DQ The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
Grand Canyon University DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
After the introduction, move into the main part of the DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NRS 433 Topic 5 DQ 1
Replies to Mireille Ulysse
The application of quantitative and qualitative research methods is different, but when the two are used together in research, they increase reliability and availability from the roles played. The quantitative designs used in research are correlational, descriptive, experimental, and quasi. Qualitative research design gives exploratory aspects of the research. Through them, the researcher gains the underlying reasons for opinions, motivations, and reasons concerning the research problem, thus providing the insights to develop ideas and hypotheses (Rahman, 2020). With the mixed research method, the two approaches are integrated within one research activity for certain benefits but are also accompanied by disadvantages.
The main advantage of using mixed methods is reducing errors and understanding the contradictions from the different types of data presented. Using the mixture methods makes the challenges of one of the research methods overcome with the other method (Ivankova & Wingo, 2018). Besides, the mixture of two research methods gives a range of multidisciplinary teams to give the gives based on qualitative and quantitative research data. Hence, more insight and professionalism when dealing with the collected data. The last advantage of using the two methods combined is that it gives more comprehensive and detailed information than when the research methodology is used.
On the other hand, mixed methods face complex planning and research problems. Using both methods need enough knowledge and skills to be appropriately implemented since researchers must be open to different ways that are not within their area of specialization (Molina-Azorin et al., 2018). The mixed methods are labor-intensive as more labor and resources are required to carry out research with the mixed methods than using a single method for the study.
DQ The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
H Mireille,
Mixed method research “draws on potential strengths of both qualitative and quantitative methods allowing researchers to explore diverse perspectives and uncover relationships that exist between the intricate layers of our multifaceted research questions” (Shorten, 2017). The reason this is so important because our patient safety highly depends on the information we receive from the studies. Researchers retrieve this information from data integration. Data integration “enables researchers to seek a more panoramic view of their research landscape, viewing phenomena from different viewpoints and through diverse research lenses” (Shorten, 2017). The three types of mixed methods of study include exploratory sequential, parallel, and nested. An example in nursing research in an exploratory sequential is studying work related symptoms of stress (quan) while measuring the number of nurses by survey (qual) who report symptoms. This mixed study helps the researcher understand two things, how many nurses report stress and the common symptom they experience from that stress. Leadership can use this information to determine how stressful their work environments are and attempt to resolve the situation with either added staff or stress related intervention such as massages or offering a free gym and wellness groups to employees. Stakeholders are going to want justification for funding, and research provides validity to the problem. The same example, a parallel study is completed concurrently, research will measure symptoms of stress (quan) and how many nurses call out of work (qual) during the time it is reported. Using the same example with nested research, the study could start with how many nurses called off (qual) and if stress related symptoms were reported in those call offs (quan). Mixed method research gives us a better understanding of the same situation from different views of understanding. Thank you, Jana
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: DQ: The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
- Replies to Mireille Ulysse
A mixed-method increases the researcher’s knowledge and creates a more in-depth understanding of the subject to be studied (Schoonenboom & Johnson, 2017). Combining the subjective and objective data creates a holistic picture of the problem or issue to be researched. There is much more to data gathering than numbers when the subjects are participants. People make a complex dimension to a study because other factors influence the outcome of a survey based on how the subject feels (CDC. 2022). Though each subject will react differently in a clinical study because they are different people with different experiences, the overall sense of side effects, adverse effects, and reactions may remain consistent between participants. Therefore, adding individually to a study brings it full circle to cause and effect and the why of a study (Regnault et al., 2018). Why do patients not adhere to medications? How does the patient feel? Why are they unmotivated to change? These can better help the reasons behind the obstacles our patients face and allow us to be better advocates to our patients if we can better understand them. It closes the communication gap to ask the right questions if we can understand patients’ mental and physical aspects.
DQ The theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods are very different, but many researchers believe both methods should be used in the research study to increase validity and reliability
References
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention [CDC]. (2022). Collecting and Analyzing Qualitative Data. Cdc.gov. https://www.cdc.gov/eis/field-epi-manual/chapters/Qualitative-Data.html
Regnault, A., Willgoss, T., & Barbic, S. (2018). Towards the use of mixed methods inquiry as best practice in health outcomes research. Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, 2(1). https://doi.org/10.1186/s41687-018-0043-8
Schoonenboom, J., & Johnson, R. B. (2017). How to Construct a Mixed Methods Research Design. KZfSS Kölner Zeitschrift Für Soziologie Und Sozialpsychologie, 69(S2), 107–131. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11577-017-0454-1
Tamara Houston
Posted Date
May 4, 2022, 6:38 PM(edited)
Replies to Mireille Ulysse
When utilizing both qualitative and quantitative research methods, to me it seems as though using mixed methods has more advantages than disadvantages. It basically allows the researcher to utilize a holistic approach to research by allowing things to be studied from different aspects to get the whole picture. Depending on the study, using a mixed method allows the researcher to understand perception, behaviors, or experiences of research through the qualitative method and also allows for measurement of data through experiment, correlation, or data collection by way of the quantitative method. Combining the two approaches can produce more scientifically sound and transferable results by synergistically integrating qualitative stakeholder engagement with quantitative outcomes to inform action/intervention planning, implementation, evaluation, and monitoring (Ivankova & Wingo, 2018). This is the basis and blueprint for evidence-based nursing practice you would think. There are disadvantages to using this mixed method as well. Inadequate justification for using mixed-methods and inadequate data integration compromises the rigor of mixed-methods studies, and data integration remains a challenge for nurse researchers (Younas et al., 2019). Due to such an abundance of information to try and mold together, researchers may find it challenging to analyze such data and also present it in an unorganized manner which ultimately can diminish the quality of the research.
