MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change
Capella University MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change
The introduction for the Capella University MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change
After the introduction, move into the main part of the MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
MSN 6218- Unit 9 Assignment Advocating for Lasting Change
Professional
Context
Nurse
leaders must be able to make effective financial and policy decisions. Equally
important is the ability to communicate their vision for change to policymakers
and provide objective, evidence-based support for their position with respect
to the regulatory, political, social, ethical, legal, and financial aspects of
systemic change.
Evidence-based practice (EBP) is the combination of research evidence, experience, and expertise, patient preferences in the process of performance of care. Clinicians bring up experience and knowledge and patients describe personal beliefs, these two components contribute to valuable research displayed by methodology to develop the best outcome. EBP requires nursing professionals to develop skills in searching the literature and finding guidelines for the application of evidence. Study designs are categorized from case reports to case-control studies, cohort studies, randomized control trials, systematic reviews, and meta-analyses, which are the most specified study designs, examining multiple validated hypotheses and combining the most reliable results (Samonte et al., 2020). Non-experimental research describes a study that lacks the manipulation of an independent variable, researchers conducting non-experimental study measure variables as they naturally happened. The distinction between non-experimental and experimental research is a significant one as the experimental research provides strong evidence that changes in an independent variable cause difference in a dependent variable; non-experimental research cannot provide this evidence and it is used in cases where the experimental study is not able to be evidenced. Experimental research is evidenced when the researcher has a specific research question or hypothesis regarding a correlation between two variables and it’s feasible and ethical to manipulate the independent variable. Thus, the non-experimental study is approached when these aspects are not met. Non-experimental research is performed when the research question or hypothesis is related to a single variable rather than two variables, the research question approaches a non-causal relationship between variables. The difference between these two types of methods of evaluating evidence is dictated by the nature of the research question. When the goal of the research question is to explain a nursing aspect and the research questions pertain to a causal relationship, the experimental evidence is approached. If the goal of the science is to describe or predict a non-experimental approach is evidenced. The two pieces of evidence can be used to address the same research question. The non-experimental study encompasses correlational research and observational research; correlational type is considered non-experimental because emphasizes the statistical relationship between two variables but does not incorporate the manipulation of an independent variable; observational type focuses on making observations of behavior in a natural setting without manipulation (Jhangiani, 2019). A quantitative non-experimental study explored students’ perceptions of faculty responses following medication errors that students perform while advancing through a four-year BN Program. The objective of the study is to determine factors which increase the likelihood of nursing students reporting medication discrepancies. The predisposition factors of medication errors are human factors (knowledge deficit, failure to follow procedure) and system factors (patient acuity, level of workload). Consistent reporting of medication errors is mandatory to maintain patient safety. Nursing students even though supervised by clinical instructors are predisposed to perform a high number of medical errors. The study evidenced that 30 % of nursing students made at least one error during the program of study and the average number of medication errors recalled per student was 1.93. The reporting of medication errors cannot be underestimated. Nurses must take all actions necessary to minimize patient safety incidents. Nursing education programs inspire ethical and moral standards in nursing students, advocating for patient safety being not only a mandate but also a moral and ethical requirement (Walsh, Anstey, Tracey, 2018).
This
assignment provides an opportunity for you to develop a presentation aimed at
soliciting resource and policy support for the community health care change you
proposed in the previous assignment. By successfully completing this
assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course
competencies and assignment criteria:
Competency
1: Identify the challenges and opportunities facing health care.
Explain why
proposed changes to a health care system require policy and financial support
to ensure positive, systemic change and to overcome present challenges.
Competency
2: Compare the effects of different health care finance models and policy
frameworks on resources and patient outcomes.
Provide
broad budget estimates to fund specific capital or human resource outlays that
are important to the success of a proposed change.
Competency
3: Evaluate the positive and negative influences of leaders on health care
processes and outcomes.
Assess the
potential future for wellness, health, and improved overall care and the role
of visionary leaders in achieving the desired goals.
