coursework-banner

NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment

NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment

Chamberlain University NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment– Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment  assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment                                

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment    depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment                                

 

The introduction for the Chamberlain University   NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment    is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment                                

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment       assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment                                

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment                                

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

 

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the  NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment

Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern

Purpose

In this course, the students will have the opportunity to identify a healthcare policy concern and community healthcare concern which can be improved with a change in policy, ordinance or the language in existing law. The outcome would be the potential for improved health for a population group.  Students will present a proposed solution or change to an elected official, and provide an analysis of the project.  While students are not responsible for ensuring the implementation of their identified solution to the healthcare policy concern, the student is required to meet with an elected official to present the concern and proposed resolution.  The purpose of this current assignment is to identify the community-based healthcare policy concern and provide an extensive evidenced-based foundation for proposing a policy change to an elected official.

My health policy I would want to implement would be to increase physical activity time for school aged children. By having more activity time, the children will develop more healthy habits early in their lives; these habits can carry over into their adult lives. By creating healthy habits early on, they are going to be less likely to develop medical conditions like high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity. There are several ways that this could be executed into the current curriculum. Most schools only have one physical education teacher. If the schools were to hire more teachers, the children would have more opportunity for organized activity. Another way to implement an increase in activity is to make sure that the children have the necessary equipment. By having physical education equipment and a designated location for this activity period, they will be more likely to engage in the activity. By the government increasing their spending limits for physical activity in schools, they are ultimately going to decrease their health care cost for these children when they are adults.

I have chosen the lack of access to mental health care in Sonoma County, CA. Currently, the largest psychiatric facility in our county is the Sonoma County Jail and a vast number of inmates are incarcerated for small crimes such as trespassing or public intoxication, centered on their mental illness. I would like to propose a policy that forces our board of supervisors to revamp outpatient psychiatric services instead of cutting funding to them, just this past week they planned to vote on a huge budget cut which would cripple our county mental health services even further.

In speaking with one of our resident physicians, she noted that the trend to “deinstitutionalize” psychiatric care was 2-fold and Sonoma County did not live up to the 2nd half of the bargain. We were to close our large psychiatric units (which we did, over 10 years ago) but build a stronger network of outpatient psychiatric options, housing assistance, etc.

So my policy would require the fulfillment of the increased outpatient psychiatric services and inpatient treatment facilities. We cannot allow the police in our county to be the largest mental health providers because studies have shown that the recidivism rate and suicide rate for those incarcerated for mental illness increase (Jaffe, Du, Huang & Hser, 2012). One of the major public health concerns regarding lack of mental health access is the enormous homeless population that we have in Sonoma County. The outrageous cost of living, lack of access and now, after the recent devastating fires, really add to the challenge of finding places for mentally ill patients to go besides jail.

The model that I feel would be best applied to my policy issue is harder for me to pin down. I have decided that either the rational-approach model or the stage-sequential model would work best, so hopefully this discussion will give me further guidance.

The rational-approach would work because, as noted in our lesson, sweeping policy is needed (CCN, 2018). Making large scale changed to the mental health system in Sonoma County will involve many different players and includes a vast number of stakeholders (CCN, 2018). The stakeholders in this change will include mental health providers, patients, community members and law enforcement, to name a few.

The stage-sequential model, which ties into the nursing model, would also be effective. We would first need to set an agenda, form the policy then evaluate the outcome, making changes as we go along (CCN, 2018).

Chamberlain College of Nursing. (2018). Week 2: Policy Making Process: How Nurses Can Make an Impact. [online lesson]. NR506: Healthcare Policy. Retrieved from: https://chamberlain.instructure.com/courses/22798/pages/week-2-lesson?module_item_id=2729952

Jaffe, A., Du, J., Huang, D., & Hser, Y.-I. (2012). Drug-abusing offenders with co-morbid mental disorders: Problem severity, treatment participation, and recidivism. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment43(2), 244–250. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsat.2011.12.002

ALSO READ:

