NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework Or Model For Change Essay

NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.

Sample Answer for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

The success of health organizations in the modern world relies largely on the implementation of transformative initiatives. Depending on the nature of an identified clinical problem or issue, particular interventions can be used to help solve the problems or reduce their occurrence rates. In most cases, the initiatives are implemented in the form of change initiatives (Nilsen et al.,2020). The changes aim at streamlining the existing systems and processes in an organization. Such initiatives can be driven by frameworks that offer a ground for implementation. Change models guide the strategies adopted in the change process. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore a change that will be utilized in the project, its steps, and how they will be applied.

The Selected Model

The selected model that will guide the implementation of the evidence-based practice project is Kurt Lewin’s model of change. Lewin’s model is a psychological theory that organizations utilize to guide the change process. Lewin developed the model in the 1950s for use by leaders and managers to understand the process of change in the organization and influencing factors. According to him, management and leadership should engage in a range of activities for the change process to be successful. They include activity and commitment planning and the transformation of the existing organization’s structures (Wilson, 2019).

Lewin’s theory of change is applicable to my project because it entails behavioral change. The adopters of the proposed change should embrace behaviors that align with the change for its success. The model supports the implementation of change based on best practices. The focus on creating an enabling environment and preparing the adopters minimizes the potential of change failure, hence, the use of best practices in the process (Hidayat et al., 2020; Wilson, 2019). Therefore, its application to the proposed evidence-based practice is anticipated to yield sustainable outcomes.

NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark Evidence Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

Stages of the Model and their Application

Kurt Lewin proposed that change occurs in three steps. They include unfreezing, change, and refreezing. The change process must occur in these steps for it to be a success in an organization. Unfreezing is the first step of the change process in the model. It is characterized by preparing the adopters for the change process (Hussain et al.,2018). The change management team makes stakeholders understand the need for change by referring to the statistics of an increased rate of patient falls among hospitalized patients, which have been high. Such a step will be key in preparing every stakeholder for an impending change to help address the increased rates of patient falls. Effective communication is crucial in this stage to motivate the adopters to begin thinking and acting in ways that support the change (Harrison et al., 2021). Open communication will be encouraged to enable them to express their views and concerns about the change.

Change or transition is the second step in Lewin’s model of change. The targets of change have accepted the change in this phase and start embracing new ways of doing things. It is characterized by the implementation of change for the achievement of the set outcomes. Change management teams employ strategies such as open communication, teamwork, active involvement, coaching, mentorship, and providing feedback in this stage to ensure successful change implementation. Training is also offered to ensure the implementers have the desired competencies to support the change (Campbell et al., 2020; Wilson, 2019). This step of change is applicable to the proposed evidence-based practice project. At this point, the proposed intervention of automated fall detectors is implemented to help address the fall problem. The stakeholders are actively involved in the change process to promote their empowerment and project ownership. Feedback will be provided to ensure the elimination of potential threats to the change process.

The third step in the change model is refreezing. Stabilization of the desired change behaviors occurs in this step. The new intervention is accepted in the organization as part of the routine and the organization’s culture. The stakeholders become actively involved in identifying best practices that can sustain improved performance in the organization. Strategies such as rewarding performance, regular reviews and giving feedback, and establishing supportive policies and structures are crucial in this step (Hidayat et al., 2020; Teguh et al., 2019). The refreezing step is applicable to the proposed change. The adopters of change will have incorporated the desired behaviors into their routines. The use of automated fall detectors is accepted in the organization as part of the routine and the organization’s culture. As a result, rewards, positive reinforcements, and aligning the change with their daily routines will be encouraged for sustained change.

Conclusion

Change frameworks or models are important in implementing proposed change in the healthcare environment. Such models provide frameworks upon which the stages of proposed change can be implemented. The proposed change model for the project is Lewin’s model of change. The model will facilitate sustained change in the organization. The theory proposed change to occur in steps that include unfreezing, change, and refreezing. These steps are applicable to the proposed evidence-based practice project. Strategies to sustain positive outcomes with the change will be explored.