The evidence-based practice at my workplace is an application used for hourly rounding. Such activities help the nurses in my workplace to anticipate and address the needs of the patients in time hence leading to the better patient outcome theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods and research-based (or evidence-based) practice. According to Borbasi and Jackson (2014), the final evidence-based practice regularly used in the workplace is the rule of hand washing for both the patient and the nurse. My workplace uses this evidence-based practice as a way of eradicating germs. Evidence-based practice at my workplace has reduced the patient fall rate drastically as well as giving nurses the chance to assess the basic needs of a patient.
To make spirituality and self-care a practice for your patients as well as yourself, you might endeavor to establish an atmosphere that is supportive of spiritual and self-care activities. For example, you may design a location in your office that is peaceful and relaxing, and that has materials accessible for patients to utilize for self-care. You may also educate patients on the value of spiritual and self-care activities, and give them with information about how to incorporate these practices into their life.
The Christian worldview encourages the practice of spirituality and self-care. Christians believe that people are formed in the image of God, and that we are made to be in connection with God. Christians also believe that we need God’s mercy in order to be healed and restored. As such, the Christian worldview supports the concept that spirituality and self-care are crucial activities that may enable us to discover healing and completeness (Dennison & Pugh, 2017).
References
Borbasi, S., & Jackson, D. (2014). Navigating the maze of nursing research. Chatswood, N.S.W: Elsevier Australia theoretical foundations of qualitative and quantitative methods and research-based (or evidence-based) practice
Dennison, L., & Pugh, L. C. (2017). Christian nursing: A comprehensive approach (4th ed.). New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company.
Incorporating qualitative and quantitative research methods provides a comprehensive understanding of the research topic. There are various advantages and disadvantages of implementing the mixed methods approach. The advantage includes a better comprehension of the area under research. The quantitative approach provides statistical significance or correlation of the variables under investigation. On the other hand, the qualitative method offers the opportunity to explore contextual factors such as preferences and experiences of the study participant on the research topic.
The study by Yeheskel & Rawal (2019) exemplified this advantage. It used a mixed method analysis to explore factors influencing patient satisfaction, especially among those with limited English proficiency in healthcare access. The other critical advantage is that the mixed method analysis improves the validity and reliability of the findings. The approach is usually anchored on triangulation, which compares various methods that strengthen the credibility and dependability of the results by cross-validating the findings.
The study by Hafez Griauzde et al. (2020) used a mixed-method approach anchored on quantitative surveys, qualitative interviews, and observations to explore a low-carbohydrate diabetes prevention program. The approach enables the integration of data from various aspects of diabetes prevention protocol, leading to improved validity and reliability of their findings. Additionally, the mixed method approach guides generalizing research findings to a broader population. Therefore, it is essential to encourage healthcare professionals to utilize a mixed-method approach in nursing research. It leads to a better understanding of the topic under study, improves validity and reliability, and generalizability to the broader population.
The mixed method approach usually has various disadvantages that can lead to challenges in data analysis. Data integration is a significant disadvantage of the approach. Nurses may face challenges integrating different data formats and structures from qualitative and quantitative methods. The study by Hong et al. (2020) provides a case study of 30 mixed-method studies and indicates the challenges faced in data integration. The other critical disadvantage of the mixed method is that it is time-consuming and resource-intensive. Each approach requires different data collection techniques and analysis methods, leading to additional time and resources for training. The study by Johnson et al. (2018) indicates that utilizing a mixed-method approach is resource-intensive and consumes a lot of time, hence the need to assess its feasibility. Additionally, the method may have contradictory results. Qualitative results may not always align with quantitative outcomes. Therefore, the researchers must be careful to reconcile the differences to ensure the validity and reliability of their findings.
References
Yeheskel, A., & Rawal, S. (2019). Exploring the “Patient Experience” of Individuals with Limited English Proficiency: A Scoping Review. Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health, 21(4), 853–878. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-018-0816-4
Hafez Griauzde, D., Saslow, L., Patterson, K., Ansari, T., Liestenfeltz, B., Tisack, A., Bihn, P., Shopinski, S., & Richardson, C. R. (2020). Mixed methods pilot study of a low- carbohydrate diabetes prevention program among adults with pre-diabetes in the USA. BMJ Open, 10(1), e033397. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-033397
Hong, Q. N., Rees, R., Sutcliffe, K., & Thomas, J. (2020). Variations of mixed methods review approach A case study. Research Synthesis Methods, 11(6). https://doi.org/10.1002/jrsm.1437