coursework-banner

NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions

NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions

Regis University NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions-Step-By-Step Guide

This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Regis University NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.

How to Research and Prepare for NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions

Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Regis University NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.

After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.

How to Write the Introduction for NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions

The introduction for the Regis University NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.

How to Write the Body for NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions

After the introduction, move into the main part of the NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.

Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.

How to Write the Conclusion for NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions

After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.

How to Format the References List for NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions

The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.

Stuck? Let Us Help You

Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease. 

 

Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NU-664B Week 4 QBank Questions assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW. 

 

Value: 100 points

Due: Day 7

Gradebook Category: QBank

Please navigate to your APEA learning portal and complete a 20-question practice quiz related to the body system/topics covered this week. You may choose whichever test mode you like. You may complete as many 20-question quizzes as you like to improve your score. Once you are satisfied with your score, please take a screenshot of the quiz score you would like to count and submit to the Moodle dropbox.

Please be sure the following are visible in your screenshot:

  1. Your name
  2. Date (must be completed in the week it is due)
  3. Number of questions completed
  4. Topics questions came from
  5. Overall score

    NU664B Week 4 QBank Questions
    NU664B Week 4 QBank Questions

To Submit Your Assignment:

  1. Select the Add Submissions button.
  2. Drag or upload your files to the File Picker.
  3. Select Save Changes.

Submission status

Submission status Submitted for grading
Grading status Graded
Time remaining Assignment was submitted 11 days 1 hour early
Last modified Wednesday, 18 January 2023, 10:02 PM
File submissions

Respiratory test.pdf Respiratory test.pdf

18 January 2023, 10:02 PM
Submission comments

iHuman Moodle Rubric

iHuman Moodle Rubric – 100 Points
Criteria Exceeds Expectations Meets Expectations Needs Improvement Inadequate Total Points
Subjective – 40% Determined by iHuman

40 points

Determined by iHuman

36 points

Determined by iHuman

32 points

Determined by iHuman

0 points

40
Objective – 25% Determined by iHuman

25 points

Determined by iHuman

22 points

Determined by iHuman

20 points

Determined by iHuman

0 points

25
Objective – 5% (Testing) Determined by iHuman

5 points

Determined by iHuman

4 points

Determined by iHuman

3 points

Determined by iHuman

0 points

5
Assessment—5% Three differential diagnoses are supported by findings and include worst-case scenario.

Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources.

5 points

Three differential diagnoses include worst-case scenario, but one diagnosis might not be fully supported by findings.

Rationale for differential diagnoses provided by scholarly resources.

3 points

Differential diagnoses may or may not include worst-case scenario, and two differential diagnoses are not supported by findings.

Rationale for all differential diagnoses not provided by scholarly resources.

1 points

Fewer than three differential diagnoses identified, or differential diagnoses not supported by findings and do not include worst-case scenario.

Scholarly resources not provided or do not support differential diagnoses.

0 points

5
Plan—25% Comprehensive plan includes all components:

  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Non-pharmacologic intervention
  • Referrals
  • Patient education
  • Follow-up

Appropriate and current guidelines cited.

25 points

Plan missing one of the identified components:

  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Non-pharmacologic intervention
  • Referrals
  • Patient education
  • Follow-up

Appropriate and current guidelines cited.

17 points

Plan missing two of the identified components:

  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Non-pharmacologic intervention
  • Referrals
  • Patient education
  • Follow-up

Guidelines are not current or appropriate for identified problem.

9 points

Plan missing more than three of the identified components:

  • Diagnostic testing
  • Pharmacologic intervention
  • Non-pharmacologic intervention
  • Referrals
  • Patient education
  • Follow-up

Guidelines for plan not cited.

0 points

25
Total Points 100