NR 393 Week 6 Assignment Course Project Phase 3: Reflection Paper
NR 393 Week 6 Assignment Course Project Phase 3: Reflection Paper
Purpose:
The purpose of this course project is for learners to explore how living nurses are making nursing history, apply lessons from nursing history, and analyze the impact of this project on nursing history today.
Course Outcomes:
This course project enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:
CO2: Apply lessons from nursing history to today’s professional nursing practice. (PO4)
CO4: Analyze the impact of nursing history on professional nursing roles today and in the future. (PO7)
Due Date for Phase 3:
Submit by Sunday at 11:59 p.m.?MT at the end of Week?6.?
Late Assignment Policy:
If the assignment is not submitted by due date, a late deduction will be applied. See rubric below.
Points Possible:
The entire project is worth 600 points. Course Project Phase 3: Reflection Paper is worth 225 points of this total.
Directions:
After completing the Phase 2: Conversation with the Selected Nurse in Week 3, you may begin working on the Phase 3: Reflection Paper. The Phase 3: Reflection Paper will be due by Sunday end of Week 6 by 11:59PM Mountain Time.
Download the Phase 3: Reflection Paper template below.
View the Phase 3: Reflection Paper Tutorial (Links to an external site.)
The Phase 3: Reflection Paper be a typed paper in APA format including:
Double-spaced, font and type size consistent with APA manual
Title Page adheres to Chamberlain and APA standards.
Content and headings as below and on the rubric:
Introduction (include Introduction content, but no heading)
Reflection on Learning from Nurse’s Answers
Insight Gained from Conversation Regarding Leadership, Provision of Care, and/or Evidence-Based Practice
Analysis of the Impact of Nursing History on Professional Practice Today and in the Future
NR 393 Week 6 Assignment Course Project Phase 3: Reflection Paper Conclusion
Length: Approximately 3 double-spaced pages excluding Title Page; 800-1000 words required in the body of the paper.
No outside sources will be used. No citations or references. No Reference page needed.
Excellent mechanics of scholarly writing including spelling, grammar, structure, paragraphing, and punctuation.
Submit Phase 3 assignment via Canvas by due date.
Reflection Paper
Type your one paragraph introduction here, and remove all yellow highlighted instructions from all pages of this template. Update your name, instructor’s name, and the due date on the title page. The introduction should clearly identify each of the three main content areas (Hint: you can find these as the headings below) that this paper will include. See the rubric on the NR393 Course Project Phase 3: Reflection Paper assignment page for details in grading throughout the paper.
Reflection on Learning from Nurse’s Answers
In this section of the paper, provide depth by reflecting on your learning from the answers provided by the nurse in your Phase 2 Conversation. Remember that reflection is an activity that involves your deep thought about your Phase 2 Conversation experience and the nurse’s answers. Think about the experiences that the nurse shared as well as your learning from those answers.
Information in this section should be two to four well developed paragraphs for a total of 800-1000 words in the entire paper (excluding the Title Page). Writing should be well organized, logical, and clear. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation should be correct throughout the paper.
Insight Gained from Conversation Regarding Leadership, Provision of Care, and/or Evidence-Based Practice
This section of the Reflection Paper focuses on insight that you gained from the Phase 2 Conversation. Depth is expected as you explain your insight and reasons why. You may select leadership, provision of care, and/or evidence-based practice as your focus in this section; clearly identify which of the three choices you select. You may select more than one of those topics, but no additional points will be earned for choosing more than one. Your choice should be guided by the answers provided by the nurse in your Phase 2 Conversation.
Information in this section should be two to four well developed paragraphs for a total of 800-1000 words in the entire paper (excluding the Title Page). Writing should be well organized, logical, and clear. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation should be correct throughout the paper.
Analysis of Impact of Nursing History on Professional Practice Today and in the Future
In this section, you will analyze the impact that nursing history has on professional nursing practice today and in the future. Writing in a clear and thorough manner, delineate the impact today versus the impact you anticipate in the future; both today and the future must be covered well in this section of the paper.
Information in this section should be two to four well developed paragraphs for a total of 800-1000 words in the entire paper (excluding the Title Page). Writing should be well organized, logical, and clear. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation should be correct throughout the paper.
