DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU

DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU

Grand Canyon University DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                                   

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University   DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                                   

 

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University   DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                                   

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                                   

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU                                   

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU

A reflective journal involves formal documentation of reflection experienced in a particular course, such as new learning experiences and new knowledge gained in the same duration. Besides, through a reflective journal, a learner can also document various difficulties or challenges encountered during the course as well as the strategies implemented to overcome the challenges and fulfill the course objectives. Therefore, the purpose of this assignment is to compose a reflection on the new learning, experiences, and difficulties encountered in undertaking and completing the Grand Canyon University DNP 835, which focuses on patient outcomes and sustainable change. As such, this reflection is evidence that the DNP learner accomplished the laid down course objectives as well as the AACN essentials for doctoral education (Ahmed et al., 2018). Throughout the course, the DNP learner managed to gain knowledge and skills on the formulation of various strategies important for patient care and quality health care promotion as well as a safe patient environment in the patient care settings.

 

Reflection

This reflection focuses on various strategies, activities, and efforts that were applied by the DNP students to help achieve the DNP 835 set objectives and requirements. For example, weekly assignments, class participation, and class discussions entailed a bigger part of the journey toward course completion, which focuses on patient outcomes and sustainable change. Throughout the learning experience, the student managed to integrate competencies and various care suspects such as healthcare delivery, patient-centered care, sustainable change, and ethical principles connected to practice. The next section discusses the essentials met.

 

Essential II: Organizational and Systems Leadership for Quality Improvement and Systems Thinking

This DNP essential deals with quality improvement and system thinking through organizational and systems leadership. This essential is directly connected to this course. During the experience, the DNP learner studied various roles that a DNP-prepared nurse can engage in in the promotion of care delivery and sustainable change in the care environment. Various aspects explored include how theory is applied to practice, challenges to cost management as part of costs management, and various activities for care coordination (Younas & Quennell, 2019). As part of the course, the DNP student also discussed strategies that can be used to evaluate quality and safety issues related to patient care activities. Innovative approaches to sustainable change and change theories were also key in fulfilling this essential. This essential was also accomplished by exploring strategies that can be used to formulate a culture of safety and quality care in the patient care environment.

Essential III: Clinical Scholarship and Analytical Methods for Evidence-Based Practice

Essential III, which focuses on clinical scholarship and analytical methods for evidence-based practice, was also achieved in this course. The DNP student focused on various activities which were key. For example, as part of the course, the DNP learner explored an evidence-based quality improvement program as well as some of the potential challenges or obstacles that can prevent the implementation of the proposed project. Coming up with such a proposal advanced the achievement of analytical methods and clinical scholarship. Improvement of patient outcomes and care delivery in the care environment has been shown to rely heavily on such evidence-based practice quality improvement projects and initiatives  (Ortiz, 2021). Aspects of evidence-based practices were also studied, including planning related to population health, evaluation, and development. In addition, the sustainability of a proposed project was explored as appropriate, as well as how change spreads through various theorists such as Lewin and Everett.

During the DNP 835 course, the student also managed to critically analyze evidence-based policy decisions concerning populations and how such policies are key to patient outcome improvements. In addition, the learner also explored how evidence-based policy decisions and population health are related by carefully analyzing the two to explore the aspects that can be used to improve patient care and ensure that change efforts are sustainable (Knepper et al., 2019). Another aspect that was explored is the culture of excellence and the strategies that can be used to promote such a culture, with a major focus on promoting patient safety. Various aspects were studied, for example, the use of quantitative and qualitative data in assessing organizational culture and applying the same data to promote the culture of safety.

 

Essential VII: Clinical Prevention and Population Health for Improving the Nation’s Health

Essential number seven was also accomplished by completing the Grand Canyon University DNP 835. This essential focus is on clinical prevention and population health for the improvement of a nation’s health. Various aspects were explored to help accomplish this essential. For example, the DNP students studied aspects such as vision and strategic planning and how they are related to healthcare. Again, the DNP learner also discussed healthcare outcome-related aspects such as healthcare disparity, for instance, the factors that lead to health disparity in the US (Brown et al.,2019). As part of health disparity, the student also explored various initiatives that can be used to help fight disparity and health iniquities in the US and some of the strategies and initiatives that can be applied to help fight healthcare iniquities and promote effective change.

