Initiatives are vital to public health, providing information of disparities in the community. As proposals are presented, they have more than a few variables to consider, in its development. The purpose of this entry is to explore a public health initiative retrieved from the CDC website analyze variables related to and evaluate current health legislation of the initiative.
“Prevention Through Design: https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/default.html”
A current public health initiative presented by the Center of Disease Control (CDC) called Prevention Thought Design, aims to

Discussion 2 Factors That Impact Population Health
occupational grievances, ailments, and casualties through functional design. NIOSH (n.d.) positions that “PtD encompasses all of the efforts to anticipate and design out hazards to workers in facilities, work methods and operations, processes, equipment, tools, products, new technologies, and the organization of work. The focus of PtD is on workers who execute the designs or have to work with the products of the design. The initiative has been developed to support designing out hazards, the most reliable and effective type of prevention” (The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health [NIOSH], n.d., Defining PtD section). This initiative provides support on a national level.
Culturally, this initiative is sans bias. Ethical considerations for this initiative will have to consider the working class of physical workers. The approach that will be used to develop and implement the PtD National Initiative will be framed by industry sector and within four functional areas: Research, Education, Practice, and Policy (NIOSH, n.d., Approach section). Legally, the initiative’s goal is to protect workers thought he use of science, to prevent injuries. I am unsure, but not surprised, of the legal factors that may be presented for this population. Participants in a culture of health and wellness pursue and achieve higher levels of health and wellness than the general population does (Nash et al., 2021, p. 276). Unfortunately, this program is not applied to healthcare workers.
Current legislation for occupational health hazards in Virginia is managed by Virginia Occupational Safety and Health (VOSH). VOSH (n.d.) positions “VOSH is responsible for the enforcement of occupational safety and health standards; Compliance officers inspect workplaces for hazardous conditions and issue citations where violations of VOSH regulations are found; Inspections may be the result of regular scheduling, imminent danger reports, fatalities, and worker complaints or referrals” (Occupational and Safety Health Administration [OSHA], n.d., para. 11). This initiative focuses on general industry, construction, and agriculture only. This is a positive for that genre of work, less responsive for those that work outside of those parameters.
Factors that impact public health are abundant, yet there are proposals in place. Initiatives are developed to address the issues presented. From a national to state level, enterprises are born and grow with knowledge.
References
Nash, D. B., Skoufalos, A., Fabius, R. J., & Oglesby, W. H. (2021). Population health: Creating a culture of wellness (3rd ed.). Jones & Bartlett.
Occupational and Safety Health Administration. (n.d.). Virginia State Plan. www.osha.gov. https://www.osha.gov/stateplans/va
The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health. (n.d.). Prevention Through Safety. www.CDC.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/topics/ptd/default.html
RE: Week 11 Main Post DQ2
Laytoya, your post was very interesting to read because I had not heard about the Prevention Through Design program (NIOSH Public Safety Program, 2019). Eliminating safety hazards and focusing on the well-being of employees is certainly a worthwhile goal. Replacing tools and machinery that are outdated or worn can only benefit manufacturing worksites. Since work-related injuries and illnesses burden the economy with approximately $250 billion annually, ongoing investigation of work environments, safety measures already in place like fire extinguishers and hazard showers, and more efficiently designed workspace can only reduce the number of negative occurrences and reduce the cost of related instances.
In 2019, the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) released a report concerning the US hospitals’ work-related injury and illness status (Worker safety in hospitals, n.d.). It found that 5.5 of these events per 100 employees account for twice the rate in the whole of private industry. Injuries resulting from manual lifting of patients not only exposes the employees to sprains and severe pain from muscle overuse, but also puts patients at risk for falls resulting in fractures, bruises, and skin tears. This one fact alone compels the medical community to reassess protocols and provide mechanical aids for lifting and rolling patients in bed. My personal experiences also include trash collection delays, unpacked supplies, and equipment improperly returned to storage. I agree that we need a CDC monitored Prevention Through Design program instituted as quickly as possible.
References
NIOSH Public Safety Program. (2019). In CDC. Retrieved from
https://www.cdc.gov/niosh/docs/2019-169/default.html
Worker safety in Hospitals. (n.d.). In United States Department of Labor. Retrieved from
https://www.osha.gov/hospitals
This is a great work on the National Action Plan (NAP) for combating Multidrug-Resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB). MDR-TB is an increasing global security risk. Global economy and health systems are likely to suffer because of huge financial burden for treatment of MDR-TB and the load that it places on health care providers, settings, and health systems (Kendall et al., 2017). The implementation of NAP focuses on the efforts by the government of the United States and its partners within the legal framework. The efforts entail implementation of new and available technological and scientific tools, evidence, experience, and proficiency gained from years of addressing TB in the U.S and globally. Essentially, the effort of NAP in addressing MDR-TB is not merely a commitment or budget document. There are various legislative factors that guide various activities in the NAP. For instance, the Congress is expected to legislate on budgetary issues and other approvals, including balancing of priorities and existing resources in developing annual budget (Samal, 2018).
References
Kendall, E. A., Azman, A. S., Cobelens, F. G., & Dowdy, D. W. (2017). MDR-TB treatment as prevention: The projected population-level impact of expanded treatment for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. PloS one, 12(3), e0172748. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172748
Samal, J. (2018). Health System and Policy Perspectives of Multidrug-resistant Tuberculosis (MDR-TB) Control in India. Journal of Development Policy and Practice, 3(1), 1-15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2455133317740448