coursework-banner

HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement

HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement

Grand Canyon University HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                                   

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University   HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                                   

 

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University   HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                                   

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                                   

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement                                   

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

Topic 4 DQ 2

Feb 20-24, 2023

Describe the difference between research and quality improvement. Provide a workplace example where qualitative and quantitative research is applied and how it was used within your organization. When replying to peers, discuss how these research findings might be incorporated into another health care setting.

Submitted on:

Feb 22, 2023, 4:22 AM

Aaya Nassar

Feb 25, 2023, 7:09 AM

Hello Class,

Good job you did this week explaining the different experimental research studies we use in health sciences and the difference between research and quality improvement.

This week you learned about important topics including:

–       Differentiating between experimental research, quasi-experimental research, and non-experimental research.

–       Identifying the key differences between qualitative and quantitative research.

–       Differentiating between research and quality improvement.

Watch “What’s the Difference Between Research and QI” on the YouTube website located at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hyWJLhyKWjQ to understand the difference between research and quality improvement.

Marlene Alvarez

Feb 24, 2023, 10:18 PM

The main goal of research is to increase the knowledge and understanding of a specific variable and its possible correlation between another variable. One example would be assessing and analyzing the effectiveness of a drug. Quality improvement, on the other hand focuses on the collection of data and statistics to improve health outcomes. An example of this would be overtime data collected stating certain amounts of insulin helps control blood sugar better and the amount of times insulin is needed to help better control blood sugars. This is all data that is collected overtime, and overall helps improve health. Health care providers and nurses carry out a QI project, it may not be the implementation of something new, but it may be improvement upon something that is already in place (Helbig, 2020). “Quantitative research usually aims to provide precise, unbiased estimates of parameters of interest for the entire population which requires a large, randomly selected sample” (Hannigan, 2018). Quantitative research uses n

HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement
HLT 362 Topic 4 DQ 2 Describe the difference between research and quality improvement

umbers and numeric variables (Helbig, 2020). Qualitative research is collected through descriptive characteristics that cannot be measured with numbers like quantitative research can (Helbig, 2020). Instead of numbers they use open-ended questions, interviews, and observation. In my hospital, leadership uses qualitative research to assess patients’ satisfaction in their hospital and ensure they feel they are receiving the care the need and anything else. They ensure this by rounding on patients and asking them open ended questions on their stay and interviewing the patient. Based on the data collected from patients, leadership connects with the managers on the floor to work on the areas needed according to the patient’s needs. In my workplace we quantitative research by assessing the number of times a patient is readmitted. My hospital strives to have a good turn around and when patients constantly are readmitted there is something not going right in the course of direction. My hospital keeps track of the readmissions and when people get admitted we assess them for high risk of being readmitted as well. When patients are readmitted case management and social worker instantly get a notification to look into their care at home and any possible needs they may need to further reduce readmissions.

Reference

 

Hannigan, A. (2018, June). Public and patient involvement in Quantitative Health Research: A statistical perspective. Health expectations : an international journal of public participation in health care and health policy. Retrieved February 24, 2023, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6250860/

 

Helbig, J. (2020). Reader. BibliU. Retrieved February 22, 2023, from https://bibliu.com/app/#/view/books/1000000000581/epub/Chapter4.html#page_50

Cornelius Ayoyi

replied toMarlene Alvarez

Feb 25, 2023, 9:25 AM

Marlene,

Great post. Incorporating of research findings in another health care setting may take time since in healthcare research, results diffuse only slowly into clinical practice, and there is a need to bridge the gap between research and practice. A rise in the amount of research results available does not automatically translate into improved patient care and treatment. Evidence suggests that it sometimes takes more than a decade to implement research results in clinical practice, and that it is often difficult to sustain innovations over time. Deepening our understanding of the factors which prohibit or promote this interplay in local practice and the operationalization and use of research results in daily clinical life is vital in order to bridge the continuing gap between healthcare research and practice

Reference.

Kristensen. N, Nymann. C, Konradsen. H. (2015)Implementing research results in clinical practice- the experiences of healthcare professionals.https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-016-1292-y

  • Esohe Jolaoluwa

replied toMarlene Alvarez

Feb 26, 2023, 3:52 PM

Hi Marlene, great post.

Research is used to collect data that gives the most effective medication; data collected for research must be approved and obtain consent; this is to ensure no harm is done toparticipants.

Managers should constantly collect data for quality improvement by interviewing the patients, checking our charting, and being sure our medication pass is accurate (Wim, 2018).

 

To add to your post, qualitative research records its findings in numbers, while quantitative research is used to provide support when one needs to draw a general conclusion and predict the outcomes. Qualitative research may be used to research patient satisfaction through interviews.

 

Reference

Wim, N. K. (2018). Quality Improvement in Evidence-Based Management for HealthCare Settings. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-10-2018-004

Amber Jones

Feb 24, 2023, 9:22 PM

To generate new information, researchers use a technique (quantitative or qualitative). EBP looks for and utilizes the most up-to-date clinical data, which is frequently derived from research, when making patient-care choices. To enhance patient outcomes, QI employs methodical methods.

Quality assurance (QA) is a continuous improvement process centered on humans, according to the Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA), whereas quality improvement (QI) is a continuous improvement approach focused on procedures and systems.

 

Provide a workplace example where qualitative and quantitative research is applied and how it was used within your organization.

 

Quantitative research, such as online surveys, is more numbers-oriented and can aid in the evaluation of hypotheses generated by qualitative research. Adding a quantitative component to qualitative research might help you get a more comprehensive (and measurable) picture of the topic you’re studying.

 

Qualitative data includes the color of a football player’s hair, the color of automobiles in a parking lot, the letter grades of pupils in a classroom, the kinds of coins in a jar, and the shape of sweets in a variety pack, if no numerical value is ascribed to any of these descriptors.

 

According to a study on workplace drug usage prevention, both qualitative and quantitative techniques have problems.

 

  • Qualitative Research Methodologies

 

When commencing your assessment, qualitative approaches are a fantastic place to start. These techniques might help you describe a problem and give insight into your intervention strategy.

 

Observation, management meetings, focus groups, one-on-one interviews, and expert consultation can all be used to accomplish this.

 

  • Quantitative Approaches

 

Quantitative approaches are advantageous since they require less time to implement than qualitative ones. They’re also easier to assess, and they could offer more objective, unambiguous findings.

 

– Pre-existing data, self-report studies, and drug testing can all help with this.

 

references:

Cleland, J. (2015). Exploring versus measuring: considering the fundamental differences between qualitative and quantitative research. Researching medical education, 1-14.Newhouse, R. P., Pettit, J. C., Poe, S., & Rocco, L. (2006). The slippery slope: differentiating between quality improvement and research. JONA: The Journal of Nursing Administration, 36(4), 211-219.

 

Grimshaw, J., Eccles, M., Thomas, R., MacLennan, G., Ramsay, C., Fraser, C., & Vale, L. (2006). Toward evidence-based quality improvement. Journal of general internal medicine, 21(2), S14.

 

Abildgaard, J. S., Saksvik, P. Ø., & Nielsen, K. (2016). How to measure the intervention process? An assessment of qualitative and quantitative approaches to data collection in the process evaluation of organizational interventions. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1380.