NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
The introduction for the Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
Literature in psychotherapy differs from other areas of clinical practice. Generally, there are no clinical trials in psychotherapy because it is often neither appropriate nor ethical to have controls in psychotherapy research. This sometimes makes it more difficult to translate research findings into practice. In your role, however, you must be able to synthesize current literature and apply it to your own clients. For this Assignment, you begin practicing this skill by examining current literature on psychodynamic therapy and considering how it might translate into your own clinical practice.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Evaluate the application of current literature to clinical practice
To prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources and reflect on the insights they provide.
- Select one of the psychodynamic therapy articles from the Learning Resources to evaluate for this Assignment.
Note: In nursing practice, it is not uncommon to review current literature and share findings with your colleagues. Approach this Assignment as though you were presenting the information to your colleagues.
The Assignment
In a 5- to 10-slide PowerPoint presentation, address the following:
- Provide an overview of the article you selected.
- What population is under consideration?
- What was the specific intervention that was used? Is this a new intervention or one that was already used?
- What were the author’s claims?
- Explain the findings/outcomes of the study in the article. Include whether this will translate into practice with your own clients. If so, how? If not, why?
- Explain whether the limitations of the study might impact your ability to use the findings/outcomes presented in the article. Support your position with evidence-based literature.
Read Also: Discussion: Assessment Tools NRNP 6640-14
NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
Note: The presentation should be 5–10 slides, not including the title and reference slides. Include presenter notes (no more than ½ page per slide) and use tables and/or diagrams where appropriate. Be sure to support your work with specific citations from the article you selected. Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK3Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 3 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK3Assgn1+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 3 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 3 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 3 Assignment
Week in Review
Now that you have:
- Evaluated the application of current literature to clinical practice
Next week, you will:
- Compare cognitive behavioral therapy and rational emotive behavioral therapy
- Recommend cognitive behavioral therapies for clients
Sample Answer for NRNP 6640 Week 3 Assignment: Applying Current Literature to Clinical Practice
Type of Group Therapy
The article by Pessagno and Hunker (2013) investigated the use of group psychotherapy in first-time mothers who are at a risk of being affected by post-partum depression. The group psychotherapy was short-term in nature. The participants were divided into two groups of psychotherapies that ran for eight weeks. The duration of the sessions was 90 minutes. According to Fawzi et al., (2020), group psychotherapy is effective for mental disorders due to its ability to transform the negative energies and behaviors of the patients. The cost-effectiveness and enhanced outcomes such as decline in relapse of symptoms make it desirable for use in practice.
Participants
The participants for the research by Pessagno and Hunker (2013) were first-time mothers who were at a risk of developing post-partum depression. The participants completed the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale for their scoring of the risk for post-partum depression among them. Mothers with EPDS score of 11 or more were requested to participate in the research. The participants had different demographic characteristics. This included differences in age, level of education, marital status, history of psychiatric treatmentm and type of treatment.
Reasons for their Selection
The mothers who participated in the study by Pessagno and Hunker (2013) were selected because of a number of reasons. Firstly, baseline assessment revealed them to be at a high risk of developing post-partum depression. Their high risk could be seen from their score of 11 or more in the EPDS scale. The second reason for their selection to participate in this research is that they consented to take part in the research. The participation of the mothers in the research was voluntary. As a result, the selected mothers consented to participate voluntarily in the study. The thid reason for their selection was to reduce the negative impacts associated with post-partum depression. Studies have shown that post-partum depresison is associated with poor health outcomes such as increased use of medications, loss of productivity and independence, and high costs of healthcare. Therefore, the participants were selected for the study with the aim of minimizing these impacts of post-partum depression in their health.
Setting of the Group
Setting refers to a place where a research was conducted. The setting of undertaking a research should facilitate the optimum acquisition of accurate data for the research. The setting for this study was a community hospital located in New Jersey. The participants in the study must have given birth in the hospital. As shown by the authors, participant screening was done 72 hours after their delivery. The screening provided objective assessment of all the mothers who were at a risk of developing post-partum depression.
Frequency of Group Meetings
The group psychotherapy sessions were conducted over eight week period. The duration of the meetings was shorter than the recommended due to request from the participants. The participants were divided into two groups. Each group had eight participants. Group 1 met every Tuesday while group 2 met every Wednesday. The discussions in the group meetings provided the participants with opportunities to explore their abilities to address issues affecting their mental health.