Improving a nation’s health involves various strategies that need to be studied. In addition, various interventions need to be implemented to help improve a nation’s health. An example is the study of social determinants of health and how such determinants of health impact people’s health, and how they can also be changed to improve people’s health outcomes (Brown et al.,2019). As part of this discussion, health equity was also explored as to how it can be used to eliminate the healthcare disparities among people. Such discussions were achieved by exploring the IHA module. The module was mainly focusing on how to improve health equity among populations hence eliminating or reducing health disparities. By identifying a particularly underserved population and formulating various activities to improve their health, it is possible to impact the overall health of a population positively. Therefore, exploring aspects of dealing with health disparity and inequity was key in helping the DNP learner accomplish this essential.

 

Conclusion

This reflective journal has attested that the DNP learner has successfully accomplished the requirements for the Grand Canyon’s DNP 835A course by engaging in various activities throughout the duration of the course. The activities were mainly dealing with strategies for improving patient outcomes and sustainable change. Some of the activities undertaken include scholarly activities, class readings and assignments, and class discussions. In the process, three DNP essentials were achieved as appropriate.

 

 

 

References

 

Ahmed, D. N. P., Stephanie, W., WHNP, L. C., Davis, D. N. P., Sheila, M., & Fuller, Ph.D., D. N. P. (2018). DNP Education, Practice, and Policy. Springer Publishing.

Brown, A. F., Ma, G. X., Miranda, J., Eng, E., Castille, D., Brockie, T., … & Trinh-Shevrin, C. (2019). Structural interventions to reduce and eliminate health disparities. American Journal of Public Health, 109(S1), S72-S78. Doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2018.304844

Younas, A., & Quennell, S. (2019). Usefulness of nursing theory‐guided practice: an integrative review. Scandinavian Journal of Caring Sciences, 33(3), 540-555. https://doi.org/10.1111/scs.12670

Knepper, H., Sonenberg, A., & Savage, P. (2019). Evidenced-based policy decisions and population health: Policies, disparities, and data integrity. Public Administration Quarterly, 43(1), 5-27. https://www.proquest.com/docview/2199062827?pq-origsite=gscholar&fromopenview=true

Ortiz, M. R. (2021). Best practices in patient-centered care: Nursing theory reflections. Nursing Science Quarterly, 34(3). https://doi-org/10.1177/08943184211010432

Learners must maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) course.
General Requirements:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
• Download the “Reflective Journal Template,” located in the DNP PI Workspace, for submission. Directions provided in the template should be followed because they align to the assignment rubric.
• A minimum of three peer-reviewed references published within the last 5 years is required.
• Doctoral learners are required to use the current APA style for their essay writing assignments. The current APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
• This assignment uses a rubric. Review the rubric before beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
• You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
• Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the digital classroom. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use. Failure to submit the reflective journal to both locations can result in an Incomplete for the course.
Directions:
Using a scholarly approach, maintain a reflective journal integrating self-reflection and inquiry demonstrated in the current DNP course.
Topic 8 Reflective Journal – Rubric
Collapse All Topic 8 Reflective Journal – RubricCollapse All
Professional Practice and Approach
4 points
Criteria Description
Professional Practice and Approach
5. Excellent
4 points
A cogent, scholarly discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is clearly explained, with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A detailed discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is complete, with appropriate details and support.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
An introductory discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice is included, but only minimal detail or support is provided for approach.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is incomplete or limited.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of discoveries by the learner about professional practice and approach is not included.
Personal Knowledge and Skills
4 points
Criteria Description
Personal Knowledge and Skills
5. Excellent
4 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided with appropriate details and support.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is provided, but with minimal detail or support.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A reflection on the personal knowledge and skills gained in the course, including examples of accomplishments or challenges, that addresses at least three health care related topics is not included.
Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes
4 points
Criteria Description
Additional Resources for Influencing Optimal Learning Outcomes
5. Excellent
4 points
A clear discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A complete discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided with appropriate details and support.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 801 Topic 8 Reflective Journal GCU 

3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
An introductory discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is provided, but with minimal detail or support.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A discussion of additional resources for influencing optimal learning outcomes is not included.
Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course
4 points
Criteria Description
Course Outcomes and Competencies Aligned to the Course
5. Excellent
4 points
A cogent, scholarly description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is thoroughly explored and clearly explained with relevant details and support.
4. Good
3.68 points
A complete description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with appropriate details and support.
3. Satisfactory
3.52 points
An introductory description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is provided with minimal detail or support.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
3.2 points
A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is incomplete or otherwise deficient.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
A description of how the learner achieved course outcomes and met the competencies aligned to the course is not included.

Thesis Development and Purpose
1 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
1 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
0.92 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
1 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
1 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
0.92 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
1 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
1 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
0.92 points
Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
1 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
1 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
0.92 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
0.88 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less Than Satisfactory
0.8 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 20 points