coursework-banner

NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

Grand Canyon University NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper-Step-By-Step Guide

 

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Grand Canyon University NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

 

How to Research and Prepare for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

 

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Grand Canyon University NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

 

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

 

How to Write the Introduction for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

The introduction for the Grand Canyon University NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

 

How to Write the Body for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

 

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

 

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

 

How to Write the Conclusion for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

 

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

 

How to Format the References List for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

 

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

Sample Answer for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

A learning style is a technique or the preferred way in which learners absorb, process, comprehend, and retain knowledge. There are various learning styles which are categorized based on the sensible approaches, which are either visual, auditory, read or write, and kinesthetic. The learning styles are found within the VARK model of students learning. VARK is an acronym for the four primary learning styles Visual, Auditory, Read and Write and Kinesthetic (VARK, 2019). The VARK model recognizes that learners have various approaches on how they process information, typically known as the preferred leaning mode. This essay will discuss learning styles for learners and will include a description of my learning style based on the VARK questionnaire. The paper will also explore the importance of educators identifying learners’ learning styles and application of learning styles in health promotion.

A learning style is a technique or the preferred way in which learners absorb, process, comprehend, and retain knowledge. There are various learning styles which are categorized based on the sensible approaches, which are either visual, auditory, read or write, and kinesthetic. The learning styles are found within the VARK model of students learning. VARK is an acronym for the four primary learning styles Visual, Auditory, Read and Write and Kinesthetic (VARK, 2019). The VARK model recognizes that learners have various approaches on how they process information, typically known as the preferred leaning mode. This essay will discuss learning styles for learners and will include a description of my learning style based on the VARK questionnaire. The paper will also explore the importance of educators identifying learners’ learning styles and application of learning styles in health promotion.

Personal Learning Style According to the VARK Questionnaire

My learning style as per the VARK questionnaire is Very Strong Kinesthetic. The VARK questionnaire results were Visual-2, Aural-2, Read/Write- 2, and Kinesthetic-12. The Kinesthetic learning style is defined as one where a learner understands effectively by using experiences and real things even though they are exhibited as images or on screens (VARK, 2019). In the Kinesthetic learning style, I prefer to encounter several experiences to promote understanding of concepts. Furthermore, ideas become valuable if they seem practical, real, and relevant to me, and I need to do something to understand it.

Preferred Learning Strategies

The Kinesthetic learning style preference uses experiences and real things when they are presented in images and on screens. The preferred learning strategies in the Kinesthetic learning style include the use of autobiographies and documentaries, applications before learning theories, and the use of demonstrations and applying what one has learned (VARK, 2019). Individuals with kinesthetic preference prefer discussing real things in their life, prefer having their own experiences, doing thing things with others and making things happen through actions (VARK, 2019). In addition, they prefer tackling practical problems and using problem-solving techniques, they complete tasks and prefer outcomes that can be measured (VARK, 2019). Besides, they prefer being part of the team, being appreciated for their experiences and prefer interacting with individuals who apply their ideas as well as individuals who are relevant, concrete, and down-to-earth.

My preferred learning strategies are similar to a majority of the preferred learning strategies for the Kinesthetic learning style. For instance, I prefer learning to solve problems using real-life case scenarios and practical experiences since I understand things better and also retain the learned information for a more extended period. I understand concepts better when I learn them practically, such as through projects and lab practical. I prefer having a trainer who explains concepts using real-life scenarios, uses demonstrations to explain a theory, and allows me to apply theory in a real-life setting. When studying, I use case studies whereby I attempt solving the case scenarios to gauge my understanding of a concept. By using case studies and theory application, I can relate the information learned and find the information valuable and relevant.

