NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal
Capella University NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Capella University NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Capella University NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal
The introduction for the Capella University NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NHS-FP6004 Assessment 2: Policy Proposal
Healthcare organizations across the globe are taking the initiative of benchmarking to identify and acknowledge gaps and areas of underperformance, for improvement purposes. Most of the time, areas of great concern are considered first for the benchmark. Such areas include chronic diseases such as diabetes. In 2012, the total financial burden associated with diabetes was approximately $245 billion in the United States (Avilés-Santa, Monroig-Rivera, Soto-Soto, & Lindberg, 2020). As such, it is necessary to implement effective policies to address issues such as diabetes at the local, state, and federal levels. According to the dashboard benchmarks, Mercy Medical Center has failed to meet the national standards for diabetes-related medical examinations such as diabetic foot examination and A1C lab. As such, this paper evaluates the need for implementation of effective policies and guidelines for conducting appropriate diabetes examinations for better quality and performance improvement at Mercy Medical Center.
The necessity of Organizational Policy
Mercy Medical Center is one of the leading healthcare institutions in Minnesota, United States. Despite the several wards achieved by the institution, it has been noted that there was a decline in the number of HbA1c examinations taken in 2019. Studies show that the most important aspect when reducing the burden of diabetes is an early diagnosis which leads to early treatment, hence positive care outcome. For early diagnosis of diabetes, healthcare institutions are required to meet all the diagnostic standards and guidelines including proper examinations to avoid chances of misdiagnosis. As a result, Mercy Medical Center, with nurses at the center of change, among other healthcare professionals, must come up with appropriate policies to enhance proper utilization of diabetic foot examination and A1C lab, for early diagnosis, to prevent complications associated with diabetes. Consequently, for the institution to improve the performance of HgbAIc and diabetes foot examination, policies aiming at annual testing of all adults, especially those above the age of 40 years, must be implemented (Casadei, Filippini, & Brognara, 2021). Patients who display results above the stated normal range must however be examined quarterly.
Ethical Evidence-Based Strategies
For the improvement of performance and outcome concerning diabetes foot exams and Hgb A1C tests, several EBP strategies
must be implemented. Such strategies include enhanced patient and public education, updating the documentation and standardized processes, use of warning sign reminders on patients’ charts, and allowing the patients’ primary healthcare provider to go through the patient’s hospital summary. Consequently, the interprofessional team member must be educated on the current practices of diabetes examination and the new proposed changes with their benefits. At Mercy Medical Center, this will be achieved through assigning special education modules to all concerned interprofessional personnel’s learning accounts, where deadlines for completing the modules will be specific every year (Kinney, 2019). Tests will be completed after every module, of which all staff members will be required to pass. Patients on the other hand will be educated through videos, brochures, PowerPoint presentations, and audio clips among others.
A standardized documentation process must also be initiated for proper record-keeping regarding the diagnostic procedures for diabetes. The new documentation process will increase consistency, hence a cost-effective outcome that will help evaluate the strategic value of the change. For instance, foot examination tools will be incorporated in the electronic health record system, which will be accessed by only authorized personnel to update patient information for better record keeping (Wu, Chan, Bae, & Ford, 2019). Information regarding the criteria for which examination to be ordered will also be included in this system, to avoid additional costs associated with unnecessary tests.
Potential Environmental Effects
For effective policy implementation in an organization, several environmental factors must be considered for a positive outcome. For instance, the number of qualified personnel to perform the introduced examination procedures should be adequate to avoid fatigue or unpreparedness. For instance, nurses among other professionals must be equipped with adequate knowledge and skills following proper training on the appropriate way of carrying out diabetes foot exams and Hgb A1C tests (Kinney, 2019). The institution must also ensure that an adequate number of nurses are hired and trained to avoid overworking of the few which will only lead to fatigue. The working space should also be adequate to give room for enough space to acquire accurate results to avoid incidences of misdiagnosis. The environment must also be clean to avoid contamination, and free from destructions such as noise. Most importantly, adequate examination equipment in addition to associated resources must be acquired to promote a conducive environment for carrying out diabetes foot exams and Hgb A1C tests. With all the above in place, Mercy Medical Center will be able to realize improvement of performance and outcome concerning diabetes foot exams and Hgb A1C tests for diabetic patients.
