A learning style is a technique or the preferred way in which learners absorb, process, comprehend, and retain knowledge. There are various learning styles which are categorized based on the sensible approaches, which are either visual, auditory, read or write, and kinesthetic. The learning styles are found within the VARK model of students learning. VARK is an acronym for the four primary learning styles Visual, Auditory, Read and Write and Kinesthetic (VARK, 2019). The VARK model recognizes that learners have various approaches on how they process information, typically known as the preferred leaning mode. This essay will discuss learning styles for learners and will include a description of my learning style based on the VARK questionnaire. The paper will also explore the importance of educators identifying learners’ learning styles and application of learning styles in health promotion.
A learning style is a technique or the preferred way in which learners absorb, process, comprehend, and retain knowledge. There are various learning styles which are categorized based on the sensible approaches, which are either visual, auditory, read or write, and kinesthetic. The learning styles are found within the VARK model of students learning. VARK is an acronym for the four primary learning styles Visual, Auditory, Read and Write and Kinesthetic (VARK, 2019). The VARK model recognizes that learners have various approaches on how they process information, typically known as the preferred leaning mode. This essay will discuss learning styles for learners and will include a description of my learning style based on the VARK questionnaire. The paper will also explore the importance of educators identifying learners’ learning styles and application of learning styles in health promotion.
Personal Learning Style According to the VARK Questionnaire
My learning style as per the VARK questionnaire is Very Strong Kinesthetic. The VARK questionnaire results were Visual-2, Aural-2, Read/Write- 2, and Kinesthetic-12. The Kinesthetic learning style is defined as one where a learner understands effectively by using experiences and real things even though they are exhibited as images or on screens (VARK, 2019). In the Kinesthetic learning style, I prefer to encounter several experiences to promote understanding of concepts. Furthermore, ideas become valuable if they seem practical, real, and relevant to me, and I need to do something to understand it.
Preferred Learning Strategies
The Kinesthetic learning style preference uses experiences and real things when they are presented in images and on screens. The preferred learning strategies in the Kinesthetic learning style include the use of autobiographies and documentaries, applications before learning theories, and the use of demonstrations and applying what one has learned (VARK, 2019). Individuals with kinesthetic preference prefer discussing real things in their life, prefer having their own experiences, doing thing things with others and making things happen through actions (VARK, 2019). In addition, they prefer tackling practical problems and using problem-solving techniques, they complete tasks and prefer outcomes that can be measured (VARK, 2019). Besides, they prefer being part of the team, being appreciated for their experiences and prefer interacting with individuals who apply their ideas as well as individuals who are relevant, concrete, and down-to-earth.
My preferred learning strategies are similar to a majority of the preferred learning strategies for the Kinesthetic learning style. For instance, I prefer learning to solve problems using real-life case scenarios and practical experiences since I understand things better and also retain the learned information for a more extended period. I understand concepts better when I learn them practically, such as through projects and lab practical. I prefer having a trainer who explains concepts using real-life scenarios, uses demonstrations to explain a theory, and allows me to apply theory in a real-life setting. When studying, I use case studies whereby I attempt solving the case scenarios to gauge my understanding of a concept. By using case studies and theory application, I can relate the information learned and find the information valuable and relevant.
Assessment Description
Learning styles represent the different approaches to learning based on preferences, weaknesses, and strengths. For learners to best achieve the desired educational outcome, learning styles must be considered when creating a plan. Complete “The VARK Questionnaire,” located on the VARK website, and then complete the following:
Click “OK” to receive your questionnaire scores.
Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
Compare your current preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Examine how awareness of learning styles has influenced your perceptions of teaching and learning.
In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise and discuss the overall value of learning styles. Include the following:
Provide a summary of your learning style according the VARK questionnaire.
Describe your preferred learning strategies. Compare your current preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
Describe how individual learning styles affect the degree to which a learner can understand or perform educational activities. Discuss the importance of an educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners.
Discuss why understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion is important to achieving the desired outcome. How do learning styles ultimately affect the possibility for a behavioral change? How would different learning styles be accommodated in health promotion?
Cite to at least three peer-reviewed or scholarly sources to complete this assignment. Sources should be published within the last 5 years and appropriate for the assignment criteria.
Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. A link to the LopesWrite technical support articles is located in Course Resources if you need assistance.
A learning style refers to how different learners acquire, process, understand, and retain new information. It denotes the habitual cognitive and affective behaviors which influence how each learner interacts in learning environments or situations (Mangold et al., 2018). There are four primary learning styles: visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic. Regarding learning styles, this paper will discuss the author’s learning style and preferred learning strategies and discuss how personal learning styles impact the level to which a learner can comprehend or carry out educational activities.
