HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
Grand Canyon University HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care? assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care? depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
The introduction for the Grand Canyon University HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care? is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
After the introduction, move into the main part of the HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care? assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care? assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care? If you were a physician, how would you be planning your practice for the future?
HCA 675 Grand Canyon Week 1 Assignment
Stakeholders Compare and Contrast
Write a paper of 1,000–1,200 words that compares and contrasts the competing visions of health care administration among stakeholders, identifies the areas where they conflict, and discusses how those conflicts could be seen in the delivery system.
Refer to the assigned readings to incorporate specific examples and details into your paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.
Sample Answer for HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
The healthcare system is complicated and requires strong collaboration between stakeholders. Healthcare stakeholders might have different and conflicting visions among themselves making care delivery even more difficult. Stakeholders in the healthcare system include patients, health providers, governments, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and others (Morse, McNamara, & Okwoli, 2018). The competing visions of healthcare administration among stakeholders can have a negative influence on the quality of healthcare. This paper compares and contrasts the competing visions of healthcare administration among stakeholders and identifies areas where they conflict. The paper also discusses how these conflicts are seen in the delivery system.
Competing Visions of Health Care Stakeholders
Insurance companies are one of the primary players in the healthcare system. Although the nature of the services provided by these companies should not be profit-driven, they always prioritize making profits. The shareholders of the insurance companies encourage them to focus on making profits making them implement stricter regulations, hence, more people find themselves uncovered (Morse et al., 2018). The uncovered people may not get the privilege to utilize most medical procedures due to the hospital expense. The insurance companies, therefore, reduce healthcare to a profit-oriented sector preventing most vulnerable people from receiving care.
Other important stakeholders in the healthcare system are the pharmaceutical companies. The competing vision of the pharmaceutical industry is to make more profit from medications. As a result, the cost of the drug has continued to rise over the years (Smith, Hicks, & McGovern, 2020). The pharmaceutical companies claim that drug prices have risen due to a large amount of money they spend on research and innovation. This claim is meant to uncover the fact that these companies spend a lot of money on marketing and advertising their products. Due to the rising cost of medication, most people cannot afford them leading to adverse health complications.
Health care providers including clinicians, doctors, and nurses, among others have a significant responsibility in healthcare delivery. They work tirelessly to ensure adequate and efficient healthcare services to their patients. Additionally, healthcare providers are patients’ advocates by regulating the rising prices of care (Garwood-Gowers, Tingle, & Wheat, 2015). The main obligation of physicians and other providers is to improve the life of a patient. Therefore, they must do everything under their power to ensure this is done. They should have respect for their patients and every patient should take part in the decision making process.
Moreover, patients are the most important stakeholders in the healthcare system. As such, they expect to receive quality and affordable healthcare services. They tend to attend hospitals where treatment services are subsidized while providing quality care. Patients’ expectations in healthcare continue to rise, hence, care should be managed keenly in order to improve outcomes and reduce liability (Smith et al., 2020). Understanding patients’ visions can help providers enhance their satisfaction level. Further, patients have the capability to control the amount of money they spend on health. For instance, the money spent on healthcare can be drastically reduced when patients embrace healthy lifestyles. Patients with good health coverage might request for very sophisticated medical procedures, not knowing that complex treatments are not automatically the best. Therefore, patients should cooperate with their providers and let them use medical knowledge to design efficient care plans.
Employers are other prominent stakeholders in healthcare. Patients who are affiliated with a workplace may be covered by the employing organization. In this case, the organization pays the medical bills in case an employee receives treatment in particular health facilities (Garwood-Gowers et al., 2015). Employers always want to maintain or reduce their contribution to the healthcare system. They advise patients to seek medical services only when necessary to ensure they do not spend a lot of medications and treatment.
