coursework-banner

Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan

NURS 6053 Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan

Walden University Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan– Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan  

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan   

 

The introduction for the Walden University  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan   

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan   

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan  

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

Sample Answer for Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan

qHealth care organizations have varying types of employees based on race, gender, beliefs and age.

qChange in the healthcare working environment need to be effective in solving incivility at the organization.

Like many other workplaces, healthcare organizations have employees diverse in races, genders, ages, and beliefs, among other factors. Such variations affect their everyday work and their relationship with colleagues and leaders. Leadership approaches and problem-solving strategies also determine the workplace climate. It can be civil or uncivil. To enhance productivity, a detailed diagnosis of the workplace environment is essential. Such a diagnosis assesses the civility level and causes of incivility. The results help nurse leaders and other involved stakeholders to implement appropriate interventions. The purpose of this paper is to describe my workplace environment assessment results, a concept related to the assessment, and appropriate strategies from literature for addressing shortcomings.

qWorkplace environment assessment results shows that my workplace is moderately healthy.

qThe scores ranges between 3 and 4 giving a total of 87 implying that civility is still and issue at my organization.

Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory is an effective tool for assessing the workplace climate as far as civility is concerned. The Clark

Assignment Change Implementation and Management Plan
Assignment Change Implementation and Management Plan

Healthy Workplace Inventory scores revealed that my workplace is moderately healthy. Generally, most of the scores ranged between 3 and 4, giving a total of 87. Oppel et al. (2019) emphasized the need for teamwork and collaboration in the workplace as critical components of civility. However, several areas require massive improvement, with the increased level of confusion among workers regarding their expectations leading in the areas that need to be addressed. The confusion stems from poor and unclear communication from team leaders.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan

qThe workers would be informed about the impending changes.

qThe implementation team would use the opinions of workers to design commence change

qThe team would examine the effect of the change on patient care after one month of implementation.

The healthcare workers would be sensitized about the impending changes taking place at the organization. This stage would effectively collect the views and perceptions of the workers on this change. The information collected from these workers would effectively design the implementation plan and meet the schedule. This transformation would aim to increase the quality-of-service delivery by promoting coloration among employees.

qIncivility affects many healthcare working condition.

qIt reduces the collaboration between health care workers.

qImplementing employee mentorship programs are crucial in promoting engagement and communication.

Regarding what the assessment results suggest about the health of my workplace, a score of 87 indicates that the working environment is not civil. Although the scores show a moderately healthy environment, poor communication between supervisors and practitioners is prevalent. Communication problems reveal a relationship gap undermining civility in the organization. I have experienced several instances of communication breakdown, suggesting the need for addressing this area adequately. For instance, there was a time when our supervisor did not give comprehensive directions regarding how nurses should conduct ward rounds and who to cover specific shifts.

qThe proposed changes will include all workers in the health care unit.

qThe management, employees and health care providers would affect the change by accepting it in the health care unit.

The stakeholder that would affect the change includes employees and the executive at the company. While it is sometimes defined as a soft side of change, managing the people side of the transformation often becomes the most challenging and critical issue in the healthcare setting. This kind of change in the health care environment at the organization should have minimal effect on employees and stakeholders in the institution. Communication gaps, workplace incivility, and other issues detrimental to patient care have been explored from various dimensions in health care research. Clark (2019) primarily focuses on the attributes of civility in healthcare settings for nurses, and the roles leaders play in fostering civil behavior within the organization. The article illustrates the connection between effective leadership and a civil workplace

qAll workers will receive an email on the proposed change and their assigned role in the change process.

q Employee resistance is likely risk and the change management team would ensure effective training of all employees on the new changes.

Besides the PEAK and self-reflection concept, Clark (2019) suggests the need for servant leadership in promoting communication and engagement as critical tools for a civil working environment. From a practice viewpoint, servant leadership is characterized by sharing knowledge and power and commitment to creating environments that promote employee’s growth. Nurse leaders usually shelve their desires to better their followers (Maglione & Neville, 2021). It is among the dominant leadership styles for empowering nurses and improving communication.

qThe workplace environment incivility affects employees that adversely affect patient care.

q It should be avoided by all means possible.

q As a result, organizations should be committed to addressing the work environment by improving the employees’ satisfaction and automating their systems.