Cultivate
stakeholder interest in and support for the proposed changes to a community
health care system.
Competency
4: Develop proactive strategies to change the culture of the organization by
incorporating evidence-based practices.
Provide
compelling evidence that proposed changes to a health care system will produce
the intended outcomes.
Outline a
plan for leading transformational, evidence-based change in an organization.
Competency
5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and
style consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly
standards.
Develop
slides that augment a multimedia presentation.
Argue persuasively
to obtain policy and financial support from policymakers for a proposed
community health care change.
Support
assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Scenario
The
executive leaders at Vila Health accepted your change proposal and would like
to move it forward. However, lasting change in a volatile regulatory and policy
environment will require adequate funding and support from the applicable
governing body or regulatory agency. Consequently, you have been asked to
present the proposed change to policymakers to seek their support and funding
for the change as an established policy for the organization and community.
Instructions
Develop and
record a video presentation for policymakers from the appropriate governing
body or regulatory agency requesting policy and financial support for your
proposed change. Draw on your work in the previous assessments and consolidate
lessons learned.
The
presentation requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in
the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level
descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. The
Guiding Questions: Advocating for Lasting Change document provides additional
considerations that may be helpful in completing your assignment. In addition,
be sure to note the requirements below for the presentation format, length, and
for citing supporting evidence.
Explain why
proposed changes to a health care system require policy support to ensure
positive, systemic change and to overcome present challenges.
Provide
compelling evidence that proposed changes to a health care system will produce
the intended outcomes.
Provide
broad budget estimates to fund specific capital or human resource outlays that
are important to the success of a proposed change.
Outline a
plan for leading transformational, evidence-based change in an organization.
Assess the
potential future for wellness, health, and improved overall care and the role
of visionary leaders in achieving the desired goals.
As a guide,
explore the website of HealthyPeople.gov, linked in the Resources.
Cultivate
stakeholder interest in and support for the proposed changes to a community
health care system.
Develop
slides that augment a multimedia presentation.
Argue
persuasively to obtain policy and financial support from policymakers for a
proposed community health care change.
Support
assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Presentation
Format and Length
Remember,
you may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to
create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint,
check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues.
Your slide
deck should consist of 10–15 slides, not including the title, questions, and
references slides. Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop
your talking points and cite your sources, as appropriate.
Be sure
that your slide deck includes the following slides:
Note: Your
slide titles will depend on your choice of community and the specific content
of your change proposal.
Title
slide.
Title or
name of your project (focus of your change proposal).
Subtitle
(optional), which could include Jordan or Armitage, if not part of the title.
Your name.
Date.
Course
number and title.
Introduction.
Identify
the stakeholders to whom you are presenting.
Social
determinants affecting health in the community (may need more than one slide).
Synopsis of
the windshield survey and environmental analysis findings.
Identify
the positive aspects of the community.
Identify
opportunities for improvement. Although your change proposal addresses these
opportunities, avoid phrasing them as negatives.
Your change
proposal—briefly outlined (may need more than one slide).
Benefits of
the change to the community and stakeholders.
Challenges
or concerns.
Address the
implications for the community and organizational stakeholders, if these
opportunities are not addressed.
Funding
(may need more than one slide).
Include the
financial implications for the community and organizational stakeholders.
Specify
your funding needs (how much and for what)?
Community
health implications (may need more than one slide).
Explain how
the proposed change will improve the health of the community.
Address
both direct or indirect benefits, as applicable.
Conclusion.
Summarize
key points.
Be sure to
thank your audience for their time and consideration of your proposal.
Questions.
Add a slide
to prompt questions from the audience.
References
(at the end of your presentation).
Supporting
Evidence
Cite 3–5
credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry
publications to support your presentation.
Submission
Requirements
Upload your
video presentation and attach the presentation slides, with speaker notes. You
may use Kaltura Media, Adobe Connect, or other technology of your choice for
your video recording. See the Using Kaltura [PDF] for more information about
uploading media. You may submit the assessment only once, so be sure that the
assessment deliverables are included before submitting your assessment.
