NRS 410 CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation On Diabetes

NRS 410 CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes

A mobile phone-based glucose-monitoring and feedback system for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is a promising new technology that has yet to be fully evaluated. Clinical studies have shown that the use of such a system leads to improved glycemic control, as well as increased patient satisfaction and engagement (Yang et al., 2020). In addition, mobile phone interventions may help to reduce healthcare costs by allowing patients to monitor their own blood sugar levels and provide feedback to their physician. While further research is needed to confirm the long-term benefits of mobile phone-based glucose monitoring, this technology shows great promise for the treatment of T2DM. A mobile phone–based glucose-monitoring and feedback system (MP-GMS) was developed to improve diabetes management in multiple primary care clinic settings. The system was implemented in three waves of clinic randomized trials. Wave 1 clinics (N=6) were randomized to either the MP-GMS or usual care. Wave 2 clinics (N=5) were randomized to the MP-GMS with additional support from a trained clinical research coordinator (CRC), or usual care. Wave 3 clinics (N=4) were randomized to the MP-GMS with or without an accompanying group education program. The electronic medical records of all participants in all three waves were analyzed (Yang et al., 2020).

A mobile phone-based glucose monitoring and feedback system can be a great asset in primary care clinic settings. By providing real-time data and feedback to patients, this type of system can help them better manage their diabetes. In addition, the ability to share data with providers can help clinics identify patterns and potential areas for improvement. When used in conjunction with traditional medical care, a mobile phone-based glucose monitoring system can be a powerful tool for improving diabetes management. A clinic setting is the ideal environment for a mobile phone-based glucose monitoring and feedback system. In a primary care setting, nurses or other health professionals can provide patients with real-time feedback on their blood sugar levels, as well as educational information about diabetes and its management. A mobile phone-based glucose monitoring and feedback system has the potential to improve glycemic control in patients with diabetes, thereby reducing the risk of long-term complications. In addition, such a system could help to reduce the burden on healthcare professionals, who are often responsible for providing patient education about diabetes self-management (Yang et al., 2020).

As a group, identify a research or evidence-based article published within the last 5 years that focuses comprehensively on a specific intervention or new treatment tool for the management of diabetes in adults or children. The article must be relevant to nursing practice.

Create a 10-15 slide PowerPoint presentation on the study’s findings and how they can be used by nurses as an intervention. Include speaker notes for each slide and additional slides for the title page and references.

Include the following:

Describe the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study.
Summarize the main idea of the research findings for a specific patient population. The research presented must include clinical findings that are current, thorough, and relevant to diabetes and nursing practice.
Provide a descriptive and reflective discussion of how the new tool or intervention can be integrated into nursing practice. Provide evidence to support your discussion.
Explain why psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects are important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes. Describe how support can be offered in these respective areas as part of a plan of care for the patient. Provide examples.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NRS 410 CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes

You are required to cite to a minimum of two sources to complete this assignment. Sources must be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria and relevant to nursing practice.

While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.

CLC – Evidence-Based Practice Project: Intervention Presentation on Diabetes – Rubric

Criteria Description

Article

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The article is published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has direct application to nursing practice.

4. Good

6.68 points

The article is published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has general application to nursing practice.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

The article is published in the last 5 years and has a general focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has some application to nursing practice.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

The article fails to meet most of the assignment criteria; the article is not relevant to nursing practice.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The article is omitted or fails to meet the assignment criteria.

Criteria Description

Intervention or Treatment Tool and Specific Patient Population of Study

5. Excellent

7.5 points

A thorough description of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented.

4. Good

6.68 points

A description of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

A summary of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. Some aspects require more detail for clarity. There are minor inaccuracies.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

An incomplete summary of the intervention, or treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. There are significant gaps and inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Intervention, or treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study are omitted or inaccurate.

Criteria Description

Summary of Article

5. Excellent

22.5 points

A thorough summary of the article is presented. The summary accurately presents the main idea for a specific patient population and the clinical findings, and clearly illustrates relevance to diabetes and nursing practice.

4. Good

20.03 points

A summary of the article is presented. The summary presents the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, and the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice. Some detail or information is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

17.78 points

A summary of the article is presented. The summary generally presents the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, and the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed.

2. Less than Satisfactory

16.88 points

A partial summary of the article is presented. There are major omissions. The summary fails to accurately represent the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, or the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The summary is omitted or fails to meet the assignment criteria.

