NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
The introduction for the Walden University NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
Assignment: Assessing Clients With Addictive Disorders
Addictive disorders can be particularly challenging for clients. Not only do these disorders typically interfere with a client’s ability to function in daily life, but they also often manifest as negative and sometimes criminal behaviors. Sometime clients with addictive disorders also suffer from other mental health issues, creating even greater struggles for them to overcome. In your role, you have the opportunity to help clients address their addictions and improve outcomes for both the clients and their families. For this Assignment, as you examine the Levy Family video in this week’s Learning Resources, consider how you might assess and treat clients presenting with addiction.
The 2010 IOM report had four key messages or recommendations for nurses to position themselves strategically in healthcare provision. Firstly, the report stresses the need for nurses to practice to the fullest level of their education and training without any hindrances imposed by state boards of nursing. The message influences nursing practice as it means that nurses should be barred from practicing what they have trained on in different specialties (Price & Reichert, 2018). Secondly, the report asserted that nurses should engage in lifelong learning to acquire higher levels of education and training based on a better education system. The message means that the nursing practice requires professional nurses to engage in continual professional development to attain the latest skills and knowledge in healthcare provision, especially the deployment of technology.
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Assess clients presenting with addictive disorders
- Analyze therapeutic approaches for treating clients with addictive disorders
- Evaluate outcomes for clients with addictive disorders
To prepare:
- Review this week’s Learning Resources and consider the insights they provide.
- Review the Levy Family video Episodes 1 through 5.
The Assignment
In a 2- to 3-page paper, address the following:
- After watching Episode 1, describe:
- What is Mr. Levy’s perception of the problem?
- What is Mrs. Levy’s perception of the problem?
- What can be some of the implications of the problem on the family as a whole?
- After watching Episode 2, describe:
- What did you think of Mr. Levy’s social worker’s ideas?
- What were your thoughts of her supervisor’s questions about her suggested therapies and his advice to Mr. Levy’s supervisor?
- After watching Episode 3, discuss the following:
- What were your thoughts about the way Mr. Levy’s therapist responded to what Mr. Levy had to say?
- What were your impressions of how the therapist worked with Mr. Levy? What did you think about the therapy session as a whole?
- Informed by your knowledge of pathophysiology, explain the physiology of deep breathing (a common technique that we use in helping clients to manage anxiety). Explain how changing breathing mechanics can alter blood chemistry.
- Describe the therapeutic approach his therapist selected. Would you use exposure therapy with Mr. Levy? Why or why not? What evidence exists to support the use of exposure therapy (or the therapeutic approach you would consider if you disagree with exposure therapy)?
- In Episode 4, Mr. Levy tells a very difficult story about Kurt, his platoon officer.
- Discuss how you would have responded to this revelation.
- Describe how this information would inform your therapeutic approach. What would you say/do next?
- In Episode 5, Mr. Levy’s therapist is having issues with his story.
- Imagine that you were providing supervision to this therapist, how would you respond to her concerns?
- Support your approach with evidence-based literature.
Note: The College of Nursing requires that all papers submitted include a title page, introduction, summary, and references. The Sample Paper provided at the Walden Writing Center provides an example of those required elements (available at http://writingcenter.waldenu.edu/57.htm). All papers submitted must use this formatting.
Also Read: Discussion: Posttraumatic Stress Disorder NRNP 6640-14
By Day 7
Submit your Assignment.
Submission and Grading Information
To submit your completed Assignment for review and grading, do the following:
- Please save your Assignment using the naming convention “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” as the name.
- Click the Week 6 Assignment Rubric to review the Grading Criteria for the Assignment.
- Click the Week 6 Assignment link. You will also be able to “View Rubric” for grading criteria from this area.
- Next, from the Attach File area, click on the Browse My Computer button. Find the document you saved as “WK6Assgn+last name+first initial.(extension)” and click Open.
