coursework-banner

NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation

NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation

Chamberlain University NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation– Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for  NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation                                

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation    depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for  NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation                                

The introduction for the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation    is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for  NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation                                

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation  assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for  NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation                                

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for  NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation                                

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation

Purpose

The purpose of this assignment is to: (a) identify and reflect upon key concepts related to your policymaker visit; (b) provide empirical evidence to support new insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policy making process; and (c) present ideas in a clear, succinct, and scholarly manner.

Course Outcomes

CO 1: Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic-focused healthcare policies using evidence-based practice principles. (PO 1)

CO 2: Communicate with decision-makers to advocate for effective policies that impact nurses and nursing, consumers, or the healthcare system to foster population health including quality and safety. (PO 2)

CO 3: Demonstrate professional and personal growth concerning the advocacy role of the advanced practice nurse in fostering policy within diverse healthcare settings. (PO 3)

CO 4: Analyze social, historical, ethical, and political contexts of healthcare policies while integrating professional values to impact population health. (PO 4)

CO 5: Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that fosters person-centered healthcare and nursing practice. (PO 5)

Due Date:  Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 7

Total Points: 275 points

Requirements

Assignment Criteria for Presentation

  1. Describe your visit/presentation, including any PowerPoint presentation materials that you utilized during your policymaker visit. Limit these slides to five slides in this project (of the 15 total slides). This includes any handouts that you left with the policymaker.
  2. Discuss the response of the policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s).
  3. Reflect on the process, follow-up plans, insights gained about the issue and process, and support with evidence.
  4. Describe possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.
  5. Provide concluding statements summarizing the content.
  6. Develop a 15-slide PowerPoint presentation with speaker notes in APA format, not including title and reference slides. Write speaker notes sufficient enough to enable someone to take over or give the presentation other than you.

ALSO READ:

NR 506 Week 7: RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

NR 506 Week 7: RN as Healthcare Policy Leader Discussion SOLUTION

NR 506 Week 7 Assignment: Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation SOLUTION

NR 506 Week 7 RN as Healthcare Policy Leader Discussion 2018

NR 506 Week 8: Global Policy Reform

NR 506 Discuss the best approach for meeting and communicating with your selected elected official for your healthcare concern

Preparing the Presentation

After completing Policymaker Visit Ungraded Worksheet 3, develop an electronic presentation to describe, analyze, and reflect upon your policymaking visit. Include 5 slides from the PowerPoint presentation that you would have used during an actual policymaker visit. Include a minimum of five (5) classic or current references within the past 5 years that specifically support insights gained regarding your policy issue and the policymaking process.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation  

Sample Answer for NR 506 Week 7: Policymaker Visit Electronic Presentation

Theories offer a foundation for all professions, and healthcare theories offer the same foundation for nursing students and professionals. Nursing theories help guide and define nursing practice and provide a foundation for clinical decision-making.

The following presentation discusses a theoretical model relevant to NP (Medical-surgical) specialty that would provide a meaningful context for evidence-based practice surrounding a common issue in NP practice. In addition, I will outline how the theoretical model can be employed to address the issue.

Pender’s Health Promotion Model (HPM) aims to increase a patient’s level of wellbeing. The model identifies behavior-modifying factors like demographics, behavioral factors, and interpersonal influences, which interact to determine cognitive-perceptual processes. HPM is applied to modify unhealthy behaviors and initiate behavioral changes to promote health (Vakilian et al., 2021).

It has assumptions that: People seek to regulate their behavior actively; Individuals interact with the environment, gradually transforming the environment and being transformed over time; Healthcare professionals make up a part of the interpersonal environment, which influences individuals through their life span; Self-initiated reconfiguration of the person-environment interactive patterns is crucial to behavior change (Vakilian et al., 2021).

Pender HPM is relevant to my NP specialty in medical-surgical nursing since it can be applied to modify unhealthy behaviors and lifestyle practices associated with common chronic illnesses like hypertension, obesity, hyperlipidemia, and diabetes. In addition, HPM can be applied to initiate behavioral changes in patients with or at risk of these conditions to promote health (Vakilian et al., 2021).

Med-surgical NPs provide health education and promotion and can use HPM in these roles. Various studies have found HPM effective in alleviating unhealthy behaviors and promoting healthy behaviors. Furthermore, Med-surgical NPs can use the model to learn that individuals are highly likely to commit to and adopt health-promoting behaviors when their significant others copy the behavior, anticipate the behavior to occur, and offer assistance and support to foster the behavior (Vakilian et al., 2021).

Diabetes complications are a major concern related to the medical-surgical NP specialty. For instance, we have had many diabetic patients diagnosed with complications like retinopathy, kidney failure, nerve damage, and diabetic foot ulcers. Most patients with these complications have a prolonged history of uncontrolled hyperglycemia (Cole & Florez, 2020). In addition, most usually report failing to adhere to the lifestyle recommendations like modifying dietary habits, engaging in physical exercises, smoking cessation, and minimizing alcohol consumption. For example, 12 out of 18 patients who underwent foot amputations in our setting were known smokers using 1-3 PPD. Furthermore, some diabetes patients do not adhere to the recommendation for daily glucose monitoring, which leads to undetected hyperglycemia.

Diabetes complications have impacted patients’ health outcomes, wellbeing, and quality of life. The complications lead to prolonged hospital stays and increased hospital readmissions. This leads to high healthcare costs for patients and high hospital operational costs (Cole & Florez, 2020). The hypoglycemic agents routinely prescribed to patients with diabetes also increase medical costs. Furthermore, complications like foot ulcers lead to foot amputations which tremendously reduce patients’ quality of life. Diabetic retinopathy causes cataracts that affect patients’ vision, which impairs their ability to perform ADLs (Cole & Florez, 2020). Diabetes complications are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates.

