NRS 233 Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations SOLUTION
Use the practice problem and two quantitative, peer-reviewed research articles you identified in the Topic 1 assignment (or two new articles based on instructor feedback in Topic 1) to complete this assignment.
In a 1,000–1,250-word essay, summarize two quantitative studies.
Use the “Research Critique Guidelines – Part II” document to organize your essay.
Quantitative Research Critique
Introduction
The inadequacy of nurses is a serious issue in the US, as it is in many other nations regarding healthcare. This issue is brought on by the steadily growing patient population and the rising nurse turnover rates. According to several authorities, a heavy workload in nursing in the US is causing stress and eventually significant nurse turnover. The issue poses serious difficulties for everyone involved in healthcare, including patients, nurses, and their relatives. Therefore, patients experience subpar care due to the high nurse attrition rate. Numerous research has been undertaken to comprehend and address this issue. This paper assesses the outcomes of two quantitative investigations on the effects of staffing levels on patient safety, infection control, and nurse and patient stress especially in the intensive care unit departments
PICOT question
In the ICU departments, do sufficient nurse workers (I) prevent the occurrence of medical errors, infections, and stress among patients and nurses themselves (O) within one year (T) compared to in
adequate nurse workers (C)?
Population (P) – The target population is the patients in the ICU.
Intervention (I) – Sufficient nurse workers
Comparison (C) – Inadequate nurse workers.
Outcome (O) -Prevents infections, stress, and medical errors among the patients and nurses
Time (T) – The duration is one year.
Background of Studies
Fagerström et al. (2018) studied how nurses’ daily workloads relate to patients’ safety in 36 units from four hospitals in Finland, one of which was a tertiary acute care hospital while the other three were secondary acute care hospitals. The researchers used the studying of safety incidents through observation. Also, they based their investigation on collecting information from the reporting system in healthcare institutions. To compare the findings with regressions using the common patients/nurse measure, researchers employed the RAFAELA system to correlate various patient safety issues and patient mortality. Patient safety events and deaths served as the investigation’s preliminary result indicators. It reveals that the nurses’ workload increases the health risks among patients. However, a reduced workload reduces the health risks.
Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patient average nursing care hours are correlated with nursing care metrics in Nogueira et al. (2017). Between 2011 and 2013, the researchers carried out a transversal, descriptive study to gather information from the nursing staff’s daily schedule and the electronic records system. The data was then analysed using Generalized Linear Models. According to the study, providing patients more daily hours reduced the risk of pneumonia and phlebitis, two conditions linked to ventilator use. As a result, it is clear from the study that the number of nursing care hours directly influences patient outcomes, necessitating modification of nurse staffing levels.
Support
The relationship between nurses’ daily workloads and patients’ safety is described in Fagerström et al. (2018). It demonstrates that the workload of nurses raises patient health concerns. But a lighter burden lessens the health dangers. Similarly, Nogueira et al. (2017) examine the proportion of nurse care hours supplied to patient demands. The research also establishes that the length of nursing care impacts patients’ health outcomes. As a result, both studies support the PICOT question since they show a connection between the quality of nursing care and patient outcomes.
Method of Studies
Fagerström et al. (2018) used observational analysis of safety occurrences. Additionally, the researchers base their work on gathering data from the reporting system in healthcare facilities. They collected information from 36 units across four Finnish hospitals, including one that provided acute tertiary care and three others that provided secondary acute care. The RAFAELA system was used daily per standards, valid nursing severity inclusion criteria were measured using the PAONCIL method, and reliable nursing intensity data were expressed in terms of an annual reliability test conducted by parallel classifications. Units that had undergone significant organizational shifts over the preceding year were excluded from the procedure. The same goes for sensitive health information about patients and any information about the qualities of the nurses. In this instance, researchers conducted logistic regression analyses to assess the data and predict correlations between each kind of result and the daily level of nursing intensity per nurse concerning the presumed optimal level. The number of nurses employed in the surveyed ICU on a daily and monthly basis was reported by the researchers in Nogueira et al. (2017) based on the nursing staff’s daily schedule and the electronic records system. After that, the researchers used generalized linear models to examine it. Therefore, the two investigations were different in that Nogueira et al. (2017) used descriptive research to collect information from the electronic records system and the daily schedule of the nursing staff. In contrast, Fagerström et al. (2018) used observation.
Since the researcher may check the validity of the data collected, the observation approach is often accurate. Based on data collected daily, researchers in Fagerström et al. (2018) successfully analyzed the association between nurse workload and patient outcomes. They could apply tools that consider patient variables, including sex, age, and diagnosis. In addition, the study offers some data that suggests the classic nurse staffing indicator, the patients to nurses’ ratio, may partly fall short of adequately controlling for patient severity and casemix.