- If applicable: From the Plagiarism Tools area, click the checkbox for I agree to submit my paper(s) to the Global Reference Database.
- Click on the Submit button to complete your submission.
Grading Criteria
To access your rubric:
Week 6 Assignment Rubric
Check Your Assignment Draft for Authenticity
To check your Assignment draft for authenticity:
Submit your Week 6 Assignment draft and review the originality report.
Submit Your Assignment by Day 7
To submit your Assignment:
Week 6 Assignment
Exam: Midterm Exam
Learning Objectives
Students will:
- Assess knowledge of concepts and principles related to the psychotherapy of individuals
This exam is a test of your knowledge in preparation for your certification exam. No outside resources including books, notes, websites, or any other type of resource are to be used to complete this exam. You are expected to comply with Walden University’s Code of Conduct.
This exam will cover the following topics, which relate to psychotherapy with individuals in the Wheeler textbook and the Fisher textbook excerpts:
- The Nurse Psychotherapist and a Framework for Practice
- Confidentiality Limits in Psychotherapy: Ethics Checklists for Mental Health Professionals
- Assessment and Diagnosis
- The Initial Contact and Maintaining the Frame
- Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
- Supportive and Psychodynamic Psychotherapy
- Stabilization for Trauma and Dissociation
- Motivational Interviewing
- Psychotherapeutic Approaches for Addictions and Related Disorders
By Day 7
Complete the Midterm Exam. Prior to starting the exam, you should review all of your materials. There is a 2-hour time limit to complete this 76-question exam. You may only attempt this exam once.
Submission
Submit Your Exam by Day 7
To submit your Exam:
Week 6 Exam
Week in Review
Now that you have:
- Assessed clients presenting with addictive disorders
- Analyzed therapeutic approaches for treating clients with addictive disorders
NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders - Evaluated outcomes for clients with addictive disorders
- Assessed knowledge of concepts and principles related to the psychotherapy of individuals
Next week, you will:
- Compare supportive psychotherapy and interpersonal psychotherapy
- Recommend therapeutic approaches for clients presenting for psychotherapy
Sample Answer for NRNP 6640 Week 6 Assignment: Assessing Clients with Addictive Disorders
In psychotherapy for addiction, the debate on whether addicts are accountable for their behaviors or not has been going on for decades. Addiction effects cannot be understated as they result in distorted thinking, perception, and feelings, which makes alcoholics behave in a manner that is not acceptable to people within the surrounding. In this paper, I will focus on assessing Mr. Levy’s case, analyzing therapeutic approaches available for the treatment of Mr. Levy’s addictive disorder, and evaluating the outcome for Mr. Levy and his family.
Episode One
What is Mr. Levy’s perception of the problem?
In the first episode, Mr. Levys’s perception of the problem is being sick while avoiding the real problem which is alcohol addiction. He believes that the problem started when he left for Iraq and it persisted since his wife has been stressing him out. According to him, things can never be better like before as the person he used to be is dead and will never come back.
What is Mrs. Levy’s perception of the problem?
From the episode, Mrs. Levy’s perception of the problem is that her husband is depressed. She believes that the problem is new and worsening their relationship as her husband was better before and not as angry and depresses as he is at the present. However, she denies the idea that her husband is sick but instead attributes the problem to be her husband’s excessive consumption of alcohol. She believes things could get back to normal.
What can be some of the implications of the problem on the family as a whole?
In the first episode, Mr. Levy denies being a drunk and justifies his drinking to his mission in Iraq. He does not display any willingness to change and become better but instead acknowledges that that is who he has become and things will never be the same. He blames his wife for stressing him. The spouse is unhappy. Mr. Levy might end up bankrupt depriving his family of necessary basic needs. They might end up in a divorce, which will negatively affect the upbringing of their children.
Episode Two
What did you think of Mr. Levy’s social worker’s ideas?
