DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
The introduction for the Walden University DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
To contribute to the physical and mental well being of every human that is entrusted to my care with compassion and respect has been the fundamental philosophy of my nursing practice. My journey as a professional nurse began over twenty years ago in the Emergency Room. “Professions are valued by society because the services professionals provide are beneficial for members of the society” (McEwen & Wills p.2). Caring for citizens of my community during one of their most vulnerable moments in life is my passion. This unique and rewarding profession allows me to engage with people of every socio-economic background. Having a moral compass that influences my decisions and guides my practice with equality and the highest ethical standard helps to address the concepts of nursing.
Findings show that religious engagement among students declines during college, but their spirituality shows substantial growth. “Students become more caring, more tolerant, more connected with others, and more actively engaged in a spiritual quest.” (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher Education”) The authors also found that spiritual growth enhances other outcomes, such as academic performance, psychological well-being, leadership development, and satisfaction with college. The study also identified a number of college activities that contribute to students’ spiritual growth. Some of these–study abroad, interdisciplinary studies, and service learning–appear to be effective because they expose students to new and diverse people, cultures, and ideas. Spiritual development is also enhanced if students engage in “inner work” through activities such as meditation or self-reflection, or if their professors actively encourage them to explore questions of meaning and purpose. (“Cultivating the Spirit – Spirituality in Higher (Alexander W, 2010)”). By raising public awareness of the key role that spirituality plays in student learning and development, by alerting academic administrators, faculty, and curriculum committees to the importance of spiritual development, and by identifying strategies for enhancing that development, this work encourages institutions to give greater priority to these spiritual aspects of students’ educational and professional development.
Practicing the art of nursing while incorporating the continued scientific findings is one sure way of advocating for fair and just treatment for all. A condition to be improved on is the inconsistent care that is given to our homeless and mental health population within our emergency health care system. As a DNP, advocating for positive social change within the nursing practice for these two populations it would require legislative involvement. Reviewing the current local and federal laws that are in place would be a helpful start. Collaborating with community leaders and partnering with organization that are helping the homeless and mental health population. “The DNP is in the best position to effect and assess change within the clinical setting” (Zaccagnini & Pechacek, p. 73).
McEwen, M. &Wills, E. M.(2019). Theoretical basis for nursing (5th ed.). Wolters Kluwer.
Jones and Bartlett LearningThe Doctor of Nursing Practice Essentials: A New Model for Advanced Practice Nursing: A New Model for Advanced Practice Nursing (3rd edition). Zaccagnin, M ., & Pechacek J, (year).
Sample Answer 2 for DNP 8114 Discussion Philosophy of Nursing Practice
Explanation of Philosophy in Nursing Practice
With many years of experience in critical and emergency nursing, my approach to patient care revolves around providing holistic support. When it comes to looking after a person’s well-being, physical health is only one part of the equation – we must also consider their mental, emotional and spiritual needs (Anderson et al., 2005). To ensure quality treatment for all patients, building trust between them and myself requires attentive listening skills and compassion towards those who are vulnerable or struggling with cultural differences. My mission going forward is not just maintaining but expanding on what I have already learned; obtaining further knowledge through completing my DNP program will enable me to deliver evidence-based practice, thereby increasing positive outcomes from healthcare provision.
The Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP) is an opportunity to become a powerful agent for social change, advocating for improved healthcare policies and practices. As part of my studies at Walden University, I am particularly focused on the implementation of diversity and inclusion training for medical providers so that they may better comprehend their patients’ needs from unique perspectives while improving communication with them – ultimately resulting in higher quality patient outcomes (Anderson et al., 2005). Additionally, I plan to actively promote increased access to healthcare services among underprivileged populations living in rural areas by initiating telehealth programs and collaborating with community-based organizations. My mission is to work towards eliminating health disparities within these communities through sustainable solutions that are based upon equity, fairness, respectfulness and solidarity.
In general, my philosophy of nursing practice revolves around providing holistic care with a focus on active listening and cultural sensitivity. As I further develop my skillset as a Doctor of Nursing Practice (DNP), I must commit to evidence-based practices in order to maximize positive patient outcomes (Baumrim, 2004). Additionally, I will work diligently towards improving access for underserved populations while advocating for the integration of diversity and inclusion training within healthcare providers. With these goals in mind, my ambition is to leave an enduring mark on the healthcare system and have a profound effect on patients who entrust me with their care.
References
Anderson RA, Crabtree BF, Steele DJ, McDaniel RR. Case study research: the view from complexity science. Qualitative Health Research. 2005;15(5):669–685.
Baumrim SB. The shoes of the other. The Philosophical Forum. 2004;35(4):397–410.
Bruton SV. Teaching the golden rule. Journal of Business Ethics. 2004;49(2):179–187
Cunningham WP. The golden rule is a universal ethical norm. Journal of Business Ethics. 1998;17(1):105–109.
Gilovich T, Griffin D, Kahneman D. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge University Press; Cambridge: 2002.
Huang Yong. A copper rule versus the golden rule: The Daoist-Confucian proposal for global ethics. Philosophy of East and West. 2005;55(3):394–425
Zinn JS, Brannon D, Mor V, Barry T. A structure-technology contingency analysis of caregiving in nursing facilities. Health Care Management Review. 2003;28(4):293–306.
