Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
Grand Canyon University Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
Religion and spirituality are critical factors in the lives of many people seeking medical care as they are part of providing cultural-competent and patient-centered care. Based on the four principles of biomedical ethics that include autonomy, beneficence, non-maleficence, and justice, it is essential for healthcare providers to consider the spiritual and religious concerns and needs of their patients (Sabo, 2021). The purpose of this paper is a case study involving a parent postponing the treatment of his son who has been diagnosed with acute glomerulonephritis (kidney failure). The decisions that the parents make are based on their spiritual and religious grounds but seem medically harmful to the minor. The paper evaluates the situation by a considering a host of factors; from the biomedical ethical principles to Christian perspective on the issue.
Every single one of us, in my view, has value. Humans were created in God’s likeness and are tasked with carrying out God’s plan for the planet. Everything happens for a reason, and I think that God has a purpose for everyone of us, even if we don’t recognize it or comprehend it. Individuals, in my opinion, have the right to make their own decisions. Abortion, in my opinion, may be justified in extreme circumstances, such as when the mother’s life is endangered by pregnancy difficulties or when the pregnancy is the consequence of rape. I believe that when two consenting adults participate in an action that is known to result in pregnancy and that pregnancy occurs, the result should be acknowledged and supported as a matter of principle and duty. My position, on the other hand, cannot supersede an individual’s right to self-determination, therefore I am pro-choice. Because they have an influence on human life, bioethical concerns, abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research are all contentious. The issue is whether these things are good or destructive to God’s creation of human life. I support stem cell research because studies show that this science has the potential to heal or cure a wide range of ailments. When the issue of “designer babies” is discussed in the context of reducing the possibility of birth malformations and disabilities, it looks to be a promising one. On the other side, prospective parents are emotionally and financially committed in this therapy. Because of this investment and medical science’s expanding ability to modify gender and other physical features, we risk enticing people into fantasizing about and attempting to make the “ideal kid”. Therefore, I don’t support” designer babies”.
Allowing Mike to Continue Making Decisions that Seem Irrational and Harmful to James
The principle of autonomy obligates physicians to respect patient decisions and choices after providing them with necessary information about their conditions and possible treatment interventions. Patient autonomy entails the rights of a patient to make decisions about their medical care and treatment without the undue influence from the healthcare providers (Sabo, 2021). The case presented involves a minor who legally is incompetent to make decisions and relies on the parents to determine what happens to him. James parents, Mike and Joanne make decisions concerning the course of his treatment. Here, the principle of patient autonomy is important as the physician should allow Mike to make whatever decision he deems fit for his son, like the choice to forego dialysis in the first instance.
Research is categorical that patient autonomy allows healthcare providers to educate patients in a better way and enable them make better decisions (Zhou et al., 2019). While the physician has an ethical obligation to respect the decisions by James’ parents, he should use his expertise to educate the family on the risks of foregoing the recommended medical procedures, like the kidney transplant to save the boy’s life. The physician should be emphatic that foregoing medical interventions like the dialysis and even the recommended kidney transplant in hope of miracles is irrational and harmful to the quality of life of the boy. The physician should provide a medical and scientific account of the impact of such decisions on the boy for the parents to appreciate the magnitude of the problem (Paris et al., 2018). Through the approach, the physician will enable the parents to make decisions from an informed perspective. However, the physician should not impose anything on Mike, even in situations where their decisions are not rational to the overall health of James. The physician should keep to the biomedical principle of patient autonomy and use the rational theory to allow them make decisions.
Christian Perspectives on Sickness and Health & Medical Interventions
Religion and spirituality are critical elements in healthcare and impact patient’s perspective on treatment interventions. Christians look at sickness and health from a religious perspective, especially based on one’s level of spiritual growth. Christians look at sickness as a consequence of sin and disobedience to God. Christians also consider sickness as testing one’s faith and resolve in God. Further, health is a sign of God’s blessings and allows individuals to witness the goodness of being a believer. However, Christians ought to consider sickness and health differently (Sabo, 2021). They should look at sickness as a natural occurrence that requires medical interventions and remedies. Further, they not consider health as the only blessing from God but an attempt by individuals to maintain a balance in life. Sickness reiterates the need to care for those suffering and reaffirms their obligation to get close to God and Jesus.