Sample Answer for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

From birth, human beings continue learning and their learning styles differ based on individual circumstances and their environment. Therefore, it is essential for each person to identify their learning styles. The Visual, aural, read/write and kinesthetic (VARK) is an analytical tool that allows one to understand their learning style better and prepare them throughout their educational process. The tool consists of sixteen questions with assessment score (VARK, 2020). Based on the results that one obtains, the tool demonstrated where one falls in the five categories. The understanding of one’s learning styles enhances their capacity to teach other in various settings (Amaniyan et al., 2020). In this paper, I discuss my score of the VARK tool and compare them to known learning styles. The paper also discusses how learning styles affect the level of a learner to understand and perform educational activities. The paper also explores the importance of learning styles of individuals to participate in health promotion.

Summary of Learning Style

Based on the VARK questionnaire, my learning style is multimodal in nature, which style has strong emphasis on aural and visual preferences. As a nurse in school, I like converting my notes into learnable packages through reducing the nots through summaries. While in class, I may prefer taking few notes but I prefer listening than taking notes. I like reading my summarized work aloud and enjoy discussing my work and different topics or subjects with peers to get a better understanding. I like attending tutorials and discussion to get better understanding of issues, and discuss new topics with others. I also tend to recall facts clearly what I hear and what is said (VARK, 2020). In practice setting, I have a tendency to ask questions, especially those involved like leaders, facilitators and authorities.

By having a liking for visual learning style to supplement my aural learning, I enjoy making summaries of what I have learned through images and charts for a better understanding. I also take moments to try various spatial arrangement from what I have learned to get a better understanding. I also acquire knowledge through association with reality. I also create my symbols to attain a better understanding and have enhanced memory. Specifically, I use aural modality through engaging in discussions with colleagues during discussions as talking about a topic enhances my understanding

Comparison with Preferred Learning Style

My preferred learning strategy is a dual coding learning style which entails the use of both words and visuals. In most cases, printed information is accompanied by charts, images, and graphs or graphic organizers. By using the dual coding learning style, I can pay attention to the visuals and consistently associate them to texts and seek an explanation of what they men in their words. Through this, I create ideas and visuals of whatever that I am learning. Again, my preferred learning style reinforces my ability to retain the information, which I have learned in the brain in different ways. The visual learning style incorporates the utilization of sight as the main learning model (Horri et al., 2019). Therefore, I could, for example, prefer taking notes than being involved in discussions.

I would also prefer being in the front position in class to get a better view of the instructor. Again, if the instructors use colorful presentations and illustrations, I would get more knowledge and information. The implication is that as an active learner, I rely on questions that paint an image of a certain situation. Therefore, compared to the identified strategies based on the VARK tool, I believe that individuals with multimodal learning strategies are better equipped to process information in the most effective way as they combine the advantages of visual and aural abilities to understand what they learn.

Effects of Learning Styles

Learning styles show one’s preferred method or approach to learning. Some individuals learn best by seeing information in visual presentation while others prefer learning through doing things such as writing notes down to each explanation that they get. The implication is that one needs to understand their learning style as they process information and get a better perspective of what they are learning. Based on the review of the VARK analysis scores, I realized that I needed significant changes to enhance my learning capabilities. Significant alterations include the need to use other aspects like kinesthetic.

While I found it odd to learn from doing, I realized that it was important to change our approaches to learning, especially as nurses in healthcare environment. In the nursing profession, nurse practitioners should attain knowledge by understanding instead of memorizing material and content (Stirling & Alquraini, 2017). Therefore, it is important to know our learning styles as it enables one to know themselves and how they disseminate knowledge. Knowing one’s learning style is critical in appreciating the types of teaching strategies that instructors can use in nursing education. Through this knowledge, one can incorporate different strategies based on the situation to improve their intake of information and content.

Educators have a responsibility to diversify their teaching styles to meet the needs and preferences of each learner. Awareness about the preferred learning style for different learners is important as it allows teaching to shift from the more traditional teacher-centered modalities to student-centric reciprocating models (Amaniyan et al., 2020). Educators need to appreciate that having different learners with diverse interests and learning approaches is a challenge and the need to use a combination of styles as advanced by the VARK framework. Diverse knowledge modalities are essential to the practical molding of learners’ educational preferences. For example, individuals with multimodal preferences may require different strategies. Thus, educators must match their teaching with the preferred learning styles of their students to attain higher scores. Knowing these styles is essential as it makes learning easy and enjoyable to all involved.