MSN6218 Leading the Future of Health Care
Unit 9 Assignment
Advocating
for Lasting Change
Professional
Context
Nurse
leaders must be able to make effective financial and policy decisions. Equally
important is the ability to communicate their vision for change to policymakers
and provide objective, evidence-based support for their position with respect
to the regulatory, political, social, ethical, legal, and financial aspects of
systemic change.
This
assignment provides an opportunity for you to develop a presentation aimed at
soliciting resource and policy support for the community health care change you
proposed in the previous assignment. By successfully completing this
assignment, you will demonstrate your proficiency in the following course
competencies and assignment criteria:
Competency
1: Identify the challenges and opportunities facing health care.
Explain why
proposed changes to a health care system require policy and financial support
to ensure positive, systemic change and to overcome present challenges.
Competency
2: Compare the effects of different health care finance models and policy
frameworks on resources and patient outcomes.
Provide
broad budget estimates to fund specific capital or human resource outlays that
are important to the success of a proposed change.
Competency
3: Evaluate the positive and negative influences of leaders on health care
processes and outcomes.
Assess the
potential future for wellness, health, and improved overall care and the role
of visionary leaders in achieving the desired goals.
Cultivate
stakeholder interest in and support for the proposed changes to a community
health care system.
Competency
4: Develop proactive strategies to change the culture of the organization by
incorporating evidence-based practices.
Provide
compelling evidence that proposed changes to a health care system will produce
the intended outcomes.
Outline a
plan for leading transformational, evidence-based change in an organization.
Competency
5: Communicate effectively with diverse audiences, in an appropriate form and
style consistent with applicable organizational, professional, and scholarly
standards.
Develop
slides that augment a multimedia presentation.
Argue persuasively
to obtain policy and financial support from policymakers for a proposed
community health care change.
Support
assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Scenario
The
executive leaders at Vila Health accepted your change proposal and would like
to move it forward. However, lasting change in a volatile regulatory and policy
environment will require adequate funding and support from the applicable
governing body or regulatory agency. Consequently, you have been asked to
present the proposed change to policymakers to seek their support and funding
for the change as an established policy for the organization and community.
Instructions
Develop and
record a video presentation for policymakers from the appropriate governing
body or regulatory agency requesting policy and financial support for your
proposed change. Draw on your work in the previous assessments and consolidate
lessons learned.
The
presentation requirements outlined below correspond to the grading criteria in
the scoring guide, so be sure to address each point. Read the performance-level
descriptions for each criterion to see how your work will be assessed. The
Guiding Questions: Advocating for Lasting Change document provides additional
considerations that may be helpful in completing your assignment. In addition,
be sure to note the requirements below for the presentation format, length, and
for citing supporting evidence.
Explain why
proposed changes to a health care system require policy support to ensure
positive, systemic change and to overcome present challenges.
Provide
compelling evidence that proposed changes to a health care system will produce
the intended outcomes.
Provide
broad budget estimates to fund specific capital or human resource outlays that
are important to the success of a proposed change.
Outline a
plan for leading transformational, evidence-based change in an organization.
Assess the
potential future for wellness, health, and improved overall care and the role
of visionary leaders in achieving the desired goals.
As a guide,
explore the website of HealthyPeople.gov, linked in the Resources.
Cultivate
stakeholder interest in and support for the proposed changes to a community
health care system.
Develop
slides that augment a multimedia presentation.
Argue
persuasively to obtain policy and financial support from policymakers for a
proposed community health care change.
Support
assertions, arguments, propositions, and conclusions with relevant and credible
evidence.
Presentation
Format and Length
Remember,
you may use Microsoft PowerPoint or other suitable presentation software to
create your slides. If you elect to use an application other than PowerPoint,
check with your faculty to avoid potential file compatibility issues.