Christian should not be against medical interventions as they are called to accept science and its biomedical uses. Medical
interventions are scientific approaches to reduce and even eliminate unnecessary suffering that individuals endure in life. Medical interventions used along prayers lead to healing and restoration of health (Zhou et al., 20119). God has given people intelligence and through this, they discover medical interventions to cure diseases and alleviate suffering. Therefore, Christians should consider medical knowledge and expertise as God’s gift to humanity. Jesus implored his disciples to seek medical interventions (Mathew 9:12, NIV). Christians need to understand that seeking medical intervention does not mean that one lacks faith but a ways of respecting God’s command to seek medical care when sick.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
On his part, Mike need to maintain his faith in God that he has power to heal his son. Christians believe in God’s power to health the sick and restore health. Mike should allow his son to undergo the medical intervention while trusting in God that He will use the physicians to restore his health (Sabo, 2021). Mike should use the information given by the physicians and figure out the most effective way to alleviate the suffering that his son endures (Paris et al., 2018). The most appropriate approach is for him to allow James undergo the recommended medical interventions that include a kidney transplant.
Honoring the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence implores the parents to allow James to have the medical intervention as recommended by the physician and the team. Beneficence implies doing greater good and ensuring that all actions and decisions by healthcare provider are in the best interests of a patient. Non-maleficence implies that healthcare providers should not perform actions that intentionally harm a patient (Zhou et al., 2019). Mike should reason that the physician does not recommend the interventions to harm James but doing so is the best interest of his health. Therefore, he should allow the son to undergo the suggested procedures.
Spiritual Needs Analysis
Considering a patient’s spiritual needs is an essential part of providing effective and holistic care. The main goal of a spiritual needs assessment is to enable a healthcare provider support a patient by integrating their religious beliefs, values, norms, and concerns to enhance quality outcomes. Spiritual needs are a critical component of patient-centered and evidence-based practice (EBP) care, especially when dealing with patients from diverse sociocultural and economic backgrounds (Timmins & Caldeira, 2017). The assessment is critical as it allows a patient to leverage the existing spiritual resources to improve their overall wellness and perspective on health interventions.
Conducting a spiritual assessment before treatment of a patient enables the healthcare provider to develop a therapeutic rapport and alliance with the patients while providing a chance for renewal, resiliency, growth and a positive attitude to their health condition that are important in health restoration (Isaac et al., 2018). The implication is that satisfying the spiritual needs of a patient is the basis of holistic care. Carrying out a spiritual assessment is complex, especially in this case where the individual with the problem is a minor yet the person making decisions is the parent.
Physicians may not be the best placed to conduct a spiritual analysis on Mike based on the decisions that he is making. The physician should refer Mike to a chaplain who can help determine effective interventions to help Mike reach better decisions for the sake of James. However, the physician can use tools like HOPE and FICA frameworks. These tools have tests that will allow the physicians to develop a rapport with Mike and incorporate his religious preferences in James’ care plan.
Conclusion
The case study on “Healing and Autonomy” shows that Christians have different perspectives on aspects like healing and medical interventions. The paper demonstrates the need for physicians to adhere to biomedical principles and enable patients to make decisions based on autonomy without any undue influence. A spiritual needs assessment is critical in evaluating a patient’s perspective concerning the recommended treatment interventions.
References
Isaac, K., Hay, J., & Lubetkin, E. (2018) Incorporating Spirituality in primary Care. Journal of
Religion and Health, 55(3), 1065-1077. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-016-0190-2
Paris, W., Seidler, R. J. H., FitzGerald, K., Padela, A. I., Cozzi, E., & Cooper, D. K. (2018).
Jewish, Christian and Muslim theological perspectives about xenotransplantation. Xenotransplantation, 25(3), e12400. DOI: 10.1111/xen.12400.
Sabo, A. (2021). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making
In Health Care (1st Edition). Grand Canyon University – Digital Resources.
