coursework-banner

DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

Information technology professionals use project management methodologies to develop and implement assigned projects in their respective organizations. Therefore, the selection of the most appropriate models plays a critical role in facilitating the implementation plans of a project, especially in health care (Sapci & Sapci, 2020). As such, this paper provides the details of an interview with a healthcare IT professional in our healthcare organization and her perspectives based on the questions raised.

Part 1: Interview Questions

  1. What motivations drove you to Informatics nursing?
  2. What makes a health IT project successful, especially in the transforming health care system?
  3. What approaches do you use to collect project requirements?
  4. What is the project development methodology that you apply in this project?
  5. What role does a HIT manager play in implementing IT projects
  6. How does the project management methodology mentioned prepare them for the challenging projects?
  7. What health informaticist skills do a HIT profession utilize?
  8. Do you use these skills’ set in your role and career?
  9. What quality assurance process and system methodology are relevant to your project and profession?
  10. Does health IT offer benefits to healthcare professionals?

Part 2

The interviewed IT professional in the organization was the informatics nurse who played a critical role in the implementation of telehealth project aimed at enhancing quality of care in the organization, especially due to the adverse effects of restrictions imposed to control the spread and infections from the COVID-19 pandemic. Different motivations drive people to specialize in different specialties in the nursing profession and health care system. According to the nurse informaticist, factors like the need to improve efficiency, quality of care, and better patient outcomes drove her to specializing in informatics. She believes that health information technology (HIT) projects will improve the quality of care and accessibility.

The informatics nurse asserted that a successful health information technology professional must use the most effective methods in implementing IT projects that have critical benefits for patients based in the acuity and chronic nature of their conditions. Successful HIT professionals should also use the most effective project development method to attain the goals of their projects. The informatics nurse opined that the best approach in development of a project is to integrate the project aspects and professional characteristics of the implementer (Hayat et al., 2019). Asked about approaches to collect project requirements, the informatics nurse recommended the need for inter-professional collaboration, engagement of stakeholders as the most appropriate ways to collect project requirements. Further, one should use tools and effective planning models to collect all requirements.

Development Methodology

The informatics nurse asserted that our organization deploys the scrum methodology to implement most of its projects. The approach is based on agile development to support incremental and iterative project progression. Scrum methodology entails using iterative design or framework for complex software development projects that utilize cross-functional teams, rely on collaborations, and lead to well manages time designed by project team and manager to attain specific goals and practical deliverables. The informatics nurse was categorical that scrum is an empirical process and values transparency, inspection and adaptability as well as regular reflective approaches in planning and project implementation (Sapci & Sapci, 2020). Scrum incorporates agile principles that include user-centeredness design which can be deployed to clarify issues to be addressed and applies a collaborative empowering team to develop a rapid usable prototype in healthcare settings.

Role of HIT Manager in Health IT Projects

Health information technology is transforming the delivery of quality care to patients through interventions like telehealth and electronic health records (EHRs). As such, HIT managers play critical roles in the implementation of health IT projects (Laukka et al., 2020). According to the interviewed informatics nurse, HIT managers are change managers and advocate for change for improved care delivery. The HIT manager also provides the direction of the project and works closely with the project manager to ensure that the IT project meets organizational needs and is user-friendly while incorporating aspects that impact patient care delivery. The HIT manager can also be a project manager, champion of the initiative and supporter as well as facilitator.

The interviewee asserted that scrum methodology prepares the HIT manager effectively to take challenging roles based on its approach to project management. The methodology envisions situations where the project managers may be overwhelmed by the project requirements. Therefore, through a collaborative aspect, the methodology ensures that the manager can engage others to implement successful projects and mitigate potential barriers.

Health Informaticist Skill Sets

According to the informaticists, skills are a vital requirement in each field and projection. The informatics nurse opined that she uses different skills that include coding, communication, time management and networking with colleagues. The ability to write codes is essential for any IT profession since IT jobs are associated with programming and software development and utilization. The informaticist nurse asserted that HIT professionals also need research skills and strategies that operationalize healthcare data to be more actionable. They need problem solving skills and people relations attributes as well as programming skills.

