DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Explain how the criteria on this table helps you evaluate the quality of a primary quantitative research article to determine if it will support a practice improvement project (DPI Project). Which criterion is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article and why? How does the “Levels of Evidence in Research” chart support your search and the use of this table
Sample Answer for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Research is one of the efforts used to continue to promote the excellence of science and in practicing science. Some experts came together and have created guidelines for research publications, systematic reviews, and quality improvement projects. One of such groups is called Enhancing the quality and Transparency of Health Research Network (EQUATOR) (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This group provides a repository and clearing for using guidelines when reporting. It improves and maintains the reliability of any published health care research work and provides the transparency and accuracy or reporting information and encouraging a wider use of the guidelines which helps to show the strength of the evidence (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). Literature review studies are very essential for any research work. It helps to present a total picture or scope of ideas of topics, methods, theories and synthesis of previous studies to increase knowledge and gives insight on how to develop studies (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018), (Loura, Bernardes, Baixinho, Henriques, Félix, & Guerreiro, 2022). Literature review helps researchers to search out relevant articles, retrieve and review them, analyze and integrate all the information from all the studies to present new information to implement in nursing knowledge and practice. Also, literature review of various studies helps with increased knowledge of effective decision making for clinical practices (Mohammadreza, Nasrullah, Najmeh, & Abdulghani, 2021). In recent times, literature reviews are regarded as a research method which follows a specific method or guidelines for conducting research that every researcher follows. It increases knowledge in any field when analyzing and critiquing materials which is different when compared to the previous traditional methods that were ad hoc, did not follow particular methods and often times were not thorough and lacked rigor and often generated questions about the validity and reliability of the research (Snyder, (2019).
There are different reasons for a literature review. One of such reasons is for the researcher to evaluate certain theories or evidence in a particular field. It can also be used to provide and overview of a research problem and identify the gaps in knowledge. It can also be used to develop theories, of building new conceptual theories or when used as a road map to research in a specific field. (Snyder, (2019). Therefore, researchers need to be able to critically evaluate reports to make sure the results are valid, reliable and applicable to nursing practice and hence replicable across board. Where scientific methods followed to maintain the validity of the research. This must be established before the results can be looked at. Qualitative research involves the use of statistical methods to analyze the research by determining the size of the research. Did it involve all aspects of a whole population or just some groups? The total number of sample size reported should equal the number of participants in the study to avoid attrition (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018).
The strength (i.e., level of evidence) and quality of an evidenced research article helps to guide research and promote its practicality and applicability for clinical practice. Hence, most research studies are based on different levels of evidence and different research designs. In addition to the levels of evidence, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ, 2002), in Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt (2018) text, states that for any level of evidence to portray strength, it needs to show quality, quantity and consistency in research (Melnyk, & Fineout-Overholt, 2018). This will help to support my research or any research when the researcher follows the guidelines that have been established for any reputable research that will be published.
References:
Loura, D. D., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., & Guerreiro, M. P. (2022). Nursing students’ learning from involvement in research projects: An integrative literature review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 75(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. LWW.
Mohammadreza, F., Nasrullah, A. Najmeh, A., & Abdulghani, A. (2021). Different types of review studies and their role in promoting nursing knowledge: A narrative review. Journal of Diabetic Nursing, 9(1), 1339-1355.
Loura, D. D., Bernardes, R. A., Baixinho, C. L., Henriques, H. R., Félix, I. B., & Guerreiro, M. P. (2022). Nursing students’ learning from involvement in research projects: An integrative literature review. Revista Brasileira de Enfermagem, 75(1). https://doi.org/10.1590/0034-7167-2021-0053
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
REPLY
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Sample Answer 2 for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Good post. Finding research that supports your clinical question, being able to critique the literature, and finding it valid and reliable is the basis of the DPI project. Also, I find using the research table template really works when you want to sort for concepts later. Good post, Dr. Etheridge
Thanks for your post, I agree with you that there are different reasons for a literature review. The main purpose of a literature review is to gain an understanding of the existing research and debates relevant to a particular topic or area of study and to present that knowledge in the form of a written report. Conducting a literature review helps the researcher build knowledge in the field, learn about important concepts, research methods, and experimental techniques that are used in the field. It will also gain insight into how researchers apply the concepts of learning in a unit to real-world problems. Another great benefit of literature reviews is that as you read, you will get a better understanding of how research findings are presented and discussed in a particular discipline.
Reference
Western Sydney University Library. (2016). Essay purpose. Retrieved March 27, 2022, from https://westernsydney.edu.au/studysmart/home/assignment_help/writing
Sample Answer 3 for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Hello Nkiruka, great points in your discussion post! I would like to add that when writing the literature review, the researcher must strive to ensure that it is organized and directly related to the thesis research question. The review must inform the audience about what is known and yet to be known in summary (Acob & Nugroho, 2019). It must discuss the issues presented by the researcher critically, identify issues in the methodology used, and identify potential gaps in research. While it is important to make the review focused, one should ensure that it has a broad interest for a wider audience. According to Lingard (2018), a wider audience has a greater significance particularly when discussing the implications of the topic or scope of the project when other disciplines are involved. Another important pointer is using up to date scientific studies, as they present the most reliable and updated information
References
Acob, J. R. U., & Nugroho, H. S. W. (2019). Writing the literature review. Aloha International Journal of Multidisciplinary Advancement (AIJMU), 1(1), 8-11.