The social worker was of the idea that Mr. Levy to start treatment with interventions such as yoga, meditation, and art therapy. Nonetheless, the patient should be evaluated first to determine the severity of his mental condition and list all the available interventions before deciding on a specific course of care plan.
What were your thoughts of her supervisor’s questions about her suggested therapies and his advice to Mr. Levy’s supervisor?
The supervisor’s questions and advise to the social worker are necessary as they are focused towards effective management therapy for the client. His first advice was on meeting the client in person first before developing a care plan. This is important as it enhances the evaluation of the patient’s condition and the development of a patient-centered care plan.
Episode Three
What were your thoughts about the way Mr. Levy’s therapist responded to what Mr. Levy had to say?
The therapist responds well to what Mr. Levy has to say as she acknowledges the difficult situation the client encountered in Iraq. This encourages the client to continue speaking. The therapist recommends exposure therapy to help the client cope with PTSD and anxiety. She believes that exposure therapy will help the client in confronting anxiety and flashbacks of traumatic experiences in Iraq.
What were your impressions of how the therapist worked with Mr. Levy? What did you think about the therapy session as a whole?
The therapy session as a whole was very effective as the patient was at ease, able to breathe normally and happy to go on with the session. The therapist was very considerate and made sure that Mr. Levy was comfortable in the whole process.
Informed by your knowledge of pathophysiology, explain the physiology of deep breathing (a common technique that we use in helping clients to manage anxiety). Explain how changing breathing mechanics can alter blood chemistry.
Deep breathing enhances the amount of oxygen received by blood cells and the release of carbon dioxide to avoid an upset in the levels of oxygen and carbon dioxide in the body, which normally results to dizziness, increased heart rate, muscle tension and stress or anxiety. Changing breathing mechanics can alter blood chemistry by decreasing or increasing heart rate and thus determining the body’s blood oxygen amount (Ma et al., 2017).
Describe the therapeutic approach his therapist selected. Would you use exposure therapy with Mr. Levy? Why or why not? What evidence exists to support the use of exposure therapy (or the therapeutic approach you would consider if you disagree with exposure therapy)?
The selected therapeutic approaches by the therapist for the client was effective. Exposure therapy allows the patient to be exposed to triggers of anxiety with no intention of causing harm to the patient (Crombach, & Elbert, 2015). The approach is recommended in this case scenario as it provides the patient with an opportunity to reinterpret anxiety triggers hence increasing the patient resilience.
Episode Four
Mr. Levy tells a very difficult story about Kurt, his platoon officer. Discuss how you would have responded to this revelation.
I would have responded to the client’s revelation by acknowledging his bravery in telling the story, and how painful it must be. The fact that the client spoke about the story relieved him of the burden. As a consequence, even the pain that he felt would subisde.
Describe how this information would inform your therapeutic approach. What would you say/do next?
The information is essential in determining the depth in which the client’s memory has mastered his traumatic experience which led to his current symptoms of anxiety and PTSD. I would use the information to determine the most effective therapeutic intervention for managing the patient’s symptoms (Begun, 2015).
Episode Five
Mr. Levy’s therapist is having issues with his story. Imagine that you were providing supervision to this therapist, how would you respond to her concerns?
When providing supervision to the therapist, I would address her concerns by offering countertransference on the therapist’s part (Ponton, & Sauerheber, 2014). I would also encourage her to always have confidence in the services that she provides.
References
Begun, A. (January 01, 2015). Treating Addictions With EMDR Therapy and the Stages of Change, by Nancy J. Abel and John M. O’Brien. Journal of Social Work Practice in the Addictions, 15(1), 130-131.
Crombach, A., & Elbert, T. (March 01, 2015). Controlling Offensive Behavior Using Narrative Exposure Therapy: A Randomized Controlled Trial of Former Street Children. Clinical Psychological Science, 3(2) 270-282.