NR506 Week 2 Identification of Healthcare Policy Concern

NR506 Week 4 Preparation of Presentation to Elected Official

NR506 Week 7 Summary of Healthcare Concern Presentation

NR506 week 7 discussion RN as Healthcare Policy Leader

NR506 Healthcare Policy Week 7 Assignment

Sample Answer 2 for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment

Preventative screening for chronic diseases gives individuals clarity and a sense of security, protecting them, and allowing them to live a longer, healthier life. To achieve this, the word needs to be spread about these wonderful immunizations and screenings. One way to do this is by creating a patient profile. This patient profile would be essentially a portal with all of their medical info, immunizations, medical history, and family history. This patient portal will remind them of the dates to be tested. For example, every year a woman should have a pap smear. It will alert them when it is needed, while also showing various health centers near them. Another example would be when their immunizations expire, such as the Tdap and tetanus shots. Based on family history, it would alert you at certain ages to be tested or screened for cancer. For example, if you have a history of breast cancer, should be tested at 30 and every year after. There is a lot of information out there and it tends to get lost in translation. This app or patient profile helps track and keep your medical history up to date.

Obesity and Children

The healthcare policy that I have selected deals with childhood obesity. From my experience in the hospital setting, I have witnessed what long term effects of being overweight can do to a person’s overall health. Studies have shown that being overweight can lead to complications such as diabetes and high blood pressure (Quelly, 2017). I am working on an orthopedic unit, and I have cared for young adult patients. Some have needed back surgery or knee replacements because their excess weight has put increased pressure and wear and tear on their bones and joints; others have lost a limb due to uncontrolled diabetes. I have come to realize that a good portion of health issues can be either significantly decreased or even eliminated. Most adults who are overweight began poor diets and exercise habits as children. One in three children now in this country is overweight (Quelly, 2017). We as Americans have a problem with increased intake of food and a decreased level of activity (Moore, Wilkie, & Desrochers, 2017). If we can instill in children the importance of eating healthy and staying active while they are young, millions of government dollars can be saved when they reach adulthood and do not have multiple medical problems that can be completely avoidable. With the federal debt rising every day, tackling this area could have significant impact and show long-term results. My husband is an elementary physical education teacher and a coach. I have heard from his experience that a lack of equipment and a lack of emphasis on the importance of physical education in schools are also factors contributing to weight and exercise. His school does not even have a gym for P.E. He is either outside in the extreme heat or cold or forced to use his only other alternative of trying to find adequate space for the children to exercise in a classroom. I believe school districts should employ more PE teachers and require more physical education time during the school day. By implementing these changes, we could help our children build a foundation of seeing health as a priority in their lives. They would hopefully be able to prevent many health complications as they move into adulthood.

To implement my policy, I think the stage-sequential model would be the best route to use. As discussed in our lesson from this week, this model has stages of implementation. Since the concept of improving physical education in schools involves having to increase funds and salaries, the school districts are not likely to quickly jump onboard. They will want to see results before they fully invest in the needed changes. With this method, a small part of the policy can be implemented and then evaluated for its success. Because policies will be developed in increments, districts will have the opportunity to change things that are not favorable or that did not work early on before too much time and money are invested. Once they see the benefits, I believe they will be more likely to keep advancing with the policy and implementing it into all the schools in their district.

 References

Moore, E. S., Wilkie, W. L., & Desrochers, D. M. (2017). All in the Family? Parental Roles in the Epidemic of Childhood Obesity. Journal Of Consumer Research43(5), 824-859. doi:10.1093/jcr/ucw059

Quelly, S. B. (2017). Characteristics Associated with School Nurse Childhood Obesity Prevention Practices. Pediatric Nursing43(4), 193-199.

Sample Answer 3 for NR 506 Healthcare Policy Week 2 Assignment

My health policy I would want to implement would be to increase physical activity time for school aged children. By having more activity time, the children will develop more healthy habits early in their lives; these habits can carry over into their adult lives. By creating healthy habits early on, they are going to be less likely to develop medical conditions like high blood pressure, diabetes, and obesity. There are several ways that this could be executed into the current curriculum. Most schools only have one physical education teacher. If the schools were to hire more teachers, the children would have more opportunity for organized activity. Another way to implement an increase in activity is to make sure that the children have the necessary equipment. By having physical education equipment and a designated location for this activity period, they will be more likely to engage in the activity. By the government increasing their spending limits for physical activity in schools, they are ultimately going to decrease their health care cost for these children when they are adults.

