DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU
Grand Canyon University DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
DNP 805 Week 6 Assignment Telehealth GCU
Assessment Description
Telehealth encompasses a wide range of basic to complex health care delivery options, with an equally expansive array of technologies to employ. For the assignment, you will locate a scholarly article on telehealth published within the last 5 years in a peer-reviewed journal. You will compose a paper containing a precis, mind map, and discussion. The precis will focus on the scholarly article pertaining to telehealth technology. The mind map and discussion will help to generate and illustrate ideas about how the identified telehealth technology can be used in your current practice.
DPI Project Content Connection: While telehealth may not be directly associated with your project, this assignment will help prepare you in learning how to review and present literature. In future courses, you will develop Chapter 2 of your manuscript in which you will review at least 50 sources related to your DPI topic. Learning how to succinctly synthesize scholarly sources is a very useful skill. The precis portion will help you learn how to summarize (future assignments will assist in synthesis), and the mind map portion will help you learn how to organize your ideas and establish connections between topics and subtopics.
General Guidelines:
Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:
- This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
- Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
- Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
- You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
- Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the learning management system. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.
Directions:
Write a 750-1,000 word paper on a telehealth technology that can be used in your current practice. The paper will include a precis, mind map (provided as the Appendix), discussion of the mind map, and conclusion, according to the following:
Introduction
Provide an introduction that is succinct and includes a thesis or main idea. The essence of the paper should be contained within the thesis, and the thesis statement should make the purpose of the paper clear. You may also use the introduction to provide an overview of the organization of the paper and establish the purpose for each section.
Precis
Donald Davidson, in his book, American Composition and Rhetoric, discusses the precis as follows:
“A precis is not an outline, but a summary or digest. It is useful as an exercise in grasping the essential ideas of an already completed composition and instating these ideas in concentrated form. The precis shears away all elaborations of the thought and gives only what is left, in such a way as to make the summary a complete composition. It does not, therefore, skeletonize the original composition so much as it reduces its scale. Many of the articles in the Reader’s Digest are only precis, so skillfully done that the average reader does not know that he is reading a summary. Since the precis says a great deal within a brief space, it is of great service in taking notes on library assignments and general reading.”
The precis should be an organization of ideas (including logical sequencing of points), contain clear and meaningful expression, and use language suitable to the situation. Your precis section should only cite the article you are reviewing. When finished, the precis section should summarize a single scholarly article on the topic of telehealth and should be four statements long:
- A statement of what was studied (i.e., argued, discussed, deliberated).
- A statement of focus of the current scholarly article selected (i.e., how it was organized and completed).
- A statement of what information was identified or learned from the scholarly article.
- A statement of why the information in the article is important to your field of study.
Mind Map
Brainstorm to generate ideas about how the identified telehealth technology can be used in your current practice using a mind map. Include the final mind map as the Appendix at the end of the paper.
Create your mind map according to the following:
- Take a sheet of paper and write an identifiable main idea in the center of the page, using only one to three words. (You may also achieve this via an electronic sheet of paper.)
- Draw a branch off your main idea. On the branch, write or draw a main topic related to your main idea.
- Continue to branch off from your main idea with main topics as needed.
- From your main topics, branch off with subtopics.
- From your subtopics, branch off with supporting details (write or draw). Continue to add more details. You are free to add more topics, subtopics, or any other items.
- When you stand back and survey your work, you should see a sort of map: hence the name for this activity. At this point, you can start to form conclusions about how to approach a potential area of practice change. At the end of the day, what you do with the particular map, cluster set, or web that you have produced depends on what you need.
- If you create your mind map on physical paper, you may scan it in as an image and insert the image into your document. If you create the mind map electronically, you may either convert the electronic map to an image or use the snipping tool. Usually you can find this tool by searching in the start menu.
Mind Map Discussion
In this section, discuss the mind map based on the scholarly article reviewed in the precis. In your discussion of the mind map:
- Include a critical evaluation of ideas and connections related to the topics and subtopics, as well as how this information could be used in practice.
- Include support from two additional scholarly sources (i.e., primary sources published within the last 5 years).
- Provide citations in text for all sources used and accompanying references in the References section. In addition, refer to the mind map in the appendix and cite it properly in text.
Conclusion
In the conclusion, provide a summary of ideas and support the main claim of the paper. Be sure to summarize key points rather than restating the material.