Pender’s HPM can be employed as a framework to guide EBP in addressing diabetes complications. HPM can be used to assess patients’ biological, psychological, and socio-cultural factors that influence their health behavior and self-care practices (Shahabi et al., 2022). It can also be used to examine patients’ perceived benefits of action, barriers to adopting healthy behaviors, and perceived self-efficacy, which influences perceived barriers to action. Patients with a higher efficacy have a low perception of barriers to adopting the behavior (Kurnia et al., 2018). Medical-surgical NPs can use the HPM to improve diabetic patients’ perceived self-efficacy. This can help achieve desired self-management behavior, like exercising, having a healthy diet, actively monitoring blood glucose, and adhering to medication and foot care.

Pender’s HPM is applied to modify unhealthy behaviors and initiate behavioral changes to promote health. It seeks to improve individuals’ level of wellbeing. HPM is related to the Medical-surgical nursing NP specialty since NPs provide health education and promotion. NPs can use the model to foster healthy behaviors to lower the incidence of chronic illnesses. Diabetes complications are a common issue facing med-surgical NPs. HPM can be used to assess and improve a patient’s perceived efficacy, which improves outcomes.

 References

Cole, J. B., & Florez, J. C. (2020). Genetics of diabetes mellitus and diabetes complications. Nature reviews. Nephrology16(7), 377–390. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41581-020-0278-5

Kurnia, A. D., Amatayakul, A., & Karuncharernpanit, S. (2018). Predictors of diabetes self-management among type 2 diabetics in Indonesia: Application theory of the health promotion model. International journal of nursing sciences4(3), 260-265. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnss.2017.06.010

Shahabi, N., Hosseini, Z., Aghamolaei, T., Ghanbarnejad, A., & Behzad, A. (2022). Application of Pender’s health promotion model for type 2 diabetes treatment adherence: protocol for a mixed methods study in southern Iran. Trials23(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13063-022-07027-9

Vakilian, P., Mahmoudi, M., Oskouie, F., Firouzian, A. A., & Khachian, A. (2021). Investigating the effect of educational intervention based on the Pender’s health promotion model on lifestyle and self-efficacy of the patients with diabetic foot ulcer: A clinical trial. Journal of Education and Health Promotion10. DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1301_20

Rubric

W7 Policymaker Presentation

W7 Policymaker Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeVisit Description
50.0 pts

Clearly describes the policymaking visit/presentation (includes actual presentation)

44.0 pts

Description of visit/presentation has rare inaccuracy.

40.0 pts

Description of visit/presentation lacks occasional important element or specificity.

19.0 pts

Description of visit/presentation has multiple instances of inaccuracies or is not addressed

0.0 pts

Does not identify, define or describe the healthcare policy.

50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePolicymaker Response
50.0 pts

Slides and speaker notes discuss response of policymaker to your message/ask/recommendation(s) and is clearly articulated.

44.0 pts

Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has rare inaccuracy.

40.0 pts

Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response occasionally inaccurate or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.

19.0 pts

Slides and speaker notes discussing policymaker response has multiple inaccuracies or lacks sufficient level of detail.

0.0 pts

Slides and speaker notes do not discuss the policymaker response.

50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReflections on Process
50.0 pts

Reflections on process (including supportive evidence), follow-up, and insights gained (issue and process) are clearly described in slide and speaker notes.

44.0 pts

Reflection on process, supportive evidence, follow-up, and insights gained has rare inaccuracy within slides and speaker notes.

40.0 pts

Occasionally inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks occasional important elements or specificity.

19.0 pts

Reflection on process, evidence, follow-up, and insights is inaccurate within slides and speaker notes or lacks sufficient detail.

0.0 pts

There is no reflection on process.

50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeFuture Opportunities
50.0 pts

Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing.

44.0 pts

Describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and their importance to nursing with need for further detail or clarity.

40.0 pts

Clearly describes possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting but no mention of importance to nursing

19.0 pts

Minimal description of possible future opportunities as a result of this meeting and no discussion of importance to nursing.

0.0 pts

Does not describe possible future opportunities or their importance to nursing.

50.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeConclusion
45.0 pts

Concluding statements summarize content in a clear and articulated manner.

40.0 pts

Concluding statements summarizing content have rare inaccuracy or lack of minor details/clarity.

36.0 pts

Concluding statements lack occasional important element or specificity.

17.0 pts

Concluding statements have multiple instances of inaccuracies or little detail.

0.0 pts

No conclusion

45.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeAPA format
15.0 pts

Slides, speaker notes, and references are completely are free from APA errors throughout.

13.0 pts

There are 2-3 APA format errors.

12.0 pts

There are 4-6 APA format errors

6.0 pts

There are 6-7 APA format errors.

0.0 pts

Eight or more errors in APA, grammar, spelling and syntax and/or citations are missing

15.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomePresentation/Writing
15.0 pts

Slide and speaker notes content are accurate. Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone. Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are consistent with formal written work. Balance among space, words/graphics, and color is effective.

13.0 pts

Presentations slides are professional in appearance and tone with rare exceptions. Slides are + 1 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with rare repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack minor detail or clarity.

12.0 pts

Presentation slides are professional in appearance and tone with occasional areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 2 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with occasional repetition of slides. Speaker notes lack detail or clarity.

6.0 pts

Most presentation slides are not professional in appearance and tone with numerous areas needing improvements in style. Slides are + 3 of required number. Speaker notes contain presentation content with multiple repetitions of slides or lack significant detail.

0.0 pts

Presentation includes numerous crowded slides and has no flow.

15.0 pts