These skills can be use in career development to learn new things from colleagues through networking. Further, problem solving abilities are essential in any environment as they allow providers to develop effective approaches to issue affecting care delivery (Sapci & Sapci, 2020). Time management allows one to accurately assess the project timelines and avoid possible creep and additional budget. As a future nurse informaticist, these skills are all important and they enhance the delivery of quality care.

Quality Assurance and System Testing

The need for quality assurance is important in health IT projects’ implementation as it ensures that IT project deliver expected outcomes. Quality assurance is about maintenance of the integrity of the system and building confidence among stakeholders. The quality assurance approach can use a host of methodologies that include the plan, do, check and act model (PDCA). Quality assurance ensures that a project meets its needs and customer satisfaction Crotty et al., 2019). System testing focuses on evaluation of the hardware and software components of the entire system and its products. For instance, an effective system checking approach for IT project must ensure that it meets organizational needs.

Conclusion

In conclusion, the informatics nurse was categorical and emphatic that health IT provides a host of benefits to providers, patients, and health care systems as it allows them to attain effectiveness and efficiency as well as attain patient outcomes. Informatics nurses should have requisite skills to deliver quality projects to their teams based on their roles. Health IT managers must facilitate change and support implementation of better projects in their facilities to reduce cost burden, improve overall quality, and enhance accessibility.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

References

Crotty, B, H., Somai, M., & Carlile, N. (2019). Health Affairs. Adopting Agile

Principles in Health Care. https://www.healthaffairs.org/do/10.1377/hblog20190813.559504/full

Hayat, F., Rehman, A. U., Arif, K. S., Wahab, K., & Abbas, M. (2019, July). The influence of

agile methodology (Scrum) on software project management. In 2019 20th IEEE/ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing (SNPD) (pp. 145-149). IEEE.

Laukka, E., Huhtakangas, M., Heponiemi, T., & Kanste, O. (2020). Identifying the roles of

healthcare leaders in HIT implementation: a scoping review of the quantitative and qualitative evidence. International journal of environmental research and public health, 17(8), 2865. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082865

Sapci, A. H., & Sapci, H. A. (2020). Teaching hands-on informatics skills to future health

informaticians: a competency framework proposal and analysis of health care informatics curricula. JMIR medical informatics, 8(1), e15748. doi: 10.2196/15748

Assessment Description

For this assignment, you will utilize content from the study materials as well as additional qualified resources to synthesize new information that you can apply towards your DPI Project, your future work area, or your clinical practice as a DNP-prepared nurse.

General Guidelines:

Use the following information to ensure successful completion of the assignment:

  • This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
  • Doctoral learners are required to use APA style for their writing assignments. The APA Style Guide is located in the Student Success Center.
  • Use primary sources published within the last 5 years. Provide citations and references for all sources used.
  • You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Class Resources if you need assistance.
  • Learners will submit this assignment using the assignment dropbox in the learning management system. In addition, learners must upload this deliverable to the Learner Dissertation Page (LDP) in the DNP PI Workspace for later use.

Directions:

For this assignment, write a 1,000-1,250 word paper in which you:

  1. Select a technology that has been explored in the course.
  2. Using the technology you have selected, define and describe how the element would be measured or evaluated.
  3. Using the content in the textbook and other readings, list three elements that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface.
  4. Perform an assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factors methods to determine functionality.
  5. For each element, propose practicable suggestions for improvement using support from the literature.
  1. Evaluation of Health Care Technology – Rubric
  2. Collapse All Evaluation Of Health Care Technology – RubricCollapse All
  3. Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course

    DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU
    DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU
  4. 11 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Selection of a Specific Technology Explored in This Course
  7. Excellent
  8. 11 points
  9. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  10. Good
  11. 12 points
  12. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is present. Discussion is convincing. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DNP 805 Week 8 Evaluation of Health Care Technology GCU

