NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
Regis University NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Regis University NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Regis University NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
The introduction for the Regis University NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
Initial Post
Performing health assessments as an APRN will help you to develop a collaborative partnership with your patients. After reading Chapter 4 and 12 in your Pender text, think about the vulnerable population that you choose during Week 1 – consider what you perceive / know about this group in relation to the following topics:
Health assets
Health problems
Health-related lifestyle strengths
Key health-related beliefs
Health behaviors that put the person at risk
Changes that could improve their quality of life
Now consider the pros and cons of implementing a Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project with the vulnerable group. You should consider not only the benefit of the actions but the active role the vulnerable will play in the development and implementation of the health promotion plan. How does your population’s health disparities and health inequities benefit and/or hinder this type of project’s success? Remember that you should include citations/references from at least three scholarly sources.
Sample Answer for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
The vulnerable population I chose in week 1 is non-verbal children. Today, there are many resources available for non-verbal children. They include parents, teachers, pediatricians, and speech language pathologists to name a few. They all benefit non-verbal children’s health and development. Non-verbal children, specifically those with autism spectrum disorder (ASD), can develop many health problems. Children with ASD have a difficult time understanding and developing language and communication skills (“Autism spectrum disorder: Communication problems in children”, 2020). They are also more prone to epilepsy, mental health conditions, other behavioral and genetic disorders, difficulty sleeping, feeding issues, gastrointestinal disorders, cardiovascular disorders, higher risk of early parkinsonism, and they have a shorter life expectancy (Bishop-Fitzpatrick & Kind, 2018). The earlier children are diagnosed with autism, the sooner interventions can be started and the sooner other health conditions can be assessed. Because young children are resilient, there is a greater chance of those who have a milder diagnosis of autism to develop excellent communication and everyday life skills.
There are many beliefs about non-verbal children, especially about those who have autism, as to what it is the result of. Different cultures also have their own beliefs about non-verbal children, therefore it is important to gain an understanding of parents’ beliefs about the condition. Many families believe there is a genetic component to autism, and a few still believe that immunizations are to blame for this even though that has been proven to not be true (Samadi, 2020). Children who are autistic are more prone to behaviors that can put them at risk. Some autistic children tend to bang their head against walls or objects, some bite, and some are clumsy, making them more prone to falls (“Autism spectrum disorder”, 2018). Autisitc children are also likely to experience light, sound, and touch sensitivities (“Autism spectrum disorder”, 2018). They also may be indifferent to changes in temperatures and pain (“Autism spectrum disorder”, 2018). This can be scary for patients because if their child is in pain, they may not know since their child can’t feel it and the same can be true about body temperature changes. As mentioned before, autistic children can have feeding issues due to textures of food which can result in malnutrition if a child is extremely picky (“Autism spectrum disorder”, 2018).
Though non-verbal children have a difficult time communicating with others, they still long for that communication just as another child or person does. It is important that non-verbal children take part in extracurriculars to help them develop better socialization skills (“Community and social participation”, n.d.). Children with high-functioning autism would be more likely to participate in a Community-Based Participatory Research health promotion project, however it is important to include all children with autism regardless of their stage of diagnosis. By including all children with autism, they will be able to speak up for themselves and for what changes they would like to see. Members of this project would be able to learn how to communicate with non-verbal children and thus would be able to spread this knowledge with others.
References
Autism spectrum disorder: Communication problems in children. National Institute of Deafness and Other Communication Disorders. (2020, April 13). Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.nidcd.nih.gov/health/autism-spectrum-disorder-communication-problems-children.
Autism spectrum disorder. Mayo Clinic. (2018, January 6). Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.mayoclinic.org/diseases-conditions/autism-spectrum-disorder/symptoms-causes/syc-20352928.
Bishop-Fitzpatrick, L., & Kind, A. J. H. (2018, November 1). A scoping review of health disparities in autism spectrum disorder. NCBI. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5693721/.