References

Campbell, A. R., Layne, D., Scott, E., & Wei, H. (2020). Interventions to promote teamwork, delegation and communication among registered nurses and nursing assistants: An integrative review. Journal of Nursing Management, 28(7), 1465–1472. https://doi.org/10.1111/jonm.13083

Harrison, R., Fischer, S., Walpola, R. L., Chauhan, A., Babalola, T., Mears, S., & Le-Dao, H. (2021). Where Do Models for Change Management, Improvement and Implementation Meet? A Systematic Review of the Applications of Change Management Models in Healthcare. Journal of Healthcare Leadership, 13, 85–108. https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S289176

Hidayat, A. T., Hariyati, R. T. S. H. S., & Muhaeriwati, T. M. (2020). Applicability of Lewin’s Change Management Model for Optimization Management Function in Nursing Delegation between Head Nurse and Team Leader: A Mini Project in Jakarta Military Hospital. International Journal of Nursing and Health Services (IJNHS), 3(4), 471-478.https://doi.org/10.35654/ijnhs.v2i2.136

Hussain, S. T., Lei, S., Akram, T., Haider, M. J., Hussain, S. H., & Ali, M. (2018). Kurt Lewin’s change model: A critical review of the role of leadership and employee involvement in organizational change. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 3(3), 123-127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2016.07.002

Nilsen, P., Seing, I., Ericsson, C., Birken, S. A., & Schildmeijer, K. (2020). Characteristics of successful changes in health care organizations: an interview study with physicians, registered nurses, and assistant nurses. BMC Health Services Research, 20, 1-8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-020-4999-8

Wilson, F. (2019). Impact of a Change in the Assistant Nurse Manager Model on Satisfaction and Work Engagement. DNP Projects. https://uknowledge.uky.edu/dnp_etds/279

Assessment Description

Applying a model or framework for change ensures that a process is in place to guide the efforts for change. In 500-750 words, discuss the model or framework you will use to implement your evidence-based practice proposal project. You will use the model or framework you select in the Topic 8 assignment, during which you will synthesize the various aspects of your project into a final paper detailing your evidence-based practice project proposal.

The trans-theoretical model of behavioral change will be utilized in the project. DiClemente and Prochaska developed the trans-theoretical model in the 1970s following their examination of the ways in which smokers quit smoking and the factors that influenced the process. The model examines the decision-making by individuals to embrace change and behaviors that are needed to influence the process. The trans-theoretical model recognizes the fact that behavioral change is a cyclical process. Individuals embrace change through a series of steps that will determine the sustainability of change. The trans-theoretical model is applicable to the proposed project because it provides insights into the determinants of change. It also enables the determination of success of the strategies implemented at each stage of the project (Cavaiola & Smith, 2020). Lastly, it provides step-wise approach to implementing and determining the level of adoption of change in an organization.

Include the following:

Identify the selected model or framework for change and discuss its relevance to your project.
Discuss each of the stages in the change model/framework.
Describe how you would apply each stage of the model or theoretical framework in your proposed implementation.
Create a concept map for the conceptual model or framework you selected to illustrate how it will be applied to your project. Attach this as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Refer to the “Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal – Assignment Overview” document for an overview of the evidence-based practice project proposal assignments.

You are required to cite minimum of four peer-reviewed sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

Complete the “APA Writing Checklist” to ensure that your paper adheres to APA style and formatting criteria and general guidelines for academic writing. Include the completed checklist as an appendix at the end of your paper.