Many fields have in recent times experienced a surge in the use of technology and technological applications to accomplish the expected goals. Healthcare has not been left behind as various technological applications have been used to improve patient care and security and address continually rising healthcare costs (Meskó et al., 2018). One of such innovations is telehealth. Various aspects of telehealth as a technology have been applied in improving the quality of patient service to enhance clinical outcomes, address healthcare disparities, and reduce healthcare costs. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to explore the use of a specific technology that has recently been published.
Precis
As earlier indicated, telehealth has gained prominence in healthcare in previous years and recent times. Therefore, various researchers have focused on the use of telehealth in managing a spectrum of conditions. One of such reports is a research work published by Gal et al. (2020). This group of researchers focused on evaluating the feasibility of using continuous glucose monitoring by telehealth to improve access among patients with diabetes. They studied the impact of telehealth application among both type 1 diabetes and type 2 diabetes patients. The continuous glucose monitoring system was offered to the patients through the mail (Gal et al., 2020). Besides, certified education specialists and diabetes care specialists offered instruction on the management of diabetes by using phone or videoconference.
Upon the implementation of the initiative, the researchers focused on days per week of glucose monitoring use as the primary outcomes and monitored the HbA1C values by comparing the baseline values and the values obtained after three months. The use of telehealth improved access to the use of continuous glucose monitoring, with every participant using the glucose monitoring by the fourth month, while ninety-four percent used it by the end of the second month (Gal et al., 2020). During the study, there were improved outcomes in HbA1c as there was a significant decrease in the values among the participants. In addition, the researchers observed improved benefits of continuous glucose monitoring using telehealth in terms of quality of life. For instance, they observed reduced technology barriers to the management of diabetes, improved satisfaction with glucose monitoring, and reduced diabetes distress (Gal et al., 2020). The findings from this research are important in that they underline the importance of using telehealth to improve diabetes care through continuous glucose monitoring. The use of the intervention can be integrated into the normal or routine care of patients with diabetes.
The Mind Map
Mind mapping is key essential in research, especially if individuals are to research and synthesize some knowledge connected to a particular interest. Therefore, mind mapping enables the researcher to arrange various points and highlights by formulating the main theme or topic and determining how it is connected to other ideas or new ideas, especially radially to help in better understanding the concept as a complete whole. Therefore, a mind map has been formulated related to diabetes and its management. This mind map can be found in the appendix. The mind map reveals various things and aspects regarding diabetes. Diabetes has various adverse impacts in a case where there is poor management.
The condition exists in two types, type 1 diabetes, and type 2 diabetes. Even though both type 2 and type 1 is chronic and may lead to higher blood sugar levels, in type 1, the patient’s body fails to make enough insulin for the body. Therefore, a patient has to get insulin injections for better outcomes (Xu et al., 2018). Comparatively, in type 2 diabetes, a patient’s body may be producing sufficient insulin, but the body fails to effectively use it, leading to the body fails to make insulin. Various management strategies have been employed in addressing diabetes among patients for better outcomes. While the normal care in most facilities entails the patients going for medication and using them at home, other innovative care strategies have been applied for even better outcomes, such as telehealth.
In the article by Gal et al. (2020), the researchers evaluated the impact of using telehealth to improve access to glucose monitoring. The telehealth aspects applied by the researchers include phone calls, emails, texts, and video training sessions. Besides, there was an involvement of a multi-professional team that helped in supporting the use of telehealth. The researchers observed substantial improvement within two months and four months of study as there were improved HbAc1 levels among the participants and the use of the continuous glucose monitoring strategy (Gal et al., 2020). It is worth noting that multi-professional team management has been shown to be successful in ensuring that the patients have better outcomes (Matthys et al., 2021). This information is vital as it can be used in this era where there is rapid technological growth. Therefore, the telehealth aspects discussed can be used to improve the management of diabetes among patients living with diabetes.
Poor management of lack of management of the condition may lead to other complications. Some of the conditions that can easily affect an individual due to the presence of diabetes include cardiovascular diseases, neuropathy, retinopathy, skin conditions, and hearing impairment, among others. Effective management of diabetes requires proper coordination among the care teams (Matthys et al., 2021). For example, a patient may need an adjustment on medication use and diet change. This can only be more effective if there is effective and timeous communication between the care teams.