The healthcare organization deals with a high rate of patient readmission. The high rate of readmission within 30 days after the patient has been discharged indicates poor management of patients during transition stage. A key goals of the healthcare organization is to ensure that there is no readmission of patients discharged. Readmission means more cost for the patient and poor health outcomes. As a nurse, it indicates the need to effectively manage the conditions that lead to increased readmission.

The change process seeks to address the high readmission rate among the patients. The healthcare organization has to deal with the financial penalties imposed due to the high readmission rate. In addition, the patients have to deal with a high cost of care. The proposed change seeks to ensure that there is better adherence to the treatment plan. Many patients fail to adhere to the treatment plan when they transition from the hospital to home. Failure to take medication means that the recovery process will be delayed. The change will involve all nurses who will be tasked with providing the patients’ education as they transition from the care facility to home.

The need to make improvements in the current discharge process is an indication that the type of change being implemented is developmental change. The change seeks to make adjustments to the process of discharging patients from the hospital facility. There is a need to have more involvement of nurses in the discharge process and the post-discharge stage.

The management team will consist of three nurse leaders, finance manager, project manager, operation manager, and human resource department members. The team will be assigned different functions intended to make the intervention successful. The nurse leaders will communicate the change and guide the rest of the nurses to adjust to the enacted changes. Also, the patients will have to be educated before discharge to ensure adherence to the treatment plan.

Emails and newsletters will be used to communicate the change process to the stakeholders. Use of emails will detail to the stakeholders their role and what is expected as a result of the change process. The stakeholders will also have a two-way communication where they can inquire and seek clarification regarding the change process.

Various strategies will be implemented to eliminate the occurrence of risk when implementing the change process. The occurrence of risks that increase the cost of implementing the change will be eliminated by going over on the budget. The excessive budgetary allocation will cover incidences involving increased costs when implementing the change process. In addition, working with deadlines will ensure that the risks of being behind schedule are reduced.

Sample Answer 2 for Assignment: Change Implementation and Management Plan

INTRODUCTION

Like many other workplaces, healthcare organizations have employees diverse in races, genders, ages, and beliefs, among other factors. Such variations affect their everyday work and their relationship with colleagues and leaders. Leadership approaches and problem-solving strategies also determine the workplace climate. It can be civil or uncivil. To enhance productivity, a detailed diagnosis of the workplace environment is essential. Such a diagnosis assesses the civility level and causes of incivility. The results help nurse leaders and other involved stakeholders to implement appropriate interventions. The purpose of this paper is to describe my workplace environment assessment results, a concept related to the assessment, and appropriate strategies from literature for addressing shortcomings.

Issues Affecting the Workplace

Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory is an effective tool for assessing the workplace climate as far as civility is concerned. The Clark Healthy Workplace Inventory scores revealed that my workplace is moderately healthy. Generally, most of the scores ranged between 3 and 4, giving a total of 87. Oppel et al. (2019) emphasized the need for teamwork and collaboration in the workplace as critical components of civility. However, several areas require massive improvement, with the increased level of confusion among workers regarding their expectations leading in the areas that need to be addressed. The confusion stems from poor and unclear communication from team leaders.

Change Process

The healthcare workers would be sensitized about the impending changes taking place at the organization. This stage would effectively collect the views and perceptions of the workers on this change. The information collected from these workers would effectively design the implementation plan and meet the schedule. This transformation would aim to increase the quality-of-service delivery by promoting coloration among employees.

Justification for Change

Regarding what the assessment results suggest about the health of my workplace, a score of 87 indicates that the working environment is not civil. Although the scores show a moderately healthy environment, poor communication between supervisors and practitioners is prevalent. Communication problems reveal a relationship gap undermining civility in the organization. I have experienced several instances of communication breakdown, suggesting the need for addressing this area adequately. For instance, there was a time when our supervisor did not give comprehensive directions regarding how nurses should conduct ward rounds and who to cover specific shifts.