Duration of Group Therapy
According to Pessagno and Hunker (2013), group therapy sessions were delivered for 8 months. However, the individual sessions during every week lasted for 90 minutes. The participants in group 1 and 2 were allocated equal duration of 90 minutes to ensure the effecitveness and equal effect of the intervention.
Curative Factors
Curative factors are important for effective recovery from mental health problems such as depression and post-partum depression. One of the curative factors is social support. According to Nillni et al., (2018), mothers who are at a risk of post-partum depression require social support. They need support from their significant others that include family members and the society as a whole. These stakeholders provide them with the emotional, social, and physical support they need to adjust to their maternal roles. The other curative factor is duration and frequency of therapy sessions. The therapy sessions should be long to enable the participants to explore their abilities in addressing their problems. They should also be given adequate time to enable them to explore their issues, opportunities, and threats to their recovery (Brown & VanArsdale, 2019). The last curative factor is resource availability and use. Mothers at risk of post-partum depression need access to resources such as social support groups and mental health services (Gillis & Parish, 2019). These resources should be used effectively to promote their mental health and wellbeing.
Exclusion Criteria
Pessagno and Hunker (2013) used specific aspects to exclude participants in their research. One of the exclusion strategies was those participants who declined to take part in the research. The participation in the research was voluntary. Therefore, those who were not willing to take part in the research were excluded. The other exclusion criteria was mothers who had childcare issues. The participants were provided asistance with childcare. However, those who felt that the needs of their children could not be met adequately were excluded in the research. The participants who had issues with the lenght of committment to the group therapy sessions were also excluded. The last exclusion strategy that was used was participants who expressed a lack of interest towards the therapy.
Findings
The results of the study revealed that the use of group psychotherapy was effective in treating and preventing post-partum depression among mothers at risk. The effectiveness could be seen in the significant decline in the EPDS scores of participants in both groups after the implementation of the therapy. The pre-intervention EDPS scores for group 1 and 2 were 16.13 and 15.5 respectively. The scores declined to 6.38 in group 1 and 6.63 in group after group psychotherapy intervention. The study also revealed that group psychotherapy has long-term benefits to mothers at risk of post-partum depression. The effectiveness could be seen from the results from both groups at six months and beyond that revealed significant decrease in EPDS scores. The last finding is that group psychotherapy improves the social skills of those at risk. This could be seen in the ability of the participants to form strong social bonds amongst them.
Impact of Limitations
The study by Pessagno and Hunker (2013) is associated with a number of limitations. The first one is the small size. The data obtained from 16 participants that were used in this research might not be generalizable to a larger population. It is uncertain whether the findings willl be consistent with the use of a larger population. The selection of participants was also prone to selection bias. The bias is likely to affect the reliability and validity of the outcomes of the study. However, these limitations cannot affect my ability to use the outcomes presented in the article. This is attributed to the fact that the study is among the few researches that have investigated the use of group psychotherapy in first-time mothers at risk of post-partum depression.
References
Brown, M., & VanArsdale MSN, C. (2019). Postpartum Depression Interventions.
Fawzi, M. C. S., Siril, H., Larson, E., Aloyce, Z., Araya, R., Kaale, A., … & Mwimba, A. (2020). Healthy Options: study protocol and baseline characteristics for a cluster randomized controlled trial of group psychotherapy for perinatal women living with HIV and depression in Tanzania. BMC Public Health, 20(1), 80.
Gillis, B. D., & Parish, A. L. (2019). Group-based interventions for postpartum depression: An integrative review and conceptual model. Archives of psychiatric nursing, 33(3), 290-298.
Nillni, Y. I., Mehralizade, A., Mayer, L., & Milanovic, S. (2018). Treatment of depression, anxiety, and trauma-related disorders during the perinatal period: A systematic review. Clinical psychology review, 66, 136-148.
Pessagno, R. A., & Hunker, D. (2013). Using Short‐Term Group Psychotherapy as an Evidence‐Based Intervention for First‐Time Mothers at Risk for Postpartum Depression. Perspectives in psychiatric care, 49(3), 202-209.
Name: Assignment Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. | 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values. An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing. An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing. |
||
| Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: Assignment Rubric