Your slide
deck should consist of 10–15 slides, not including the title, questions, and
references slides. Use the speaker’s notes section of each slide to develop
your talking points and cite your sources, as appropriate.
Be sure
that your slide deck includes the following slides:
Note: Your
slide titles will depend on your choice of community and the specific content
of your change proposal.
Title
slide.
Title or
name of your project (focus of your change proposal).
Subtitle
(optional), which could include Jordan or Armitage, if not part of the title.
Your name.
Date.
Course
number and title.
Introduction.
Identify
the stakeholders to whom you are presenting.
Social
determinants affecting health in the community (may need more than one slide).
Synopsis of
the windshield survey and environmental analysis findings.
Identify
the positive aspects of the community.
Identify
opportunities for improvement. Although your change proposal addresses these
opportunities, avoid phrasing them as negatives.
Your change
proposal—briefly outlined (may need more than one slide).
Benefits of
the change to the community and stakeholders.
Challenges
or concerns.
Address the
implications for the community and organizational stakeholders, if these
opportunities are not addressed.
Funding
(may need more than one slide).
Include the
financial implications for the community and organizational stakeholders.
Specify
your funding needs (how much and for what)?
Community
health implications (may need more than one slide).
Explain how
the proposed change will improve the health of the community.
Address
both direct or indirect benefits, as applicable.
Conclusion.
Summarize
key points.
Be sure to
thank your audience for their time and consideration of your proposal.
Questions.
Add a slide
to prompt questions from the audience.
References
(at the end of your presentation).
Supporting
Evidence
Cite 3–5
credible sources from peer-reviewed journals or professional industry
publications to support your presentation.
Submission
Requirements
Upload your
video presentation and attach the presentation slides, with speaker notes. You
may use Kaltura Media, Adobe Connect, or other technology of your choice for
your video recording. See the Using Kaltura [PDF] for more information about
uploading media. You may submit the assessment only once, so be sure that the
assessment deliverables are included before submitting your assessment.
APA Writing Checklist
Use this document as a checklist for each paper you will write throughout your GCU graduate program. Follow specific instructions indicated in the assignment and use this checklist to help ensure correct grammar and APA formatting. Refer to the APA resources available in the GCU Library and Student Success Center.
Also Check Out: MSN 6218- Unit 3 Assignment- Proposing Evidence-Based Change
☐ APA paper template (located in the Student Success Center/Writing Center) is utilized for the correct format of the paper. APA style is applied, and format is correct throughout.
☐ The title page is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ The introduction is present. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ Topic is well defined.
☐ Strong thesis statement is included in the introduction of the paper.
☐ The thesis statement is consistently threaded throughout the paper and included in the conclusion.
☐ Paragraph development: Each paragraph has an introductory statement, two or three sentences as the body of the paragraph, and a transition sentence to facilitate the flow of information. The sections of the main body are organized to reflect the main points of the author. APA format is applied correctly. There are no errors.
☐ All sources are cited. APA style and format are correctly applied and are free from error.
☐ Sources are completely and correctly documented on a References page, as appropriate to assignment and APA style, and format is free of error.
Scholarly Resources: Scholarly resources are written with a focus on a specific subject discipline and usually written by an expert in the same subject field. Scholarly resources are written for an academic audience.
Examples of Scholarly Resources include: Academic journals, books written by experts in a field, and formally published encyclopedias and dictionaries.
Peer-Reviewed Journals: Peer-reviewed journals are evaluated prior to publication by experts in the journal’s subject discipline. This process ensures that the articles published within the journal are academically rigorous and meet the required expectations of an article in that subject discipline.
Empirical Journal Article: This type of scholarly resource is a subset of scholarly articles that reports the original finding of an observational or experimental research study. Common aspects found within an empirical article include: literature review, methodology, results, and discussion.
Adapted from “Evaluating Resources: Defining Scholarly Resources,” located in Research Guides in the GCU Library.
☐ The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Utilize writing resources such as Grammarly, LopesWrite report, and ThinkingStorm to check your writing.