NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
Chamberlain University NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion– Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Chamberlain University NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Chamberlain University NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
The introduction for the Chamberlain University NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Week 3 Discussion
EHRs Benefits and Drawbacks
Purpose
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction (CO4)
Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)
Requirements:
Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:
As discussed in the lesson and assigned reading for this week, EHRs provide both benefits and drawbacks. Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table and include at least 3 items for each list. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you selected to include it on the respective list.
Refer to the Stage 3 objectives for Meaningful Use located in this week’s lesson under the heading Meaningful Use and the HITECH Act. Select two objectives to research further. In your own words, provide a brief discussion as to how the objective may impact your role as an APN in clinical practice.
Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:
Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.
Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.
Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.
Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.
For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.
ALSO READ: NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 7 Discussion
Sample Answer for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
EHR’s PROS and CONS
| PRO | RATIONALE | CON | RATIONALE |
| Patient Access | With an EHR patients can have access to their records anywhere and anytime. Patients can access laboratory results, radiology or procedure reports, ask their provider questions, and schedule or change appointments. This allows patients to take an active role in their healthcare. | Limited Access to Technology | Not everyone has access to the internet, a computer, laptop or smart phone. Patients that do not have this technology are not able to access their EHR. |
| Cumulative Data | An EHR contains all the patient’s information. It allows providers to see results from previous studies and view the patient’s history. This allows the provider to see any new changes and old patterns and trends. It allows a provider to obtain allergies and view current medications. | Innaccurate Data | If a provider checks the wrong box or enters the wrong result and does not catch it, this error can become a permanent part of the patient’s record. This can lead to further errors in diagnosis, treatment and outcome. |
| Legibility | One of the leading causes in medication errors in the past was handwriting. It was reported that more than 60% of medication errors in hospitals were a result of poor handwriting (Hoover, 2017). Having to type the order makes the order legible for others. | Difficult To Use | There is not one standard EHR. There are many different programs that facilities can choose from. They are not all easy to use. Many healthcare professionals report that EHR’s are difficult to use, take up too much time to perform certain tasks, and often multiple ways to. navigate the system that can lead to confusion and frustration (Ratwani, Hodgkins, & Bates, 2018). |
Meaningful Use Objectives
Provide patients with electronic access to their health information and patient specific education. This gives patients the ability to access their own health record via a patient portal. It also provides patients will specific patient education materials. This access helps the patient take an active role in their care and also advocate for themselves. This gives the patient so much information. I remember having to call a doctor’s office and waiting for a call back to get any answers to questions or lab results. Now all of this information is available 24 hours a day and seven days a week. This will impact my role as a nurse practitioner by allowing my to communicate quickly and effectively with my patients via their patient portal. It will be very important for me to make sure that my patients know how to log on and use the system.
Generate and transmit prescriptions electronically. My office has just recently implemented this practice. According to Mohsin-Shaikh, et. al., (2019), electronic prescribing has eliminated the need for paper medication charts, but other time-consuming tasks such as login procedures and technical difficulties can delay ordering or lose the order if the system fails. They go on to explain that workload has actually increased for health care providers in some instances. I agree with these statements. I have had multiple patients call and complain that the pharmacy does not have the prescription even when we have sent it. The login process is lengthy as well as the time to input the medication information. This will impact my role as a nurse practitioner by making sure I dedicate enough time to send prescriptions and whether i like it or not, this is an important step in my future practice.
References
Hoover, R. (2017) Benefits of using an electronic health record. Nursing Critical Care, 12(1), 9-10.
Mohsin-Shaikh, S. (2019). The impact of electronic prescrbing systems in the hospital setting: A systematic review and narrative synthesis. BMC Health Services Research, 19(1), 1-8.
Ratwani, R., Hodgkins, M., & Bates, D. (2018). Improving electronic health record usability and safety requires transparency. Journal of American Medical Association, 320(24), 2533-2534.
Two of the cons you chose, inaccurate data and difficult to use are cons that I didn’t really think about. It is heavily important to consider that it is much more easy to miss something electronically if we input information too quickly in the system, and as you stated, we could misdiagnose and cause problems for the patients. As for the difficulty of use, there needs to be a standardized use of EHR systems to make to it seamless and user friendly in all aspects.
NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice
Week 5 Discussion
Clinical Decision Support Systems
Purpose
The ideas and beliefs underpinning the discussions guide students through engaging dialogues as they achieve the desired learning outcomes/competencies associated with their course in a manner that empowers them to organize, integrate, apply and critically appraise their knowledge to their selected field of practice. The ebb and flow of a discussion is based upon the composition of student and faculty interaction in the quest for relevant scholarship.