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

Benchmark Information

This benchmark assignment assesses the following programmatic competencies:

MBA-MSN; MSN-Nursing Education; MSN Acute Care Nurse Practitioner-Adult-Gerontology; MSN Family Nurse Practitioner; MSN-Health Informatics; MSN-Health Care Quality and Patient Safety; MSN-Leadership in Health Care Systems; MSN-Public Health Nursing

1.2 Apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level.

Resources

Collapse All

Guidelines and Measures

Study “Guidelines and Measures,” located on the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality website.

https://www.ahrq.gov/gam/index.html

Study Designs

Review “Study Designs,” located on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website.

https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/study-designs

Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence

Read “Evidence Based Medicine: Levels of Evidence,” by the University of Illinois/Chicago’s Library of the Health Sciences at Peo

Nursing Best Practice Guidelines

Investigate the Nursing Best Practice Guidelines page of the Registered Nurses Association of Ontario (RNAO) website.

http://www.rnao.org/Page.asp?PageID=861&SiteNodeID=133

Use of Evidence-Based Practice Models and Research Findings in Magnet-Designed Hospitals Across the United States: National Survey Results

Read “Use of Evidence-Based Practice Models and Research Findings in Magnet-Designed Hospitals Across the United States: National Sur

Updating the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice

Read “Updating the Stetler Model of Research Utilization to Facilitate Evidence-Based Practice,” by Stetler, by Nursing Outlo

A Test of the ARCC Model Improves Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Culture, and Patient Outcomes

Read “A Test of the ARCC Model Improves Implementation of Evidence-Based Practice, Healthcare Culture, and Patient Outcomes,” by

Critical Appraisal Tools

Read “Critical Appraisal Tools,” located on the Centre for Evidence Based Medicine (CEBM) website.

https://www.cebm.ox.ac.uk/resources/ebm-tools/critical-appraisal-tools

Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare : A Guide to Best Practice

Read Chapter 14 and review Chapter15 in Evidence-Based Practice in Nursing and Healthcare: A Guide to Best Practice.

View Resource

Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession

Read Chapter 6 in Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession.

View Resource

Worksheet for Using Practice Guidelines

Study “Worksheet for Using Practice Guidelines,” from the “Evidence Based Medicine Toolkit,” by Buckingham, Fisher, and S

Star Model

Explore the Star Model resources, located on the UT Health San Antonio School of Nursing website.

https://www.uthscsa.edu/academics/nursing/star-model

Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation

Read “Iowa Model of Evidence-Based Practice: Revisions and Validation,” by Buckwalter et al., from Worldviews on Evidence-Bas

https://lopes.idm.oclc.org/log

Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project: Framework or Model for Change – Rubric

Collapse All

Selected Model or Framework for Change

12 points

Criteria Description

Selected Model or Framework for Change

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

Sample Answer 2 for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

The evidence-based practice (EBP) process results from integration of existing research, clinical expertise, and patient preferences aimed at customizing care and promoting effective care decision-making (Cullen et al., 2020). As such, the use of effective frameworks or models for change in the EBP allows change implementers to use appropriate models to guide the process to attain the expected outcomes. These models are critical in ensuring that all stakeholders accept changes so that there is minimal or no resistance (Amit-Aharon et al., 2020). Nurses as the core implementers of change require enough knowledge and participation to comprehend different components of the proposed change aimed at reducing falls among adult-hospitalized patients in medical-surgical unit through the use of TIPS toolkit as a bundled care approach. The purpose of this paper is to select and describe an evidence-based practice framework or model for change in implementing the mentioned intervention in clinical settings to reduce falls and their adverse effects.

Selected Model or Framework for Change

Organizations implementing EBP change interventions should adopt models that best fit their situations, align with the quality improvement goals and address priority clinical issues as well as guide a systematic and evaluative approach to enhancing collaboration in practice change (Melnyk et al., 2022). The selected model for this change process is the Iowa evidence-based practice to promote quality care (IEBPPQC). The Iowa model is appropriate for this project because it continues to be reviewed to better address sustainability of the EBP, enhance inter-professional change implementation and patient-centered care for clinicians and advanced practice registered nurses (APRNs), guiding them through a team-based and multiple process.

