PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1
Grand Canyon University PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1 assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1 depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1 is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1
After the introduction, move into the main part of the PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1 assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the PHI 413 Topic 3 DQ 1 assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
DQ The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values
Every single one of us, in my view, has value. Humans were created in God’s likeness and are tasked with carrying out God’s plan for the planet. Everything happens for a reason, and I think that God has a purpose for everyone of us, even if we don’t recognize it or comprehend it. Individuals, in my opinion, have the right to make their own decisions. Abortion, in my opinion, may be justified in extreme circumstances, such as when the mother’s life is endangered by pregnancy difficulties or when the pregnancy is the consequence of rape. I believe that when two consenting adults participate in an action that is known to result in pregnancy and that pregnancy occurs, the result should be acknowledged and supported as a matter of principle and duty. My position, on the other hand, cannot supersede an individual’s right to self-determination, therefore I am pro-choice. Because they have an influence on human life, bioethical concerns, abortion, designer babies, and stem cell research are all contentious. The issue is whether these things are good or destructive to God’s creation of human life. I support stem cell research because studies show that this science has the potential to heal or cure a wide range of ailments. When the issue of “designer babies” is discussed in the context of reducing the possibility of birth malformations and disabilities, it looks to be a promising one. On the other side, prospective parents are emotionally and financially committed in this therapy. Because of this investment and medical science’s expanding ability to modify gender and other physical features, we risk enticing people into fantasizing about and attempting to make the “ideal kid”. Therefore, I don’t support” designer babies”.
Replies
The four principles are respect for autonomy, beneficence, nonmaleficence, and justice. My belief is nonmaleficence is most important because no one should harm anyone else. Next I would say beneficence because preventing harm to others is important. Justice would be third because fair benefits and risks should be distributed throughout society. Autonomy would be last because without the other three no one would respect anyone’s autonomy. For the Christian narrative they’d be ranked in the order of beneficence, nonmaleficence, autonomy, and justice. Beneficence because all actions are intended to help others. Nonmaleficence because above all is to do no harm. Autonomy because people have a right to choose based on their beliefs. Justice because distributing with fairness whether it distributive, remedial, or retributive justice. Everyone has their one views on how they should be ranked. It is important though that all are part of a healthy society and importantly a safe society.
Hoener, P. (2020). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values & Decision Making in
Health Care (1st ed.). Retrieved from: Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making in Health Care (gcumedia.com)
You make a terrific point. All individuals have their way of assigning the importance of the four principles of medical ethics due to their worldview. Learning about and accommodating a patient’s cultural background into their health care (whenever possible as long as the practices will not be harmful to the patient) can also provide insight into a patient’s preferences in what the principles mean to them, their level of importance and how they should be applied in their health care.
Replies
Cultural competence is one of the must important aspects in nursing. Patients who feel their needs are being met tend to feel they have received good care. We were just talking about different cultures in my class at Merced College and what we have learned in clinicals about other cultures. During my second semester I learned that Hmong women only drink warm water and eat soup after giving birth. I now know I will ask someone who is Hmong if they want cold or warm water if I’m ever in the same situation again. We should all treat others with respect regarding their cultural preferences. Different cultures may view four principles differently than the Christian view, however we are not there to judge their views.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DQ: The four principles, especially in the context of bioethics in the United States, has often been critiqued for raising the principle of autonomy to the highest place, such that it trumps all other principles or values
Hoener, P. (2020). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values & Decision Making in
Health Care (1st ed.). Retrieved from: https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-
dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-
care/v1.1/#/chapter/1
Hello, thank you for sharing, interesting post. all human beings created in the image of God deserve to be treated with dignity and respect (White, 2020); therefore, the principle of autonomy should be applied to provide the respect that others deserve. A healthcare professional must respect a patient’s decision with their care and treat them with the same respect.
Reference:
White, Nathan H. (2020). God, humanity, and human dignity. In Grand Canyon University [GCU]. Practicing Dignity: An introduction to Christian values and decision making in healthcare. (ch.2). https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/2
“Ethical theories informed by a worldview will, in turn, determine what specific principles will be appropriate or useful in approaching moral problems” (Hoehner, 2020). If I were to rank the four biomedical ethics principles, I would say nonmaleficence should be on the top list. Do no harm is the first and foremost important rule to practice in the medical field. Then respect for autonomy. While taking care of patients, you must respect their decisions based on their worldviews and wants. We must inform the patient of the benefits and risks of treatment and get consent. Beneficence and Justice would come next. In the medical field you must care for your patients with their best interest and prevent any harm to them. This refers to beneficence. This “requires that one prevents harm to others, provides benefits, and balances those benefits against risks and costs” (Hoehner, 2020). And lastly, Justice, each patient shall be treated with respect no matter their situation. Fair and equitable treatment for all patients.
Hoehner, Paul J. (2020). Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative. In Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values & decision making in health care (1st ed.), https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/3
Replies
I agree that nonmaleficene should be at the top of the four principles. No one should do harm to others. My opinion is the others don’t matter if someone is harming others. We as health professionals are there to treat the patient not to harm them. The other principles are important but if someone is harming someone do they really matter? Autonomy goes out the window, beneficence is not happening, and yes justice can be served but the damage has already been done.
Hoener, P. (2020). Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values & Decision Making in
Health Care (1st ed.). Retrieved from: Practicing Dignity: An Introduction to Christian Values and Decision Making in Health Care (gcumedia.com)
Thank you for responding to my post. I agree with you that respect for autonomy, beneficence, and justice principles do not matter if someone harms others. In certain biomedical and medical practices such as stem cell research, one human being is a means to another end. “To say that all human beings have intrinsic moral worth and dignity is to say that it is morally wrong to use one person for the mere benefit of another” (Hoener, 2020).
Reference:
Hoehner, Paul J. (2020). Biomedical Ethics in the Christian Narrative. In Practicing dignity: An introduction to Christian values & decision making in health care (1st ed.), https://lc.gcumedia.com/phi413v/practicing-dignity-an-introduction-to-christian-values-and-decision-making-in-health-care/v1.1/#/chapter/3
The definition of harm may be relative to the type of care given. Especially surgery and other invasive medical interventions invoke unintentional harm to the patient. However, the long-term intention is to promote the patient’s best interests in recovery and well-being (Hobden, 2008). Non-maleficence requires that the care provider or the research “does no harm” to their patients or participants. The understanding of harm may differ between the care professional or the researcher and the patient or participants.