NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
Chamberlain University NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
Purpose
The self-assessment is completed using the TIGER-based Assessment of Nursing Informatics Competencies (TANIC) tool. TIGER refers to the Technology Informatics Guiding Education Reform Initiative which identified a list of the minimum informatics competencies for all nurses and students graduating from pre- and post-licensure programs. The graded self-evaluation of your informatics competencies is required in order to increase one’s own understanding of competencies in nursing informatics which will enable the planning of strategies to enhance knowledge and skills.
Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?
Before taking the Post-TANIC self-assessment I felt really confident that I did improve a little in the area of information literacy, however, I still need to make further improvements to be more competent and proficient at utilizing resources and literature databases effectively for the research of information management, being able to evaluate the quality of the resources and research with educating and developing a skillset on defining the specific target area of research. My dilemma with information literacy is being able to pinpoint the correct terms and keywords for searching the necessary content that is needed for my search.
Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?
Nurses play a significant role in recognizing, understanding, progressing, and translating the necessary education and informational needs of patients, these skills all serve as a benefit to advanced practice nursing because it helps to enhance patient compliance in their healthcare treatment plan and promote efficient and optimal holistic healthcare (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). Thus, to become fluent, proficient, and competent in informational literacy including facilitating the development of information literacy in patients’ nurses need to become familiar with informational literacy models and frameworks (Buchanan & Nicol, 2019). As also stated by Farokhzadian et al (2021), one of the most essential requirements for nurses’ readiness to implement evidence-based practice is to improve their information literacy skills, and through learned evidence-based practice skills nurses will be able to apply the appropriate and effective research findings in their nursing practice to provide high-quality, safe and compassionate nursing care and be able to make decisions based on the most recent evidence in clinical settings. Therefore, nurses need to be provisioned with the necessary information literacy skills to obtain the most recent research findings to provide sympathetic, safe, ethical, and cost-effective health care as it is fundamental for the successful implementation of evidence-based clinical practice (Farokhzadian et al, 2021).
The competency of clinical information management is associated with the quality of care, critical thinking, problem-solving, ethical knowledge, clinical decision-making, focusing on skills, teamwork, and collaboration. Advanced practice nurses need to remain efficient in clinical decision-making competence to maintain the retention of traditional life-saving nursing skills, ethics, effective patient care, and fundamentals for maintaining patient safety (Wallin et al., 2022).
Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.
The two competencies in this class that I achieved educational efficiency were informational literacy and clinical information management. This course has taught me how to analyze current and emerging technologies to support safe practice environments and to optimize patient safety, cost-effectiveness, and health outcomes by maximizing the skillset of having proficient and competent clinical information management. I have learned how to utilize the TIGER framework to help integrate informatics competencies by identifying knowledge and skillsets in my clinical decision-making. Also, through studying the efficacy of informational literacy I have gained proficiency and competency in being able to recognize when further educational and evidence-based research is needed, how to search for the specifically targeted information that is needed, and how to navigate the informatic technologies and provided CDS, which is critical in obtaining optimal holistic patient-centered care, patient compliance, patient safety, and safe professional nursing practice.
NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docxDownload NUR599 WEEK 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment-2.docx
References
Buchanan, S., & Nicol, E. (2019). Developing health information literacy in disengaged at-risk populations. Journal of Documentation, 75(1), 172–189. https://doi.org/10.1108/JD-06-2018-0086Links to an external site.
Farokhzadian, J., Jouparinejad, S., Fatehi, F., & Falahati-Marvast, F. (2021). Improving nurses’ readiness for evidence-based practice in critical care units: results of an information literacy training program. BMC Nursing, 20(1), 79–79. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12912-021-00599-yLinks to an external site.
Wallin, K., Werkander Harstäde, C., Bremer, A., & Hörberg, U. (2022). Nurse preceptors’ experience‐based strategies for supporting learning in the ambulance service—A combined focus group and dyadic interview study. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 78(6), 1704–1717. https://doi.org/10.1111/jan.15127Links to an external site.
ALSO READ: NR 599 Week 5 Discussion Clinical Decision Support Systems
Sample Answer 2 for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
My informatics competency level has improved markedly compared to my week 2 Pre-TANIC self-assessment results. I have improved my competency in computer skills, information literacy, and informatics skills. For example, I have improved my knowledge in previously weak areas like privacy and security of information in computer systems and maintaining the integrity of information resources, systems, equipment, and facilities. I can now clearly explain the privacy and security of information.
