coursework-banner

DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

The introduction for the Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

Sample Answer for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

To contribute to the physical and mental well being of every human that is entrusted to my care with compassion and respect has been the fundamental philosophy of my nursing practice. My journey as a professional nurse began over twenty years ago in the Emergency Room. “Professions are valued by society because the services professionals provide are beneficial for members of the society” (McEwen & Wills p.2). Caring for citizens of my community during one of their most vulnerable moments in life is my passion. This unique and rewarding profession allows me to engage with people of every socio-economic background. Having a moral compass that influences my decisions and guides my practice with equality and the highest ethical standard helps to address the concepts of nursing.

Findings show that religious engagement among students declines during college, but their spirituality shows substantial growth. “Students become more caring, more tolerant, more connected with others, and more actively engaged in a spiritual quest.” (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher Education”) The authors also found that spiritual growth enhances other outcomes, such as academic performance, psychological well-being, leadership development, and satisfaction with college. The study also identified a number of college activities that contribute to students’ spiritual growth. Some of these–study abroad, interdisciplinary studies, and service learning–appear to be effective because they expose students to new and diverse people, cultures, and ideas. Spiritual development is also enhanced if students engage in “inner work” through activities such as meditation or self-reflection, or if their professors actively encourage them to explore questions of meaning and purpose. (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher (Alexander W, 2010)”). By raising public awareness of the key role that spirituality plays in student learning and development, by alerting academic administrators, faculty, and curriculum committees to the importance of spiritual development, and by identifying strategies for enhancing that development, this work encourages institutions to give greater priority to these spiritual aspects of students’ educational and professional development.

Practicing the art of nursing while incorporating the continued scientific findings is one sure way of advocating for fair and just treatment for all. A condition to be improved on is the inconsistent care that is given to our homeless and mental health population within our emergency health care system. As a DNP, advocating for positive social change within the nursing practice for these two populations it would require legislative involvement. Reviewing the current local and federal laws that are in place would be a helpful start. Collaborating with community leaders and partnering with organization that are helping the homeless and mental health population.  “The DNP is in the best position to effect and assess change within the clinical setting” (Zaccagnini & Pechacek,  p. 73).

McEwen, M. &Wills, E. M.(2019). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Jones and Bartlett LearningThe Doctor of Nursing Practice Essentials: A New Model for Advanced Practice Nursing: A New Model for Advanced Practice Nursing (3rd edition). Zaccagnin, M ., & Pechacek  J, (year).

Sample Answer 2 for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

Explanation of Philosophy in Nursing Practice

With many years of experience in critical and emergency nursing, my approach to patient care revolves around providing holistic support. When it comes to looking after a person’s well-being, physical health is only one part of the equation – we must also consider their mental, emotional and spiritual needs (Anderson et al., 2005). To ensure quality treatment for all patients, building trust between them and myself requires attentive listening skills and compassion towards those who are vulnerable or struggling with cultural differences. My mission going forward is not just maintaining but expanding on what I have already learned; obtaining further knowledge through completing my DNP program will enable me to deliver evidence-based practice, thereby increasing positive outcomes from healthcare provision.

The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is an opportunity to become a powerful agent for social change, advocating for improved healthcare policies and practices. As part of my studies at Walden University, I am particularly focused on the implementation of diversity and inclusion training for medical providers so that they may better comprehend their patients’ needs from unique perspectives while improving communication with them – ultimately resulting in higher quality patient outcomes (Anderson et al., 2005). Additionally, I plan to actively promote increased access to healthcare services among underprivileged populations living in rural areas by initiating telehealth programs and collaborating with community-based organizations. My mission is to work towards eliminating health disparities within these communities through sustainable solutions that are based upon equity, fairness, respectfulness and solidarity.

In general, my philosophy of nursing practice revolves around providing holistic care with a focus on active listening and cultural sensitivity. As I further develop my skillset as a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), I must commit to evidence-based practices in order to maximize positive patient outcomes (Baumrim, 2004). Additionally, I will work diligently towards improving access for underserved populations while advocating for the integration of diversity and inclusion training within healthcare providers. With these goals in mind, my ambition is to leave an enduring mark on the healthcare system and have a profound effect on patients who entrust me with their care.