Activity Learning Outcomes
Through this discussion, the student will demonstrate the ability to:
Contribute level-appropriate knowledge and experience to the topic in a discussion environment that models professional and social interaction (CO4)
Actively engage in the written ideas of others by carefully reading, researching, reflecting, and responding to the contributions of their peers and course faculty (CO5)
Requirements:
Post a written response in the discussion forum to EACH threaded discussion topic:
This week we learned about the potential benefits and drawbacks to clinical decision support systems (CDSSs). Create a “Pros” versus “Cons” table with a column for “Pro” and a separate column for “Con”. Include at least 3 items for each column. Next to each item, provide a brief rationale as to why you included it on the respective list.
The primary goal of a CDSS is to leverage data and the scientific evidence to help guide appropriate decision making. CDSSs directly assist the clinician in making decisions about specific patients. For this discussion thread post, you are to assume your future role as an APN and create a clinical patient and scenario to illustrate an exemplary depiction of how a CDSS might influence your decision. This post is an opportunity for you to be innovative, so have fun!
Adhere to the following guidelines regarding quality for the threaded discussions in Canvas:
Application of Course Knowledge: Demonstrate the ability to analyze, synthesize, and/or apply principles and concepts learned in the course lesson and outside readings.
Scholarliness and Scholarly Sources: Demonstrates achievement of scholarly inquiry for professional and academic decisions using valid, relevant, and reliable outside scholarly source to contribute to the discussion thread.
Writing Mechanics: Grammar, spelling, syntax, and punctuation are accurate. In-text and reference citations should be formatted using correct APA guidelines.
Direct Quotes: Good writing calls for the limited use of direct quotes. Direct quotes in discussions are to be limited to one short quotation (not to exceed 15 words). The quote must add substantively to the discussion. Points will be deducted under the grammar, syntax, APA category.
For each threaded discussion per week, the student will select no less than TWO scholarly sources to support the initial discussion post.
Sample Answer for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
Overall, I would have to say that there are more benefits than drawbacks for the use of the CDSS in the clinical setting. One of the major benefits of the CDSS is that improves patient safety. For this reason alone, I think that the use of the CDSS is important in the clinical setting. Up to 65% of patients in the inpatient setting are exposed to drug-drug interactions that are common and prevented through CDSS that are designed with drug safety software, (Sutton et al., 2020). Other benefits of CDSS besides drug-drug interactions are catching prescribing errors, reducing medication administration errors, and general safety alerts.
With current research in process and nursing informaticists analyzing ways to incorporate CDSS into workflow, there is plenty of opportunity for improvement. A challenge with implementation and use is that every practice is different and CDSS must be very personalized to each work setting or even provider. Due to this there is always room for improvement and ways the CDSS can benefit providers.
Even with some setbacks, CDSS can provide improved workflow, better patient outcomes, increased patient safety, care plan guidance, reduced duplicate testing, the ability to analyze trends in labs, and much more. Healthcare and a growing geriatric population are demanding more and more from providers across the country which is causing an increased need for nurse practitioners to help alleviate the workload on physicians. It is a challenge both inpatient and outpatient to serve as many patients as possible. It is necessary to incorporate technology into practice so that all types of health care providers, NPs included, may keep up with the increased demands of modern-day healthcare.
Sutton, R. T., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D. C., Sadowski, D. C., Fedorak, R. N., & Kroeker, K. I. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: Benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine, 3, 17. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-020-0221-y
Sample Answer 2 for NR599 Nursing Informatics for Advanced Practice Week 3 and 5 Discussion
The CDSS changed professional decisions by reducing medication errors and negative patient outcomes. Medication errors are common yet preventable. The CDSS is designed with a drug safety software that has safeguards for dosing, drug allergies, and duplications. Overall, CDSS has changed professional decisions by making the provider aware of possible errors and encouraging the need to be careful and analyze data. CDSS is a great tool to help prevent duplicate testing, adverse events, and monitor for possible health risks (Sutton el al., 2020). CDSS helps to improve decisions made by providers. How will you use this to improve patient care and safety?
Sutton, R., Pincock, D., Baumgart, D., Sadowski, D., Fedorak, R., & Kroeker, K. (2020). An overview of clinical decision support systems: benefits, risks, and strategies for success. NPJ Digital Medicine London, 3(1). https://www.proquest.com/docview/2528863632?pq-origsite=primo&accountid=147674Links to an external site. Links to an external site.Links to an external site.