Understanding Learning Style in Health Promotion

Nurses have a duty to promote health in different settings as educators. Therefore, they should understand the different styles of people that participate in health promotion to attain the desired outcomes. Individuals learn differently and the knowledge of these preferences will assist nurse educators to customize health promotion messages and information to suit the various learners. The participants’ learning style will impact the individuals’ ability to conceptualize instruction and process information disseminated to them in different ways (Horri et al., 2019). By understanding the style, the nurse educator can select the type of learning style to use and the activities that suit all the learners. The ability to decipher the various learning styles demonstrate that nurses should focus on effective strategies that allow participants in health promotion to enhance their engagement and generate most effective strategies.

Learning styles impact the possibility of behavioral changes as learners and educators understand the different ways of disseminating critical information. Behavioral change occurs through effective learning. For example, multimodal learners prefer using a combination of strategies to get information. Such learners have increased probability of getting information on behavioral change through different ways than kinesthetic learners who prefer task-based learning or activities (Stirling & Alquraini, 2017). The implication is that nurses and other providers must develop strategies that can accommodate the different learning styles when promoting health. The various learning styles imply that individuals have a better understanding of disseminated information as it is individualized based on their circumstances.

Conclusion

Conclusively, the VARK model allows individuals to know their learning styles. By using the tools designed for an individual, one can improve their learning and comprehension of different educational materials. As demonstrated, I am a multimodal learner who utilizes different styles to get information and use it in health promotion as a nurse.

References

Amaniyan, S., Pouyesh, V., Bashiri, Y., Snelgrove, S., & Vaismoradi, M. (2020). Comparison of

the conceptual map and traditional lecture methods on students’ learning based on the vark learning style model: a randomized controlled trial. SAGE Open Nursing, 6, 2377960820940550. https://doi.org/10.1177/2377960820940550

Horri, A., Hajmohammadi, S., Kamyabi, H., Asadipour, M., Rad, M., & Asadipour, E. (2019).

The relationship between learning style preferences from VARK model and academic performances among the students of Dentistry in 2016-2017. Journal of Oral Health and Oral Epidemiology, 8(3), 131-137. doi: 10.2147/AMEP.S235002

Stirling, B. V., & Alquraini, W. A. (2017). Using VARK to assess Saudi nursing students’

learning style preferences: Do they differ from other health professionals? Journal of Taibah University Medical Sciences, 12(2), 125-130. doi: 10.1016/j.jtumed.2016.10.011

VARK (2020). The VARK Questionnaire. Retrieved from

https://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/

Complete “The VARK Questionnaire: How Do I Learn Best?”

http://www.stellarleadership.com/docs/Approach%20to%20Learning/assessment/VARK%20Questionnare.pdf

  1. Click “OK” to receive your questionnaire scores.
  2. Once you have determined your preferred learning style, review the corresponding link to view your learning preference.
  3. Review the other learning styles: visual, aural, read/write, kinesthetic, and multimodal (listed on the VARK Questionnaire Results page).
  4. Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
  5. Appraise how this awareness of learning attributes influences your perceptions of teaching and learning.

In a paper (750-1,000 words), summarize your analysis of this exercise. Include the following:

  1. Provide a summary of your learning style.
  2. List your preferred learning strategies.
  3. Compare your preferred learning strategies to the identified strategies for your preferred learning style.
  4. Discuss how the awareness of individual learning styles, preferences and strategies influence teaching (those who are in a position to teach) and learning (those who are in a position to learn).
  5. Cite a minimum of three references in the paper.

Although the topic of this assignment refers to your individual learning style, avoid the use of first person voice (words such as, “I, we,

our”) in your essay.NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

Prepare this assignment according to the guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required.

This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.

You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.

