NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study
Regis University NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study-Step-By-Step Guide
This guide will demonstrate how to complete the Regis University NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study assignment based on general principles of academic writing. Here, we will show you the A, B, Cs of completing an academic paper, irrespective of the instructions. After guiding you through what to do, the guide will leave one or two sample essays at the end to highlight the various sections discussed below.
How to Research and Prepare for NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study
Whether one passes or fails an academic assignment such as the Regis University NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study depends on the preparation done beforehand. The first thing to do once you receive an assignment is to quickly skim through the requirements. Once that is done, start going through the instructions one by one to clearly understand what the instructor wants. The most important thing here is to understand the required format—whether it is APA, MLA, Chicago, etc.
After understanding the requirements of the paper, the next phase is to gather relevant materials. The first place to start the research process is the weekly resources. Go through the resources provided in the instructions to determine which ones fit the assignment. After reviewing the provided resources, use the university library to search for additional resources. After gathering sufficient and necessary resources, you are now ready to start drafting your paper.
How to Write the Introduction for NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study
The introduction for the Regis University NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study is where you tell the instructor what your paper will encompass. In three to four statements, highlight the important points that will form the basis of your paper. Here, you can include statistics to show the importance of the topic you will be discussing. At the end of the introduction, write a clear purpose statement outlining what exactly will be contained in the paper. This statement will start with “The purpose of this paper…” and then proceed to outline the various sections of the instructions.
How to Write the Body for NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study
After the introduction, move into the main part of the NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study assignment, which is the body. Given that the paper you will be writing is not experimental, the way you organize the headings and subheadings of your paper is critically important. In some cases, you might have to use more subheadings to properly organize the assignment. The organization will depend on the rubric provided. Carefully examine the rubric, as it will contain all the detailed requirements of the assignment. Sometimes, the rubric will have information that the normal instructions lack.
Another important factor to consider at this point is how to do citations. In-text citations are fundamental as they support the arguments and points you make in the paper. At this point, the resources gathered at the beginning will come in handy. Integrating the ideas of the authors with your own will ensure that you produce a comprehensive paper. Also, follow the given citation format. In most cases, APA 7 is the preferred format for nursing assignments.
How to Write the Conclusion for NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study
After completing the main sections, write the conclusion of your paper. The conclusion is a summary of the main points you made in your paper. However, you need to rewrite the points and not simply copy and paste them. By restating the points from each subheading, you will provide a nuanced overview of the assignment to the reader.
How to Format the References List for NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study
The very last part of your paper involves listing the sources used in your paper. These sources should be listed in alphabetical order and double-spaced. Additionally, use a hanging indent for each source that appears in this list. Lastly, only the sources cited within the body of the paper should appear here.
Stuck? Let Us Help You
Completing assignments can sometimes be overwhelming, especially with the multitude of academic and personal responsibilities you may have. If you find yourself stuck or unsure at any point in the process, don’t hesitate to reach out for professional assistance. Our assignment writing services are designed to help you achieve your academic goals with ease.
Our team of experienced writers is well-versed in academic writing and familiar with the specific requirements of the NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study assignment. We can provide you with personalized support, ensuring your assignment is well-researched, properly formatted, and thoroughly edited. Get a feel of the quality we guarantee – ORDER NOW.
NU641 Week 2 Assignment Interactive Hypertension Case Study
NU641 Advanced Clinical Pharmacology
Week 2 Assignment
Interactive Hypertension Case Study
In this assignment, you will review the interactive Hypertension Case Study patient scenario and analyze the data to determine the health status of the patient. You will need a minimum of two evidence-based practice articles using the clinical practice guidelines, as well as the course textbook.
Thanks for your educational post. This writer is of the notion that a face-to-face method is ideal for the internal dissemination of evidence-based projects. However, for an evidence-based project on diabetic education writer is of the notion that one vital external method of dissemination can also incorporate the use of technology such as the media since diabetes is a global problem in urgent need of evidence-based interventions to improve these individuals’ quality of life. The traditional news media such as newspapers, television, and radio can be an important channel for reaching practitioners coupled with the technological use of social media. The media also ensures highlights newsworthy public health issues at a particular time. Researchers are also of the notion that the media is one of the most vital means to disseminate research findings to gain policymakers’ attention. However, when using the media for external dissemination several key factors must be taken into consideration such as the seriousness of the problem, human interest, timeline of the story, a local angel for a national or state headline, and conflict or controversy surrounding information (Ross et al., 2018).
Use the NU641 Hypertension Case Study Questions (Word) document to complete the case study assignment.
Follow the requirements posted in the rubric.
This case study should be three to five pages, excluding title and references pages.
All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.
Please refer to the Grading Rubric for details on how this activity will be graded.
NU641: Advanced Clinical Pharmacology
Case Study Week 2 – Hypertension
Instructions
Review the patient case study and answer the questions provided. You are expected to include two evidence-based practice articles to support your work. Additionally, you will need to include the national guidelines for any treatment plans/options. All papers must conform to the most recent APA standards.
Case Study
Darius, a 65-year-old black man, was referred to the clinic for evaluation of high blood pressure noted on an initial screening. He reports having headaches and nocturia. He states that he has gained 8 pounds over the last year.
