Healthcare Information Technology Trends Discussion

Healthcare Information Technology Trends Discussion

Healthcare Information Technology Trends Discussion

Question Description
Discussion week 6

Discussion: Healthcare Information Technology Trends

Throughout history, technological advancements have appeared for one purpose before finding applications elsewhere that lead to spikes in its usage and development. The internet, for example, was originally developed to share research before becoming a staple of work and entertainment. But technology—new and repurposed—will undoubtedly continue to be a driver of healthcare information. Informaticists often stay tuned to trends to monitor what the next new technology will be or how the next new idea for applying existing technology can benefit outcomes.

In this Discussion, you will reflect on your healthcare organization’s use of technology and offer a technology trend you observe in your environment.

To Prepare:

Reflect on the Resources related to digital information tools and technologies.
Consider your healthcare organization’s use of healthcare technologies to manage and distribute information.
Reflect on current and potential future trends, such as use of social media and mobile applications/telehealth, Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled asset tracking, or expert systems/artificial intelligence, and how they may impact nursing practice and healthcare delivery.
Post a brief description of general healthcare technology trends, particularly related to data/information you have observed in use in your healthcare organization or nursing practice. Describe any potential challenges or risks that may be inherent in the technologies associated with these trends you described. Then, describe at least one potential benefit and one potential risk associated with data safety, legislation, and patient care for the technologies you described. Next, explain which healthcare technology trends you believe are most promising for impacting healthcare technology in nursing practice and explain why. Describe whether this promise will contribute to improvements in patient care outcomes, efficiencies, or data management. Be specific and provide examples.


McGonigle, D., & Mastrian, K. G. (2017). Nursing informatics and the foundation of knowledge (4th ed.). Burlington, MA: Jones & Bartlett Learning. ( User name ( Password:Maria#0724)
Chapter 14, “The Electronic Health Record and Clinical Informatics” (pp. 267–287)
Chapter 15, “Informatics Tools to Promote Patient Safety and Quality Outcomes” (pp. 293–317)
Chapter 16, “Patient Engagement and Connected Health” (pp. 323–338)
Chapter 17, “Using Informatics to Promote Community/Population Health” (pp. 341–355)Healthcare Information Technology Trends Discussion
Chapter 18, “Telenursing and Remote Access Telehealth” (pp. 359–388)
Rao-Gupta, S., Kruger, D. Leak, L. D., Tieman, L. A., & Manworren, R. C. B. (2018). Leveraging interactive patient care technology to Improve pain management engagement. Pain Management Nursing, 19(3), 212–221. doi:10.1016/j.pmn.2017.11.002
Article :

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: Healthcare Information Technology Trends Discussion

Leveraging Interactive Patient Care Technology to Improve Pain Management Engagemet.

Rao-Gupta S; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois. Electronic address:
Kruger D; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Leak LD; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Tieman LA; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois.
Manworren RCB; Ann & Robert H. Lurie Children’s Hospital of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois; Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Department of Pediatrics, Chicago, Illinois.


Pain Management Nursing: Official Journal Of The American Society Of Pain Management Nurses [Pain Manag Nurs] 2018 Jun; Vol. 19 (3), pp. 212-221. Date of Electronic Publication: 2017 Dec 15.

Publication Type:


Journal Article



Journal Info:

Publisher: WB Saunders Co. Country of Publication: United States NLM ID: 100890606 Publication Model: Print-Electronic Cited Medium: Internet ISSN: 1532-8635 (Electronic) Linking ISSN: 15249042 NLM ISO Abbreviation: Pain Manag Nurs Subsets: MEDLINE; Nursing

Original Publication: Philadelphia : WB Saunders Co., c2000-

MeSH Terms:

Nursing Process*
Patient Participation*
Chronic Pain/*drug therapy
Pain Measurement/*instrumentation
Child ; Child, Hospitalized ; Chronic Pain/nursing ; Hospital Units ; Humans ; Illinois ; Pain Measurement/standards ; Pilot Projects ; Quality Improvement