Click here to ORDER an A++ paper from our Verified MASTERS and DOCTORATE WRITERS: NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

NRS 429V Week 1 Discussion 1

Using the health belief model, how can nurses encourage patients to make immediate and permanent behavior changes; particularly as they relate to lifestyle choices?

Re: Topic 1 DQ 1

A nurse’s profession entails a large amount of patient education. Patients who receive education are better able to enhance their health. Assessment is the first step a nurse must take when teaching a patient. Because each patient has a unique learning style, educational level, values, and belief system, patient assessment is required. Nurses are also in charge of determining whether there are any learning barriers. Culture, health disparities, environmental, language, literary, and physiological barriers are only a few of them. (Whitney, 2018) A nurse’s purpose as a health educator is to educate individuals on how to make educated health decisions, avoid diseases, and promote health.

Nurse educators can work with an interdisciplinary team to create a personalized care plan for each patient. Assessing the readiness and motivation of the patient is a key tool for effective education. (Smith & Zsohar, 2013) The nurse educator should use tactics that will assist the patient gain more knowledge, feel less anxious, be more satisfied, and have better outcomes. (Roxanne, n.d.) Various successful approaches, such as computer technology, audio and videotapes, textual materials, and demonstrations, can be employed to attain these aims. Various instructional tactics that were employed in tandem were also beneficial. Furthermore, systematic, culturally relevant, and patient-specific instructions have been shown to be superior to ad hoc or generalized teaching. When a patient is willing to learn and change, behavioral objectives should be included in their treatment plan.

References

Whitney. (2018). Teaching and Learning Styles. In Health Promotion [Review of Teaching and Learning Styles. In Health Promotion].

Smith, J. A., & Zsohar, H. (2013). Patient-education tips for new nurses. Nursing43(10), 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1097/01.nurse.0000434224.51627.8a

Roxanne, C. (n.d.). Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods of Delivery for Patient Education: A Systematic Review and Practice Guideline Recommendations [Review of Effective Teaching Strategies and Methods of Delivery for Patient Education: A Systematic Review and Practice Guideline Recommendations].

ALSO READ: NRS 429V How could you use the family structural theory to determine if a family is dysfunctional or not?

NRS 429V Week 1 Discussion 2

In the assigned reading, “How to Write Learning Objectives That Meet Demanding Behavioral Criteria,” Kizlik explained that “objectives that are used in education, whether they are called learning objectives, behavioral objectives, instructional objectives, or performance objectives are terms that refer to descriptions of observable behavior or performance that are used to make judgments about learning.” How do health providers design educational programs to clearly articulate objectives to engage both patients as well as families?

Topic 1: Teaching and Learning Styles

Description

Objectives:

  1. Evaluate personal learning styles.
    2. Discuss the application of teaching strategies to support individualized nursing care plans.
    3. Examine health promotion models used for behavioral change.
    Study Materials

Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum

Description:

Read Chapter 1 in Health Promotion: Health and Wellness Across the Continuum.

The VARK Questionnaire

Description:

Complete “The VARK Questionnaire,” located on the VARK website.

Teaching Strategies to Support Evidence-Based Practice

Description:

Read “Teaching Strategies to Support Evidence-Based Practice,” by Winters and Echeverri, from Critical Care Nurse
(2012).

Patient-Education Tips for New Nurses

Description:

Read “Patient-Education Tips for New Nurses,” by Smith and Zsohar, from Nursing 2013 (2013).

Patient Education in Home Care: Strategies for Success

Description:

Read “Patient Education in Home Care: Strategies for Success,” by Ashton and Oermann, from Home Healthcare Now
(2014).

Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points
NRS-429VN NRS-429VN-O502 VARK Analysis Paper 100.0

Criteria Percentage Unsatisfactory (0.00%) Less than Satisfactory (75.00%) Satisfactory (79.00%) Good (89.00%) Excellent (100.00%)
Content 80.0%
Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire 20.0% Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described. Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection.

Preferred Learning Strategies 20.0% Personal learning strategy content is missing. Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete. Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described. Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented. Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.

Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator) 20.0% Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support. Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion.

Learning Styles and Health Promotion (learning styles and importance to achieving desired outcome for learners, learning styles and effect on behavioral change, accommodation of different learning styles in health promotion) 20.0% Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion, the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes, and the accommodation of different learning styles is not discussed. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is partially presented; a correlation has not been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is incomplete. There are inaccuracies. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is generally presented; a general correlation has been established. More rationale or evidence is needed to fully establish correlation. Accommodation of different learning styles is summarized. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed; a correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. Some detail or minor support is needed. Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed in detail. A strong correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. The narrative demonstrates insight into the importance of learning styles to health promotion and behavioral outcomes.

Organization and Effectiveness 15.0%
Thesis Development and Purpose 5.0% Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear. Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Argument Logic and Construction 5.0% Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Format 5.0%
Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) 2.0% Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent. Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style) 3.0% Sources are not documented. Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present. Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct. Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Sample Answer 3 for NRS 429V Week 1 Assignment VARK Analysis Paper

A learning style refers to how different learners acquire, process, understand, and retain new information. It denotes the habitual cognitive and affective behaviors which influence how each learner interacts in learning environments or situations (Mangold et al., 2018). There are four primary learning styles: visual, auditory, tactile, and kinesthetic. Regarding learning styles, this paper will discuss the author’s learning style and preferred learning strategies and discuss how personal learning styles impact the level to which a learner can comprehend or carry out educational activities.

Personal Learning Style

The VARK questionnaire helps one identify their learning style by proposing the learning strategies one should employ to increase their capacity to understand and carry out the learning activities. According to the VARK questionnaire, I am a Very Strong Kinesthetic. The results were Visual-2, Aural-2, Read/Write- 2, and Kinesthetic-12. In the Kinesthetic learning style, the learner understands more effectively when experiences and real things are provided, even if presented as images or through screens (VARK, 2019).  Individuals who fall under the Kinesthetic learning style prefer to learn through experiences and real things. From the VARK assessment, I realized that I prefer encountering experiences since they foster comprehension of concepts. Besides, I identify ideas as valuable if they appear real, practical, and relevant to my life experiences.

Preferred Learning Strategies

A learning strategy refers to a person’s approach of organizing and applying a specific set of skills to understand the content or achieve other tasks more effectively and efficiently in academic and non-academic environments. I prefer to learn how to solve a problem by being presented with a real case scenario and applying it to learn the concepts of addressing similar issues. Besides, I prefer learning through practical experiences because I can understand concepts better and retain them in the long term compared to when I read a book or listen to a lecture. I also grasp new information more effectively from practical learning sessions such as field practicum and projects. Furthermore, I prefer tutors and instructors who teach using demonstrations and provide real-life scenarios and guide the learner to apply the learned concept in solving an existing issue.

My preferred learning strategies compare to most strategies under the Kinesthetic learning style. For instance, the preferred strategies in the Kinesthetic learning style include using real things and experiences when presented through images and screens. Other preferred strategies include documentaries and autobiographies, applying theories before theoretical learning, demonstrations, and applying learned concepts (VARK, 2019). Furthermore, people with the kinesthetic preference would rather discuss real things in their lives, have their own experiences, carry out activities with others, and achieve things using actions(VARK, 2019). Like my preferences,  kinesthetic individuals prefer solving practical problems and applying problem-solving approaches and desire to achieve measurable outcomes.

Effect on Educational Performance and Importance of Identifying Learning Styles for Learners as an Educator

A person’s learning style influences how they comprehend or carry out educational activities. A learner grasps the concepts more effectively when the teaching method is consistent with their learning style (Childs-Kean et al., 2020). Consequently, when the teaching method aligns with the learner’s learning style, they understand and perform educational activities more effectively than when forced to adjust to other learning styles. An educator should strive to understand the preferred learning styles of individual learners in order to modify the teaching style to suit each learner’s style. By identifying individual learning styles, the educator can plan the teaching session to incorporate teaching methods that match the learners’ learning styles (Childs-Kean et al., 2020). For instance, in a setting with learners having all the learning styles, the educator can include: chart and diagrams for visuals, a lecture and audio recordings for the aural, reading handouts and books for read/write, and case studies and demonstrations for the kinesthetic. By doing so, the educator will help each learner gain the most from the learning session.