Timmins, F., & Caldeira, S. (2017). Assessing the spiritual needs of patients. Nursing standard,
31(29): 47-53. doi: 10.7748/ns. 2017.e10312.
Zhou, S. K., Rueckert, D., & Fichtinger, G. (Eds.). (2019). Handbook of medical image
computing and computer assisted intervention. Academic Press.
Sample Answer 2 for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
Patients autonomy allows patients to make own decisions without outside influence. With patient autonomy, the physician or nurse can educate but cannot make decisions for the patient. There are some cases when spiritual beliefs mislead patients to make decisions that are not beneficial (Butts & Rich, 2019). Health providers often face challenging situations when the patient’s spiritual beliefs contradict available medical interventions. To avoid such instances, the care provider should assess the patient’s spiritual needs so as to advise the patient appropriately. This paper uses the presented case study to answer particular questions regarding the patient’s autonomy and spiritual needs in light of the Christian worldview.
Physician’s Options Regarding Mike
In the case study, Mike is making decisions that may further cause serious harm to James. Mike is deep into spirituality and believes that God could health James without medical interventions. He has already failed in the first place when James condition got worse. He again wants to do it for the second time and this may put James life in even more risk than before. In that regard, the physician should not allow Mike to continue making decisions that do not help improve James health status. Patient autonomy is a very important aspect of care that should be considered (Butts & Rich, 2019). However, it might be disregarded when the decision made by the patient or the guardian may cause harm. In this case, the patient himself is still a child and may not make sound decisions, therefore, his parents are in a position to make decisions on his behalf (Butts & Rich, 2019). These decisions made by the father have no benefit at all. Stopping mike from making further decisions may conflict with the principle of patient autonomy, however, it would help save the life of the patient. Therefore, it is more ethical and beneficial to disregard the patient’s autonomy, in this particular case, to save the life of the patient.
Christianity’s Perspectives
Christianity has several denominations that teach differently concerning sickness and health. How a Christian will perceive sickness and good health depends on the beliefs that the denominations hold and their teachings. Some Christians believe that sickness is a punishment of sin by God. They think that one only becomes sick after sinning and now God is angry with them (O’brien, 2017). Others believe that God tests the faith of His people and that sickness is one of the ways that God uses to test their faith. For instance, Mike believes that God is testing his faith and he should be strong and trust more in God. As a result, he opted for spiritual healing instead of medical interventions. It is appropriate for Christians to view sickness as disruption of bodily functions that needs the interventions of a medical professional.
A Christian should think positively about medical intervention, as a remedy for sickness. Christians should perceive medical interventions as the act of interceding with the intent of improving the patient’s condition. Additionally, they should think of medication and medical interventions as supplements to spiritual healing that have no harm to Christian beliefs (O’brien, 2017). Mike as a Christian should allow the physician to perform a kidney transplant on James as per the treatment plan. However, he should maintain his spiritual belief as a Christian. He can combine medical treatment with spiritual healing to help James recover. For instance, mike can allow medical organ transplant while praying to God to make the process successful so than James can recover and continue with his normal life.
With regard to the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence, Mike can reason up on the best decision to make. The principle of beneficence requires that the action decided upon brings benefits to the parents (Ellis, 2020). It assumes that decisions made within the hospital environment regarding a patient bring a positive impact to the patient. With this idea in mind, Mike can make decisions that only impact the life of James positively. On the other hand, the principle of non-maleficence requires that all decisions made do not cause harm to the patient. In this case, mike can make a decision that is both beneficial and causes no harm to James (Ellis, 2020). If his faith does not bring benefits and only leads to harm, then he should think otherwise. In this case, he should opt for a kidney transplant because that is what will help improve James health status.
Spiritual Needs Assessment
Spiritual assessment is an important aspect of care, especially when such beliefs might influence the type of care provided. According to O’brien (2017). Spiritual assessment is not only meant to determine one’s religion but also to identify spiritual and religious beliefs related to coping with illness. Spiritual needs assessment would enable the physician to help mike make good decisions to help James, after identifying spiritual needs, the physician can incorporate the results of the assessment to the decision making process. The physician will identify spiritual beliefs that negatively impact healthcare and find a way of informing mike about these beliefs.
