Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data
Grand Canyon University Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Comparison Organizations with Benchmark Data assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Health facilities offer different quality care based upon the competency of staffs and the availability of medical tools. Persons seeking medical services should take into account quality aspects of care even as they leverage on the cost efficiency of one facility compared to another. The purpose of this paper is to compare two distinct health institutions based on their performance in quality care.
Description of Two Organizations
The first chosen care facility is the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center (CSMC) where I did my clinical practicums as a nurse student four years ago. The facility is a non-profit institution located in Beverly Grove in Los Angeles, California. The hospital has a bed capacity of 958 and is also a multi-specialty academic health science for the training of students enrolled in health science courses. The facility is a Level I Trauma Center preferred by both for pediatrics and adults. It is a rehabilitation center for patients with anxiety disorders and provided trauma-related services such as surgery. The Joint Commission accredited Cedars-Sinai for the treatment of stroke, surgery as well as neonat
al and pregnancy related complications. The facility is ranked fourth in the entire western United States of America.
The second facility I chose is the Dignity Health-California Hospital Medical Center (CHMC). The care center is located in Los Angeles, California. The facility has a 318-bed capacity, and the emergency department offers treatment to over 70,000 patients annually. CHMC is a Level II Trauma Center. It also operates cardiology, orthopedics, intensive care unit as well as obstetrics and gynecology departments. In 2013, the facility received an accreditation from the Joint Commission as a certified primary stroke center. CHMC also received the Flu Compliance Award in 2014 as well as the National Patient Satisfaction Award.
Comparison of Two Organizations
The first comparison of the two facilities is based on the examination of the (HCAHPS) Hospital Consumer
Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems scores. According to Astier-Peña et al. (2016), the latter is used to measure patient experience based on in-patient services and care is ranked as per 10-point scale. Based on the patients surveyed, the HCAHPS for CSMC was rated at 65% for its emergency services in 2018. This followed a drop based on the previous year results where the results stood at 67%. The patient satisfaction at the inpatient units was rated at 83% in 2018, an improvement from the previous year. However, the outpatient services were estimated at 92% in 2018 and have since recorded an improvement giving the overall 4.0-star rating. The CHMC facility, on the other hand, received a 2.5-star rating at 54% based on its implementation of the HCAHPS. This indicates dissatisfaction of patients with quality services especially with regard to pediatrics and postpartum care.
Howell et al. (2015) vouch for comparison of the two facilities based on the report of healthcare-associated infections (HAIs). For the CHMC, the Central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSI) was low at 0.85 while Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections (MRSA BSI) rated at 0.87. Clostridium difficile diarrhea infections (CDI) was recorded at 0.85, and the surgical site infections (SSI) rated at 0.89 in the standardized infection ratio (SIR). As for the Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, the CLABSI was lower than the national benchmark a recorded at 0.7. MSRA was rated at 0.3 while colon surgical site infection ratio recorded at 0.7 compared to the California benchmark of 0.9.
Analysis of Factors that Contribute to Performance Measures
Different values for performance measurements are recorded in the two health facilities. The Cedars-Sinai Medical Center received a 4.0-star rating compared to the 2.5-star rating for CHMC. The higher the star rating the better the quality of healthcare administered to patients. HAI and the HCAHPS for the two facilities were analyzed based on the 2018 findings. However, evidenced-based measures for each facility could not be ascertained as the performance measurements relied on the report provided by patients following a one month study in care centers.
Data Standardization to Improve Quality Comparison Measures
Duplechan (2016) ascertains the effectiveness in quality comparison since the information on HAI and the HCAHPS is based on raw data from patients. The quality measures of the information from the respondents are compared with the databases in the electronic health records (EHR) systems for each of the care facilities to ascertain the accuracies in the comparison of patient care. According to Astier-Peña et al. (2016), EHR guarantees reliable and standardized information regarding the current information on performance measurement for care facilities. Neuhausen et al. (2014) indicates that the report complements the qualitative data availed by patients as per their perception of care. As such, the gaps in quality care can be identified by the hospital administrators in a bid to respond to poor service delivery.
Conclusion
Patients determine the quality performance measurements based on their perception of health service delivery. The study delved into a comparison analysis of care in the two facilities in Los Angeles, California. The performance measurements were leveraged on HAI and the HCAHPS in which Cedars-Sinai Medical Center was rated best compared to Dignity Health-California Hospital Medical Center. Patients in Los Angeles and with close proximity to both the facilities would prefer Cedars-Sinai Medical Center to the CHMC for quality care.
References
Astier-Peña, M. P., Torijano-Casalengua, M. L., & Olivera-Canadas, G. (2016). Setting priorities for patient safety in primary care. Atencion primaria, 48(1), 3.
Duplechan, L. (2016). Improving HCAHPS scores by offering hospitable service. Health facilities management, 29(4), 44-44.
Howell, A. M., Burns, E. M., Bouras, G., Donaldson, L. J., Athanasiou, T., & Darzi, A. (2015). Can patient safety incident reports be used to compare hospital safety? Results from a quantitative analysis of the English national reporting and learning system data. PloS one, 10(12), e0144107.
Neuhausen, K., Davis, A. C., Needleman, J., Brook, R. H., Zingmond, D., & Roby, D. H. (2014). Disproportionate-share hospital payment reductions may threaten the financial stability of safety-net hospitals. Health Affairs, 33(6), 988-996.