References

Anderson RA, Crabtree BF, Steele DJ, McDaniel RR. Case study research: the view from complexity science. Qualitative Health Research.      2005;15(5):669–685.

Baumrim SB. The shoes of the other. The Philosophical Forum. 2004;35(4):397–410.

Bruton SV. Teaching the golden rule. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004;49(2):179–187

Cunningham WP. The golden rule is a universal ethical norm. Journal of Business Ethics. 1998;17(1):105–109.

Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2002.

Huang Yong. A copper rule versus the golden rule: The Daoist-Confucian proposal for global ethics. Philosophy of East and West. 2005;55(3):394–425

Zinn JS, Brannon D, Mor V, Barry T. A structure-technology contingency analysis of caregiving in nursing facilities. Health Care Management Review. 2003;28(4):293–306.

For this first course Discussion, you will present a philosophy of nursing practice that draws on your experience, area(s) of expertise, and beliefs. Looking ahead to your role as a DNP, also consider how to expand your awareness of issues beyond your own current practice—such as regarding diversity, global health, collaboration—and how to fulfill the Walden requirement to advocate for social change.

Photo Credit: steheap / Adobe Stock

In short, begin now to commit to a higher level of contribution and practice as a DNP and to reflect that commitment in your philosophy of nursing practice for today and the future. As you continue through the course, note this image will appear with each Discussion and indicates an opportunity to connect your thinking with that of colleagues, for learning with and from one another.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

To prepare:
Review the Week 1 Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the Chapter 1 reading from McEwen and Wills, “Philosophy, Science, and Nursing.”
Reflect on your nursing experience, expertise you have developed, and beliefs about nursing and nursing practice you have formed as a result.
Consider how your philosophy of nursing practice is shaped by these elements.
Consider goals for expanding your professional awareness through the DNP program and the requirement as a Walden student to be an advocate for social change. How can your philosophy of nursing practice support you in these areas? How can these goals and Walden social change requirement enrich your philosophy of nursing practice?

With these thoughts in mind …

By Day 3 of Week 1

Post an explanation of your philosophy of nursing practice that briefly describes your nursing experience and area(s) of expertise. Be sure to explain your beliefs that inform your philosophy of nursing practice and your goals for expanding your experience and practice as a DNP (e.g., embrace of diversity, global health issues, collaboration). Then, explain the DNP role as a social change agent and recommend at least one way you will advocate for positive social change as a Walden DNP. Be specific and provide examples, with all citations in APA 7 style.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.

By Day 6 of Week 1

Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days. Choose colleagues with different life experiences and beliefs from your own, and contrast how these factors have shaped their philosophies compared with yours. Also comment on their goals for expanding their experience, practice, and social change advocacy with suggestions or guidance based on your experience. Be specific and provide examples.

Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!

Name: NURS_8114_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View

 

Excellent

90%–100%

 

Good

80%–89%

 

Fair

70%–79%

 

Poor

0%–69%

 

Main Posting:

Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

 

Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)

Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).

Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.

No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three current credible sources.

 

Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)

Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).

Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.

Supported by at least three credible references.

 

Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)

Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).

One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.

Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Cited with fewer than two credible references.

 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)

Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.

Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.

Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.

Contains only one or no credible references.

 

Main Posting:

Writing

 

Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Written clearly and concisely.

Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

 

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Written concisely.

May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.

Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.

 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Written somewhat concisely.

May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Contains some APA formatting errors.

 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Not written clearly or concisely.

Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.

Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.

 

Main Posting:

Timely and full participation

 

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

 

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts main Discussion by due date.

 

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post main Discussion by due date.

 

First Response:

Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

 

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

First Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

 

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

First Response:
Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

 

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.

Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)

Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.

Responds to questions posed by faculty.

The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.

 

Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.

Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.

Second Response:
Writing

Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)

Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.

Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.

Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.

 

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.

Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.

Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.

Response is written in standard, edited English.

 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.

Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.

Few or no credible sources are cited.

 

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)

Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.

Response to faculty questions are missing.

No credible sources are cited.

Second Response:
Timely and full participation

Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)

Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.

Posts by due date.

 

Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)

Meets requirements for full participation.

Posts by due date.

