Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
Walden University Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
The introduction for the Walden University Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
After the introduction, move into the main part of the Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the Controversy Associated with Personality and Paraphilic Disorders assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Narcissistic personality disorder (NPD) is a cluster B personality disorder with dramatic, emotional, and erratic behavior. It manifests with a persistent pattern of grandiosity, an increased sense of self-importance, and an obsession with fantasies of great success. The purpose of this paper is to discuss the controversy surrounding NPD, maintaining a therapeutic relationship with NPD patients, and ethical and legal considerations.
Controversy That Surrounds NPD
Controversies surrounding NPD have surfaced regarding the definition of grandiose and vulnerable features present in the disorder. Questions have come up on various issues, including whether a universal description of NPD exists, the differences between normal and pathological narcissism, the central and peripheral characteristics of narcissism, the possible etiology, and the role of self-esteem in NPD (Crowe et al., 2019). Theorists have proposed that different dimensions or variants of narcissism can be grouped into narcissistic grandiosity and narcissistic vulnerability. The failure to differentiate between grandiose (overtly immodest, entitled, self-centered, and domineering) and vulnerable (self-centered, neurotic, distrustful, and introverted) presentations of narcissism has further contributed to controversy (Miller et al., 2018). The existing inventories of narcissism conflict on whether they assess grandiose, vulnerable narcissism, or both. They also conflict on the level to which they adequately assess these dimensions.
Professional Beliefs about NPD
I believe that NPD differs from narcissism, and the two should be distinguished in the clinical setting. Narcissism is a personality element that occurs in various disorders, but it is central to NPD. I would diagnose a person as having a narcissistic personality if they are haughty, feel superior to others, are obsessed with themselves and admiration, and exhibit a significant lack of empathy (Miller et al., 2021; Day et al., 2022). Patients with NPD have difficulties in identity and emotion regulation within the perspective of interpersonal relationships (Crowe et al., 2019). Words that can be used to describe people with narcissistic grandiosity-related presentations are overt, thick-skinned, spiteful, insensible, manipulative, thick-skinned, arrogant, and psychopathic.
Maintaining a Therapeutic Relationship with a Patient with NPD
Therapists working with patients with NPD often face various challenges because of the complex nature of the disorder’s intra and interpersonal processes. Zalman et al. (2019) explain that narcissistic patients can be less inclined to share their vulnerability and admit their need for other people. Thus, it is important to not only concentrate on the explicit aspects but also focus on more inherent aspects of the therapeutic alliance. Furthermore, the therapist should set clear boundaries with the patient, create a less-threatening atmosphere, and exhibit non-pathologic coping skills to the patient.
Ethical and Legal Considerations Related to NPD
Ethical considerations when handling patients with NPD should include preventing any harm to the pat
ient, whether physical or psychological. The practitioner should create an environment where patients can admit they have made a mistake while maintaining their overall positive self-image (Bolsinger et al., 2020). This communicates to the patients that it is acceptable to make mistakes and that they do not have to threaten their self-worth.
Conclusion
Controversies surrounding NPD are based on the definition of grandiose and vulnerable features, the universal description of NPD, and the differences between normal and pathological narcissism. The therapist should pay attention to the inherent aspects of the therapeutic alliance. Besides, the therapist should create a psychologically safe environment for the patient.
References
Bolsinger, J., Jaeger, M., Hoff, P., & Theodoridou, A. (2020). Challenges and Opportunities in Building and Maintaining a Good Therapeutic Relationship in Acute Psychiatric Settings: A Narrative Review. Frontiers in psychiatry, pp. 10, 965. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00965
Crowe, M. L., Lynam, D. R., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2019). Exploring the structure of narcissism: Toward an integrated solution. Journal of Personality, 87(6), 1151–1169. https://doi.org/10.1111/jopy.12464
Day, N. J. S., Townsend, M. L., & Grenyer, B. F. S. (2022). Living with pathological narcissism: core conflictual relational themes within intimate relationships. BMC psychiatry, 22(1), 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12888-021-03660-x
Miller, J. D., Lynam, D. R., Hyatt, C. S., & Campbell, W. K. (2018). Controversies in Narcissism. Annual Review of Clinical Psychology, 13(1), 291–315. doi:10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-032816-045244
Miller, J. D., Back, M. D., Lynam, D. R., & Wright, A. G. (2021). Narcissism today: What we know and what we need to learn. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 30(6), 519–525. https://doi.org/10.1177/09637214211044109
Zalman, H., Doorn, K. A., & Eubanks, C. F. (2019). Alliance challenges in the treatment of a narcissistic patient: the case of Alex. Research in psychotherapy (Milano), 22(2), 351. https://doi.org/10.4081/ripppo.2019.351