Stages of the Iowa EBP Model

The Iowa model is one of the most popular approaches in addressing and implementing changes to improve quality and patient outcomes. The model has seven essential stages or steps. These include identification of a problem-based trigger or knowledge-focused issue that generate the need for change in practice, determining if the issue is a priority for the healthcare organization, and analyzing the interest of the organizational team and stakeholders which entails searching for, appraising, and synthesizing literature associated with the issue (DeNisco, 2019). The fourth stage is to evaluate the availability and merit of evidence which implies understanding the level of evidence and its quality. The fifth step in the Iowa model is to pilot practice change based on the credibility and reliability of the available evidence. The pilot change intervention aims at assessing the level of impact that such practice will have on the organization, patients, and other stakeholders.

The sixth step is to evaluate the results of the pilot practice intervention to ascertain if the organization should or should not implement the practice change. The seventh step is to disseminate the change across the department if it is feasible and can result in significant benefits to the different stakeholders. After introducing the change, it is essential for stakeholders to continue monitoring, evaluating and analyzing the results while making necessary alterations to attain the expected outcomes.

Application of Each Stage of the Iowa Model

The Iowa EBP model is easy to use for the current issue of preventing and reducing falls among hospitalized adults in medical-surgical unit. The initial step in this case is to identify the need for change. The use of TIPS toolkit means that the stakeholders, especially nurses have identified falls as a trigger problem that reduces the quality of care because of its adverse effects on patients. Secondly, reducing and prevention of falls is a healthcare organization priority. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) considers patient falls as never events and does not compensate organizations for expenses and costs associated with the issue (DeNisco, 2019). As such, reducing and preventing falls is a priority for the organization to improve the quality of care it offers to patients and enhancing their overall safety.

The change team’s topic of interest on falls’ prevention through the TIPS toolkit is essential for the organization. In this case, team comprises of different stakeholders interested in developing, evaluating and implementing changes to improve patient safety because of their increased susceptibility to falls due to their condition. The EBP team in this case, comprises of different players, from physicians to nurses and physiotherapists as well as quality assurance experts to ensure that the proposed EBP intervention attains its set goals based on the PICOT framework. The next step for the team is to gather and analyze research associated to the desired practice change (Melnyk et al., 2022). As demonstrated through literature review and synthesis, sufficient evidence exists to support the use of fall TIPS toolkit to reduce and prevent falls in medical-surgical units among adult patients. The research illustrates that different facilities use the TIPS toolkit in their efforts to prevent and reduce falls.

The next aspect of the project will be to implement a pilot change practice based on the availability of not just reliable but also credible evidence (Duff et al., 2020). Based on the results from the pilot intervention, the team will appraise the outcomes before rolling out the entire change practice initiative to reduce falls and disseminate the process to nurses in the unit. As such, the intervention would become part of the routine process and culture in its quality improvement initiatives to attain better patient outcomes.

Conclusion

The use of an appropriate EBP model is essential for change implementation teams to achieve the desired changes in quality care improvement. The Iowa change model remains one of the most popular and easy to use frameworks to implement EBP interventions in healthcare organizations. As illustrated, this model is appropriate for the identified health issue of patient falls among adult patients in medical-surgical units as it will help the change team achieve desired outcomes.

References

Amit-Aharon, A., Melnikov, S., & Warshawski, S. (2020). The effect of evidence-based practice

perception, information literacy self-efficacy, and academic motivation on nursing students’ future implementation of evidence-based practice. Journal of professional nursing, 36(6), 497-502. DOI: 10.1016/j.profnurs.2020.04.001.

Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., Farrington, M., Anderson, R., Dimmer, E., Miner, R., … & Rod, E.

(2020). Evidence-based practice change champion program improves quality care. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 50(3), 128-134.

DeNisco, S. M. (2019). Advanced Practice Nursing: Essential Knowledge for the Profession:

Essential Knowledge for the Profession. Jones & Bartlett Learning.