Personal Learning Style
The VARK questionnaire helps one identify their learning style by proposing the learning strategies one should employ to increase their capacity to understand and carry out the learning activities. According to the VARK questionnaire, I am a Very Strong Kinesthetic. The results were Visual-2, Aural-2, Read/Write- 2, and Kinesthetic-12. In the Kinesthetic learning style, the learner understands more effectively when experiences and real things are provided, even if presented as images or through screens (VARK, 2019). Individuals who fall under the Kinesthetic learning style prefer to learn through experiences and real things. From the VARK assessment, I realized that I prefer encountering experiences since they foster comprehension of concepts. Besides, I identify ideas as valuable if they appear real, practical, and relevant to my life experiences.
Preferred Learning Strategies
A learning strategy refers to a person’s approach of organizing and applying a specific set of skills to understand the content or achieve other tasks more effectively and efficiently in academic and non-academic environments. I prefer to learn how to solve a problem by being presented with a real case scenario and applying it to learn the concepts of addressing similar issues. Besides, I prefer learning through practical experiences because I can understand concepts better and retain them in the long term compared to when I read a book or listen to a lecture. I also grasp new information more effectively from practical learning sessions such as field practicum and projects. Furthermore, I prefer tutors and instructors who teach using demonstrations and provide real-life scenarios and guide the learner to apply the learned concept in solving an existing issue.
My preferred learning strategies compare to most strategies under the Kinesthetic learning style. For instance, the preferred strategies in the Kinesthetic learning style include using real things and experiences when presented through images and screens. Other preferred strategies include documentaries and autobiographies, applying theories before theoretical learning, demonstrations, and applying learned concepts (VARK, 2019). Furthermore, people with the kinesthetic preference would rather discuss real things in their lives, have their own experiences, carry out activities with others, and achieve things using actions(VARK, 2019). Like my preferences, kinesthetic individuals prefer solving practical problems and applying problem-solving approaches and desire to achieve measurable outcomes.
Effect on Educational Performance and Importance of Identifying Learning Styles for Learners as an Educator
A person’s learning style influences how they comprehend or carry out educational activities. A learner grasps the concepts more effectively when the teaching method is consistent with their learning style (Childs-Kean et al., 2020). Consequently, when the teaching method aligns with the learner’s learning style, they understand and perform educational activities more effectively than when forced to adjust to other learning styles. An educator should strive to understand the preferred learning styles of individual learners in order to modify the teaching style to suit each learner’s style. By identifying individual learning styles, the educator can plan the teaching session to incorporate teaching methods that match the learners’ learning styles (Childs-Kean et al., 2020). For instance, in a setting with learners having all the learning styles, the educator can include: chart and diagrams for visuals, a lecture and audio recordings for the aural, reading handouts and books for read/write, and case studies and demonstrations for the kinesthetic. By doing so, the educator will help each learner gain the most from the learning session.
Learning Styles and Health Promotion
Health providers conducting health promotion need to be familiar with the learning styles of the individuals receiving the health education. Understanding a patient’s learning style helps enhance their learning, understanding, and retention of the health messages. Retention of health promotion messages increases the likelihood of individuals implementing them to adopt healthy lifestyle choices (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). Individuals tend to have a greater interest in health promotion activities if the provider’s teaching method is consistent with their learning styles. Learning styles influence the likelihood of behavioral change if the individual effectively understands and retains the health messages and applies them in making healthier choices (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). For instance, if a diabetic patient with a visual preference is educated on diet and exercise planning using charts and diagrams, they are likely to retain the information and apply the concepts to change their lifestyle practices.
Different learning styles can be incorporated in health promotion using various teaching methods aiming at aura, visual, read/write, and hands-on. For instance, the provider can give a health talk to target aural learners and use posters and charts containing health messages for visual learners (Mangold et al., 2018). In addition, handouts and pamphlets can be provided to target read/write learners, and demonstrations can be used for kinesthetic learners.
Conclusion
Learning styles are a major element of the comprehensive approach that should be considered when planning and facilitating a learning program. My preferred learning style is Kinesthetic since I grasp and retain concepts better when I learn them from practical activities, real-life experiences, and scenarios. Individuals comprehend differently based on whether they learn best when they visualize, hear, read, or engage in practical activities. Therefore, the educator should consider the learner’s style to make the best out of the learning session.
References
Bokhari, N. M., & Zafar, M. (2019). Learning styles and approaches among medical education participants. Journal of education and health promotion, 8, 181. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_95_19
Childs-Kean, L., Edwards, M., & Smith, M. D. (2020). A Systematic Review of Learning Style Framework Use in Health Sciences Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7885
Mangold, K., Kunze, K. L., Quinonez, M. M., Taylor, L. M., & Tenison, A. J. (2018). Learning Style Preferences of Practicing Nurses. Journal for nurses in professional development, 34(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000462
VARK Learn Limited. (2019). The VARK questionnaire. Retrieved from http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/
VARK Analysis Paper – Rubric
Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire
Criteria Description
Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire
5. Excellent
20 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection.