Conclusion
Telehealth has played a significant role in improved and better management of various health conditions such as diabetes. While patients still have to collaborate with the care providers for better outcomes. The use of telehealth has greatly helped such a course, especially in this era of technological advances. A recently published article that reports the use of telehealth in diabetes management has been explored, with the researchers reporting that telehealth was instrumental in improving outcomes.
References
Gal, R. L., Cohen, N. J., Kruger, D., Beck, R. W., Bergenstal, R. M., Calhoun, P., … & Aleppo, G. (2020). Diabetes telehealth solutions: improving self-management through remote initiation of continuous glucose monitoring. Journal of the Endocrine Society, 4(9), bvaa076. https://doi.org/10.1210/jendso/bvaa076,
Matthys, E., Van Bogaert, P., Blommaert, S., Verdonck, L., & Remmen, R. (2021). Evidence-based early-stage type 2 diabetes follow-up in Belgian primary care practices: Impact of multi-professional teams and care protocols. Primary Care Diabetes, 15(2), 249-256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2020.09.003
Meskó, B., Hetényi, G., & Győrffy, Z. (2018). Will artificial intelligence solve the human resource crisis in healthcare?. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-4. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-3359-4.
Xu, G., Liu, B., Sun, Y., Du, Y., Snetselaar, L. G., Hu, F. B., & Bao, W. (2018). Prevalence of diagnosed type 1 and type 2 diabetes among US adults in 2016 and 2017: population based study. Bmj, 362. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.k1497
Telehealth – Rubric
Collapse All Telehealth – RubricCollapse All
Introduction
5 points
Criteria Description
Introduction
- Excellent
5 points
An introduction is extremely thorough, with substantial supporting detail.
- Good
4.6 points
An introduction is complete and includes supporting detail.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
An introduction is included but lacks supporting detail.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
An introduction is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
An introduction is not included.
Precis: Statement of What Was Studied
5 points
Criteria Description
Precis: Statement of What Was Studied
- Excellent
5 points
A statement of what was studied (i.e., argued, discussed, or deliberated) is extremely thorough, organized, and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Good
4.6 points
A statement of what was studied (i.e., argued, discussed, or deliberated) is complete. The statement is organized and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
A statement of what was studied (i.e., argued, discussed, or deliberated) is included but lacks clarity and meaningful expression.
Check Out Also: MAT 2051 Unit 6 Discussion DQ1 Cryptography and Security
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
A statement of what was studied (i.e., argued, discussed, or deliberated) is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A statement of what was studied (i.e., argued, discussed, or deliberated) is not included.
Precis: Statement of Focus of the Scholarly Article (How It Was Organized and Completed)
5 points
Criteria Description
Precis: Statement of Focus of the Scholarly Article (How It Was Organized and Completed)
- Excellent
5 points
A statement of focus of the scholarly article (how it was organized and completed) is extremely thorough, organized, and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Good
4.6 points
A statement of focus of the scholarly article (how it was organized and completed) is organized and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
A statement of focus of the scholarly article (how it was organized and completed) is included but lacks clarity and meaningful expression.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
A statement of focus of the scholarly article (how it was organized and completed) is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A statement of focus of the scholarly article (how it was organized and completed) is not included.
Precis: Statement of Information Identified or Learned From the Scholarly Article
5 points
Criteria Description
Precis: Statement of Information Identified or Learned From the Scholarly Article
- Excellent
5 points
A statement of information identified or learned from the scholarly article is extremely thorough, organized, and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Good
4.6 points
A statement of information identified or learned from the scholarly article is complete. The statement is organized and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
A statement of information identified or learned from the scholarly article is included but lacks clarity and meaningful expression.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
A statement of information identified or learned from the scholarly article is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A statement of information identified or learned from the scholarly article is not included.
Precis: Statement of Why the Information in the Article Is Important to the Field of Study of the DN
5 points
Criteria Description
Precis: Statement of Why the Information in the Article Is Important to the Field of Study of the DNP Learner
- Excellent
5 points
A statement of why the information in the article is important to the field of study of the DNP learner is extremely thorough, organized, and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Good
4.6 points
A statement of why the information in the article is important to the field of study of the DNP learner is organized and contains clear meaningful expression.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
A statement of why the information in the article is important to the field of study of the DNP learner is included but lacks clarity and meaningful expression.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
A statement of why the information in the article is important to the field of study of the DNP learner is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
A statement of why the information in the article is important to the field of study of the DNP learner is not included.