Duff, J., Cullen, L., Hanrahan, K., & Steelman, V. (2020). Determinants of an evidence-based

practice environment: an interpretive description. Implementation science communications, 1(1), 1-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s43058-020-00070-0

Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2022). Evidence-based practice in nursing &

healthcare: A guide to best practice. Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Sample Answer 3 for NUR 590 Assignment Benchmark – Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Project Framework or Model for Change Essay

One of the roles played by advanced practice nurses is ensuring that patients are safe in the care environment. The safety and quality measures used in the care environment are more effective when nurses effectively apply and implement them. The implication is that nurses’ mental and physical health should take center stage to enable them to offer the required care (Melnyk et al., 2018). Interventions are used to manage negative factors such as stress among the nurses. Implementing such interventions in most cases requires a change initiation. The implementation of such changes has been shown to be more successful when change models are used since they offer a framework upon which the desired change can be implemented. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to discuss the change model that will be used to guide the project that focuses on reducing stress levels among the nurses using mindfulness-based techniques.

The Selected Model and Relevance

The chosen change model is the Advancing Research and Clinical Practice Through Close Collaboration (ARCC) model. This model majorly entails a system-wise EBP implementation as well as sustenance of the EBP to obtain desired quality outcomes(Melnyk et al.,2017). The model has five major steps, including assessing the organizational readiness and culture, identifying the possible barriers and facilitators of the evidence-based practice process, identification of the EBP mentors. The next phase entails the implementation of the evidence and evaluation of the outcomes. This model is relevant to the proposed project since it allows the change implementation in five distinct and concise phases. The model also offers a framework for identifying possible facilitators and barriers to a proposed change hence improving the chances of the change effort being successful.

The Stages of the Model

As earlier indicated, the ARCC model has five distinct stages of change implementation. The first phase entails the assessment of both organizational readiness for change implementation and culture in the healthcare system. This face requires that the change team find out how well the organizational culture aligns with the proposed change goals and to what extent the organization is ready to accept the implemented change(Melnyk et al.,2017).

The second phase involves the identification of possible barriers and facilitators to the EBP within the organization so that necessary steps are timeously taken to overcome the barriers. The third stage of this major is the identification of the evidence-based practice major mentors. Mentors are key in the progress of change initiation and implementation as they act as guides through the whole process (Gorsuch et al., 2020). Therefore, it is important to accurately identify them and engage them early enough so that they can help in the project. The second last phase entails the implementation of the obtained outcomes and making it one of the organizational practices. The last phase of the model is the evaluation of the outcomes. During this stage, the team finds out the impact of the implemented intervention. The concept map for the model has been included in the appendix.

Application of the Model to the Project

The ARCC model was chosen to guide the implementation of the proposed solution. Therefore the five stages can be used in implementing the change initiative. In the first phase, which entails the assessment of the organizational culture and readiness, there is a plan to assess whether the organization supports the decision to use intervention and if they are ready for it. The organizational readiness for implementation will therefore be assessed in stage one (Fritz & Wilson, 2019). During stage 2, various facilitators and barriers to the change process are identified. This will help to eliminate the barriers and enhance facilitators to increase the chances of success. EBP mentors are key in any change initiative. Therefore they will also be consulted on a need-to-need basis and also help drive the change in the desired direction. During the implementation phase, the mindfulness-based intervention or techniques will be implemented and used to see the impact. Eventually, the project will be evaluated based on the results obtained to find out the efficacy of the intervention.

Conclusion

Change models or frameworks are key when implementing evidence-based practice projects as they give frameworks for implementing the change initiative. In most cases, these models have various stages or phases of implementing the changes and therefore enable change implementation in distinct manageable stages. Therefore, the proposed change model that has been explored in this write up is the ARCC.