Scope and Change Management Team

The stakeholder that would affect the change includes employees and the executive at the company. While it is sometimes defined as a soft side of change, managing the people side of the transformation often becomes the most challenging and critical issue in the healthcare setting. This kind of change in the health care environment at the organization should have minimal effect on employees and stakeholders in the institution. Communication gaps, workplace incivility, and other issues detrimental to patient care have been explored from various dimensions in health care research. Clark (2019) primarily focuses on the attributes of civility in healthcare settings for nurses, and the roles leaders play in fostering civil behavior within the organization. The article illustrates the connection between effective leadership and a civil workplace

Communication and Risk Mitigation Plan

Besides the PEAK and self-reflection concept, Clark (2019) suggests the need for servant leadership in promoting communication and engagement as critical tools for a civil working environment. From a practice viewpoint, servant leadership is characterized by sharing knowledge and power and commitment to creating environments that promote employee’s growth. Nurse leaders usually shelve their desires to better their followers (Maglione & Neville, 2021). It is among the dominant leadership styles for empowering nurses and improving communication.

REFERENCES

Borkowski, N., & Meese, K. A. (2021). Organizational behavior, theory, and design in health care. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Chakravorty, I. (2019). Incivility in healthcare. Sushruta Journal of Health Policy & Opinion12(1), 17-19. https://doi.org/10.38192/12.1.9

Clark, C. M. (2019). Fostering a culture of civility and respect in nursing. Journal of Nursing Regulation10(1), 44-52. https://doi.org/10.1016/S2155-8256(19)30082-1

Clark, C. M., & Ritter, K. (2018). Policy to foster civility and support a healthy academic work environment. Journal of Nursing Education57(6), 325-331. https://doi.org/10.3928/01484834-20180522-02

Kwame, A., & Petrucka, P. M. (2020). Communication in nurse-patient interaction in healthcare settings in sub-Saharan Africa: A scoping review. International Journal of Africa Nursing Sciences12, 100198. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijans.2020.100198

Maassen, S. M., van Oostveen, C., Vermeulen, H., & Weggelaar, A. M. (2021). Defining a positive work environment for hospital healthcare professionals: A Delphi study. Plos One16(2), e0247530. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0247530

Maglione, J. L., & Neville, K. (2021). Servant leadership and spirituality among undergraduate and graduate nursing students. Journal of Religion and Health60(6), 4435–4450. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-021-01311-9

Oppel, E. M., Mohr, D. C., & Benzer, J. K. (2019). Let’s be civil: Elaborating the link between civility climate and hospital performance. Health Care Management Review44(3), 196-205. https://doi.org/10.1097/HMR.0000000000000178.

It is one of the most cliché of clichés, but it nevertheless rings true: The only constant is change. As a nursing professional, you are no doubt aware that success in the healthcare field requires the ability to adapt to change, as the pace of change in healthcare may be without rival.

As a professional, you will be called upon to share expertise, inform, educate, and advocate. Your efforts in these areas can help lead others through change. In this Assignment, you will propose a change within your organization and present a comprehensive plan to implement the change you propose.

Resources

Be sure to review the Learning Resources before completing this activity.
Click the weekly resources link to access the resources.

WEEKLY RESOURCES

To Prepare:

  • Review the Resources and identify one change that you believe is called for in your organization/workplace.
    • This may be a change necessary to effectively address one or more of the issues you addressed in the Workplace Environment Assessment you submitted in Module 4. It may also be a change in response to something not addressed in your previous efforts. It may be beneficial to discuss your ideas with your organizational leadership and/or colleagues to help identify and vet these ideas.
  • Reflect on how you might implement this change and how you might communicate this change to organizational leadership.

The Assignment (5-6-minute narrated PowerPoint presentation):

Change Implementation and Management Plan

Create a 5- or 6-slide narrated PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose.

Your narrated presentation should be 5–6 minutes in length.

Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:

  • An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (This can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment previously submitted, if relevant.)
  • A description of the change being proposed
  • Justifications for the change, including why addressing it will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace
  • Details about the type and scope of the proposed change
  • Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the change
  • Identification of a change management team (by title/role)
  • A plan for communicating the change you propose
  • A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the change you propose

Alternate Submission Method

You may also use Kaltura Personal Capture to record your narrated PowerPoint. This option will require you to create your PowerPoint slides first. Then, follow the Personal Capture instructions outlined on the Kaltura Media Uploader

Rubric

NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
NURS_6053_Module05_Week11_Assignment_Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

Create a 5- or 6-slide PowerPoint that presents a comprehensive plan to implement changes you propose. Your Change Implementation and Management Plan should include the following:· An executive summary of the issues that are currently affecting your organization/workplace (this can include the work you completed in your Workplace Environment Assessment).· A description of the changes being proposed.· Justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on your organization/workplace.

40 to >35.0 pts

Excellent
The narrated presentation accurately and completely presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. … The narrated presentation accurately and clearly describes the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and clearly provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

35 to >31.0 pts

Good
The narrated presentation adequately presents a comprehensive plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation adequately describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. … The narrated presentation adequately describes the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation adequately provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

31 to >27.0 pts

Fair
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, or incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary. … The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely describes the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation inaccurately or vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization.

27 to >0 pts

Poor
The narrated presentation vaguely, inaccurately, and incompletely presents a plan to implement proposed changes. … The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the issues currently affecting the organization in an executive summary or executive summary is missing. … The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely describes the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. … The narrated presentation inaccurately and vaguely provides justifications for the changes, including why addressing them will have a positive impact on the organization or justifications are missing.
40 pts

· Details about the type and scope of the proposed changes.· Identification of the stakeholders impacted by the changes.· Identification of a change management team (by title/role).· A plan for communicating the changes you propose.· A description of risk mitigation plans you would recommend to address the risks anticipated by the changes you propose.

30 to >26.0 pts

Excellent
The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly details the type and scope of the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and clearly identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. … The narrated presentation accurately and completely identifies a change management team by title/ role. … The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. … The narrated presentation accurately and thoroughly describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

26 to >23.0 pts

Good
The narrated presentation adequately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation adequately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. … The narrated presentation adequately identifies a change management team by title/ role. … The narrated presentation adequately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. … The narrated presentation adequately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

23 to >20.0 pts

Fair
The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed. … The narrated presentation vaguely or inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed.

20 to >0 pts

Poor
The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately details the type and scope of the proposed changes or proposed changes are missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies the stakeholders impacted by the changes or stakeholders are missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately identifies a change management team by title/ role or change management team is missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately proposes a detailed plan for communicating the changes proposed or communication plan is missing. … The narrated presentation vaguely and inaccurately describes recommended risk mitigation plans that address the risks anticipated by the changes proposed or recommendations are missing.
30 pts

Resource Synthesis

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 2 or 3 course-specific resources. … PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Using proper in-text citations, the response fully integrates at least 2 outside resources and 1 course-specific resource. … PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Using proper in-text citations, the response minimally integrates outside and course-specific resources. … PowerPoint presentation includes references slide.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
The response does not integrate outside and course-specific resources or no in-text citations are used. … References slide is incomplete or missing.
5 pts

Presentation Narration

10 to >0.0 pts

Excellent
Narration is present.

0 pts

Fair

0 pts

Good

0 pts

Poor
Narration is missing.
10 pts

PowerPoint Presentation: The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

10 to >8.0 pts

Excellent
The presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

8 to >7.0 pts

Good
Eighty percent of the presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

7 to >6.0 pts

Fair
Sixty to seventy nine percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.

6 to >0 pts

Poor
Less than sixty percent of the presentation follows these guidelines: presentation is professional; images are appropriately attributed; images are clear. The presentation text is readable. Presentation flows well and is presented in a logical order.
10 pts

Written Expression and Formatting—English Writing Standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation.

5 to >4.0 pts

Excellent
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors.

4 to >3.0 pts

Good
Contains a few (one or two) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

3 to >2.0 pts

Fair
Contains several (three or four) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors.

2 to >0 pts

Poor
Contains many (five or more) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding.
5 pts
Total Points: 100