The two competencies that will benefit my future APN role are computer skills and informatics literacy. Computer skills will be crucial since I will be required to use healthcare technology and computer systems to facilitate nursing care and support educational resources for nursing education. The use of information technology has become a vital part of the healthcare industry. It requires healthcare providers, including APNs, to have basic computer knowledge and informatics competencies, to manage and use technology to provide healthcare (Kleib et al., 2021).
On the other hand, informatics literacy will be crucial in my future APN role since I will be expected to use data to improve nursing practice. I recognize that computers only facilitate nursing care, and there are human functions that computers cannot carry out. The informatics knowledge will be beneficial since I will be responsible for making ethical decisions in computing and designing, selecting, implementing, and evaluating systems in health care (Singh & Masango, 2020). The course has increased my understanding of the impact of computerized information management on the APN’s role and the limitations and reliability of computerized patient monitoring systems.
The competencies that I achieved in this course are informatics literacy and information skills. In informatics literacy, I have increased my ability to determine the utility of software applications and can participate in the selection process, design, implementation, and evaluation of systems. Besides, I can transfer my informatics knowledge. I can also search for and access sources to help in ethical and rational decision-making. Furthermore, I can help integrate innovations and up-to-date informatics methods into my APN specialty (Khezri & Abdekhoda, 2019). I have acquired informatics skills like using different programs to develop a simple database. I have learned to use database applications to enter and retrieve data and access shared data sets like clinical log Databases and Minimum Data sets. Furthermore, I have acquired skills in extracting data from clinical data sets.
References
Kleib, M., Chauvette, A., Furlong, K., Nagle, L., Slater, L., & McCloskey, R. (2021). Approaches for defining and assessing nursing informatics competencies: a scoping review. JBI evidence synthesis, 19(4), 794-841.
Khezri, H., & Abdekhoda, M. (2019). Assessing nurses’ informatics competency and identifying its related factors. Journal of research in nursing : JRN, 24(7), 529–538. https://doi.org/10.1177/1744987119839453
Singh, F., & Masango, T. (2020). Information technology in nursing education: perspectives of student nurses. The Open Nursing Journal, 14(1). DOI: 10.2174/1874434602014010018
Sample Answer 3 for NR 599 Week 7 Discussion Post TANIC Self-Assessment and Reflection Post
Upon completing the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment, I feel that my competency level has improved. After taking the week 2 self-assessment I became very cognizant of how I already apply informatics in my day-to-day at my nursing job. I am competent in most of the skills that were listed in the assessment. After completing this Post-TANIC assessment I have more confidence in my informatics abilities. There will always be more to learn, but I am able to easily navigate and understand the current technology related to my nursing work.
For my future role as an APN, I believe the two competencies that I will benefit from in the future will be the QSEN competencies of Evidence-based Practice and Informatics. The QSEN Competency of Evidence-based Practice ensures the nurse can read research and evidence databases and relate them to clinical practice(QSEN, n.d.). Being able to incorporate evidence-based practice to guide my decision-making for patient care plans will be crucial if I want positive health outcomes. Information literacy will help guide my ability to gather evidence-based practice from online databases. I want to properly incorporate the latest evidence-based practices to help my patients achieve optimal outcomes. Evidence-based articles are always emerging and properly understanding that knowledge and incorporating it into my treatment plans will benefit my patients.
The QSEN competency of Informatics involves being able to properly respond to clinical decision-making supports and alerts and monitor outcomes of care processes through information management tools (QSEN, n.d.). Having the ability to understand and use a clinical decision support system(CDSS) will be crucial for future practice. Electronic health records are the standard in many practices along with a CDSS. I intend to use a CDSS to help guide my decisions, for optimal patient care plans, while not being overly reliant on them. These two competencies will help me provide safe and optimal care for my patients.
In this course, I believe the two competencies I achieved were information literacy and clinical information management. For information literacy, we evaluated an online medical application to understand how this electronic resource can benefit patient care. We appraised the ease of use and the privacy settings of this application to help us as future practitioners to make recommendations for use. For clinical information management competency, we evaluated the pros and cons of a CDSS and its influence on patient care and safety. Understanding that CDSS can have many pros and cons, can help me be aware of how to appropriately incorporate a CDSS into my future practice.
Information technology is constantly evolving and improving. Healthcare is incorporating technology more than ever, and it could potentially increase positive patient outcomes and improve patient safety. Astier et al. (2020) note that technology can improve patient safety with appropriate medication alerts, access to accurate patient data, and improved diagnostic reports, but require staff to be properly trained an educated. Technology can be complicated and could overwhelm many healthcare professionals, properly training staff could be the key to successfully incorporating technology in healthcare. Patient safety is optimal, and properly utilizing technology can achieve the goal of successful patient outcomes across all healthcare settings.