Learning Styles and Health Promotion

Health providers conducting health promotion need to be familiar with the learning styles of the individuals receiving the health education. Understanding a patient’s learning style helps enhance their learning, understanding, and retention of the health messages.  Retention of health promotion messages increases the likelihood of individuals implementing them to adopt healthy lifestyle choices (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). Individuals tend to have a greater interest in health promotion activities if the provider’s teaching method is consistent with their learning styles. Learning styles influence the likelihood of behavioral change if the individual effectively understands and retains the health messages and applies them in making healthier choices (Bokhari & Zafar, 2019). For instance, if a diabetic patient with a visual preference is educated on diet and exercise planning using charts and diagrams, they are likely to retain the information and apply the concepts to change their lifestyle practices.

Different learning styles can be incorporated in health promotion using various teaching methods aiming at aura, visual, read/write, and hands-on. For instance, the provider can give a health talk to target aural learners and use posters and charts containing health messages for visual learners (Mangold et al., 2018). In addition, handouts and pamphlets can be provided to target read/write learners, and demonstrations can be used for kinesthetic learners.

Conclusion

Learning styles are a major element of the comprehensive approach that should be considered when planning and facilitating a learning program. My preferred learning style is Kinesthetic since I grasp and retain concepts better when I learn them from practical activities, real-life experiences, and scenarios. Individuals comprehend differently based on whether they learn best when they visualize, hear, read, or engage in practical activities. Therefore, the educator should consider the learner’s style to make the best out of the learning session.

 References

Bokhari, N. M., & Zafar, M. (2019). Learning styles and approaches among medical education participants. Journal of education and health promotion8, 181. https://doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_95_19

Childs-Kean, L., Edwards, M., & Smith, M. D. (2020). A Systematic Review of Learning Style Framework Use in Health Sciences Education. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education. https://doi.org/10.5688/ajpe7885

Mangold, K., Kunze, K. L., Quinonez, M. M., Taylor, L. M., & Tenison, A. J. (2018). Learning Style Preferences of Practicing Nurses. Journal for nurses in professional development34(4), 212–218. https://doi.org/10.1097/NND.0000000000000462

VARK Learn Limited. (2019). The VARK questionnaire. Retrieved from http://vark-learn.com/the-vark-questionnaire/

VARK Analysis Paper – Rubric

Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire

Criteria Description

Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire

5. Excellent

20 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection.

4. Good

17.8 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire.

Preferred Learning Strategies

Criteria Description

Preferred Learning Strategies

5. Excellent

20 points

Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.

4. Good

17.8 points

Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15 points

Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Personal learning strategy content is missing.

Learning Styles

Criteria Description

Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator)

5. Excellent

20 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion.

4. Good

17.8 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented.

Learning Styles and Health Promotion

Criteria Description

Learning Styles and Health Promotion (learning styles and importance to achieving desired outcome for learners, learning styles and effect on behavioral change, accommodation of different learning styles in health promotion)

5. Excellent

20 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed in detail. A strong correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. The narrative demonstrates insight into the importance of learning styles to health promotion and behavioral outcomes.

4. Good

17.8 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed; a correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. Some detail or minor support is needed.

3. Satisfactory

15.8 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is generally presented; a general correlation has been established. More rationale or evidence is needed to fully establish correlation. Accommodation of different learning styles is summarized.