Past medical history:
• Appendectomy 30 years ago
• Peptic ulcer disease 10 years ago
• Type 2 diabetes mellitus for 10 years
• Gout
Family history:
• Father had hypertension; died of myocardial infarction at age 55.
• Mother had diabetes mellitus and hypertension; died of cerebrovascular accident at age 60.
Physical examination:
• Height 69 in, weight 90 kg
• BP: 140/89 mm Hg (left arm), 138/82 mm Hg (right arm)
• Pulse: 84 beats/minute, regular
• Funduscopic examination: mild arterial narrowing, sharp discs, no exudates or hemorrhages
Laboratory findings:
• Blood urea nitrogen: 24 mg/dL
• Serum creatinine: 1.1 mg/dL
• Glucose: 95 mg/dL
• Potassium: 4.0 mEq/L
• Total cholesterol: 201 mg/dL
• High-density lipoprotein cholesterol: 30 mg/dL
• Triglycerides: 167 mg/dL
• Urinalysis: within normal limit (no proteinuria)
• Electrocardiogram and chest radiograph: mild left ventricular hypertrophy
Social history:
• Tobacco: 35 pack years
• Alcohol: 1 pint of vodka/week
• Coffee: 2 cups/day
Diagnosis: Stage 1 Hypertension
1. List specific goals for treating Darius’ hypertension.
2. What drug therapy would you prescribe? Why?
3. What are the parameters for monitoring success of the therapy?
4. Discuss specific patient education based on the prescribed therapy.
5. List one or two adverse reactions for the selected agent that would cause you to change therapy.
6. What would be the choice for second-line therapy?
7. What over-the-counter and/or alternative medications would be appropriate for Darius?
8. What lifestyle changes would you recommend to Darius?
Check Out Also: Benchmark- Capstone Project Change Proposal
9. Describe one or two drug–drug or drug–food interaction for the selected agent.
ADDITIONAL INSTRUCTIONS FOR THE CLASS
Discussion Questions (DQ)
Initial responses to the DQ should address all components of the questions asked, include a minimum of one scholarly source, and be at least 250 words.
Successful responses are substantive (i.e., add something new to the discussion, engage others in the discussion, well-developed idea) and include at least one scholarly source.
One or two sentence responses, simple statements of agreement or “good post,” and responses that are off-topic will not count as substantive. Substantive responses should be at least 150 words.
I encourage you to incorporate the readings from the week (as applicable) into your responses.
Weekly Participation
Your initial responses to the mandatory DQ do not count toward participation and are graded separately.
In addition to the DQ responses, you must post at least one reply to peers (or me) on three separate days, for a total of three replies.
Participation posts do not require a scholarly source/citation (unless you cite someone else’s work).
Part of your weekly participation includes viewing the weekly announcement and attesting to watching it in the comments. These announcements are made to ensure you understand everything that is due during the week.
APA Format and Writing Quality
Familiarize yourself with APA format and practice using it correctly. It is used for most writing assignments for your degree. Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for APA paper templates, citation examples, tips, etc. Points will be deducted for poor use of APA format or absence of APA format (if required).
Cite all sources of information! When in doubt, cite the source. Paraphrasing also requires a citation.
I highly recommend using the APA Publication Manual, 6th edition.
Use of Direct Quotes
I discourage overutilization of direct quotes in DQs and assignments at the Masters’ level and deduct points accordingly.
As Masters’ level students, it is important that you be able to critically analyze and interpret information from journal articles and other resources. Simply restating someone else’s words does not demonstrate an understanding of the content or critical analysis of the content.
It is best to paraphrase content and cite your source.
LopesWrite Policy
For assignments that need to be submitted to LopesWrite, please be sure you have received your report and Similarity Index (SI) percentage BEFORE you do a “final submit” to me.
Once you have received your report, please review it. This report will show you grammatical, punctuation, and spelling errors that can easily be fixed. Take the extra few minutes to review instead of getting counted off for these mistakes.
Review your similarities. Did you forget to cite something? Did you not paraphrase well enough? Is your paper made up of someone else’s thoughts more than your own?
Visit the Writing Center in the Student Success Center, under the Resources tab in LoudCloud for tips on improving your paper and SI score.
Late Policy
The university’s policy on late assignments is 10% penalty PER DAY LATE. This also applies to late DQ replies.
Please communicate with me if you anticipate having to submit an assignment late. I am happy to be flexible, with advance notice. We may be able to work out an extension based on extenuating circumstances.
If you do not communicate with me before submitting an assignment late, the GCU late policy will be in effect.
I do not accept assignments that are two or more weeks late unless we have worked out an extension.
As per policy, no assignments are accepted after the last day of class. Any assignment submitted after midnight on the last day of class will not be accepted for grading.
Communication
Communication is so very important. There are multiple ways to communicate with me:
Questions to Instructor Forum: This is a great place to ask course content or assignment questions. If you have a question, there is a good chance one of your peers does as well. This is a public forum for the class.
Individual Forum: This is a private forum to ask me questions or send me messages. This will be checked at least once every 24 hours.