References:
Astier, A., Carlet, J., Hoppe-Tichy, T., Jacklin, A., Jeanes, A., McManus, S., Pletz, M. W., Seifert, H., & Fitzpatrick, R. (2020). What is the role of technology in improving patient safety? A French, German and UK Healthcare Professional Perspective. Journal of Patient Safety and Risk Management, 25(6), 219–224. https://doi.org/10.1177/2516043520975661
Qsen competencies. (n.d.). Retrieved April 19, 2023, from https://qsen.org/competencies/pre-licensure-ksas/
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this assignment, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Apply knowledge of nursing informatics and non-nursing science (CO 1 and 2)
Assess nursing informatics competencies (CO2)
Evaluate progress in enhancing nursing informatics competencies (CO4)
Foster professional and personal development with planning strategies to enhance these competencies (CO4)
Examine ethical decision making in relation to these competencies (CO3)
Requirements:
In order to prepare for this assignment, read the lessons as well as the assigned readings BEFORE attempting the self-assessment.
Please use the following hyperlink to access and complete the survey: Week 7 Post-TANIC Self-Assessment Survey (Links to an external site.)
FAILURE TO COMPLETE THE SURVEY WILL RESULT IN A GRADE OF ZERO (0) FOR THE ASSIGNMENT.
After completing the survey, navigate to the Week 7 Module in Canvas and respond to EACH of the questions for your Reflection Post .
The Reflection Posts DOES NOT require cross-posting to a peer or faculty .
Scholarly Sources: Only scholarly sources are acceptable for citation and reference in this course. These include peer-reviewed publications, government reports, or sources written by a professional or scholar in the field. The textbooks and lessons are NOT considered to be outside scholarly sources. For the threaded discussions and reflection posts, reputable internet sources such as websites by government agencies (URL ends in .gov) and respected organizations (often ends in .org) can be counted as scholarly sources. The best outside scholarly source to use is a peer-reviewed nursing journal. You are encouraged to use the Chamberlain library and search one of the available databases for a peer-reviewed journal article. The following sources should not be used: Wikipedia, Wikis, or blogs. These websites are not considered scholarly as anyone can add to these. Please be aware that .com websites can vary in scholarship and quality. For example, the American Heart Association is a .com site with scholarship and quality. It is the responsibility of the student to determine the scholarship and quality of any .com site. Ask your instructor before using any site if you are unsure. Points will be deducted from the rubric if the site does not demonstrate scholarship or quality. Current outside scholarly sources must be published with the last 5 years. Instructor permission must be obtained BEFORE the assignment is due if using a source that is older than 5 years.
ATTENTION: Students will not receive results following completion of this survey. For the reflection questions, please recall how you rated your proficiency/competency with the skills on the survey.
Reflection Questions:
Reflect and respond to?EACH?of the following questions.
Regarding the Post-TANIC Self-Assessment for this week, how does your competency level compare to the Week 2 Self-Assessment?
Which two competencies do you think may benefit you in your future role as an APN and why?
As discussed in the lesson this week, healthcare providers must be competent in informatics in order to make ethical decisions about informatics technologies and patients’ intimate healthcare data and information. To the extent that information technology is reshaping healthcare practices or promises to improve patient care, healthcare professionals must possess certain competencies which will assist with consistency and quality. Which two competencies did you achieve in this course? Explain.
Late Assignment Policy
Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.
Also Check Out: NR 599 Week 2 Midweek Comprehension Questions
In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.
This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.
Evaluation Methods
The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.
| Graded Item | Points | Weighting |
|---|---|---|
| Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) | 375 | 37.5% |
| Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) | 200 | 20% |
| Management of Power Paper (Week 5) | 200 | 20% |
| Executive Summary (Week 7) | 225 | 22.5% |
| Total | 1,000 | 100% |
No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.
All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.
| Letter Grade | Points | Percentage |
|---|---|---|
| A | 940–1,000 | 94% to 100% |
| A- | 920–939 | 92% to 93% |
| B+ | 890–919 | 89% to 91% |
| B | 860–889 | 86% to 88% |
| B- | 840–859 | 84% to 85% |
| C+ | 810–839 | 81% to 83% |
| C | 760–809 | 76% to 80% |
| F | 759 and below | 75% and below |
NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.
Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.
Participation for MSN
Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.
Participation Guidelines
Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.
Direct Quotes
Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.