 

Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.

Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)

Does not meet requirements for full participation.

Does not post by due date.

Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8114_Week1_Discussion_Rubric

Week 1 Discussion

Week 1 Discussion

Post an explanation of your philosophy of nursing practice that briefly describes your nursing experience and area(s) of expertise. Be sure to explain your beliefs that inform your philosophy of nursing practice and your goals for expanding your experience and practice as a DNP (e.g., embrace of diversity, global health issues, collaboration). Then, explain the DNP role as a social change agent and recommend at least one way you will advocate for positive social change as a Walden DNP.

Sample Answer 3 for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

The philosophy of nursing practice entails the nurse’s ethics, values, and belief, along with their motivation and dedication for being part of the profession. As illustrated by Glasdam et al. (2020), the philosophy of nursing is based on the perspective of a nurse regarding their practice, education and patient care ethics. My philosophy of nursing can be summed up by the basic principles that I strive to live by in my daily practice, i.e., to provide empathetic, holistic, and culturally sensitive, and quality care to all of my patients. As stated by Farokhzadian, Nayeri, and Borhani (2018), nurses are required to remain committed to keep updating their knowledge and skills with the aim of providing high quality and effective care to their patients. With that principle in mind, my philosophy of nursing also includes a firm belief never to stop learning and improving all the essential skills that are required for my practice, such as honesty, kindness, persistence, integrity, caring, and evidence-based knowledge.  In addition to this, Nunnery (2019) stated that the nursing profession is all about caring. Drawn from Jean Watson’s caring theory, I believe that my nursing practice should be all about caring about people and showing genuine empathy to them. Moreover, it is stated that health reflects the quality of life. Belief in this philosophy has thus helped my personal and professional self-actualization in my nursing practice.

Role of DNP as a social change agent

While working in a hospital setting, where I was engaged in providing care to the patients with acute trauma, I came to realize how important it is for nurses to be committed to enhancing the long-term quality of life of patients that have experienced trauma or experiencing multiple acute and chronic diseases long after they have left the hospital. Similarly, while working as a nurse in critical care, PACU, and day surgery, I came to understand that health is a dynamic state that can easily be changed from wellness to illness as a result of external influences and as a response to the environmental factors. Thus, my professional goal is to continuously get exposure to different critical care and problem solving situations that can expand my skills, knowledge, practice, and experience as a DNP. I also intend to get involved in addressing global health issues that could allow me to enhance my practice as a DNP.  As Zaccagnini and Pechacek (2019) asserts, the DNP nurse has a significant role as a social change agent as they can facilitate learning with the standard practices and values of the nursing profession and advocate positive social change through leading quality improvement initiatives and evidence-based practice innovations. In order to become a Walden DNP, it is essential for me not to be overwhelmed regarding compassion and caring for patients and their families and to help them develop trustful and meaningful relationships with nurses. This will allow me to advocate for positive social changes in my daily practice as a Walden DNP.

 

References

Farokhzadian, J., Nayeri, N. D., & Borhani, F. (2018). The long way ahead to achieve an effective patient safety culture: challenges perceived by nurses. BMC health services research, 18(1), 1-13. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-3467-1

Glasdam, S., Ekstrand, F., Rosberg, M., & van der Schaaf, A. M. (2020). A gap between the philosophy and the practice of palliative healthcare: sociological perspectives on the practice of nurses in specialised palliative homecare. Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 23(1), 141-152. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11019-019-09918-2

Nunnery, R. K. (2019). Advancing your career: Concepts of professional nursing. FA Davis.