2. Less than Satisfactory

15 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is partially presented; a correlation has not been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is incomplete. There are inaccuracies.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion, the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes, and the accommodation of different learning styles is not discussed.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Criteria Description

Thesis Development and Purpose

5. Excellent

5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

4. Good

4.45 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

3. Satisfactory

3.95 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

Argument Logic and Construction

Criteria Description

Argument Logic and Construction

5. Excellent

5 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

4. Good

4.45 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

3. Satisfactory

3.95 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Criteria Description

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

5. Excellent

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

4. Good

4.45 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

3. Satisfactory

3.95 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

2. Less than Satisfactory

3.75 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Criteria Description

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

5. Excellent

2 points

All format elements are correct.

4. Good

1.78 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

3. Satisfactory

1.58 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

1.5 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

Documentation of Sources

Criteria Description

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

5. Excellent

3 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

4. Good

2.67 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3. Satisfactory

2.37 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2. Less than Satisfactory

2.25 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

1. Unsatisfactory

0 points

Sources are not documented.

Welcome to class

Hello class and welcome to the class and I will be your instructor for this course. This is a -week course and requires a lot of time commitment, organization, and a high level of dedication. Please use the class syllabus to guide you through all the assignments required for the course. I have also attached the classroom policies to this announcement to know your expectations for this course. Please review this document carefully and ask me any questions if you do. You could email me at any time or send me a message via the “message” icon in halo if you need to contact me. I check my email regularly, so you should get a response within 24 hours. If you have not heard from me within 24 hours and need to contact me urgently, please send a follow up text to.

I strongly encourage that you do not wait until the very last minute to complete your assignments. Your assignments in weeks 4 and 5 require early planning as you would need to present a teaching plan and interview a community health provider. I advise you look at the requirements for these assignments at the beginning of the course and plan accordingly. I have posted the YouTube link that explains all the class assignments in detail. It is required that you watch this 32-minute video as the assignments from week 3 through 5 require that you follow the instructions to the letter to succeed. Failure to complete these assignments according to instructions might lead to a zero. After watching the video, please schedule a one-on-one with me to discuss your topic for your project by the second week of class. Use this link to schedule a 15-minute session. Please, call me at the time of your appointment on my number. Please note that I will NOT call you.

Please, be advised I do NOT accept any assignments by email. If you are having technical issues with uploading an assignment, contact the technical department and inform me of the issue. If you have any issues that would prevent you from getting your assignments to me by the deadline, please inform me to request a possible extension. Note that working fulltime or overtime is no excuse for late assignments. There is a 5%-point deduction for every day your assignment is late. This only applies to approved extensions. Late assignments will not be accepted.

If you think you would be needing accommodations due to any reasons, please contact the appropriate department to request accommodations.

Plagiarism is highly prohibited. Please ensure you are citing your sources correctly using APA 7th edition. All assignments including discussion posts should be formatted in APA with the appropriate spacing, font, margin, and indents. Any papers not well formatted would be returned back to you, hence, I advise you review APA formatting style. I have attached a sample paper in APA format and will also post sample discussion responses in subsequent announcements.

Your initial discussion post should be a minimum of 200 words and response posts should be a minimum of 150 words. Be advised that I grade based on quality and not necessarily the number of words you post. A minimum of TWO references should be used for your initial post. For your response post, you do not need references as personal experiences would count as response posts. If you however cite anything from the literature for your response post, it is required that you cite your reference. You should include a minimum of THREE references for papers in this course. Please note that references should be no more than 5 years old except recommended as a resource for the class. Furthermore, for each discussion board question, you need ONE initial substantive response and TWO substantive responses to either your classmates or your instructor for a total of THREE responses. There are TWO discussion questions each week, hence, you need a total minimum of SIX discussion posts for each week. I usually post a discussion question each week. You could also respond to these as it would count towards your required SIX discussion posts for the week.

I understand this is a lot of information to cover in 5 weeks, however, the Bible says in Philippians 4:13 that we can do all things through Christ that strengthens us. Even in times like this, we are encouraged by God’s word that we have that ability in us to succeed with His strength. I pray that each and every one of you receives strength for this course and life generally as we navigate through this pandemic that is shaking our world today. Relax and enjoy the course!

