NR543 W6 Usability Assessment
Chamberlain University NR543 W6 Usability Assessment– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR543 W6 Usability Assessment assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR543 W6 Usability Assessment
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR543 W6 Usability Assessment depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR543 W6 Usability Assessment
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR543 W6 Usability Assessment is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR543 W6 Usability Assessment
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR543 W6 Usability Assessment assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR543 W6 Usability Assessment
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR543 W6 Usability Assessment
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR543 W6 Usability Assessment assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Sample Answer for HNR543 W6 Usability Assessment Included After Question
NR543 W6 Usability Assessment
recognize the role of usability considerations in the design, use, and acceptance of technology;
identify features that impact usability; and compare the merits of different usability-assessment methods.
Select a software application, preferably an information system that you currently use in your work setting, to assess usability. You may personally test the application or solicit the participation of another party. You have the option to do one of the following:
Address a list of questions that you create or adopt from a source that you will identify.
Ask another party, via guided discussion, to assess the usability of the specified function/information system.
Observe a user completing the identified function, noting the length of time required for completion, any obstacles, and at the conclusion of the task, ask for an impression on usability/issues. If you do not currently have access to an automated system, then speak with your instructor to determine a mutually agreeable alternative.
You may wish to use the following reference to formulate your list of questions/observations:
Lowry, S. Z., Ramaiah, M., Taylor, S., Patterson, E. S., Prettyman, S.S., Simmons, D., Brick, D., Latkany, P., & Q Gibbons, M. C. (2015). Technical evaluation, testing and validation of the usability of electronic health record: empirically based use cases for validating safety-enhanced usability and guidelines for standardization. Retrieved from https://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2015/NIST.IR.7804-1.pdf (Links to an external site.)
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS:NR543 W6 Usability Assessment SOLVED
Usability Assessment
Usability assessment measures how easy technology is to use and whether people can complete tasks using the technological system under consideration. It helps identify problems with usability and provides solutions on how to use various aspects of the system. By making sure that the technology system is easy to use, hospitals can improve patient care and reduce medical errors. The whole process should be conducted early in the design process to address any issues before the technology is finalized and released (Mlekus et al., 2020). Electronic Health Records (EHR) is one system that relies on usability assessment before implementation is done. EHR usability assessment often involves heuristic evaluation, cognitive walkthroughs, and focus groups. The purpose of this paper is to recognize the role of usability considerations in the design, use, and acceptance of technology; identify features that impact usability, and compare the merits of different usability-assessment methods.
Background on Function/Information System Assessed
For this assignment, the information system assessed was the EHR System commonly used to manage patients’ information. By definition, an EHR system is a medical information system that stores patients’ health information in an electronic format (Mlekus et al., 2020). Design elements of an EHR system include the following: Patient Demographics comprising basic patient information, such as name, date of birth, and sex; Clinical Information, which includes all the clinical data collected from a patient’s visit to a provider, such as medications prescribed, lab results, and problem list; Administrative Information comprising billing and insurance information, as well as other administrative data.
ALSO READ:
NR 543 W3 Test Plan
NR 542 Wk 4 Database Plan SOLUTION
NR 541 WK 7 Network Presentation SOLUTION
NR 541 Wk 2 Interview with NI (Nurse Informatics) Practitioner SOLUTION
HLRT-362V Summary and Descriptive Statistics Solved
The EHR system’s design often considers the needs of all stakeholders – providers, nurses, clerks, pharmacists, and administrators. A health record is a compilation of a person’s medical history. Electronic health records are digital versions of this information that can be accessed by authorized providers and staff within the healthcare system. The purpose of electronic health records is to provide healthcare providers with secure, on-demand access to a patient’s medical history, which can then inform decisions about care (Lowry et al., 2015). Additionally, EHRs can help improve communication among providers and ensure that critical patient information is available wherever and whenever it is needed.
In my healthcare organization, the EHR system under consideration has been in use for the last five years; it has aided patient data management and ensured quality improvement in healthcare delivery processes. Healthcare professionals, including myself, have been regular users of this system. As a result, there is an advanced understanding of different aspects of the system (Lowry et al., 2015). I have experience with electronic health record (EHR) systems from provider and patient perspectives. From my experience, EHRs are a valuable tool for providers because they allow us to quickly and easily access patient information. This is especially helpful when we are providing care for multiple patients simultaneously.
Patients also appreciate EHRs because they can view their medical history online and receive appointment reminders via email or text message. Additionally, many EHR systems offer patients the ability to communicate with their providers electronically via secure messaging (Lowry et al., 2015). This feature is especially beneficial for patients who live far from the clinic or who have a busy lifestyle and cannot always make it to the clinic for an in-person visit.