For this first course Discussion, you will present a philosophy of nursing practice that draws on your experience, area(s) of expertise, and beliefs. Looking ahead to your role as a DNP, also consider how to expand your awareness of issues beyond your own current practice—such as regarding diversity, global health, collaboration—and how to fulfill the Walden requirement to advocate for social change.
Photo Credit: steheap / Adobe Stock
In short, begin now to commit to a higher level of contribution and practice as a DNP and to reflect that commitment in your philosophy of nursing practice for today and the future. As you continue through the course, note this image will appear with each Discussion and indicates an opportunity to connect your thinking with that of colleagues, for learning with and from one another.
To prepare:
Review the Week 1 Learning Resources. Pay particular attention to the Chapter 1 reading from McEwen and Wills, “Philosophy, Science, and Nursing.”
Reflect on your nursing experience, expertise you have developed, and beliefs about nursing and nursing practice you have formed as a result.
Consider how your philosophy of nursing practice is shaped by these elements.
Consider goals for expanding your professional awareness through the DNP program and the requirement as a Walden student to be an advocate for social change. How can your philosophy of nursing practice support you in these areas? How can these goals and Walden social change requirement enrich your philosophy of nursing practice?
With these thoughts in mind …
By Day 3 of Week 1
Post an explanation of your philosophy of nursing practice that briefly describes your nursing experience and area(s) of expertise. Be sure to explain your beliefs that inform your philosophy of nursing practice and your goals for expanding your experience and practice as a DNP (e.g., embrace of diversity, global health issues, collaboration). Then, explain the DNP role as a social change agent and recommend at least one way you will advocate for positive social change as a Walden DNP. Be specific and provide examples, with all citations in APA 7 style.
Read a selection of your colleagues’ posts.
By Day 6 of Week 1
Respond to at least two colleagues on 2 different days. Choose colleagues with different life experiences and beliefs from your own, and contrast how these factors have shaped their philosophies compared with yours. Also comment on their goals for expanding their experience, practice, and social change advocacy with suggestions or guidance based on your experience. Be specific and provide examples.
Note: For this Discussion, you are required to complete your initial post before you will be able to view and respond to your colleagues’ postings. Begin by clicking on the “Post to Discussion Question” link and then select “Create Thread” to complete your initial post. Remember, once you click on Submit, you cannot delete or edit your own posts, and you cannot post anonymously. Please check your post carefully before clicking on Submit!
Name: NURS_8114_Week1_Discussion_Rubric
Grid View
List View
Excellent
90%–100%
Good
80%–89%
Fair
70%–79%
Poor
0%–69%
Main Posting:
Response to the Discussion question is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
Points Range: 40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
Thoroughly responds to the Discussion question(s).
Is reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module and current credible sources.
No less than 75% of post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three current credible sources.
Points Range: 35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
Responds to most of the Discussion question(s).
Is somewhat reflective with critical analysis and synthesis representative of knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
50% of the post has exceptional depth and breadth.
Supported by at least three credible references.
Points Range: 31 (31%) – 34 (34%)
Responds to some of the Discussion question(s).
One to two criteria are not addressed or are superficially addressed.
Is somewhat lacking reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Somewhat represents knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Cited with fewer than two credible references.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 30 (30%)
Does not respond to the Discussion question(s). Lacks depth or superficially addresses criteria.
Lacks reflection and critical analysis and synthesis.
Does not represent knowledge gained from the course readings for the module.
Contains only one or no credible references.
Main Posting:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Written clearly and concisely.
Contains no grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Written concisely.
May contain one to two grammatical or spelling errors.
Adheres to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Written somewhat concisely.
May contain more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Contains some APA formatting errors.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Not written clearly or concisely.
Contains more than two spelling or grammatical errors.
Does not adhere to current APA manual writing rules and style.
Main Posting:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 10 (10%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts main Discussion by due date.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Posts main Discussion by due date.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post main Discussion by due date.
First Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
First Response:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
First Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.
Second Response:
Post to colleague’s main post that is reflective and justified with credible sources.
Points Range: 9 (9%) – 9 (9%)
Response exhibits critical thinking and application to practice settings.
Responds to questions posed by faculty.
The use of scholarly sources to support ideas demonstrates synthesis and understanding of learning objectives.
Points Range: 8 (8%) – 8 (8%)
Response has some depth and may exhibit critical thinking or application to practice setting.
Points Range: 7 (7%) – 7 (7%)
Response is on topic and may have some depth.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 6 (6%)
Response may not be on topic and lacks depth.
Second Response:
Writing
Points Range: 6 (6%) – 6 (6%)
Communication is professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are fully answered, if posed.
Provides clear, concise opinions and ideas that are supported by two or more credible sources.
Response is effectively written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Communication is mostly professional and respectful to colleagues.
Response to faculty questions are mostly answered, if posed.
Provides opinions and ideas that are supported by few credible sources.
Response is written in standard, edited English.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Response posed in the Discussion may lack effective professional communication.
Response to faculty questions are somewhat answered, if posed.
Few or no credible sources are cited.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 3 (3%)
Responses posted in the Discussion lack effective communication.
Response to faculty questions are missing.
No credible sources are cited.
Second Response:
Timely and full participation
Points Range: 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Meets requirements for timely, full, and active participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Meets requirements for full participation.
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Posts by due date.
Points Range: 0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Does not meet requirements for full participation.
Does not post by due date.
Total Points: 100
Name: NURS_8114_Week1_Discussion_Rubric