Course Outcomes

This assignment enables the student to meet the following course outcomes:

CO 1. Employ strategies to impact the development, implementation, and consequences of holistic focused healthcare policies at the institutional, local, national, and international levels using evidence-based practice principles.  (PO 1)

CO 3. Demonstrate professional and personal growth regarding the advocacy role of the advance practice nurse in healthcare policy for diverse healthcare settings.   (PO 3)

CO 5.  Advocate for institutional, local, national, and international policies that influence person-centered healthcare, consumers, and nursing practice.  (PO 5)

Due Date Sunday 11:59 p.m. MT at the end of Week 2

Students are given the opportunity to request an extension on assignments for emergent situations. Supporting documentation must be submitted to the assigned faculty. If the student’s request is not approved, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction

Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction

Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

If the student’s request is approved, the student will be informed of the revised due date. Should the student fail to meet the revised due date, the assignment is graded and a late penalty is applied as follows:

Monday = 10% of total possible point reduction

Tuesday = 20% of total possible point reduction

Wednesday = 30% of total possible point reduction

Total Points: 250 points

Requirements

Description of the Assignment

For this assignment, the student must first select a healthcare policy concern.  The concern must be a community-based, public health policy concern.  Student may not use healthcare entities or organizational concerns occurring within a private or public healthcare facility.  Scholarly evidence supporting the concern must be presented that provides a comprehensive picture of the selected healthcare concern as well as the student-identified solution.  The elected official whom the student will interview is also identified in this paper.

Criteria for Content

Overview of healthcare policy: This section introduces healthcare policy. It should contain the following elements:

Define healthcare policy in general and its implications for the nursing profession

Define the role of advocacy and how it can impact healthcare policy

Explain how the role of advocacy is consistent with the responsibilities of an advance practice nurse

Identification of selected healthcare policy concern: This section provides foundational information regarding the student-selected healthcare policy concern.  It should contain the following elements:

Specifically identify the selected healthcare policy concern

Description of the impacted population group

Provide a comprehensive description of the selected healthcare concern by including:

How frequently does it occur?

What impact does the selected healthcare concern have upon the community and population group?

Description of student-identified solution to the selected healthcare concern: This section presents a comprehensive picture of the student-selected solution to the selected healthcare concern.  It should contain the following elements:

Identify, with specific detail, the solution to the student-selected healthcare concern

Identify the following areas:

What would be the positive outcome if the solution was implemented?

What changes would need to occur in the community to foster implementation?

What changes would need to occur in the population group to foster implementation?

What measureable actions will demonstrate a positive outcome if the solution was implemented?

What might be 2 (two) challenges to implementing the proposed solution and how can each of these challenges be avoided or resolved?

Identification of elected official: This section identifies the elected official that the student will present the selected healthcare concern and its solution to.  It should contain the following elements:

The name of the elected official

The position of the elected official

Explanation of why this individual was selected

Conclusion: This section provides a comprehensive and concise review of the key elements of the assignment.

Preparing the Assignment

Criteria for Format and Special Instructions

The paper (excluding the title page and reference page) should be at least 6, but no more than 10 pages. Points will be lost for not meeting these length requirements.

Title page, body of paper, and reference page must follow APA guidelines as found in the current edition of the manual. This includes the use of headings for each section of the paper except for the introduction where no heading is used.

A minimum of 6 (six) appropriate research-based scholarly references must be used of which 2 may be empirical evidence from state and county website data… (Check with your instructor regarding .org or .gov sites). Required textbook for this course, dictionary and Chamberlain College of Nursing lesson information may NOT be used as scholarly references for this assignment.  For additional assistance regarding scholarly nursing references, please see the course Library Guide.  Be aware that information from .com websites may be incorrect and should be avoided.  References are current – within a 5-year time frame unless a valid rationale is provided and the instructor has approved them prior to submission of the assignment.

Ideas and information from scholarly, peer reviewed, nursing sources must be cited must be cited within the text of the paper as well as appearing in the reference list with correct APA format.

