–223. https://doi.org/10.1097/jhq.0000000000000221
Sample Answer 4 for NURS 8302 Assignment 1: Applying Project Management Approaches for a Quality Improvement Practice Gap
Healthcare organizations should always be committed to delivering care that meets all the outcome standards. As a result, progressive assessment of performance gaps is necessary to identify areas that need attention and quality improvement. Due to their critical role in primary care provision, nurses engage in evidence-based practice projects within their healthcare settings or other appropriate settings. Generally, these health projects follow the typical phases of project management, including initiation, planning, execution, evaluation, and controlling. Nurses also need to set SMART goals when implementing EBP projects, showing the application of project management principles in healthcare delivery. This paper described the quality improvement practice gap, SMART objectives, and project management activities relevant to the project.
Quality Improvement Practice Gap
I chose readmissions for my nursing practice quality improvement gaps. According to Hekkert et al. (2019), hospital readmissions hamper the quality of care since they are associated with unfavorable patient outcomes. Readmissions indicate that patients do not receive the deserved care and are at risk of health complications. Upadhyay et al. (2019) further mentioned that readmissions have substantial financial implications since more resources are used to address the same problem. Resources used towards readmissions can be used for quality improvement initiatives. Due to the profound implications of readmissions, process improvement and the use of data are essential. Process improvement includes interventions such as preventing hospital-acquired infections and improving handoff communication. Data-driven care includes utilizing technology to enhance accuracy and communication outcomes. Data for at-risk patients can be used to make special arrangements for their care to reduce delays.
SMART Objectives to Apply in the Project Planning Phase
- Identifying three causes of readmissions in healthcare settings as the basis for appropriate interventions
- To identify and apply two quality improvement interventions to reduce readmission rates
As a critical phase in project management, project planning involves laying out the project’s roadmap. In this case, the requirements of the project to facilitate easy implementation are identified. For instance, tasks and technical requirements are identified during the planning phase. Goals and deliverables are also set during the project planning phase (Moran, 2019). As a result, the two SMART objectives indicate the goals and deliverables to be achieved through the project.
Project Management Activities
Like projects in other fields, DNP projects are tiring and time-consuming. Whether using the agile approach or other methods, it is important to outline the necessary project management activities to guide decision-making and resources allocation. Tasks are also distributed according to the project’s activities (Moran, 2019). A suitable project management activity suiting my project is outlining the scope of the project. Here, the implication is that specific project goals, tasks, deliverables, costs, and deadlines should be outlined. For instance, an education program to increase healthcare providers’ knowledge of reducing readmission rates should be complete in six months. The other activity suiting my project is identifying appropriate stakeholders. Quanbeck (2019) defined stakeholders as influencers in practice change projects since the outcomes directly affect them. Appropriate stakeholders should be identified, including their roles and expectations. The two activities are critical since outlining the scope facilitates efficient resource allocation while stakeholders provide huge support. For instance, organizations’ management prepares the organization for change and provides venues for organizing meetings.
In conclusion, the project management approach can be used in addressing quality improvement practice gaps. In this case, nursing projects can apply similar project management phases and guidelines. SMART objectives ensure that the nurse looks forward to achieving specific and measurable outcomes. Ambiguity should be avoided by all means. As described above, appropriate project management activities for my project including defining the scope and identifying the stakeholders.
References
Hekkert, K., Borghans, I., Cihangir, S., Westert, G. P., & Kool, R. B. (2019). What is the impact on the readmission ratio of taking into account readmissions to other hospitals? A cross-sectional study. BMJ Open, 9(4), e025740. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025740
Moran, K. J. (2019). Doctor of nursing practice project: A framework for success. Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Quanbeck, A. (2019). Using stakeholder values to promote implementation of an evidence-based mobile health intervention for addiction treatment in primary care settings. JMIR mHealth and uHealth, 7(6), e13301. doi: 10.2196/13301
Upadhyay, S., Stephenson, A. L., & Smith, D. G. (2019). Readmission Rates and Their Impact on Hospital Financial Performance: A Study of Washington Hospitals. Inquiry : A Journal of Medical Care Organization, Provision and Financing, 56, 46958019860386. https://doi.org/10.1177/0046958019860386
Rubric Detail
Select Grid View or List View to change the rubric’s layout.
Content
Name: NURS_8302_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | ||
| Briefly describe the quality improvement practice gap you identified in your nursing practice or organization. Be specific. | Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and clearly describes in detail the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization. The response provides accurate and specific details that fully support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified. |
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response accurately describes the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization. The response provides accurate details that support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization. The response provides inaccurate or vague details that may support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes the quality improvement practice gap identified in their nursing practice or organization, or it is missing. The response provides inaccurate and vague details that do not support the selection of the quality improvement practice gap identified, or it is missing. |
|
| Develop at least two SMART objectives you might apply in the project planning phase or execution phase to address the quality improvement practice gap you identified. | Points Range: 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response accurately and completely develops two SMART objectives that comprehensively address the quality improvement gap identified. |
Points Range: 28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response accurately develops two SMART objectives to address the quality improvement gap identified. |
Points Range: 25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely develops two SMART objectives to address the quality improvement gap identified. OR The response develops less than two SMART objectives. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely develops two SMART objectives to address the quality improvement gap identified, or it is missing. |
|
| Recommend at least two project management activities you would use for your project addressing the quality improvement practice gap you identified, and explain your justification for why these activities would provide the best support. Be specific, and provide examples. | Points Range: 23 (23%) – 25 (25%)
The response accurately and clearly describes in detail two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified. |
Points Range: 20 (20%) – 22 (22%)
The response accurately describes two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified. |
Points Range: 18 (18%) – 19 (19%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely describes two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified. OR The response recommends less than two project management activities. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 17 (17%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely describes two project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the justification for the use of project management activities to address the quality improvement practice gap identified, or it is missing. |
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
|
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
|
| Total Points: 100 | |||||
Name: NURS_8302_Week4_Assignment1_Rubric