The last healthcare stakeholder is the government. It ensures that the patient receives quality care. The government also envisions equity among patients in terms of healthcare provision. The government enacts and implements laws to ensure healthcare facilities provide quality care services (Raphael, Rootmanm, Dupéré, Pederson, & O’Neill, 2017). Any form of discrimination in healthcare is against governmental laws and policies and such people risk prosecutions in the court of law for that. All these stakeholders are important in one way or the other; however, they pose conflicting visions that might impact care delivery.
Arising Conflicts
Looking at the stakeholders’ visions listed above, certain conflicts tend to a rise impacting the care delivery system. The decision around the conflicts determines whether or not the delivery system would be successful. It would be necessary to identify areas where conflicts occur in order to understand how they manifest themselves in healthcare. For instance, the visions of the patient and employer may conflict (Leviton & Melichar, 2016). The patients expect that the employer offers a wide range of options concerning health delivery services that can meet all their specific needs. Also, patients look for employers who can find most of their insurance covers. However, employers tend to limit their contribution to healthcare. They want patients to receive care only when needed, follow the provider’s instruction and maintain quick recovery to full utility.
Another area of conflict happens between providers and payers. Providers want to use modern treatment services that are accurate and effective but expensive. They also envision providing preventive care which might not be covered by insurance companies (Leviton & Melichar, 2016). Nevertheless, payers want providers to follow the clearest evidence-based diagnostic and treatment plan that has fewer tests and less number of visits.
The vision of pharmaceutical companies and that of healthcare providers might conflict. While the providers advocate for affordable healthcare by reducing the cost of medications, the pharmaceutical companies want to maximize their profitability (Garwood-Gowers et al., 2015). As a result, they compromise the provider’s vision of protecting and advocating for patients. Additionally, insurance companies can also conflict with the government in terms of their visions. Whereas the government advocates for quality and affordable healthcare and equity among all patients, pharmaceutical companies increase the cost of drugs leading to expensive medications. The case has also been observed between the government and the insurance companies (Smith et al., 2020). As insurance companies increase coverage premiums, many people lose their health insurance leading to inequalities in terms of healthcare delivery which is against government expectations.
How the Conflicts Could be Seen in Health Care Conclusion
In summary, the healthcare system is complicated and requires strong collaboration between the administration and stakeholders. Stakeholders in the health care system include patients, health providers, governments, insurance companies, pharmaceutical companies, and others. Every stakeholder has a vision that might conflict with one another. Various ways in which stakeholders’ visions conflict with each other in the healthcare system have been discussed. It is apparent that these conflicts might affect care delivery negatively.
References
Garwood-Gowers, A., Tingle, J., & Wheat, K. (2015). Contemporary issues in healthcare law and ethics. Edinburgh: Elsevier Butterworth-Heinemann.
Leviton, L. C., & Melichar, L. (2016). Balancing stakeholder needs in the evaluation of healthcare quality improvement. BMJ Qual Saf, 25(10), 803-807. https://qualitysafety.bmj.com/content/qhc/25/10/803.full.pdf
Morse, S., McNamara, N., & Okwoli, B. (2018). Visions of sustainability: stakeholders, change and indicators. Routledge.
Raphael, D., Rootmanm, I., Dupéré, S., Pederson, A., & O’Neill, M. (2017). Implications of inequities in health for health promotion practice. Rootman, I., Pederson, A., Frohlich, K., & Dupere, S.(2017). Health promotion in Canada: New perspectives on theory, practice, policy, and research, 146-166. https://www.canadianscholars.ca/books/health-promotion-in-canada-4th-edition
Smith, I., Hicks, C., & McGovern, T. (2020). Adapting Lean methods to facilitate stakeholder engagement and co-design in healthcare. BMJ, 368. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m35.
This assignment uses a grading rubric. Instructors will be using the rubric to grade the assignment; therefore, students should
review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the assignment criteria and expectations for successful completion of the assignment
You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: HCA 675 What is your assessment of the origins and validity of physician resentment toward the push by a variety of health care entities to standardize care?
Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.
Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.
The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.