coursework-banner

Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

Capella University Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan                                   

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University          Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan                                   

 

The introduction for the Capella University Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan                                   

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan                                   

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan                                   

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

Eliminating illnesses from society or significantly reducing their severity is among the key objectives of health care providers. Illnesses control enables communities to remain developmentally active and productive. However, for a long time, American society has faced numerous challenges in chronic illnesses’ control. For instance, the rates of diabetes, obesity, hypertension, and cancers increase progressively. Due to such trends, it is crucial to devise population health improvement plans to enable people to live more healthily. This paper illustrates a health population plan for obesity among Hispanics; discussion areas include data, plan, value and relevance of evidence, outcome evaluation, and communication.

Data Evaluation

Health improvement plans should be evidence-based. As a result, it is vital to examine all the data necessary to inform decision-making. Demographic data is vital in showing the criticality of a health problem. Data from the CDC report shows that the prevalence of obesity is as high as 42.4% (average), which increases gradually, and Hispanic adults at 44.8% are the most affected population groups (CDC, 2021). Due to the high prevalence, people’s productivity continues to decrease. Health care costs become an issue considering that the medical cost of people with obesity exceeds those with a normal weight by $1,429 (CDC, 2021). Practical interventions are necessary to change the situation.

Besides demographic data, epidemiological data is a reliable reference point, justifying the need for evidence-based interventions to improve the population’s health. Childhood obesity is a precursor of adult obesity which puts the affected populations at risk of type 2 diabetes, hypertension, and hyperlipidemia. A cross-sectional study by Webster et al. (2018) found that people with obesity are at a double risk of diabetes and hypertension. Vulnerability to stress and depression is also high, particularly when obese people are stigmatized (Ha et al., 2017). Obesity is also a precursor of cardiovascular health, particularly in low and middle-income areas (Webster et al., 2018). Hispanics belong to this category.

Environmental data also enables health care providers to make more informed health decisions. One of the environmental factors

Assessment 3 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan
Assessment 3 Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

central to exacerbating obesity rates is changes in the built environment. Empirical data shows that the rate of physical inactivity increases with changes in the built environment, such as street connectivity and building, reducing the number and sizes of parks and green space (Gray et al., 2018). The reducing state of physical activity is worsened by the increased access to fast foods in the changing built environment. Unless the populace understands this relationship, obesity rates will continue increasing progressively and putting people at more health risks.

Empirical data and cross-sectional studies contain levels I and II evidence, highly reliable as the foundation of evidence-based health interventions. Such data is also consistent since supporting evidence from peer-reviewed studies in literature review sections is consistent about causes, severity, and impacts of obesity. Accordingly, the data is reliable and valid as required in health research. Overall, the CDC data and findings from empirical evidence affirm that obesity is a significant health risk affecting people physically and mentally. Moreover, it increases the affected populace’s vulnerability to other chronic illnesses.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assessment 3: Evidence-Based Population Health Improvement Plan

Health Improvement Plan

Obesity is a multifaceted health problem. Its causes vary profoundly, and the illness leads to profound health concerns. Accordingly, the most practical health improvement plan is the one that focuses on addressing the problem multi-dimensionally. The proposed health improvement is creating informed communities that understand the basics of obesity prevention, including nutritional intervention, increased physical activity, and cognitive behavior therapy. The first part of the plan is providing people [obese and non-obese] with health education materials when they visit health care facilities. The second part is an intensified health campaign through mainstream and social media.

On nutritional intervention, the main target populace is children. Parents should be sensitized about the dangers of excessively feeding children with high-energy diets rich in sugars and saturated fats. In this context, the objective is to reduce the intake of fatty and high-energy content food and prioritize healthy eating, such as taking food rich in micronutrients and polyunsaturated fats. Increased physical activities should be part of the plan, considering that many Americans, including Hispanics, understand the need for physical exercises but developing a comprehensive plan is challenging (Gray et al., 2018). The populace should be educated on how to develop physical activity plans according to ages and health needs. The other important component of the plan is cognitive-behavioral therapy. Behavior change is essential, particularly in helping people avoid sedentary living, such as spending too much time watching television and playing video games.

Value and Relevance of Evidence

Different populations face different health problems, and it is crucial to use data as the basis of evidence-based interventions. A multidimensional problem with profound effects such as obesity requires an in-depth review before recommending a lasting solution. As a result, it is vital to examine all the available evidence to understand the problem from different perspectives. In this context, it would be challenging to understand the severity of obesity among Hispanics without evaluating the demographic data. Impacts on health cannot be understood without examining epidemiological evidence. In the same case, major causes cannot be understood without assessing obesity’s connection with the environment. Evaluating evidence from different perspectives enables health care providers to develop comprehensive plans that focus on all the necessary areas.

Criteria for Evaluating Population Health Improvement Outcomes

Population health improvement plans spend many health care organizations, community, and public health resources to deliver the desired outcomes. Accordingly, it is vital to evaluate whether they deliver the desired results progressively and in a summative way. Fry et al. (2018) postulated that plan evaluations could be process-based or outcome-based, which applies to the current plan. The process evaluation answers questions related to how the population receives the plan, factors affecting the implementation, and its satisfaction levels. The outcome evaluation involves asking questions such as whether the program outcomes have been achieved. In this situation, it is more about answering whether the program has any significance on the population facing the greatest inequalities (Hispanics).

Communication with Colleagues and Community Members

Communication is a critical success factor when developing health intervention plans. Colleagues should understand each other in detail, and any unclear area clarified to avoid conflicts. When interacting with community members, language barriers are likely to hamper the communication process. Bias is also possible depending on how people view others stereotypically. To enhance ethical, culturally sensitive, and inclusive communication, it is vital to avoid communication bias. Cultures and other elements unique to a community, such as values and religious beliefs should be respected. At all times, communication should be centered on assumptions, and all community members should be given a fair chance to be heard and concerns addressed appropriately.

In conclusion, illnesses inhibit social and economic growth and reduce people’s productivity significantly. For a long time, the severity of obesity has been a concern, and its increasing rates are worrying. A health improvement plan focusing on affected communities can improve outcomes. The community of interest in this plan is Hispanics. Being the most affected community, as the CDC report shows, the plan’s priority areas include dietary interventions, increased physical exercise, and cognitive-behavioral therapy. Creating an informed population will make it change its unhealthy behaviors and live healthily.

References

CDC. (2021, Feb 11). Adult obesity facts. https://www.cdc.gov/obesity/data/adult.html#:~:text=The%20prevalence%20of%20obesity%20was%2040.0%25%20among%20adults%20aged%2020,adults%20aged%2060%20and%20older.

Fry, C. E., Nikpay, S. S., Leslie, E., & Buntin, M. B. (2018). Evaluating community-based health improvement programs. Health Affairs37(1), 22-29. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.2017.1125

Gray, C. L., Messer, L. C., Rappazzo, K. M., Jagai, J. S., Grabich, S. C., & Lobdell, D. T. (2018). The association between physical inactivity and obesity is modified by five domains of environmental quality in US adults: A cross-sectional study. PloS one13(8), e0203301. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203301

Ha, H., Han, C., & Kim, B. (2017). Can obesity cause depression? A pseudo-panel analysis. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health = Yebang Uihakhoe chi50(4), 262–267. https://doi.org/10.3961/jpmph.17.067

Webster, E. K., Logan, S. W., Gray, W. N., & Robinson, L. E. (2018). A cross-sectional study on the relationship between the risk of hypertension and obesity status among pre-adolescent girls from rural areas of Southeastern region of the United States. Preventive Medicine Reports12, 135–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pmedr.2018.09.006