4. Good
17.8 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described.
3. Satisfactory
15.8 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided.
2. Less than Satisfactory
15 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire.
Preferred Learning Strategies
Criteria Description
Preferred Learning Strategies
5. Excellent
20 points
Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.
4. Good
17.8 points
Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented.
3. Satisfactory
15.8 points
Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described.
2. Less than Satisfactory
15 points
Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Personal learning strategy content is missing.
Learning Styles
Criteria Description
Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator)
5. Excellent
20 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion.
4. Good
17.8 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support.
3. Satisfactory
15.8 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support.
2. Less than Satisfactory
15 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented.
Learning Styles and Health Promotion
Criteria Description
Learning Styles and Health Promotion (learning styles and importance to achieving desired outcome for learners, learning styles and effect on behavioral change, accommodation of different learning styles in health promotion)
5. Excellent
20 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed in detail. A strong correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. The narrative demonstrates insight into the importance of learning styles to health promotion and behavioral outcomes.
4. Good
17.8 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed; a correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. Some detail or minor support is needed.
3. Satisfactory
15.8 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is generally presented; a general correlation has been established. More rationale or evidence is needed to fully establish correlation. Accommodation of different learning styles is summarized.
2. Less than Satisfactory
15 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is partially presented; a correlation has not been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is incomplete. There are inaccuracies.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion, the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes, and the accommodation of different learning styles is not discussed.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Criteria Description
Thesis Development and Purpose
5. Excellent
5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
4. Good
4.45 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
3. Satisfactory
3.95 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
2. Less than Satisfactory
3.75 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
Argument Logic and Construction
Criteria Description
Argument Logic and Construction
5. Excellent
5 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
4. Good
4.45 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
3. Satisfactory
3.95 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
2. Less than Satisfactory
3.75 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Criteria Description
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
5. Excellent
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
4. Good
4.45 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
3. Satisfactory
3.95 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
2. Less than Satisfactory
3.75 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Criteria Description
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
5. Excellent
2 points
All format elements are correct.
4. Good
1.78 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
3. Satisfactory
1.58 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
1.5 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
Documentation of Sources
Criteria Description
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
5. Excellent
3 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
4. Good
2.67 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3. Satisfactory
2.37 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2. Less than Satisfactory
2.25 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
1. Unsatisfactory
0 points
Sources are not documented.
Welcome to class
Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to.
I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.
Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.
If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.
Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.
Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.
I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!
Sincerely,
Rubric Criteria
Total 100 points
Criterion
1. Unsatisfactory
2. Less than Satisfactory
3. Satisfactory
4. Good
5. Excellent
Argument Logic and Construction
Argument Logic and Construction
0 points
Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.
3.75 points
Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.
3.95 points
Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.
4.45 points
Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.
5 points
Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
Thesis Development and Purpose
Thesis Development and Purpose
0 points
Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.
3.75 points
Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.
3.95 points
Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.
4.45 points
Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.
5 points
Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire
Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire
0 points
Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire.
15 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete.
15.8 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided.
17.8 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described.
20 points
Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection.
Preferred Learning Strategies
Preferred Learning Strategies
0 points
Personal learning strategy content is missing.
15 points
Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete.
15.8 points
Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described.
17.8 points
Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented.
20 points
Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.
Documentation of Sources
Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)
0 points
Sources are not documented.
2.25 points
Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.
2.37 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.
2.67 points
Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.
3 points
Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)
0 points
Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.
3.75 points
Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.
3.95 points
Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.
4.45 points
Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.
5 points
Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)
0 points
Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.
1.5 points
Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.
1.58 points
Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.
1.78 points
Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.
2 points
All format elements are correct.
Learning Styles
Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator)
0 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented.
15 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies.
15.8 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support.
17.8 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support.
20 points
Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion.
Learning Styles and Health Promotion
Learning Styles and Health Promotion (learning styles and importance to achieving desired outcome for learners, learning styles and effect on behavioral change, accommodation of different learning styles in health promotion)
0 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion, the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes, and the accommodation of different learning styles is not discussed.
15 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is partially presented; a correlation has not been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is incomplete. There are inaccuracies.
15.8 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is generally presented; a general correlation has been established. More rationale or evidence is needed to fully establish correlation. Accommodation of different learning styles is summarized.
17.8 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed; a correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. Some detail or minor support is needed.
20 points
Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed in detail. A strong correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. The narrative demonstrates insight into the importance of learning styles to health promotion and behavioral outcomes.