Methods of Assessment
Usability assessment is important for healthcare technology because it can help to ensure that patients can use the technology without difficulty and understand how to use it. Usability testing aims to identify problems and fix them before the product is released to the public or put into use by different organizations. Usability problems can cause devices to be rejected by users, which can lead to increased costs for manufacturers and hospitals. Usability assessments should also be conducted regularly during a product’s life, as changes in user needs or interface design can affect how users interact with technology (Lowry et al., 2015). When it comes to EHR usability assessment, a few key methods are commonly used: heuristic evaluation, cognitive walkthroughs, and focus groups.
Heuristic evaluation is one of the major assessment methods that involves having a small team of experts evaluate a product based on specific design principles. It is a usability testing method that involves evaluators reviewing designs and judging their compliance with recognized usability principles (heuristics). The heuristic evaluation aims to find the most serious usability problems in a design, preferably early in the design process. Some benefits of heuristic evaluation include: It is quick and easy to do, good for finding major usability problems, can be done with low fidelity prototypes, and helps identify where you need to do more user testing (Lowry et al., 2015). Cognitive walkthroughs involve walking through potential tasks that users might complete with the product. And focus groups involve gathering feedback from a group of potential users. These methods can be useful in identifying usability issues with an EHR system by addressing these issues early.
The usability assessment of an EHR system identified the following problems: users were not able to easily find the information they needed, the system was difficult to use and navigate, users were not able to complete tasks within the required time frame, and the system provided limited feedback, which made it difficult for users to determine their progress (Lowry et al., 2015). Based on these findings, potential solutions could include: improving the search functionality of the system, making the navigation easier to use, providing more feedback to users, and simplifying the tasks that users need to complete.
Evidence-Based Recommendations to Resolve Each Problem Identified
The evidence-based recommendation to resolve each of the problems identified includes: improving the search functionality of the system, making the navigation easier to use, providing more feedback to users, and simplifying the tasks that users need to complete. There are several ways to improve the search functionality of an EHR system. Some key considerations should include designing a search interface that is intuitive and easy to use, making sure the search results are relevant and accurate, offering different ways to search for information, including keywords, filters, and advanced searches, and testing the search functionality regularly to ensure it is working correctly (Waldenbooks et al., 2019).
To solve the problem of navigation, there is the need for developers to make sure the navigation is easy to find and easy to use. It should be placed in an easily accessible location, and the buttons and links are easy to click. Also, there is a need for clear labels for the buttons and links. Ambiguous terms like “Home” or “Settings” should be avoided. Finally, specific labels like “Website Home” or “Account Settings” should be applied. Besides, system developers should consider standard web conventions for navigating the website (Wildenbos et al., 2019). For example, use arrows to indicate whether a user can go back or forward, and use underlines to indicate links (Waldenbooks et al., 2019).
Further, the navigation should be consistent across all pages within the system. Providing more user feedback will ensure that all the possible problems are identified and rectified before the system is implemented or put into actual use. Finally, tasks should be simplified by incorporating specialized features that encourage users to locate or identify various functionalities in the entire system.
Conclusion
Usability assessment is the process of measuring how easy technology is to use and whether people can complete tasks using the technology. Usability assessment helps identify problems with usability and provides solutions so that the system can be improved. Usability assessment methods are important for identifying potential usability issues in EHR systems. In a heuristic evaluation, experts review the system against a set of usability principles. A cognitive walkthrough is a technique used to assess how well users can complete tasks using the system. In a focus group, users are asked to provide feedback on their system experience (Lowry et al., 2015). Each of these methods has its strengths and weaknesses. Heuristic evaluations are quick and inexpensive, but they may not identify all usability issues. Cognitive walkthroughs can identify more issues than heuristic evaluations, but they are more time-consuming and expensive to conduct. Focus groups can provide detailed information about user experiences and preferences, but they are also expensive.
References
Lowry, S. Z., Brick, D., Gibbons, M. C., Latkany, P., Lowry, S. Z., Patteron, E. S., …& Taylor, S. (2015). Technical evaluation, testing, and validation of the usability of electronic health records: empirically-based use cases for validating safety-enhanced usability and guidelines for standardization. US Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology.
Mlekus, L., Bentler, D., Paruzel, A., Kato-Beiderwieden, A. L., & Maier, G. W. (2020). How to raise technology acceptance: user experience characteristics as technology-inherent determinants. Gruppe. Interaktion. Organisation. ZeitschriftfürAngewandteOrganisationspsychologie (GIO), 51(3), 273-283.https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11612-020-00529-7
Wildenbos, G. A., Jaspers, M. W., Schijven, M. P., &Dusseljee-Peute, L. W. (2019). Mobile health for older adult patients: Using an aging barriers framework to classify usability problems. International journal of medical informatics, 124, 68-77.https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S1386505618305008