Ma, X., Yue, Z. Q., Gong, Z. Q., Zhang, H., Duan, N. Y., Shi, Y. T., Wei, G. X., … Li, Y. F. (January 01, 2017). The Effect of Diaphragmatic Breathing on Attention, Negative Affect, and Stress in Healthy Adults. Frontiers in Psychology, 8.
Ponton, R. F., & Sauerheber, J. D. (December 01, 2014). Supervisee Countertransference: A Holistic Supervision Approach. Counselor Education and Supervision, 53(4), 254-266.
Next Week
Name: Assignment Rubric
| Excellent | Good | Fair | Poor | |||
| Summarize your interpretation of the frequency data provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, and family income from prior month. | 32 (32%) – 35 (35%)
The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, a summary of the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately and clearly explains, in detail, the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values in describing intervals that sufficiently provides an analysis that fully supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and appropriate examples that fully support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
28 (28%) – 31 (31%)
The response accurately summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response accurately explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response accurately explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and explains extreme values in describing intervals that provides an analysis which supports the categorization of each variable value. The response includes relevant, specific, and accurate examples that support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
25 (25%) – 27 (27%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data. The response inaccurately or vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and inaccurately or vaguely explains extreme values. An analysis that may support the categorization of each variable value is inaccurate or vague. The response includes inaccurate and irrelevant examples that may support the explanations provided for each of the areas described. |
0 (0%) – 24 (24%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the frequency distributions for the variables presented, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the number of times the value occurs in the data, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely explains the appearance of the data, the range of data values, and an explanation of extreme values, or it is missing. An analysis that does not support the categorization of each variable values is provided, or it is missing. The response includes inaccurate and vague examples that do not support the explanations provided for each of the areas described, or it is missing. |
||
| Summarize your interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided in the output for respondent’s age, highest school grade completed, race and ethnicity, currently employed, and family income from prior month. | 45 (45%) – 50 (50%)
The response accurately and clearly summarizes in detail the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately and clearly evaluates in detail each of the variables presented, including an accurate and complete description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
40 (40%) – 44 (44%)
The response accurately summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response accurately explains evaluates each of the variables presented, including an accurate description of the sample size, the mean, the median, standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
35 (35%) – 39 (39%)
The response inaccurately or vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided. The response inaccurately or vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate or vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data. |
0 (0%) – 34 (34%)
The response inaccurately and vaguely summarizes the interpretation of the descriptive statistics provided, or it is missing. The response inaccurately and vaguely evaluates each of the variables presented, including an inaccurate and vague description of the sample size, the mean, the median, the standard deviation, and the size and spread of the data, or it is missing. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – Paragraph Development and Organization: Paragraphs make clear points that support well-developed ideas, flow logically, and demonstrate continuity of ideas. Sentences are carefully focused—neither long and rambling nor short and lacking substance. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement and introduction is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity. A clear and comprehensive purpose statement, introduction, and conclusion is provided which delineates all required criteria. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 80% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is stated, yet is brief and not descriptive. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity 60%–79% of the time. Purpose, introduction, and conclusion of the assignment is vague or off topic. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Paragraphs and sentences follow writing standards for flow, continuity, and clarity < 60% of the time. No purpose statement, introduction, or conclusion was provided. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – English writing standards: Correct grammar, mechanics, and proper punctuation |
5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct grammar, spelling, and punctuation with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) grammar, spelling, and punctuation errors that interfere with the reader’s understanding. |
||
| Written Expression and Formatting – The paper follows correct APA format for title page, headings, font, spacing, margins, indentations, page numbers, parenthetical/in-text citations, and reference list. | 5 (5%) – 5 (5%)
Uses correct APA format with no errors. |
4 (4%) – 4 (4%)
Contains a few (1 or 2) APA format errors. |
3 (3%) – 3 (3%)
Contains several (3 or 4) APA format errors. |
0 (0%) – 2 (2%)
Contains many (≥ 5) APA format errors. |
||
| Total Points: 100 | ||||||
Name: Assignment Rubric