Proposed Policy and Guidelines
Based on the latest diabetes care standards outlined by the American Diabetes Association on approaches to managing diabetes using the Chronic Care model, six core elements must be considered. Mercy Medical Center must be able to incorporate these elements in their proposed policies to be able to comply with the national set standards for proper diabetes diagnostic/examination procedures. These elements include appropriate delivery system design, self-management support system, decision making support system, patient-specific and population-based support registries for the care team, appropriate processes for identifying and developing resources for supporting healthy lifestyles, and lastly creating a quality-oriented culture (Nayeri, Samadi, Larijani, & Sayadi, 2020). Healthcare providers are also expected to play active roles in terms of enhancing patient visits and follow-ups, with diabetes foot exams and Hgb A1C tests.
Additionally, part of the policy must address the rearrangement of appointment systems for scheduling diabetes-related exams to increase the process of data collection and patient compliance. Patients must also be encouraged to show up and receive all diabetes-related care interventions during their annual physical examination. Part of the policy will also address staffing hours adjustments in addition to hiring more staff during these annual visits for diabetes-related examinations to avoid overworking individual nurses, hence improving the quality of care provided (Nayeri, Samadi, Larijani, & Sayadi, 2020). Data reporting on patient compliance must then be gathered and evaluated for future revisions and implementation of necessary changes. Lastly, the evidence must be documented to improve continuity of diabetes care, for better patient outcomes.
Stakeholders Involvement of the Policy Implantation
All involved stakeholders must play an active role in successful policy implementation. Such stakeholders include physicians, nurses, podiatrists, clinical engineers, and wound care specialists among others. Such stakeholders must be educated on the new policies and assigned different roles during the implementation process. for instance, nurses must be able to prepare patients for foot exams and Hgb A1C screening, in terms of educating them on the need of the process, encouraging them to show up for routine examination and supporting them when the results are out. Once the organization has achieved a good statistic on the number of patients showing up for foot exams and Hgb A1C screening, nurses, nurses, and wound care specialists can now come together and help the patient manage the condition based on the examination results to smoothen the process (Wu, Chan, Bae, & Ford, 2019). the clinical engineer will then update the data on the electronic health record software, for future reference.
Conclusion
Diabetes and associated health complications are one of the leading causes of death in the United States. Several policies and guidelines have been put in place to try and prevent the prevalence of diabetes among American citizens to reduce the burden associated with the disorder. Studies show that one of the most effective ways of curbing this issue is through early diagnosis and treatment. As such, several national guidelines have been outlined to help promote appropriate examination for early diagnosis of the disorder, hence the implementation of appropriate interventions. Mercy Medical Center, being one of the leading healthcare institutions in Minnesota, has however failed to meet the national standards for conducting foot exams and Hgb A1C screening (Nayeri, Samadi, Larijani, & Sayadi, 2020). As such, several policies have been proposed to promote the performance and improve the care outcome in this institution regarding diagnosing and managing diabetes among adults.
References
Avilés-Santa, M. L., Monroig-Rivera, A., Soto-Soto, A., & Lindberg, N. M. (2020). Current State of Diabetes Mellitus Prevalence, Awareness, Treatment, and Control in Latin America: Challenges and Innovative Solutions to Improve Health Outcomes Across the Continent. Current diabetes reports, 20(11), 1-44. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11892-020-01341-9
Casadei, G., Filippini, M., & Brognara, L. (2021). Glycated Hemoglobin (HbA1c) as a Biomarker for Diabetic Foot Peripheral Neuropathy. Diseases, 9(1), 16. https://doi.org/10.3390/diseases9010016
Dehghan Nayeri, N., Samadi, N., Larijani, B., & Sayadi, L. (2020). Effect of nurse‐led care on quality of care and level of HbA1C in patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A randomized clinical trial. Wound Repair and Regeneration, 28(3), 338-346. https://doi.org/10.1111/wrr.12788
Kinney, K. C. (2019). A Quality Improvement Project to Enact Evidence-Based Guidelines to Improve Documentation of Hemoglobin A1c for Inpatient Diabetes Populations. https://scholarworks.gvsu.edu/kcon_projects/20
Wu, S. S., Chan, K. S., Bae, J., & Ford, E. W. (2019). Electronic clinical reminder and quality of primary diabetes care. Primary care diabetes, 13(2), 150-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pcd.2018.08.007