Rules of grammar, spelling, word usage, and punctuation are followed and consistent with formal, scientific writing.

This assignment must be submitted to TurnItIn™ (TII) as required by the TurnItIn™ policy. To allow sufficient time for revision, early submission of the assignment to TurnItIn™ is highly encouraged.  The final submission will be graded by faculty.  If a TurnItin™ report indicates that plagiarism has occurred, the Academic Integrity policy will be followed.

Late Assignment Policy

Students are expected to submit assignments by the time they are due. Assignments submitted after the due date and time will receive a deduction of 10% of the total points possible for that assignment for each day the assignment is late. Assignments will be accepted, with penalty as described, up to a maximum of three days late, after which point a zero will be recorded for the assignment.

In the event of an emergency that prevents timely submission of an assignment, students may petition their instructor for a waiver of the late submission grade reduction. The instructor will review the student’s rationale for the request and make a determination based on the merits of the student’s appeal. Consideration of the student’s total course performance to date will be a contributing factor in the determination. Students should continue to attend class, actively participate, and complete other assignments while the appeal is pending.

This Policy applies to assignments that contribute to the numerical calculation of the course letter grade.

Evaluation Methods

The maximum score in this class is 1,000 points. The categories, which contribute to your final grade, are weighted as follows.

Graded Item Points Weighting
Discussion (50 points, Weeks 1–7; 25 points, Week 8) 375 37.5%
Shared Governance Model Paper (Week 3) 200 20%
Management of Power Paper (Week 5) 200 20%
Executive Summary (Week 7) 225 22.5%
Total 1,000 100%

No extra credit assignments are permitted for any reason.

All of your course requirements are graded using points. At the end of the course, the points are converted to a letter grade using the scale in the table below. Percentages of 0.5% or higher are not raised to the next whole number. A final grade of 76% (letter grade C) is required to pass the course.

Letter Grade Points Percentage
A   940–1,000 94% to 100%
A-  920–939 92% to 93%
B+ 890–919 89% to 91%
B   860–889 86% to 88%
B-  840–859 84% to 85%
C+ 810–839 81% to 83%
C   760–809 76% to 80%
F   759 and below 75% and below

NOTE:To receive credit for a week’s discussion, students may begin posting no earlier than the Sunday immediately before each week opens. Unless otherwise specified, access to most weeks begins on Sunday at 12:01 a.m. MT, and that week’s assignments are due by the next Sunday by 11:59 p.m. MT. Week 8 opens at 12:01 a.m. MT Sunday and closes at 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday. Any assignments and all discussion requirements must be completed by 11:59 p.m. MT Wednesday of the eighth week.

Students agree that, by taking this course, all required papers may be subject to submission for textual similarity review to Turnitin.com for the detection of plagiarism. All submitted papers will be included as source documents in the Turnitin.com reference database solely for the purpose of detecting plagiarism of such papers. Use of the Turnitin.com service is subject to the Terms and Conditions of Use posted on the Turnitin.com site.

Participation for MSN

Threaded Discussion Guiding Principles

The ideas and beliefs underpinning the threaded discussions (TDs) guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The use of TDs provides students with opportunities to contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a safe, caring, and fluid environment that models professional and social interaction. The TD’s ebb and flow is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship. Participation in the TDs generates opportunities for students to actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty. TDs foster the development of members into a community of learners as they share ideas and inquiries, consider perspectives that may be different from their own, and integrate knowledge from other disciplines.

Participation Guidelines

Each weekly threaded discussion is worth up to 25 points. Students must post a minimum of two times in each graded thread. The two posts in each individual thread must be on separate days. The student must provide an answer to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week. If the student does not provide an answer to each graded thread topic (not a response to a student peer) before the Wednesday deadline, 5 points are deducted for each discussion thread in which late entry occurs (up to a 10-point deduction for that week). Subsequent posts, including essential responses to peers, must occur by the Sunday deadline, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week.

Direct Quotes

Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in Threaded Discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the Grammar, Syntax, APA category.

Grading Rubric Guidelines

Performance Category 10 9 8 4 0

Scholarliness

Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions.