Spiritual beliefs can also act as the basis for convincing mike to make better decisions. For instance, if he believes in going good to others, s, the physician might tell him about the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence (Ellis, 2020). This might make him believe that medical interventions achieve the same goal as those in spirituality. At least these similarities might make him change his mind. Spiritual assessment will also make the physician understand the approach to use in order to convince him. Spiritual expressions such as love, compassion, and hope constitute the most basic universal approach in nursing care (O’brien, 2017). Therefore, spiritual assessment is important because it enables the physicians to figure out the dimensions of their client’s lives.
Conclusion
Patient’s autonomy allows patients to make their own decisions without outside influence. In the case study, Mike is making decisions that may further cause serious harm to James. Mike should be stopped from making such decisions so as to improve James health status. How a Christian will perceive sickness and good health depends on the beliefs that the denominations hold and their teachings. It is appropriate for Christians to view sickness as disruption of bodily functions that needs the interventions of a medical professional. Spiritual assessment is an important aspect of care, especially when such beliefs might influence the type of care provided.
References
Butts, J. B., & Rich, K. L. (2019). Nursing ethics. Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Ellis, P. (2020). Understanding ethics for nursing students. London: Learning Matters.
O’brien, M. E. (2017). Spirituality in nursing. Burlington, Massachusetts: Jones & Bartlett Learning.
Sample Answer 3 for Benchmark – Patient’s Spiritual Needs: Case Analysis PHI-413V
Nursing’s primary concepts include healing and wellness promotion. Spirituality and religious affiliations are essential factors even for those seeking medical care. The implication is that healthcare providers like nurses should understand the different aspects of spirituality and religious foundations to offer holistic care in their nursing setting and practice. Healthcare settings and principles allow individuals to access multiple resources to maintain their health (Beever & Brightman, 2017). The purpose of this case analysis is to assess the decisions made by Mike and Joanne concerning the treatment of their child James who requires a kidney transplant yet the parents make certain choices that jeopardizes the quality of health for the ailing son.
Allowing Mike to Continue Making Decisions that Seem Irrational
The case describes a situation that presents a dilemma for the physician because of biomedical ethics like patient autonomy against the ethical and legal duties of health professionals like the protection and preservation of life. Mike’s decision to take James to church for a miracle healing service emanates from his exercising of autonomy as the parent of the minor while the physician’s accepting that choice is based on the ethical value of respect for the patient’s independence. Witnesses to the boy’s state of health will doubt if the parents have his best interests in mind (Daniels & Sabin, 2018). Therefore, the doctor should not allow Mike to proceed making decisions that have no medical basis and are harming the boy. While the physician cannot make decisions regarding the eventual action without the parents’ consent, he has a responsibility to protect life and ensure that the family make better choices. The family is traumatized due to the prognosis and the delicate aspect of the transplant given that the matching donor’s kidney is James’ twin brother, Samuel. The parents may be hesitant to give their consent to this aspect as they hope for an alternative because they fear that they may lose all the children to complications arising from the procedure or later in life.
The physician has a responsibility to protect susceptible minors from potential neglect. When health professionals face minors that are in danger of disability and even death due to parents’ inaction, decisions or action, they are mandated by law and obliged by professional codes to report to necessary authorities. Healthcare professionals also have an ethical responsibility to conduct life-saving interventions over parental objections when they realize that a child’s life is in danger. Pediatric health providers have ethical and legal responsibilities and duties to make decisions and offer care that confers benefits to pediatrics and not essentially what the parents may want.
Christian Thinking about Sickness and Health, Medical Intervention
The source of motivation for individuals facing illness and getting hope during sickness differs from individuals based on their worldviews. Accordingly, Christians look to God as their source of hope, motivation and consolation with the believe that what He utters in biblical scriptures and teachings through revelation are true. For a majority of Christians, good health is a sign of God’s blessings while illnesses may denote to tests and trials as well as a form of reprisal for the sins that one may have done. In this situation, Mike wonder if he failed to honor God and does not have sufficient faith.