Criteria Description

Inclusion of the Psychological, Cultural, and Spiritual Aspects

5. Excellent

22.5 points

A compelling explanation for why the psychological, cultural and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation is well-developed and contains strong reasoning and rationale for support.

4. Good

20.03 points

An explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains adequate reasoning or rationale provided for support. Some detail is needed for clarity.

3. Satisfactory

17.78 points

A general explanation of why the psychological, cultural and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains some omissions and inaccuracies. General reasoning or rationale is provided for support.

2. Less than Satisfactory

16.88 points

A partial explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains significant omissions and inaccuracies. Reasoning or rationale is not provided for support.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects are important to consider for patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is omitted.

Criteria Description

Presentation of Content

5. Excellent

60 points

The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.

4. Good

53.4 points

The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.

3. Satisfactory

47.4 points

The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.

2. Less than Satisfactory

45 points

The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.

Criteria Description

Layout

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.

4. Good

6.68 points

The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.

Criteria Description

Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.

4. Good

6.68 points

The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

6.68 points

Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

7.5 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

6.68 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

5.93 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

5.63 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Total 150 points

Rubric Criteria

Total150 points

Criterion	1. Unsatisfactory	2. Less than Satisfactory	3. Satisfactory	4. Good	5. Excellent
Presentation of Content Presentation of Content	0 points The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear.	45 points The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information.	47.4 points The presentation slides are generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other.	53.4 points The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources.	60 points The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The project includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The project gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
Inclusion of the Psychological, Cultural, and Spiritual Aspects Inclusion of the Psychological, Cultural, and Spiritual Aspects	0 points Explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects are important to consider for patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is omitted.	16.88 points A partial explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains significant omissions and inaccuracies. Reasoning or rationale is not provided for support.	17.78 points A general explanation of why the psychological, cultural and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains some omissions and inaccuracies. General reasoning or rationale is provided for support.	20.03 points An explanation of why the psychological, cultural, and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation contains adequate reasoning or rationale provided for support. Some detail is needed for clarity.	22.5 points A compelling explanation for why the psychological, cultural and spiritual aspects is important to consider for a patient who has been diagnosed with diabetes is presented. The explanation is well-developed and contains strong reasoning and rationale for support.
Article Article	0 points The article is omitted or fails to meet the assignment criteria.	5.63 points The article fails to meet most of the assignment criteria; the article is not relevant to nursing practice.	5.93 points The article is published in the last 5 years and has a general focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has some application to nursing practice.	6.68 points The article is published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has general application to nursing practice.	7.5 points The article is published in the last 5 years, has a focus on an intervention or treatment tool for managing diabetes in adults or children. The article has direct application to nursing practice.
Intervention or Treatment Tool and Specific Patient Population of Study Intervention or Treatment Tool and Specific Patient Population of Study	0 points Intervention, or treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study are omitted or inaccurate.	5.63 points An incomplete summary of the intervention, or treatment tool, and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. There are significant gaps and inaccuracies.	5.93 points A summary of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. Some aspects require more detail for clarity. There are minor inaccuracies.	6.68 points A description of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for clarity or accuracy.	7.5 points A thorough description of the intervention or treatment tool and the specific patient population used in the study is presented.
Summary of Article Summary of Article	0 points The summary is omitted or fails to meet the assignment criteria.	16.88 points A partial summary of the article is presented. There are major omissions. The summary fails to accurately represent the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, or the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice.	17.78 points A summary of the article is presented. The summary generally presents the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, and the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice. There are some inaccuracies. More information is needed.	20.03 points A summary of the article is presented. The summary presents the main idea for a specific patient population, the clinical findings, and the relevance to diabetes and nursing practice. Some detail or information is needed for clarity.	22.5 points A thorough summary of the article is presented. The summary accurately presents the main idea for a specific patient population and the clinical findings, and clearly illustrates relevance to diabetes and nursing practice.
Layout Layout	0 points The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident.	5.63 points The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text.	5.93 points The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability.	6.68 points The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text.	7.5 points The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
Documentation of Sources Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)	0 points Sources are not documented.	5.63 points Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.	5.93 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.	6.68 points Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.	7.5 points Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.)	0 points Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately.	5.63 points Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately.	5.93 points Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part.	6.68 points The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly.	7.5 points The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)	0 points Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning.	5.63 points Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader.	5.93 points Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader.	6.68 points Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present.	7.5 points Writer is clearly in control of standard, written, academic English.