Assignment: Levels of Clinical Inquiry
Assignment: Levels of Clinical Inquiry
Question Description
Assignment: Evidence-Based Project, Part 3: Advanced Levels of Clinical Inquiry and Systematic Reviews
Your search for a new car begins with identifying the factors that are important to you. You collect evidence and try to understand the extent of that evidence as you search for cars that score high on those factors. A report indicating that a specific make and model of automobile has a high mileage is encouraging. But who wrote the report? How reliable is it? What method was used to collect the data, and what was the sample size?
You will delve deeper into clinical inquiry in this Assignment by closely examining your PICO(T) question. You also begin to examine the evidence you’ve gathered.
To Get Ready:
Examine the Resources and identify a clinical issue of interest that could serve as the basis for a clinical investigation.
To address the clinical issue of interest for the Assignment, create a PICO(T) question.
Search at least four different databases in the Walden Library using the key words from your PICO(T) question. Identify at least four relevant systematic reviews or other filtered high-level evidence sources, such as meta-analyses, critically acclaimed topics (evidence syntheses), and critically acclaimed individual articles (article synopses). Because the evidence may not address all of the elements of your PICO(T) question, choose the most important concepts to search for and find the best evidence available.
Consider the process of developing a PICO(T) question and locating peer-reviewed research.
The Challenge (Evidence-Based Project)
Part 3: Advanced Clinical Inquiry Levels and Systematic Reviews
Make a 6- to 7-slide PowerPoint presentation that includes the following:
Determine and briefly describe your clinical issue of interest.
Describe how you created a PICO(T) question about your clinical issue of interest.
Identify the four research databases that you used to find the peer-reviewed articles you chose.
Please provide APA citations for the four peer-reviewed articles you chose.
Describe the levels of evidence in each of the four peer-reviewed articles you chose, as well as the benefits of using systematic reviews in clinical research. Be specific and provide examples.
Submit Part 3 of your Evidence-Based Project by Day 7 of Week 5.
INFORMATION ON SUBMISSION AND GRADING
Do the following to submit your completed Assignment for review and grading:
Please save your Assignment with the name “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the extension.
To review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment, click the Week 5 Assignment Rubric.
Select the Week 5 Assignment option. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for this area’s grading criteria.
Then, in the Attach File section, click the Browse My Computer button. Open the document you saved as “WK5Assgn+last name+first initial. (extension)”.
If appropriate: Click the checkbox next to I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database in the Plagiarism Tools section.
To finish your submission, click the Submit button.
Criteria for Evaluation
To view your rubric, go to Week 5 Assignment Rubric.
You should proofread your paper. However, do not rely solely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part, and your grade will suffer as a result. Papers with a high number of misspelled words and grammatical errors will be penalized. Before submitting your paper, go over it in silence and then aloud, and make any necessary changes. It is often beneficial to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Uncorrected mistakes are preferable to handwritten corrections.
Use a standard 10 to 12 point typeface (10 to 12 characters per inch). Smaller or compressed type, as well as papers with narrow margins or single spacing, are difficult to read. It is preferable to allow your essay to exceed the recommended number of pages rather than attempting to compress it into fewer pages.
Large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are also unacceptable, waste trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced, and have a one-inch margin on all four sides of each page. When submitting hard copies, use white paper and print with dark ink. It will be difficult to follow your argument if it is difficult to read your essay.
-Order nursing papers written by our nursing assignment gurus for an A++ nursing paper.