Background: Most children experience pain in hospitals; and their parents report dissatisfaction with how well pain was managed. Engaging patients and families in the development and evaluation of pain treatment plans may improveperceptions of pain management and hospital experiences.
Objectives: The aim of this performance improvement project was to engage patients and families to address hospitalized pediatric patients’ pain using interactive patient care technology. The goal was to stimulate conversations about pain management expectations and perceptions of treatment plan effectiveness among patients, parents, and health care teams.
Methods: Plan-Do-Study-Act was used to design, develop, test, and pilot new workflows to integrate the interactivepatient care technology system with the automated medication dispensing system and document actions from both systems into the electronic health record.
Setting: The pediatric surgical unit and hematology/oncology unit of a free-standing, university-affiliated, urban children’s hospital were selected to pilot this performance improvement project because of the high prevalence of painfrom surgeries and hematologic and oncologic diseases, treatments, and invasive procedures.
Results: Documentation of pain assessments, nonpharmacologic interventions, and evaluation of treatment effectiveness increased. The proportion of positive family satisfaction responses for pain management significantly increased from fiscal year 2014 to fiscal year 2016 (p = .006).
Conclusion: By leveraging interactive patient care technologies, patients and families were engaged to take an active role in pain treatment plans and evaluation of treatment outcomes. Improved active communication and partnership with patients and families can effectively change organizational culture to be more sensitive to patients’ pain and patients’ and families’ hospital experiences.

You must proofread your paper. But do not strictly rely on your computer’s spell-checker and grammar-checker; failure to do so indicates a lack of effort on your part and you can expect your grade to suffer accordingly. Papers with numerous misspelled words and grammatical mistakes will be penalized. Read over your paper – in silence and then aloud – before handing it in and make corrections as necessary. Often it is advantageous to have a friend proofread your paper for obvious errors. Handwritten corrections are preferable to uncorrected mistakes.

Use a standard 10 to 12 point (10 to 12 characters per inch) typeface. Smaller or compressed type and papers with small margins or single-spacing are hard to read. It is better to let your essay run over the recommended number of pages than to try to compress it into fewer pages.

Likewise, large type, large margins, large indentations, triple-spacing, increased leading (space between lines), increased kerning (space between letters), and any other such attempts at “padding” to increase the length of a paper are unacceptable, wasteful of trees, and will not fool your professor.

The paper must be neatly formatted, double-spaced with a one-inch margin on the top, bottom, and sides of each page. When submitting hard copy, be sure to use white paper and print out using dark ink. If it is hard to read your essay, it will also be hard to follow your argument.

Hello Shakiera, I appreciate you discussing current healthcare events and your views on EHR implementation in healthcare facilities. Indeed, I concur that electronic health records (EHRs) have greatly facilitated the accessibility and quality of healthcare documentation.

However, I would like to add other thoughts about the benefits and dangers of EHRs. One such opening is the possibility that EHRs can enhance patient outcomes via data analysis. Healthcare organizations can use analytics to make better decisions for patient care by sifting through the mountains of data contained in electronic health records (EHRs) (Rieke et al., 2020). Better results and lower costs may emerge as a result of this.

One possibility is telemedicine’s incorporation into EHRs, allowing doctors to treat patients from afar. This is especially helpful for those living in areas with less convenient access to medical care, such as rural and remote communities (Shi et al., 2020). During peak demand periods, like a pandemic, telemedicine has the added benefit of easing the strain on healthcare facilities and providers.

I agree that compromised data security is a major concern when considering potential risks. Healthcare providers must take precautions to prevent the misuse or loss of sensitive patient information (Seh et al., 2020). Data entry errors are another reason healthcare providers using EHRs should receive extensive training and education.

Finally, electronic health records (EHRs) have many advantages but are not a panacea. Some patients may feel unsafe sharing their information online, while others prefer paper records. As a result, healthcare facilities should consider patient input and offer supplementary services as needed.

In conclusion, EHRs have the potential to completely transform healthcare systems and dramatically enhance the quality of care that patients receive. EHRs may not be the best option for every patient, but healthcare organizations still need to be aware of the risks and take measures to address them.


Rieke, N., Hancox, J., Li, W., Milletarì, F., Roth, H. R., Albarqouni, S., Bakas, S., Galtier, M. N., Landman, B. A., Maier-Hein, K., Ourselin, S., Sheller, M., Summers, R. M., Trask, A., Xu, D., Baust, M., & Cardoso, M. J. (2020). The future of digital health with federated learning. Npj Digital Medicine, 3(1), 1–7.

Seh, A. H., Zarour, M., Alenezi, M., Sarkar, A. K., Agrawal, A., Kumar, R., & Khan, R. A. (2020). Healthcare Data Breaches: Insights and Implications. Healthcare, 8(2), 133. NCBI.

Shi, S., He, D., Li, L., Kumar, N., Khan, M. K., & Choo, K.-K. R. (2020). Applications of blockchain in ensuring the security and privacy of electronic health record systems: A survey. Computers & Security, 97, 101966.