Community and social participation. Drexel University. (n.d.). Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://drexel.edu/autismoutcomes/topics/community-and-social-participation/.
Samadi, S. A. (2020, February). Parental beliefs and feelings about autism spectrum disorder in Iran. NCBI. Retrieved September 20, 2021, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7038212/.
Sample Answer 2 for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
Thinking about ethical considerations of dealing with vulnerable populations it is important that we have an ethical duty to create just and equitable health care systems that promote autonomy, foster engagement, enhance cultural safety and support the well-being of all (Clark, B., & Preto, N. (2018)). I think non-verbal children is a great vulnerable topic to discuss and many people do not understand what all Autism consist of and the daily tasks children, parents, teachers, providers, etc. work with to provide proper means for these children. When considering the many environmental and safety modifications caregivers must provide for these children there are modifications that can be recommended to individuals who do not understand ASD and how to effective work and provide proper means for these children. Assisting people with understanding ASD steps that could be recommended would be to organize everyday items with visual labels. By placing labels on drawers and closets this can help reduce power struggles over asking a child to put things away (Autism Society. (2020)). By assisting more individuals on how to work with NV children and those with ASD we can work to provide better means for these children to provide proper environments for them and more inclusive activities that they can be involved in. Personally, I knew nothing of children with ASD until I started working in pediatrics. One of my co-workers adopted two twins who both struggle with ASD and there are so many challenges that she faces when it comes to proper care for her boys. One of the largest issues she has is with the school and limited exposure they have when it comes to dealing with NV children. She has helped open my eyes on this vulnerable population and the struggles that she deals with daily on society and the care of her children.
Autism Society. (2020). Safety in the Home. https://www.autism-society.org/living-with-autism/how-the-autism-society-can-help/safe-and-sound/safety-in-the-home/.
Clark, B., & Preto, N. (2018). Exploring the concept of vulnerability in health care. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 190(11), E308–E309. https://doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.180242
Sample Answer 3 for NU 629- Week 4 Discussion Pros and Cons to Delivering Community-Based Participatory Care to Those Who Are Vulnerable
Thank you for your discussion on the assets that non-verbal children possess as some of the difficulties this vulnerable population faces. There is no question that ethical practices are vital to quality research. Research conducted on all populations must be fair, present as little harm as possible, confidential, and the participant must be able to exit the study at any time (Gray & Grove, 2021). In addition, there are further ethical considerations specific to pediatric research due to the vulnerability of this population (Gray & Grove, 2021). Federal law requires that both parental consent and child assent (expressed willingness to participate) are obtained before a child can participate in a study (Gray & Grove, 2021). This gets more complicated when children are very young, have cognitive challenges, or in this case, are non-verbal because the children either cannot understand what the research entails and/or cannot verbally give assent; these cases must be examined closer by the research team and the IRB to decide about participation (Gray & Grove, 2021). All research involving children generally must be proven to present minimal harm to be approved by an IRB as well (Gray & Grove, 2021).
Because of the requirements discussed above, your research team must assure that proper consent is obtained per federal law and the IRB’s requirements (Gray & Grove, 2021). The most influential ways that you could protect your research subjects and enhance the research/participation process are thoroughly educating the parents and participants (with tailored learning methods), having ongoing and open lines of communication with participants and their parents, and encouraging trusting, compassionate relationships between the researchers, community partners, and the participants involved (Cascio et al., 2020).
References
Cascio, M. A., Weiss, J. A., & Racine, E., (2020). Person-oriented ethics for autism research: Creating best practices through engagement with autism and autistic communities. Autism: The International Journal of Research and Practice, 24(7), 1676-1690.
Gray, J. R. & Grove, S. K. (2021). Burns & Grove’s the practice of nursing research: Appraisal, synthesis, and generation of evidence. (9th ed.). St. Louis, Missouri: Elsevier.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.