Christians ought to think about illness and health as critical aspects of human life and while they may have different meanings in their eyes based on their level of faith. As such, if staunch religious faith is an alleyway to good health and protection from all forms of illnesses and disease, then sickness is an outcome of reduced dedication to one’s faith (Carr & Winslow, 2017). Therefore, Christians should know that sickness and health are natural processes and an individual’s level of faith may help them deal with negative events in life. For instance, Mike believes that his insufficient devotion to his faith may be responsible for his son’s condition which makes him believe that James can get healing through prayers and not medical interventions.
Christians should believe that medical interventions are a way of respecting God’s command for individuals to seek medical treatment and not a demonstration of lack of faith. Jesus in Mathew 9:12 tells his disciples to seek medical interventions when he says that healthy individuals do not need physicians but those ailing. God does not command Christians to shun medical interventions. In real sense, medical knowledge is God’s gift to humanity to ensure that they benefit. The implication is that Christians have an obligation to seek medical care as a means of honoring God with their bodies as God’s temple. The opportunity for God to save the sick arises through conventional medical interventions and Christians should consider medicines not in contrast to their beliefs but as an aspect of God’s master plan. In this case, Mike should allow James to undergo the necessary medical intervention with the belief that God will use the healthcare professionals to heal his son.
The parents should look at the principles of beneficence and non-maleficence as means of helping their son. Mike should consider beneficence as the conventional duty of the medical professionals as reflected by the Good Samaritan narrative who comes to the aid of the sick and relieves them from pain and agony (Gillon, 2018). Further, he should uphold the principle of non-maleficence by understanding that accepting a kidney transplant will not be meant to harm him or offer an undue burden to his faith but provide healing to his son. Mike needs to trust in God through the intervention and know that the medical procedure will confer more benefits to James.
Significance of a Spiritual Needs Assessment
Spiritual needs assessment is an essential aspect of providing holistic care for patients and their families, especially those who believe that such interventions can work alongside conventional medical procedures and processes. A spiritual needs assessment allows healthcare providers to have an improved perception on approaching a patient’s diagnosis by being informed about the patient’s and family’s spiritual convictions, their perceptions about issues like death and dying. In this case, a spiritual needs assessment would help the physician in determining suitable interventions for James and his family and others involved in the treatment plan (Carr & Winslow, 2017). The physician would identify their spiritual needs based on the medical care and use interventions that will be respectful and responsive to their religious beliefs. A spiritual needs assessment provides a context to discuss patients’ and their families’ experiences in coping with diseases and beliefs that may be in contrary to medical decisions.
The aspects needed for spiritual assessment comprise of supporting spiritual beliefs, organizing resources and participation in spiritual activities (Beever & Brightman, 2017). In this case, the physician should ensure that he identifies and determines that Mike and the family needs a spiritual assessment and refer them to a chaplain since he cannot perform these aspects. Therefore, Mike and the family should get necessary spiritual assessment interventions to prepare them sufficiently in dealing with the procedure and accepting the current situation.
Conclusion
Patient’s spiritual needs assessment or analysis is a critical aspect of effective care provision. As illustrated in the case study, Mike’s decisions and actions may be detrimental to the health and positive outcome of his son’s treatment. Therefore, he may need a spiritual assessment to help him navigate and accept the current situation and allow medical interventions to take precedent as ways for God to demonstrate his healing power.
References
Beever, J., & Brightman, A. O. (2017). Reflexive principlism as an effective approach for
developing ethical reasoning in engineering. Science and engineering ethics, 22(1), 275-291. doi: 10.1007/s11948-015-9633-5
Carr, M. F. & Winslow, G. R. (2017). From Conceptual to concrete. In World Religions for
Healthcare Professional (pp.31-45). Routledge.
Daniels, N., & Sabin, J. (2018). Contextual features in medical ethics. McGraw Hill.
Gillon, R. (2018). Principlism, virtuism, and the spirit of oneness. In Health Ethics, Law and
Professionalism (pp.45-59). Routledge.