Zaccagnini, M., & Pechacek, J. M. (2019). The doctor of nursing practice essentials: A new model for advanced practice nursing. Jones & Bartlett Learning. https://www.alrayane-healthcare.com/sites/default/files/webform/pdf-the-doctor-of-nursing-practice-essentials-mary-zaccagnini-kathryn-white-pdf-download-free-book-e7c9ee0.pdf

Sample Answer 4 for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

I have been a nurse for about fifteen years and have worked in the medical-surgical unit for almost eleven years. I became a charge nurse three years ago. My nursing philosophy is to provide holistic and unique patient-centered care to each patient based on their circumstances by using evidence-based practices, collaborating with interdisciplinary staff, and continuing education. Evidence-based practice uses the most recent data from research and knowledge gained from life experiences to make the best clinical decisions (Stewart, Chambless, & Stirman, 2018). Likewise, philosophy looks into how to obtain knowledge and facts and how they can be significant (McEwen & Wills, 2019). I was a patient each time I went into the hospital to give birth to my children, and I did not have a great experience with some of the nurses who cared for me. Due to my personal beliefs, experiences, and role as a leader to colleagues and patients, I treat each patient and coworker with respect and dignity, and I also treat them how I would want others to treat me if I were in their shoes. I go into my patients’ rooms with a positive attitude, talk to them, and listen to their concerns, and this aids me in knowing the areas that I might be able to help them with through our hospital resources. I do my best to be culturally sensitive and use interpreters to communicate with patients who do not speak English and so much more.

I have gained a lot of experience through the many years that I have worked in nursing, and my experience has given me helpful data that has been useful to me and has also aided me in providing exceptional care to my patients. I have my master’s degree, and the next step up is a doctorate (DNP) because I want to gain more knowledge and be the best I can become. I am also pursuing my DNP because I love to learn so that I can also teach others. Attaining my DNP, one of the highest degrees in the nursing field, will aid me in getting a top leadership role at any healthcare organization, which is my ultimate goal. Individuals in leadership are the ones who help to put policies in place, and I will be able to put policies in place that will positively impact nursing practice at my place of employment as a Walden DNP graduate by being a social change agent. DNP-prepared nurses lead in putting policies in place locally and globally due to them holding leadership positions (Fain, Asselin, & McCurry, 2008). As a social change agent, I plan to ensure that my organization has an excellent education department that regularly goes into each hospital unit to provide education and always be available to provide guidance, answer questions, and provide solutions to any nurse’s clinical issue. I want the nursing department to feel safe and secure and know that the educational department can help them when needed.

References:

Fain, J. A., Asselin, M. & McCurry, M. (2008). The DNP … … Why now. Nursing Management (Springhouse), 39 (7), 34-37. doi:             10.1097/01.NUMA.0000326565.46790.c0.

McEwen, M., & Wills, E. M. (2019). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.

Stewart, R. E., Chambless, D. L., & Stirman, S. W. (2018). Decision making and the use of evidence-based practice: Is the three-legged stool balanced?. Practice Innovations, 3(1),56-67. doi:10.1037/pri0000063

Sample Answer 5 for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice

It is nice to meet you, and I enjoyed reading your post. I have to admit, working in the acute cardiology setting does not always afford the opportunity to contemplate the emotional/spiritual/mental impacts of our involvement. More often than not, our team is faced with patients who present with life threatening injuries, and the focus of care is to act swiftly and judiciously to get them out of harm’s way. So, having to use terms like “heart attack”, “heart failure” and “shock your heart back into rhythm”, sometimes doesn’t immediately give the perception of an empathetic provider. In fact, it can give the perception of a provider that just sees the patient as a diagnosis, and not a person who has no idea what these complex medical terms even mean. Perhaps this is why many cardiologists are perceived as cold and rude, though in actuality, I feel that this perception couldn’t be farther from the truth. We want our patients to survive and have a good quality of life, so we fight for them with everything we’ve got.

I try my best to be mindful of my tone of voice when treating acute STEMI patients. With the chaos of the moment, lots of clinicians chattering, machines beeping, and the other noises of the hospital, I must have a commanding presence in the midst of it all – in order to ensure that the appropriate life saving measures are being implemented.

I commend you for your desire to bring greater access to healthcare in underserved populations, as this is immensely important, as these areas have been disproportionately affected by heart disease (Bove et al., 2011). Thank you for all that you do, and thank you in advance for the indelible impression you will leave on your patients and the healthcare community.

Reference

Bove, A. A., Santamore, W. P., Homko, C., Kashem, A., Cross, R., McConnell, T. R., Shirk, G., & Menapace, F. (2011). Reducing Cardiovascular Disease Risk in Medically Underserved Urban and Rural Communities. American Heart Journal161(2), 351–359.