NR 393 Week 6 Assignment Course Project Phase 3: Reflection Paper Conclusion
Provide a Conclusion as the final portion of your paper. Write a summary of the three main sections (headings) in your paper that is complete yet concise. End the Conclusion with a concluding statement tying the parts of your paper together as a whole.
Information in this section should be one well developed paragraph for a total of 800-1000 words in the entire paper (excluding the Title Page). Writing should be well organized, logical, and clear. Spelling, grammar, and punctuation should be correct throughout the paper.There are no References page or citations in this paper.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
ALSO READ:
NR 393 Week 6: Amazing Changes and Events
NR 393 Week 6 Course Project Milestone 3
NR 393 Week 7: Interview Impact
NR 393 Week 8: AACN BSN Essential VIII and Your Future Practice
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
| Graded Item | Points | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) | 375 | 37.5% |
| Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) | 200 | 20% |
| Management of Power Paper (Week 5) | 200 | 20% |
| Executive Summary (Week 7) | 225 | 22.5% |
| Total | 1,000 | 100% |
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
| Letter Grade | Points | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| A | 940–1,000 | 94% to 100% |
| A- | 920–939 | 92% to 93% |
| B+ | 890–919 | 89% to 91% |
| B | 860–889 | 86% to 88% |
| B- | 840–859 | 84% to 85% |
| C+ | 810–839 | 81% to 83% |
| C | 760–809 | 76% to 80% |
| F | 759 and below | 75% and below |
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.
Reflection is an important practice in nursing practice. It informs nurses’ practice by contributing to their identification of areas of improvement in their roles in the patient care process. Nurse practitioners should demonstrate abilities to enhance their practice using evidence-based interventions. Therefore, this paper is a reflection of my experience with this week’s learning.
Nurse practitioners play an important role in the promotion of evidence-based practice in their roles. As a result, I view my role in the implementation of evidence-based practice to encompass several aspects. One of them is being a change agent. I view my role being a facilitator of change in the implementation of evidence-based practice. I have to adopt interventions such as open communication, training, and active involvement of the adopters of change for successful implementation of evidence-based practice. I also have to assess the need for evidence-based practice in my role. It will include assessing crucial and potential needs in my organization and recommending change initiatives to address them (Belowska et al., 2020). Lastly, I envision my role to include advocating for the right culture that supports evidence-based practice. The organization’s culture should enable best practices utilization for the optimum health of those in need.
My future role also entails my engagement in scholarship as a nurse practitioner. One of the ways in which I will engage in scholarship is by publishing articles on issues that affect nursing practice. I will conduct studies to explore how to improve outcomes in nursing practice using best-available evidence. I will also engage in scholarship through continuous professional development (Trautman et al., 2018). I will explore opportunities such as professional trainings to improve my scholarship skills.
Some barriers may be experienced in the implementation of evidence-based practice. One of them is resistance to change. The adopters of the evidence-based practices may resist them because of the lack of knowledge and skills, fear of the unknown outcomes, and their inadequate involvement. The other barrier is the lack of institutional support. Health organizations should support change by creating an enabling culture as well as providing adequate financial, material, and human resources (Bach-Mortensen et al., 2018). Therefore, interventions to minimize these barriers should be adopted.
In summary, I will play crucial roles in the implementation of evidence-based practice as a nurse practitioner in the future. I will be actively involved as a nurse scholar to advance evidence in nursing. I may experience barriers such as resistance to change in implementing evidence-based practice. Therefore, I should be ready to implement responsive interventions to prevent them.
NR 393 Week 6 Assignment Course Project Phase 3: Reflection Paper References
Bach-Mortensen, A. M., Lange, B. C. L., & Montgomery, P. (2018). Barriers and facilitators to implementing evidence-based interventions among third sector organisations: A systematic review. Implementation Science, 13(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13012-018-0789-7
Belowska, J., Panczyk, M., Zarzeka, A., Iwanow, L., Cieślak, I., & Gotlib, J. (2020). Promoting evidence-based practice – perceived knowledge, behaviours and attitudes of Polish nurses: A cross-sectional validation study. International Journal of Occupational Safety and Ergonomics, 26(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10803548.2018.1489993
Trautman, D. E., Idzik, S., Hammersla, M., & Rosseter, R. (2018). Advancing scholarship through translational research: The role of PhD and DNP prepared nurses. Online Journal of Issues in Nursing, 23(2).