  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry clearly stating how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions
  • Evaluates literature resources to develop a comprehensive analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses valid, relevant, and reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion
  • Provides relevant evidence of scholarly inquiry but does not clearly state how the evidence informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Evaluates information from source(s) to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Uses some valid, relevant, reliable outside sources to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) with some interpretation/evaluation, but not enough to develop a coherent analysis or synthesis.
  • Little valid, relevant, or reliable outside sources are used to contribute to the threaded discussion.
  • Demonstrates little or no understanding of the topic.
  • Discusses using scholarly inquiry but does not state how scholarly inquiry informed or changed professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is taken from source(s) without any interpretation/evaluation.
  • The posting uses information that is not valid, relevant, or reliable
  • No evidence of the use of scholarly inquiry to inform or change professional or academic decisions.
  • Information is not valid, relevant, or reliable
Performance Category  10 9 8 4 0

Application of Course Knowledge –

Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings and relate them to real-life professional situations

  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources;
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life.
  • Posts make direct reference to concepts discussed in the lesson or drawn from relevant outside sources.
  • Applies concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Interactions with classmates are relevant to the discussion topic but do not make direct reference to lesson content
  • Posts are generally on topic but do not build knowledge by incorporating concepts and principles from the lesson.
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Does not demonstrate a solid understanding of the principles and concepts presented in the lesson
  • Posts do not adequately address the question posed either by the discussion prompt or the instructor’s launch post.
  • Posts are superficial and do not reflect an understanding of the lesson content
  • Does not attempt to apply lesson concepts to personal experience in their professional setting and or relevant application to real life
  • Posts are not related to the topics provided by the discussion prompt or by the instructor; attempts by the instructor to redirect the student are ignored
  • No discussion of lesson concepts to personal experience in the professional setting and or relevant application to real life
Performance Category  5 4 3 2 0

Interactive Dialogue

Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days.

(5 points possible per graded thread)

  • Exceeds minimum post requirements
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts three or more times in each graded thread, over three separate days.
  • Replies to a post posed by faculty and to a peer
  • Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.
  • Replies to each graded thread topic posted by the course instructor, by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT, of each week, and posts a minimum of two times in each graded thread, on separate days
  • Replies to a question posed by a peer

Summarizes what was learned from the lesson, readings, and other student posts for the week.

  • Meets expectations of 2 posts on 2 different days.
  • The main post is not made by the Wednesday deadline
  • Does not reply to a question posed by a peer or faculty
  • Has only one post for the week
  • Discussion posts contain few, if any, new ideas or applications; often are a rehashing or summary of other students’ comments
  • Does not post to the thread
  • No connections are made to the topic
Minus 1 Point Minus 2 Point Minus 3 Point Minus 4 Point Minus 5 Point
Grammar, Syntax, APA

Note: if there are only a few errors in these criteria, please note this for the student in as an area for improvement. If the student does not make the needed corrections in upcoming weeks, then points should be deducted.

Points deducted for improper grammar, syntax and APA style of writing.

The source of information is the APA Manual 6th Edition

  • 2-3 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have 2-3 grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is generally clear, focused, and facilitates communication.
  • 4-5 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 4-5 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is somewhat focused.
  • 6-7 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 6-7 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is slightly focused making discussion difficult to understand.
  • 8-10 errors in APA format.
  • Writing responses have 8-10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style is not focused, making discussion difficult to understand.
  • Post contains greater than 10 errors in APA format.
  • Written responses have more than 10 grammatical, spelling and punctuation errors.
  • Writing style does not facilitate communication.
  • The student continues to make repeated mistakes in any of the above areas after written correction by the instructor
0 points lost -5 points lost

Total Participation Requirements

per discussion thread

The student answers the threaded discussion question or topic on one day and posts a second response on another day. The student does not meet the minimum requirement of two postings on two different days

Early Participation Requirement

per discussion thread

The student must provide a substantive answer to the graded discussion question(s) or topic(s), posted by the course instructor (not a response to a peer), by Wednesday, 11:59 p.m. MT of each week. The student does not meet the requirement of a substantive response to the stated question or topic by Wednesday at 11:59 pm MT.