Sincerely,

Rubric Criteria

Total 100 points

Criterion

1. Unsatisfactory

2. Less than Satisfactory

3. Satisfactory

4. Good

5. Excellent

Argument Logic and Construction

Argument Logic and Construction

0 points

Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources.

3.75 points

Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility.

3.95 points

Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis.

4.45 points

Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative.

5 points

Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.

Thesis Development and Purpose

Thesis Development and Purpose

0 points

Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim.

3.75 points

Thesis is insufficiently developed or vague. Purpose is not clear.

3.95 points

Thesis is apparent and appropriate to purpose.

4.45 points

Thesis is clear and forecasts the development of the paper. Thesis is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose.

5 points

Thesis is comprehensive and contains the essence of the paper. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.

Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire

Personal Learning Styles According to VARK Questionnaire

0 points

Personal learning style content is missing. Personal learning style presented is not reflective of VARK questionnaire.

15 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified, but summary is incomplete.

15.8 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and basic summary is provided.

17.8 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described.

20 points

Personal learning style according to the VARK questionnaire is identified and described in detail. Summary offers examples that display personal insight or reflection.

Preferred Learning Strategies

Preferred Learning Strategies

0 points

Personal learning strategy content is missing.

15 points

Personal learning strategy is partially described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is incomplete.

15.8 points

Personal learning strategy is summarized. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is generally described.

17.8 points

Personal learning strategy is described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is presented.

20 points

Personal learning strategy is clearly described. A comparison of current preferred learning styles and VARK identified learning styles is detailed. Overall discussion demonstrates insight into preferred learning strategies and how these support preferred learning styles.

Documentation of Sources

Documentation of Sources (citations, footnotes, references, bibliography, etc., as appropriate to assignment and style)

0 points

Sources are not documented.

2.25 points

Documentation of sources is inconsistent or incorrect, as appropriate to assignment and style, with numerous formatting errors.

2.37 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, although some formatting errors may be present.

2.67 points

Sources are documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is mostly correct.

3 points

Sources are completely and correctly documented, as appropriate to assignment and style, and format is free of error.

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use)

0 points

Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is used.

3.75 points

Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, or word choice are present.

3.95 points

Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used.

4.45 points

Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used.

5 points

Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

Paper Format (use of appropriate style for the major and assignment)

0 points

Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly.

1.5 points

Template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken; lack of control with formatting is apparent.

1.58 points

Template is used, and formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present.

1.78 points

Template is fully used; There are virtually no errors in formatting style.

2 points

All format elements are correct.

Learning Styles

Learning Styles (Effect on educational performance and importance of identifying learning styles for learners as an educator)

0 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is not presented.

15 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is partially presented. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is unclear. There are inaccuracies.

15.8 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is generally discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is generally established. There are minor inaccuracies. More rationale or evidence is needed for support.

17.8 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is established. Some rationale or evidence is needed for support.

20 points

Importance of learning styles for a learner, and importance of educator identifying individual learning styles and preferences when working with learners, is thoroughly discussed. The importance of learning styles for learners participating in healthy promotion, and identifying them as an educator, is clearly established. Strong rationale and evidence support discussion.

Learning Styles and Health Promotion

Learning Styles and Health Promotion (learning styles and importance to achieving desired outcome for learners, learning styles and effect on behavioral change, accommodation of different learning styles in health promotion)

0 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion, the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes, and the accommodation of different learning styles is not discussed.

15 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in health promotion and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is partially presented; a correlation has not been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is incomplete. There are inaccuracies.

15.8 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is generally presented; a general correlation has been established. More rationale or evidence is needed to fully establish correlation. Accommodation of different learning styles is summarized.

17.8 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed; a correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. Some detail or minor support is needed.

20 points

Understanding the learning styles of individuals participating in a health promotion, and the correlation to behavioral change and achieving desired outcomes is discussed in detail. A strong correlation has been established. Accommodation of different learning styles is discussed. The narrative demonstrates insight into the importance of learning styles to health promotion and behavioral outcomes.