References

Fritz, R. L., & Wilson, M. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing. In The Intersection (pp. 1-17). Chandos Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-101282-6.00001-3

Gorsuch, C. R. P. F., Gallagher Ford, L., Koshy Thomas, B., Melnyk, B. M., & Connor, L. (2020). Impact of a formal educational skill‐building program based on the ARCC Model to enhance evidence‐based practice competency in nurse teams. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 17(4), 258-268. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12463

Melnyk, B. M., Fineout‐Overholt, E., Giggleman, M., & Choy, K. (2017). A test of the ARCC© model improves implementation of evidence‐based practice, healthcare culture, and patient outcomes. Worldviews on Evidence‐Based Nursing, 14(1), 5-9. https://doi.org/10.1111/wvn.12188

Melnyk, B. M., Orsolini, L., Tan, A., Arslanian-Engoren, C., Melkus, G. D. E., Dunbar-Jacob, J., … & Lewis, L. M. (2018). A national study links nurses’ physical and mental health to medical errors and perceived worksite wellness. Journal of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 60(2), 126-131. https://doi.org/10.1097/JOM.0000000000001198

5: Excellent

12 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are thoroughly discussed. Rationale or support is provided.

4: Good

11.04 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

3: Satisfactory

10.56 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are incomplete.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

9.6 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are summarized. More information or support is needed.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The selected model or framework and its relevance to the project are not discussed.

Stages for Model or Framework

13 points

Criteria Description

Stages for Model or Framework

5: Excellent

13 points

The stages in the change model or framework are outlined. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed.

4: Good

11.96 points

The stages in the change model or framework are thoroughly discussed.

3: Satisfactory

11.44 points

The stages in the change model or framework are discussed. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

10.4 points

The stages in the change model or framework are not discussed.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

The stages in the change model or framework are only partially discussed.

Application of Model or Framework to Proposed Implementation

15 points

Criteria Description

Application of Model or Framework to Proposed Implementation

5: Excellent

15 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is thoroughly described.

4: Good

13.8 points

General application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is outlined. More information is needed.

3: Satisfactory

13.2 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is described. Some detail is needed for clarity or support.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is incomplete.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Application of each stage of the model or theoretical framework to the proposed implementation is omitted.

Concept Map for Model or Framework

15 points

Criteria Description

Concept Map for Model or Framework

5: Excellent

15 points

A detailed and accurate concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix.

4: Good

13.8 points

A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. Some detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3: Satisfactory

13.2 points

A general concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is attached in the Appendix. There are inaccuracies.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

12 points

The concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is incomplete or inaccurate. The concept map is attached, but not in the Appendix.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

A concept map for the selected conceptual model or framework is omitted.

Application of Theoretical Framework in Decision Making (B)

10 points

Criteria Description

Application of Theoretical Framework in Decision Making (C.1.2)

5: Excellent

10 points

The author has clearly demonstrated the ability to effectively apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level.

4: Good

9.2 points

The ability to apply theoretical frameworks from nursing and other disciplines to make decisions regarding practice and health-related problems at the individual and population level is adequately demonstrated.

3: Satisfactory

8.8 points

2: Less Than Satisfactory

8 points

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Required Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Required Sources

5: Excellent

5 points

Number of required sources is met, but sources are outdated or inappropriate.

4: Good

4.6 points

Number of required resources is met. Sources are current, and appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Number of required sources is met. Sources are current, but not all sources are appropriate for the assignment criteria and nursing content.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Sources are not included.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Number of required sources is only partially met.

Thesis Development and Purpose

7 points

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5: Excellent

7 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

4: Good

6.44 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

3: Satisfactory

6.16 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

5.6 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

8 points

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5: Excellent

8 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4: Good

7.36 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3: Satisfactory

7.04 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

6.4 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5 points

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5: Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4: Good

4.6 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.

3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5 points

Criteria Description

Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5: Excellent

5 points

All format elements are correct.

4: Good

4.6 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

5 points

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5: Excellent

5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4: Good

4.6 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3: Satisfactory

4.4 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2: Less Than Satisfactory

4 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1: Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

APA Writing Checklist

Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.

☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.

☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ Topic is well defined.

☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.

☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.

☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.

☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.

☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.

Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.

Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.

Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.

Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.

Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.

☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.