NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU
South University NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the South University NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the South University NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU
The introduction for the South University NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NSG 4055 Week 5 Discussion SU assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
With many people still facing health care access problems, initiatives to improve access to care should be highly recommended and supported. Healthy People 2030’s guiding principle is health improvement characterized by timely and high-quality health care services (Healthy People 2030, n.d.). With a significant proportion of Americans lacking health insurance, access problems will continue affecting health outcomes adversely unless sufficiently addressed. This discussion explains the most beneficial Healthy People 2030 objectives for Access to Care to patients with chronic Illnesses.
One of the Healthy People 2030 objectives for Access to Care includes reducing the proportion of emergency department visits with a longer wait time than recommended. The other objective is increasing the proportion of adults getting recommended evidence-based preventive health care (Healthy People 2030, n.d.). Based on the projected outcomes, the most beneficial objective is increasing access to preventive health. Synnes et al. (2020) found that patients with chronic illnesses are vulnerable to health complications and other chronic illnesses. Accordingly, they need preventive health care services to reduce the vulnerability and enable them to cope with their present conditions. Access to evidence-based preventive health care has also been described as an effective way of preventing disease and early death (Tremain et al., 2018). Team-based care and copays’ reduction enable patients to receive the required services. Increasing access to preventive health will improve overall health outcomes and play an instrumental role in reducing emergency department visits.
In conclusion, increasing access to preventive health care is crucial for people with chronic illnesses. For a healthy populace, it is important to initiate health programs that promote healthy living, and focusing on people with chronic illnesses is essential. As a vulnerable population, access to preventive health care promotes health and reduces mortality rates. Strategies that help to achieve this goal should be increased to optimize current outcomes.
Considering the resolution of some of the symptoms of the condition the sele
ction of Zoloft was justified as the drug has been effective in reducing symptoms of PTSD. Additionally, use of Zoloft 50 mg has not shown any negative impact on the patient since the first dose was administered. This implies that the patient tolerates the drug well. Therefore, raising the dosage will ensure that the plasma concentration of the drug is high, thus, leading to its positive impact. This is opposite to maintaining the dosage at 50 mg, which means that further resolution of the symptoms will not occur. Also, raising the oral dosage to 100 mg puts the patient at risk of being negatively affected by the drug. Therefore, both maintaining of the dosage at 50mg and raising it at 100mg are not effective decisions.
Difference between Expected Results and Actual Results
Through increasing the amount of plasma concentration of the drug, the nurse practitioner estimated that this would lead to a concomitant reduction in the symptomatology of the generalized anxiety disorder. This is true from the report that is given by the patient as it shows that the symptoms have reduced. The reduction is recorded to be 61% according to the proof by HAM A score. Therefore, through increasing the dosage, there is a partial reduction of the symptoms; however, the rate at which the symptoms reduce does not match the expectations of the healthcare provider.