NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone
South University NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the South University NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the South University NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone
The introduction for the South University NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NSG 4076 Week 4 Project Capstone assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Risk assessment is a crucial participatory process for analyzing the hazards, risks, and vulnerability of a given population to promote the development of coping strategies and risk management initiatives by the local community (Susanto et al., 2018). In conducting this risk assessment exercise, I interviewed three female participants between the age of 35 to 44 years from Fort Pierce Florida as my aggregate population. The purpose of this paper is to report on the outcomes of environmental and occupational health, family assessment, home assessment, and the general risk factors affecting the health of this population.
Risk Assessment
Environment Assessment
The environment of the target group was assessed using the comprehensive occupation and environmental history form. The assessment entailed three main parts, such as community exposures, home exposures, and work history (Sprung & Rogers, 2021). Community exposures involved assessment of the location of the aggregates’ homes, accessibility to clean water, and common health disparities such as obesity and their prevalence within the neighborhood. The home exposures involved analysis of the time the home was constructed, general safety protocols, and condition of the available utilities among other exposures like the heating system. The work assessment mainly focused on the total number of working hours per week, associated risks to injury or trauma, and exposure to occupational hazards such as dangerous chemicals and dust. All these aspects of the occupational and environmental assessment are crucial in identifying the actual sources of risk factors undermining the patient’s health.
Family Assessment
The Friedman Family Assessment model was utilized to evaluate the family of the aggregate population. The
main focus of the interview was on the family structure and stress and coping mechanisms displayed by the family members among other factors undermining the health of the family (Susanto et al., 2018). Developmental stages and family composition were also assessed. The family power structure and the relationship among family members in terms of their decision-making process and communication patterns were the points of focus in family structure assessment. The family beliefs and values were also evaluated in relation to health stressors and coping mechanisms.
Home Assessment
Assessment of the aggregates’ homes was conducted through short-answer structur
ed interview questions regarding their exposures to build on information collected under environmental assessment as described above. The interview started with questions regarding the living condition, followed by maintenance and potential hazards within the house. Other factors assessed include the fuel source, ventilation, and exposure to chemicals like pesticides (Sprung & Rogers, 2021). The location of the home was also analyzed in terms of terrain, and positioning of the house, including the surrounding neighborhood. Generally, the home assessment interview focused on collecting data regarding how safe the home was to promote the health and wellbeing of the aggregate.
Strengths and Weaknesses
Strengths of Community
From the community risk assessment results, several strengths were noted within the society. For instance, it was noted that the aggregate belonged to a community with adequate facilities necessary to facilitate healthy living. Resources such as transport and availability of easily accessible clean water and healthcare services were reported within the community. Consequently, the crime level within the community was reported to be minimal (Weisburd & White, 2019). Lastly, several health promotion resources such as routine screening programs and physical activity programs were also reported within the community as a strategy of promoting their general health and wellbeing.
Weaknesses of Community
However, several challenges affecting the health and well-being of the community members were also reported. For instance, the community lack unity with poor communication and limited engagement especially when it comes to solving problems collectively. The interviewee reported that most people do not involve themselves with other people’s problems, leading to increased stress and a lack of adequate coping mechanisms (Sprung & Rogers, 2021). Consequently, the community is next to a large water body that tends to suffer from water pollution, as some industries still dispose of their wastes into the water. Other than the provision of clean water through filtration, pollution of water can lead to the spreading of diseases, especially to an individual who visits the beach during their leisure time.
Strengths of Aggregate
From the assessment of the aggregate, several strengths were noted ranging from an appropriate family structure with good communication promoting stress coping mechanisms. All interviewees reported that they came from a family with a strong support system for one another, based on respect and good relationships (Susanto et al., 2018). They also claimed that in case one family member encountered a problem, they would sit down together and find a solution, without giving up on the family members. Generally, the aggregate believes in and values family ties as the most important aspect of life.
Weaknesses of Aggregate
However, the aggregate reported several risks associated with their living situation and risks associated with the workplace. One of the interviewees reported that most of her family members are now living in different parts of the city as a result of the location of their workplace. This has led to less communication, hence losing the family support system which they enjoyed before. Consequently, as a result of the covid-19 pandemic, most of the family members would fear visiting one another or engaging to prevent spreading the virus to their family members (Kantor & Kantor, 2020). They were also afraid to go to work at times, for the same reason. Such factors contribute to increased stress levels with inappropriate coping mechanisms.
Health Risks of Aggregate Identified
Generally, through the assessment, several risk factors undermining the health of the aggregate were noted. For instance, environmental hazards such as water pollution and inaccessibility to clean air can contribute to the spread of infectious diseases. Consequently, lack of community engagement and separation of the aggregate family members can also lead to less personal touch and engagement essential in promoting the mental health of the population. As such, the aggregate is at high risk of mental health problems such as anxiety and depression. Lastly, due to the current pandemic, most of the working-class members of the community are at high risk of contracting the coronavirus, leading to increased morbidity and mortality rates (Sen-Crowe et al., 2021).
Conclusion
The conducted risk assessment exercise revealed the home, family, and environment factors undermining the health of the aggregate for development and implementation of appropriate mitigating strategies. Consequently, several strengths were also noted within the community such as accessibility to clean air and affordable healthcare services essential in promoting the health and wellbeing of the community members.
References
Kantor, B. N., & Kantor, J. (2020). Mental health outcomes and associations during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic: a cross-sectional survey of the US general population. MedRxiv. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jagp.2021.01.076
Sen-Crowe, B., Sutherland, M., McKenney, M., & Elkbuli, A. (2021). The Florida COVID-19 mystery: lessons to be learned. The American Journal of Emergency Medicine. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.08.009
Sprung, J. M., & Rogers, A. (2021). Work-life balance as a predictor of college student anxiety and depression. Journal of American college health, 69(7), 775-782. https://doi.org/10.1080/07448481.2019.1706540
Susanto, T., Arisandi, D., Kumakura, R., Oda, A., Koike, M., Tsuda, A., … & Sugama, J. (2018). Development and testing of the family structure and family functions scale for parents providing adolescent reproductive health based on the Friedman family assessment model. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 26(2), 217-236. DOI:10.1891/1061-3749.26.2.217
Weisburd, D., & White, C. (2019). Hot spots of crime are not just hot spots of crime: examining health outcomes at street segments. Journal of contemporary criminal justice, 35(2), 142-160. https://doi.org/10.1177/1043986219832132