HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
Grand Canyon University HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
New Technology Interview
Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented.
Write a paper of 1,000–1,200 words, from your perspective, on how that process occurred, what happened, what the leader would do again, and what mistakes he or she may have made.
Refer to the assigned readings to incorporate specific examples and details into your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for
successful completion of the assignment.
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Sample Answer for HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
Adding a new technology in a healthcare setting is both exciting and empowering. A well-implemented technology comes along with considerable, however, navigating through the process may be challenging. Change is being observed in the healthcare industry in terms of healthcare technology (Stevens & Schaik, 2020). Currently, many healthcare organizations around the globe are in the process of digital transformation. They are putting in place the necessary effort to introduce new technology to replace old legacy systems. One cannot just directly to the implementation process of new technology, there must be steps to follow. This paper discusses an interview done to a healthcare leader regarding a new technology he selected planned and implemented.
How that Process Occurred, What Happened
An electronic health record was implemented in all the treatment rooms within the institution. An electronic health record (EHR) an electronic version of a patient’s medical history. It can be defined as real-time patient-centered records that make information available and securely to authorized users. Electronic health records can be used to transmit data between interdisciplinary teams and departments and to enhance communication between physicians (Palabindala, Pamarthy, & Jonnalagadda, 2016). They enhance the decision-making process, clinical alerts, and reminders, and contain medical information. It is a performance improvement tool, real-time quality reporting, and has interfaces with lab, registries, and other records. It also has features that can detect medical errors and alert the physician or the user. Therefore the EHRs have a significant role in maintaining quality care within a healthcare organization.
Planning should be step by step to enable effective implementation of the technology. The first step involves the identification of the need to implement new technology in the hospital (Morilla, Sans, Casasa, & Giménez, 2017). Implementation of an EHR is necessary when patients experience longer lengths of stay, physicians having difficulty retrieving data, cases of medical errors, and some patients missing their appointments. Therefore, the need for an electronic health record system is important to combat these challenges.
The second step involves communicating his vision with the administration and team members. According to Yadav, Steinbach, Kumar, & Simon (2018), once it is clear that the new technology is going to work in the organizational daily tasks, it is necessary to communicate clear visions to team members. This would be helpful because no one would support a change in their usual routine without a vision. The advantages and the positive changes associated with implementing an EHR system must be properly communicate. By so doing, it is possible to win the trust of the administration as well as team members.
The third step is the planning phase. Planning is the most important step in the implementation process. A planning team was established to help the process go smoothly. Planning sessions include staff members such as physicians, nurses, administration, and medical assistants (Uzialko, 2018). The planning team reviews the benefits, disadvantages, budget and the project time frame from planning implementation. The planning session contributes majorly to the acceptance of the idea. The team works closely with the account manager to ensure that implementation becomes successful. This is a very important process as it contributes a lot to the new technology.
Step four includes training programs to ensure all providers underhand how to use the electronic health records system. The training program begin by educating all medical staff basic skills of HER. The second phase involves training super users of the system in every department (Uzialko, 2018). These super users are meant to continue training other professionals even after the launch of the new technology. The new technology that is expected to work better and bring much positive change may not achieve all the expectations unless everyone knows adequately how to work with it. Before beginning the implementation, a couple of training will make every member comfortable with the system.
Step five of the process involves the implementation of the EHR system. Normally, the implementation can take two approaches such as big bang or incremental. Big bang means launching the system for all patients and functions on the same day (Uzialko, 2018). On the other hand, incremental involves introducing the EHR functions one at a time, for instance, one can decide that e-prescribing to begin then introducing other features later. Most organizations use the incremental approach because it is less disruptive and less risky.
To ensure that the program works effectively, the team may establish a way to gather feedback for continual improvement. The administration together with the planning team must keep the lines of open communication with all nurses, physicians, and other staff to feel comfortable providing reliable feedback (Palabindala et al., 2016). The hospital can develop two types of questionnaires to gather views of both medical staff and patients to determine whether the system is effective. Most of the responses about EHR are often positive. Patients have reported a high level of satisfaction offered with the help of the system. Similarly, providers have reported improved workflow.
Additionally, the evaluation process may include observing the positive change associated with the EHR system. For instance, physicians can just send a prescription for every patient through the system to the pharmacy which reduces time spent. Also, the system detects medical errors and alerts nurses at the right time to administer medications (Morilla et al., 2017). In a nutshell, the system leads to reduced length of stay and reduced medical errors. Furthermore, the incidences of missed appointments have reduced because the system alerts doctors of the pending appointments. Also, the cost of healthcare has greatly reduced due to limited medical errors. Besides, communication between departments and interdisciplinary teams has significantly improved in many organizations where EHR is efficiently implemented.
What The Leader Would Do Again, and What Mistakes He or She May Have Made
Although the process turned out successful, the views of patients and staff members were not consulted at the beginning of the project. A planning team was established that perfumed literally everything without gathering ideas from the rest of the staff. Other nurses and physicians were only included in the training and implementation rather than planning and budgeting. The healthcare leader should maintain an open channel of communication with nurses and physicians to identify areas that need improvement (Uzialko, 2018). The leader should include all nurses in the entire process of the future implementation of new technologies. futhermore, the leader should consult all users regarding any modification on the EHR system.
Conclusion
The healthcare leader described his process of planning and implementation of the electronic healthcare record system. The new healthcare technology was effectively implemented. It brought along the significant improvement of patient care, healthcare process and outcome. The evaluation process reflects the effectiveness of the process. The system led to reduced length of stay, improved communication, and patient appointments among other things.
References
Morilla, M. D. R., Sans, M., Casasa, A., & Giménez, N. (2017). Implementing technology in healthcare: insights from physicians. BMC medical informatics and decision making, 17(1), 92. doi: 10.1186/s12911-017-0489-2.
Palabindala, V., Pamarthy, A., & Jonnalagadda, N. R. (2016). Adoption of electronic health records and barriers. Journal of community hospital internal medicine perspectives, 6(5), 32643. doi: 10.3402/jchimp.v6.32643.
Stevens, M., & van Schaik, J. (2020). Implementing new technologies for complex care: The role of embeddedness factors in team learning. Journal of Operations Management, 66(1-2), 112-134. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1034
Uzialko. (2018). How to Implement an Electronic Health Records System. Retrieved from https://www.businessnewsdaily.com/9102-implement-an-electronic-health-records-system.html
Yadav, P., Steinbach, M., Kumar, V., & Simon, G. (2018). Mining Electronic Health Records (EHRs) a survey. ACM Computing Surveys (CSUR), 50(6), 1-40. doi.org/10.1145/3127881.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCA 675 Discussion Interview a health care leader about a new technology he or she selected, planned for, and implemented
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.