Additionally, researchers can rely on various tools to verify the phenomena in the observation method. Researchers in Fagerström et al. (2018) gathered nursing resources, patients’ nursing intensity, patient mortality, and patient safety issues daily, totalling 12 475 data points. Additionally, using uncorrected logistic regression models and models that took into account the impacts of the day of the week, holiday, and season, they were able to predict relationships between OPC/nurse and patient safety events or death. However, when utilizing the observational method, researchers might miss some instances that are being examined. Fagerström et al. (2018) study neglect to consider the potential impact of the experts’ patient-related direct time, skill mix, competency level, or job experience.
Using transverse, descriptive studies, researchers can describe, analyse, and record people’s behaviors such as emotions, responses, and attitudes. Researchers found that giving patients more daily hours reduced pneumonia and phlebitis, which are linked to ventilator use (Nogueira et al. (2017). However, this method is subject to biases. For instance, they could base conclusions about a person on the analysis of a larger group or conclude about a group of people based on one person. Nogueira et al. (2017) aim to circumvent this issue by focusing on a particular audience, 1,717 patients.
Results of Studies
According to Fagerström et al. (2018), the risk of patient mortality and other safety issues is enhanced by hospital nurses’ increased workload. The researchers found that if OPC/nurse was below the limit, a medical error mortality chance was nearly 25% lower. A workforce metric based on daily assessments of specific patient care needs and the necessary NWL (OPC/nurse) performed marginally better in predicting incidents and mortality rates than the conventional patient-to-nurse measure.
Nursing care hours affected patients’ health outcomes, according to Nogueira et al. (2017). Researchers found that extending the day for patients reduced their risk of developing pneumonia and phlebitis, two conditions linked to ventilator use.
Ethical Considerations
Fagerström et al. (2018) ensured that the study adheres to ethical standards and protects participants’ rights. It is necessary to obtain approval from the pertinent authorities. Hence, they sought approval from the chief administrative physicians of all four hospitals involved. However, it did not necessitate any additional ethical clearance, which complies with Finland’s regulatory framework for health research. Similarly, Nogueira et al. (2017) had approval from various organizations, including the University of São Paulo (EERP/USP) and the Research Ethics Committee of Ribeirão Preto College of Nurse. Consequently, the two studies were following the necessary laws and regulations.
Before starting their study, researchers must also get participants’ informed consent. Participants are told of the study’s goals, rights, potential advantages and dangers, and the methodology. The participants must next indicate their agreement to participate in the study by signing a consent form. However, informed consent was not used in either study because of the scope of the investigations. The type of approval used by Nogueira et al. (2017) did not require participant agreement. Fagerström et al. (2018) did not require patient agreement because their study incorporated observation and data collection from the reporting process in healthcare facilities.
Conclusion
Both Fagerström et al. (2018) and Nogueira et al. (2017) examine the relationship between the nature of nursing care and patient safety. Specifically, Fagerström et al. (2018) investigate the relationship between patient safety concerns and fatalities and the workload of each nurse. On the other hand, Nogueira et al. (2017) compare nurse care indicators with the number of nursing hours spent caring for patients in intensive care units. While Nogueira et al. (2017) utilized a transverse, descriptive study to gather data, researchers in Fagerström et al. (2018) used observation. Both investigations adhere to ethical norms because they have received the necessary authority’s approval. The two approaches were useful since they supported the study’s conclusions that staffing levels affect nurses’ and patients’ outcomes. However, they had some limitations that probably compromised the findings.
References
Fagerström, L., Kinnunen, M., & Saarela, J. (2018). Nursing workload, patient safety incidents and mortality: an observational study from Finland. BMJ Open, 8(4), e016367.
Nogueira, T. D. A., Menegueti, M. G., Perdoná, G. D. S. C., Auxiliadora-Martins, M., Fugulin, F. M. T., & Laus, A. M. (2017). Effect of nursing care hours on the outcomes of Intensive Care assistance. PloS one, 12(11), e0188241. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0188241
Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 233 Rough Draft Quantitative Research Critique and Ethical Considerations SOLUTION
Lopes Write Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to Lopes Write, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.
Important information for writing discussion questions and participation
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Hi Class,
Please read through the following information on writing a Discussion question response and participation posts.
Contact me if you have any questions.
Important information on Writing a Discussion Question
- Your response needs to be a minimum of 150 words (not including your list of references)
- There needs to be at least TWO references with ONE being a peer reviewed professional journal article.
- Include in-text citations in your response
- Do not include quotes—instead summarize and paraphrase the information
- Follow APA-7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
Participation –replies to your classmates or instructor
- A minimum of 6 responses per week, on at least 3 days of the week.
- Each response needs at least ONE reference with citations—best if it is a peer reviewed journal article
- Each response needs to be at least 75 words in length (does not include your list of references)
- Responses need to be substantive by bringing information to the discussion or further enhance the discussion. Responses of “I agree” or “great post” does not count for the word count.
- Follow APA 7th edition
- Points will be deducted if the above is not followed
- Remember to use and follow APA-7th edition for all weekly assignments, discussion questions, and participation points.
- Here are some helpful links
- Student paper example
- Citing Sources
- The Writing Center is a great resource