Mind Map: Identifiable Main Idea
10 points
Criteria Description
Mind Map: Identifiable Main Idea
- Excellent
10 points
Mind map includes an identifiable main idea that is extremely thorough and logical.
- Good
9.2 points
Mind map includes an identifiable main idea that is complete, clear, and logical.
- Satisfactory
8.8 points
Mind map includes an identifiable main idea but it lacks clarity.
- Less Than Satisfactory
8 points
Mind map includes an identifiable main idea that is incorrect or incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mind map does not include an identifiable main idea.
Mind Map: Main Topic Branch or Branches Related to the Main Idea
10 points
Criteria Description
Mind Map: Main Topic Branch or Branches Related to the Main Idea
- Excellent
10 points
Mind map includes a main topic branch or branches related to the main topic, and they are extremely thorough and logical.
- Good
9.2 points
Mind map includes a main topic branch or branches related to the main idea, and they are clear and logical.
- Satisfactory
8.8 points
Mind map includes a main topic branch or branches related to the main idea, but they lack clarity.
- Less Than Satisfactory
8 points
Mind map includes a main topic branch or branches related to the main idea, but they are incorrect or incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mind map does not include a main topic branch or branches related to the main idea.
Mind Map: Subtopics Related to the Main Topics and the Main Idea
10 points
Criteria Description
Mind Map: Subtopics Related to the Main Topics and the Main Idea
- Excellent
10 points
Mind map includes subtopics related to the main topics and the main idea that are extremely thorough and logical.
- Good
9.2 points
Mind map includes subtopics related to the main topics and the main idea that are clear and logical.
- Satisfactory
8.8 points
Mind map includes subtopics related to the main topics and the main idea, but they lack clarity.
- Less Than Satisfactory
8 points
Mind map includes subtopics related to the main topics and the main idea, but they are incorrect or incomplete.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mind map does not include subtopics related to the main topics and the main idea.
Mind Map Discussion: Critical Evaluation of Ideas and Connections Related to the Topics and Subtopic
5 points
Criteria Description
Mind Map Discussion: Critical Evaluation of Ideas and Connections Related to the Topics and Subtopics
- Excellent
5 points
Mind map discussion critical evaluation of ideas and connections is extremely thorough and incorporates substantial supporting detail.
- Good
4.6 points
Mind map discussion provides a critical evaluation of ideas and connections that is complete and includes a sufficient amount of detail.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Mind map discussion provides a critical evaluation of ideas and connections but lacks a sufficient amount of detail.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Mind map discussion provides a critical evaluation of ideas and connections that is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mind map discussion providing a critical evaluation of ideas and connections is not included.
Mind Map Discussion: Connection to the Usefulness of the Information in Practice
5 points
Criteria Description
Mind Map Discussion: Connection to the Usefulness of the Information in Practice
- Excellent
5 points
Mind map discussion explains a connection to the usefulness of the information in practice that is extremely thorough and incorporates substantial supporting detail.
- Good
4.6 points
Mind map discussion includes a connection to the usefulness of the information in practice that is complete and includes a sufficient amount of detail.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Mind map discussion explains a connection to the usefulness of the information in practice but lacks a sufficient amount of detail.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Mind map discussion that explains a connection to the usefulness of the information in practice is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Mind map discussion that explains a connection to the usefulness of the information in practice is not included.
Conclusion: Provides a Summary of Ideas and Supports the Main Claim of the Paper
5 points
Criteria Description
Conclusion: Provides a Summary of Ideas and Supports the Main Claim of the Paper
- Excellent
5 points
Conclusion is extremely thorough and incorporates substantial supporting detail.
- Good
4.6 points
Conclusion is complete and includes a sufficient amount of detail.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Conclusion is included but lacks sufficient amount of detail.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Conclusion is incomplete or incorrect.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Conclusion is not included.
Thesis Development and Purpose
7 points
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
- Excellent
7 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
- Good
6.44 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
- Satisfactory
6.16 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
- Less Than Satisfactory
5.6 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
8 points
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
- Excellent
8 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
- Good
7.36 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
- Satisfactory
7.04 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
- Less Than Satisfactory
6.4 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5 points
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
- Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
- Good
4.6 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5 points
Criteria Description
Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
- Excellent
5 points
All format elements are correct.
- Good
4.6 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
5 points
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
- Excellent
5 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
- Good
4.6 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
- Satisfactory
4.4 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
- Less Than Satisfactory
4 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
- Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Total 100 points