  1. Satisfactory
  2. 68 points
  3. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is perfunctory.

Also Read:  MAT 2051 Discrete Mathematics Unit 7 Assignment 1

  1. Less Than Satisfactory
  2. 8 points
  3. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is marginal or incomplete.
  4. Unsatisfactory
  5. 0 points
  6. Selection of a specific technology explored in this course is not present.
  7. Assessment Performed Using Elements of User-Technology Interface or Human Factor Methods to Determin
  8. 5 points
  9. Criteria Description
  10. Assessment Performed Using Elements of User-Technology Interface or Human Factor Methods to Determine Existing Functionality of the Specified Technology
  11. Excellent
  12. 5 points
  13. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  14. Good
  15. 18 points
  16. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  17. Satisfactory
  18. 52 points
  19. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level.
  20. Less Than Satisfactory
  21. 2 points
  22. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is marginal or incomplete.
  23. Unsatisfactory
  24. 0 points
  25. An assessment using elements of user-technology interface or human factor methods to determine existing functionality of the specified technology is not present.
  26. List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the U
  27. 5 points
  28. Criteria Description
  29. List With Support for Three Elements of the Specified Technology That Will Be Used to Evaluate the User-Technology Interface Using the Course Content
  30. Excellent
  31. 5 points
  32. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  33. Good
  34. 18 points
  35. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  36. Satisfactory
  37. 52 points
  38. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but at a perfunctory level.
  39. Less Than Satisfactory
  40. 2 points
  41. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is present but is marginal or incomplete.
  42. Unsatisfactory
  43. 0 points
  44. A list with support of three elements of the specified technology that will be used to evaluate the user-technology interface using the course content is not present.
  45. Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Elemen
  46. 5 points
  47. Criteria Description
  48. Definition of Each Element of the Specified Technology Identified and Description of How Each Element Would Be Measured or Evaluated
  49. Excellent
  50. 5 points
  51. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  52. Good
  53. 18 points
  54. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  55. Satisfactory
  56. 52 points
  57. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but at a perfunctory level.
  58. Less Than Satisfactory
  59. 2 points
  60. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are present but are marginal or incomplete.
  61. Unsatisfactory
  62. 0 points
  63. A definition of each element of the specified technology identified and a description of how each element would be measured or evaluated are not present.
  64. Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement
  65. 5 points
  66. Criteria Description
  67. Proposal That Employs Support From the Literature to Provide Practicable Suggestions for Improvement in the Use of Each Element of the Specified Technology
  68. Excellent
  69. 5 points
  70. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Discussion is insightful and forward-thinking. Information presented is from current scholarly sources.
  71. Good
  72. 18 points
  73. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present in full. Discussion is convincing and defines specific elements. Information presented is from scholarly though dated sources.
  74. Satisfactory
  75. 52 points
  76. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but at a perfunctory level.
  77. Less Than Satisfactory
  78. 2 points
  79. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is present but is marginal or incomplete.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. A proposal that employs support from the literature to provide practicable suggestions for improvement in the use of each element of the specified technology is not present.
  3. Purpose
  4. 7 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Purpose
  • Excellent
  1. 7 points
  2. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
  • Good
  1. 08 points
  2. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 78 points
  2. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 16 points
  2. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
  3. Argument Logic and Construction
  4. 8 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Argument Logic and Construction
  • Excellent
  1. 8 points
  2. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
  • Good
  1. 1 points
  2. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 74 points
  2. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 04 points
  2. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
  3. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
  4. 5 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
  • Excellent
  1. 5 points
  2. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
  • Good
  1. 06 points
  2. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 84 points
  2. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 4 points
  2. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
  3. Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
  4. 5 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
  • Excellent
  1. 5 points
  2. All format elements are correct.
  • Good
  1. 06 points
  2. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 84 points
  2. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 4 points
  2. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
  3. Documentation of Sources
  4. 5 points
  5. Criteria Description
  6. Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
  • Excellent
  1. 5 points
  2. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
  • Good
  1. 06 points
  2. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
  • Satisfactory
  1. 84 points
  2. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
  • Less Than Satisfactory
  1. 4 points
  2. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
  • Unsatisfactory
  1. 0 points
  2. Sources are not documented.
  3. Total 110 points