Lingard, L. (2018). Writing an effective literature review. Perspectives on medical education, 7(2), 133-135.
Sample Answer 4 for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Literature evaluation tables and other forms of appraisal tools aid in identifying the quality of articles and studies (Siering et al., 2013). In addition, the table helps DNP learners organize pertinent content from articles such as the type of research design, methodology, limitations, and more. With this, the criteria on the literature evaluation table hold valuable information that will define and can ultimately support the DPI project. For instance, the quantitative research study must coincide with the DPI project, thus making it essential to provide the research questions, purpose, and aim of the study. The type of primary research design also plays an important role as it helps identify the level of evidence (Dang & Dearholt, 2018). The type of primary research is most helpful in identifying a qualifying research article as it determines the overall strength and quality of the research. In addition, the interpretation of data and outcomes is essential to the overall success of the DPI project as it will support the intervention and gain stakeholder buy-in (Siering et all, 2013). Ultimately, a thorough literature review is vital for a successful DPI project. The literature and level of evidence need to support the problem and intervention and are pertinent to achieving positive outcomes. The various levels of evidence in research can be classified by the study’s methodology (Dang & Dearholt, 2018). For instance, the highest level includes studies utilizing systematic reviews, randomized-controlled trials, and meta-analyses. The level of evidence is necessary and a part of the evidence table.
References:
Dang, D., & Dearholt, S.L. (2018). John Hopkins nursing evidence-based practice: Model & guidelines (3rd ed.). Sigma Thea Tau International
Siering, U., Eikermann, M., Hausner, E., Hoffmann-Eer, W., & Neugebauer, E. A. (2013). Appraisal tools for clinical practice guidelines: A systematic review. PLoS ONE,
8(12), 1. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0082915
Sample Answer 5 for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
DPI projects go hand in hand with quantitative studies because they are one of the best methods of research for clinical studies because the participants are grouped into two groups the experimental and the control group and when numerical data is received, it that can be used to analyze information obtained from the groups to decide which will be the best practice to use. With the quantitative studies using different research design methods such as meta-analyses, systematic reviews and Randomized control trials (RCTs) and some more and with each method producing different levels of evidence on the pyramid based on the quality of the research and the volume of evidence utilized, these three being at the top three levels. When a higher method of evidence is used and the research is great, it produces a very accurate representation of the true situation with increased confidence of validity, reliability and applicability with other care patients. Though most research trials are never perfect according to Archie Cochrane of the Cochrane databases, because the large number of RCTs with various results and qualities or evidence was not presented to clinicians in a form that they could use to effect change in practice hence the need to apply systematic reviews to most studies to improve the outcomes and practice.
References:
Chalmers, J., & Cowdell, F. (2021). What Are Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods? A Brief Introduction. Dermatological Nursing, 20(2), 45–48.
Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (2018). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice. LWW.
Sample Answer 6 for DNP 801 Topic 6 Discussion Question PEER Posts
Scholarly research needs more than adequate time to assess, organize sources, and analyze previous literature about the research. This entails the researcher spending a great deal of time reading and summarizing other people’s work, engaging in critical thinking, assessing sources, doing some background research on the authors, and in the end looking out for biases and assess the validity and consistency of the various information/texts before using them to support his own research. (University of Washington Bothell, nd). It is essential to create a resource organizational table to use as a tool in identifying the different perspectives, thought processes, and variables that affect the question at stake (University of Washington Bothell, nd).
Therefore, it becomes imperative to complete a well-grounded literature review before developing a quality improvement project, bearing in mind the chances of biases, and focusing primarily on reducing the risks of such bias. (Watts, 2020). A great literature review requires the researcher to explore multiple databases (Bethel et al., 2021). Additionally, it is helpful to use a literature evaluation table because articles may be found on different databases but ordered and listed in a separate location. As stated earlier, the table serves as an organizational tool for easy identification of certain research trends and themes. With a strong literature review, the study design, results, and outcomes will be valuable to the quality of the research, and even help to form the PICOT question, and at the same time provide supporting data to the PICOT intervention, thus lending viability to the research and DPI project.
References
University of Washington, Bothell. (nd) Integrating writing: assessing sources/writing a literature review. https://www.uwb.edu/wacc/resources/writing/reviews
Bethel, A. C., Rogers, M., & Abbott, R. (2021). Use of a search summary table to improve systematic review search methods, results, and efficiency. Journal of the Medical Library Association, 109 (1), 97–106. https://doi-org.lopes.idm.oclc.org/10.5195/jmla.2021.809
Watts, K. (2020). How to conduct a literature review. Podiatry Review, 77 (1), 14-15.